Commit Graph

203 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 0e22a0ecc7 manifests: revert the TEST-ONLY OS approval wait (ruled 24h + 1 night)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 29s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 11:14:42 +02:00
admin 44992360a4 manifests: TEST-ONLY OS approval wait 2m / 0 nights (Part G 2; reverted in the same session)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 29s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 11:12:04 +02:00
admin 66b7540b7a manifests: hub 0.130.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 30s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 10:58:53 +02:00
admin 85e3e05e10 manifests: hub 0.129.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 28s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 08:58:02 +02:00
admin 7a0d0c027d hub: remove the OFFSITE_ABANDON_DELAY=3m test configuration (decision-74 live proof done) — set-aside deletions wait 7 days again
gates / gates (push) Successful in 28s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 07:12:33 +02:00
admin 5eee18cf16 hub v0.128.0 deployed — with OFFSITE_ABANDON_DELAY=3m as a logged TEST configuration for the decision-74 live proof (reverted next)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 30s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-04 07:06:40 +02:00
admin cdfcc47b15 hub v0.127.0 deployed: manifest image tag + required OFFSITE_SECRET_KEY (Secret/offsite-secret-key, created out-of-band)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 29s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-10-03 16:58:23 +02:00
admin 7e50098088 manifests: hub 0.126.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 26s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-30 10:36:53 +02:00
admin 27641ce9e7 added IE
gates / gates (push) Successful in 25s
2026-09-30 10:15:01 +02:00
admin f12f8609fc manifests: hub 0.125.0 (R-688)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-25 13:28:37 +02:00
admin 068e06537a manifests: hub 0.124.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 24s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-24 16:27:41 +02:00
admin b33a33130e manifests: hub 0.123.0 (decision 28 app_stopped_unhealthy)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 27s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-24 11:39:17 +02:00
admin 500488cad6 manifests: hub 0.122.0 (R-659 app_hold_no_whole_copy)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 28s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-24 07:34:19 +02:00
admin 3add9fa678 manifests: hub 0.121.0 (app_oom_storm, R-636)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 25s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-23 17:18:14 +02:00
admin 7caa24ffe1 manifests: hub 0.120.0 (app_update_undone/held reach the household)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 25s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-23 13:48:50 +02:00
admin 83b558b3ea deploy hub 0.119.0 (R-597)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
Rollback: set this line back to felhom-hub:0.118.1, commit, sync.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-21 07:57:59 +02:00
admin a2c52ebf2a hub v0.118.1: the test mail follows the language too (R-558)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
Found during v0.118.0's own live proof, which is the only reason it was found:
I went to press "send test notification" for the English demo box and read
sendTestEmail first.

It had its own hardcoded Hungarian subject and body and never went through
FormatCustomerEmail, so it was the one customer mail v0.118.0 did not localise
— and it is the only customer mail an operator can trigger on demand, which
makes it the one most likely to be used to check whether the localisation
works. Pressing the button for an English household would have answered that
question wrongly, and convincingly.

The two sentences are extracted byte-for-byte into the bundle, so the Hungarian
test mail is unchanged. Red-proofed against the hardcoded version.

The general form worth keeping: the surface you would use to CHECK a feature is
the one most worth checking first. A broken instrument that reports success is
worse than a broken feature.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-18 16:25:20 +02:00
admin 9167cf53af hub v0.118.0: the household's e-mails follow the household's language (R-558 Part A)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
The hub has written every customer e-mail in Hungarian whatever the box was set
to. The box has published its language since controller v0.247.0; nothing read
it. Now it does.

Nothing an operator reads changes. The Hungarian mails are byte-identical, and
that is a diff rather than a reading: 56 goldens per language captured from
v0.117.0 BEFORE any string moved, and all 56 Hungarian ones pass unchanged after
every sentence was routed through the new bundle.

- internal/i18n: flat bundle, 79 keys, hu authoritative + hu fallback, ceiling 0.
- customerMessages/severityLabels are DERIVED from the bundle, so a sentence is
  written in one place and all 40+ tests that read those maps still work.
- Language order: last reported -> created-with -> hu. reports.language defaults
  to EMPTY, never hu: "never told us" is not "chose Hungarian".
- message_customer on POST /api/v1/event, additive and optional forever, for the
  sentences the box composes and the hub cannot translate.
- The bind page is per-language, and its `expired` state stays Hungarian: it is
  the state an unknown token lands in, so rendering a real English customer's
  token in English would make the LANGUAGE answer what the TEXT refuses to.

Two defects found inside the release:
- R-581: the newest report was picked by received_at, which has SECOND
  granularity, so same-second reports tied and the winner was arbitrary. Ordered
  by the autoincrement id now. GetCustomers() still has the shape - row open.
- R-582: the English copy-guard stems, ported word for word from Hungarian,
  convicted 141 honest sentences. The English claim is a phrase with a modal.

R-555 closed: the language allowlist entry is out of wire_contract_gate.py.
hub_copy_gate.py follows the sentences into the bundle - without that it would
have scanned four files that no longer hold any customer text and reported
success. Three new decoys incl. an innocent control.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-18 16:20:11 +02:00
admin 06334e164c manifests: hub 0.117.0 and stale_threshold 45m (R-549, operator ruling A)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 20s
Three report cycles instead of two. The chaos-night round-9 measurement: cadence
15m, a failed push retried for ~100 s, a 29m59s gap against a 30m threshold -
one second from paging the operator about a healthy, self-repaired box.
node_down and host_down move to 90m with it (2x). The same release makes the
dashboard's customer status read this value instead of a hardcoded 30m.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-17 10:21:44 +02:00
admin 638535b49b hub: deploy v0.116.0 (off-site on by default; the R-536 event pair)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 21s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-16 16:58:36 +02:00
admin 2dd80a5d28 deploy: hub 0.115.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-16 10:54:19 +02:00
admin d8cd4d4412 deploy: hub 0.114.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-15 10:07:49 +02:00
admin 63f29c6ad8 hub v0.113.0: deploy (R-497 passphrase hand-over copy)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-14 17:28:53 +02:00
admin 2f5d3af6f9 deploy: hub 0.112.0 (R-472 declared MinAgent floor)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 20s
2026-09-13 16:49:15 +02:00
admin 0f65f7a197 manifests: hub 0.111.0 -> 0.111.1 (R-434, the alarm's withdrawn promise)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 18s
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LB8FmJaGd2cyjvy6dbEjpM
2026-09-01 18:35:58 +02:00
admin 65c82c4aa0 manifests: hub 0.110.0 -> 0.111.0 (R-431)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 16s
The manifest is the truth - a code push and an image build deploy NOTHING until this tag changes in
git AND the app is synced. Auto-sync is OFF.
2026-09-01 14:26:38 +02:00
admin 1aeaa30c28 hub v0.110.0: allowlist + operator-only for offsite_proof_empty (R-87)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 15s
Controller v0.231.0 adds a nightly job that proves an app's newest off-site snapshot still
CONTAINS that app's data. When it finds one that does not, it emits offsite_proof_empty.

Two register lines, both load-bearing and both in this commit:
- allowedEventTypes - an unallowlisted type is answered 400 and VANISHES, so this entry is
  what makes the alarm exist at all.
- operatorOnlyEvents - a missing customerMessages entry is NOT a routing block
  (FormatCustomerEmail falls back to the raw message, the v0.78.0 defect that register was
  built for). A customer can take no action on a hollow recovery unit.

DELIBERATELY NOT reusing backup_integrity_failed, which is the nearest existing type: it
means THE STORE IS DAMAGED and carries the Hungarian template saying so. Here the store is
sound and the CONTENT is absent - different cause, different action, and telling a customer
their backups are damaged when they are not is the more expensive mistake. Same asymmetry
looksLikeRepositoryDamage is shaped around.

DELIBERATELY no customerMessages entry (the controller's dynamic Hungarian names the app and
what is missing; a template would discard it) and DELIBERATELY not in perAppCooldownEvents
(a fenced act - this job proves ONE app per night, so the coarse hourly cooldown is already
the right grain).

This widens the R-87 task's stated repo scope to felhom.eu/hub/. The reason is recorded in
felhom-controller/CONTEXT.md ruling 4 rather than left as an unexplained diff.

Hub green gate: go build/vet/test all pass, 18 packages.
2026-08-31 20:53:13 +02:00
admin f5c9411e5e R-331 (hub half): the Backup card reads offsite, not the dead backup fields (v0.109.0)
The customer page's Backup card read `Snapshots 0 / Repo Size 0 MB / Integrity
Unknown` for EVERY customer, indefinitely. Measured on demo-hp 2026-08-30 while
that night's controller log said `[offbox] backup OK: 8 app(s) backed up, 67
snapshot(s), 2m14s` and the box held snapshot_count:67, repo_size_bytes:
140829678, stats_known:true.

A card reading "no backups" over a working backup is worse than no card -- the
R-88 direction of failure (degrade to NO BACKUP rather than to UNKNOWN) on the
one screen that answers "is this customer protected?".

The data was never missing. The card rendered the report's `backup` object,
whose snapshot/size/integrity fields have had no producer since slice 8C. The
live numbers are in the `offsite` object, which THIS PACKAGE already reads for
the Offsite page and which monitor.OffsiteChecker already alarms from. Proof the
bytes were arriving: the Offsite page rendered demo-hp's usage as 0.1 GB from
that very object while the Backup card said 0 MB. So this is a render fix over
an existing feed, not a new pipeline.

Not a one-line swap, because snapshot_count:0 means two opposite things --
"holds nothing" and "never measured". R-225 measured that confusion one layer
down. backup_card.go resolves a three-way ruling in Go (a {{if}} chain over
map[string]interface{} float64s cannot keep the absent/zero distinction the card
is entirely about):
  no offsite object   -> "No off-site data reported", and says explicitly that
                         this is NOT the same as "no backups"
  disabled + state    -> names the blocker (needs_credential)
  stats_known:false   -> em-dash + "never been measured". NEVER 0
  stats_known:true    -> the real numbers, INCLUDING a real 0

A pre-v0.225.0 controller sends no stats_known -> false -> "unknown". That
direction is pinned: upgrading the hub ahead of the fleet must not report every
un-upgraded customer as having zero backups.

The Integrity row is DELETED, not re-sourced: nothing produces it, the
controller runs no integrity check, and NotifyIntegrityOK/Failed are called from
nowhere.

RED-PROOF: restore the pre-fix card markup -> all four tests fail, reporting 67
and 134.3 MB absent from the rendered page and the Integrity row present. The
tests drive handleCustomerUnified and grep the HTML on purpose: the defect was
the template's choice of source object, so a test one layer below it would have
been green against the shipped bug.

Green gate clean: 18 packages, rc 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LB8FmJaGd2cyjvy6dbEjpM
2026-08-30 18:39:15 +02:00
admin 45659bdc5a hub v0.108.0: deploy the per-app cooldown grain (R-389)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s
Image built and pushed to the registry BEFORE this manifest bump lands, so a
sync can never point at a missing tag. Auto-sync is off; the sync that follows
is deliberate. Never kubectl set image.
2026-08-23 13:54:48 +02:00
admin 68a9f5475c hub v0.107.0: the hub rewrote a severity and said nothing (R-387); golden 0.223.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s
One handler, two fields, opposite discipline. An unknown event_type is rejected
with a loud 400. An unknown severity was rewritten to "info" without a word -
and severityNotifies drops "info" before BOTH legs, so the event was stored,
answered 200, and mailed to nobody.

Two shipped features went out that way: DiskAlertKind.Severity emitted "warn"
until controller v0.215.0, app_start_failed until v0.223.0. Measured on the live
hub DB today: 91 app_start_failed events stored all-time, ZERO notification_log
rows before this session - not one, on any channel.

The mechanism built to catch this class was structurally blind to it: the
dispatcher's `unrecognized severity` line cannot execute for anything arriving
over the API, because the coercion one line earlier guarantees the value it
looks for cannot arrive.

The coercion STAYS - a rejected event is a lost event, and losing an alarm is
worse than mis-routing one. Only the silence is fixed: a WARN naming the
customer, the event type and the rejected value.

The dispatcher branch is KEPT, not deleted as dead, and the reason is evidence
rather than caution: cmd/hub/main.go wires dispatcher.ProcessEvent DIRECTLY as
the monitor.EventNotifyFunc for the staleness, host-staleness and offsite-box
checkers, which never pass through the handler. For those it is the only
severity guard there is. All 90 severity literals in internal/monitor are
already valid, so the guard is silent because the producers are correct.

Test count 702 -> 709. Red-proof seen failing: delete the WARN line and the
coercion test fails with "the hub rewrote a severity and said nothing".

Golden 0.223.0 baked and published (sha 9eaf39ac3921...), round-trip HTTP 206.
Vouching is the operator's act and was not done here.
2026-08-23 11:57:26 +02:00
admin c03f629d43 manifests: hub 0.105.0 -> 0.106.0 (R-339 box reachability)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 14s
The image is built and pushed; this is the change that actually deploys it.
A code change plus a CHANGELOG bump deploys nothing -- the running image
moves only when this tag moves in git and the app is synced.
2026-08-18 19:28:46 +02:00
admin bbd59f4a44 Deploy hub 0.105.0 — the third name, the quiet-machine alarm, and the copy guard
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
2026-08-13 15:51:49 +02:00
admin 7c97c949f6 Deploy hub 0.104.0 — the guest-network reader and the naming half
gates / gates (push) Successful in 25s
2026-08-13 10:51:23 +02:00
admin 823cd2949b Publish installer-v1.28.0: move both git-sync refs to the new tag
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
Pushing publishes nothing here - /scripts/ follows the installer TAG, and both the
sidecar and the init container carry the ref. Verified against the live URL after
the sync, because the runbook still says otherwise (R-309, still open).
2026-08-13 08:16:28 +02:00
admin 8b188bea68 hub v0.103.0 — a host can read the packages we kept for it (R-311)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 37s
ListSupersededEscrow had zero production callers for nineteen days. It is the only
reader of a retained identity_blob, so the retention shipped in v0.93.0 was
material the product could not reach - proven on the fixture 2026-08-12, where a
code that opens a retained package was answered as a code that opened nothing.

New GET /api/v1/hosts/<id>/escrow/retained: self-scoped exactly as the current-row
GET, same recovery-mode gate, same audit event written BEFORE the bytes leave,
capped at 16. Rows with a NULL identity_blob are WITHHELD and returned as
unopenable_count - they retain the PBS key, not the repository password, so they
can never open what the caller is asking about, and serving them would let the
screen claim an earlier package is openable on exactly the boxes the original
defect hurt. The count is returned because their existence is load-bearing and
underivable by the caller.

The trade, stated rather than waved through: the hub still cannot read any of it -
sealed bytes in, sealed bytes out, no decrypt path, no recovery code ever held.
What widens is volume, bounded by self-scope, the recovery-mode gate and the cap.

The response is a NAMED TYPE, not a map, so the wire-contract gate can resolve it;
the wire is declared as a fourth ROOT and the gate now checks 182 tags rather than
174. A positive control shows that check is name-presence, not decodability -
filed as R-315 rather than reported as coverage.

Also: golden 0.214.0 baked, published and round-trip verified; the countdown on
demo-felhom cancelled on the operator's ruling (R-307); the spike that halted
Part 3 recorded as R-312; the set-aside store found unrecoverable as R-313.
Six hub tests through the real endpoint; four red-proofs asserted applied.
2026-08-12 18:56:44 +02:00
admin 1d5f2b8bb6 DRILL: the retained key works, and the customer cannot reach it
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
Three verdicts, kept separate because collapsing them is how this assumption
survived a week.

(a) The material IS retained. host_escrow_superseded id 11 is the first retained
row in fleet history to carry identity_blob (572 B), byte-identical to the
pre-supersession row (sha256 a10032341c8584ed...).

(b) The retained material DOES open the old store. Unsealed with the old recovery
code it yielded a password byte-identical to the pre-change one, and restored
three planted files byte-identical from a store the box itself could no longer
open - including a Hungarian accented filename verified as raw bytes. Negative
control ran first and failed closed.

(c) The customer has NO route, and is misinformed. ListSupersededEscrow has zero
production callers; the recovery path selects FROM host_escrow. Asked with the
code that had just worked by hand, the product answered "the recovery code did
not open the sealed bundle". A valid code for retained history is reported as a
bad code - the R-224 class again. R-304, rank 1.

Both installer faults were watched happening first, so installer-v1.27.0 is now
published (tag + both webpage.yaml refs). Pre-fix: the box came up on controller
0.98.3 against a vouched 0.213.0, below the floor and below the version carrying
the recovery screen; and our own uninstall left dnsmasq on 0.0.0.0:53 so our own
next install refused. R-297 and R-300 CLOSED.

Also filed R-305 (the dnsmasq fix fires once per machine - the leftover returns
on the second reinstall, proven), R-306 (--preflight-only writes state it says it
does not), R-307 (a live abandon countdown on demo-felhom, firing 2026-08-24 -
operator decision), R-308 (stored controller password stale), R-309 (the day-0
runbook's publication claim has been false since R-110), R-310 (two edges).

Ceiling R-303 -> R-310. Capability map moved: the retention claim is now marked
operator-only. Phase A logs did not survive the intermediate revert; recorded.
2026-08-12 17:41:56 +02:00
admin 36bcd12543 Deploy hub v0.102.0, and record that the package deleter is still not established
gates / gates (push) Successful in 21s
manifests/hub.yaml 0.101.0 -> 0.102.0. Image built and pushed, and verified
served by the registry before the bump rather than after.

R-287 corrected on two counts. My own sentence "no DELETE on the packages API
appears in 48h of Gitea router logs" is WITHDRAWN: kubectl logs on the Gitea pod
now returns nothing older than 2026-08-09 16:35 and contains zero api/packages
lines even for requests I made myself, so the log never covered the window and
its silence was never evidence.

A second attempt to attribute the deletion also failed and the deleter remains
NOT ESTABLISHED. Sources exhausted: no register row records a package prune
(R-210 is WAITING-ON-OPERATOR, says "Nothing was deleted; this is a list, not an
action", and concerns local Docker images); package_version has no soft-delete
column so a deletion leaves no row; Gitea's action feed carries no package
operation at all in the window; and a uniform newest-ten cap is not visible --
felhom-agent generic holds 10 but the container packages hold 19 each. It may be
unestablishable from this side: Gitea keeps no package-deletion trail.
2026-08-09 19:15:17 +02:00
admin d7d147ed5a deploy: hub 0.101.0 (60s artifact-dropdown memo)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 29s
2026-08-08 20:10:03 +02:00
admin 047e296ad1 deploy: hub 0.100.2 (connection reuse for the Gitea client)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 31s
2026-08-08 17:56:34 +02:00
admin de0110b8da deploy: hub 0.100.1 (the side-by-side dropdown resolve rides this image)
gates / gates (push) Failing after 14m52s
2026-08-08 17:51:29 +02:00
admin 5ef7b92b67 deploy: hub 0.100.0 — the manifest is the truth
gates / gates (push) Successful in 25s
felhom-hub:0.100.0 confirmed present in the registry (manifest HTTP 200) before this bump. A built
image deploys nothing until this tag moves in git and the app is synced.
2026-08-08 17:43:07 +02:00
admin 9771fd9c27 deploy: hub 0.99.0 — the manifest is the truth (R-260)
gates / gates (push) Failing after 18s
A built image deploys nothing until this tag moves in git and the app is synced.
felhom-hub:0.99.0 confirmed present in the registry (manifest HTTP 200) before the bump.
2026-08-08 09:03:23 +02:00
admin b12f8ec2f3 deploy hub v0.98.0 — the R-241 superseded-package purge
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
The manifest is the truth: the image was built and pushed, but nothing
deploys until this tag moves and the app is synced.
2026-08-07 12:20:59 +02:00
admin 79e31ac24b manifests: hub 0.97.0 -> 0.97.1 (held-floor reason matches its cause)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
2026-08-05 17:54:33 +02:00
admin cad0406e2b manifests: hub 0.96.0 -> 0.97.0 (R-216 floor guard, R-222 ACK fields)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
2026-08-05 17:50:23 +02:00
admin 4114c5f891 manifests: hub 0.96.0 (R-204 item 4, hub half)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
2026-08-05 10:51:44 +02:00
admin 975a690fbe manifests: hub 0.95.0 (R-196 / R-204 item 2)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
2026-08-05 07:19:57 +02:00
admin dd089265e8 manifests: hub 0.93.0 -> 0.94.0 (R-199 box-authenticated escrow retrieval)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 8s
2026-08-04 13:40:26 +02:00
admin 40687b0921 manifests: hub 0.92.0 -> 0.93.0 (R-198 escrow retention + R-197/R-192 honesty pass)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
2026-08-04 12:58:04 +02:00
admin f581ac1349 manifests: hub 0.91.1 -> 0.92.0 (R-195 phantom-customer alarm)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 6s
2026-08-04 11:05:41 +02:00