34d22a1a92
gates / gates (push) Successful in 21s
Round 3 (use bookstack, system disk held at 96% for ten minutes): - the household saw nothing wrong: wiki, status and paste all answered 200 before, during and after, and the background loop logged 12 operations with ZERO failures on a 96%-full disk - the box kept all 26 containers running and released the space cleanly (29G used -> 944M used) with the thin pool untouched at 39.69% throughout - NO alarm fired at any point, checked twice independently after the fill was released That silence is the finding, and it was predicted from the ladder before the round rather than discovered after: disk_critical is defined at >=95% used, but the fill-watch is a daily sweep at 03:30 plus one check ~90s after a controller start. The controller happened to restart at 21:28, so its single opportunistic check ran about twenty seconds BEFORE the disk filled. A disk that fills and empties between sweeps is invisible - by design, but the honest answer to "would the household be told?" is no. Also fixed and explained: my injector printed "unexpected EOF" while the accident itself completed. bash -n passes, so it was not local syntax - G() flattens its argument through `pct exec`, so a nested bash -c '...' has its quoting re-parsed remotely. Both instances were in the disk branch only; the accidents still to come use plain commands. The experiment was verified on the box, not from the script's own account. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS