The recovery codes are shredded with the plant->find->shred->fail-to-find
control the brief asks for, and THE CONTROL PAID FOR ITSELF ON ITS FIRST RUN:
it found the Phase 0 code in ~/.config/credentials as R_CAMPAIGN_11 — a copy
this session did not create and would never have looked for. Without it, a
'codes shredded' claim would have been false. That key was removed from the
shared file with a verified diff (every other line identical, nine keys intact)
and HUB_PW re-tested at hub:200.
Consequence stated plainly rather than left to be discovered:
/home/felhom-repo.orphaned-20260805 (12 535 KB, the three Phase 0 sentinels) is
now permanently unopenable — which is what the set-aside screen promises, and
teardown removes it anyway.
Venue left WORKING and said so: ONLINE, 4 containers healthy, backup target not
degraded, off-site on 2 snapshots. Two things a future session needs: the raw
/mnt/{adatok,mentes} mounts are deliberately left unmounted (R-220's
workaround), and the appliance root credential was shredded — re-fetch it from
the hub.
REPORT-campaign11-phase24.md rather than REPORT.md, per the repo's
parallel-session rule.
No product code changed. No version bumped.
All five daily jobs fired exactly once and completed on time. The 04:15 offsite
run produced snapshot_count 1 -> 2, last_status ok, 24.9s — unprompted, on a box
rebuilt twice and set aside four hours earlier. Nothing on the must-not list
fired, including offsiteheal: that is R-218's NEGATIVE control passing (a box
with a target must not declare), which does not substitute for its positive
half, still owed.
Investigated and DISPROVED: tier2-backup completing in 118ms looked like a
silent no-op; the copy is real and on the backup drive (818.5 KB verified).
Correction to my own pre-registration: backup_run_digest is a TEST FILENAME, not
an event type. The real one is backup_run_failures, a failures digest whose
silence on a clean night is correct — reporting it as a miss would have been a
finding I invented. What survives: the offsite run emits no hub event while both
lesser tiers announce success; failures and staleness are covered elsewhere, so
it is a consistency wrinkle, recorded not filed.
Two absences answered rather than assumed: the restore-test's silence was
PRE-REGISTERED as correct (6h eval, 24h settle); the agent's whole-guest tier is
left explicitly UNRESOLVED because routine local-api calls are not logged at INFO
— a 5h search returns 0 on a box that demonstrably served such calls, so the
instrument cannot answer.
No product code changed.
Written BEFORE the soak so the comparison cannot be fitted afterwards. Sources
are the box's own [scheduler] Registered lines and the agent's backup tier armed
lines, read at 23:56.
MUST happen: db-dump 02:30, tier2-backup + fill-watch 03:30, metrics-prune
04:00, offbox-backup 04:15 (snapshot_count 1 -> 2), a backup_run_digest event,
reports every ~15m.
MUST NOT happen: host_stale/host_recovered, offsite_selfheal_restaged (this is
also R-218's negative control — a box WITH a target must not declare),
offbox_repo_orphaned, offsite_repo_key_changed, escrow blob SERVED, any
controller self-update.
Genuinely uncertain and recorded as such: the restore-test has a 24h settle and
every archive here is hours old, so NOT running is correct, not a gap.
F11 PASS ok->stale->ok, an operator mail each way, customer mail correctly
pairing-gated. DOWN (>1h) not reached — stated, not implied.
F7 the set-aside PASSES decisively: move-aside to
/home/felhom-repo.orphaned-20260805, mtime and du -s (12535 KB) and
snapshot f3d9cd67 all unchanged; a fresh empty repo beside it.
NOTHING DELETED.
the afterwards FAILS -> R-228: settings.json records
"orphaned_renamed_to" and OrphanedRenamedTo has ZERO references in
any template or handler. 12.5 MB of retained customer data at a path
the box knows and never shows. Seam built, never wired.
F9 R-215's fix PROVEN LIVE on a narrower shape: with recoveryOffer() false,
GET /recovery now 302s instead of rendering its story. The literal
never-had-offsite precondition was not staged (it needs a rebuild,
which the brief forbids before Phase 4) — recorded as partial.
F10 NOT INJECTED, harness not product. Three attempts, each with a control:
the app, then the controller's monitor, then the run itself recreate
the mandatory directory within ~1 s. Kept as an observation: at
capture the directory held only a recreated metadata.db and NOT the
customer's file, and the run still said ok.
Also reproduced live for a third time: R-220 (candidates empty; unmounting only
the raw mounts flips both drives back) — still OPEN.
Venue left WORKING: 4 containers healthy, backup target not degraded, off-site
fresh repo last_status ok, escrow escrowed.
No product code changed.
Phase 2 (eleven injected faults) and the §4 positives that were owed.
- §4.1 MEASURED, twice: the box's rendered GetFloor() is 0.200.0, and a
cold-started controller logs "settle-gate: GO — at/above floor 0.200.0"
against the same line reading "floor still unknown" while the hold was in
force. Also corrects the brief's plan: SetFloor's line is u.dbg(), gated on
logging.level=debug and written to the logger, so it can NEVER reach the
debug ring — a restart alone would not have produced it.
- §4.2 still NOT measured, deliberately: the venue has an off-site target, so
needsOffsiteCredential correctly returns false. Recorded, not inferred from
the unit test.
- F1 PARTIAL, F2 PASS, F3 FAIL, F4 FAIL, F5 PASS, F6 PASS, F8 PARTIAL.
F3+F4: a hub outage and a stopped agent are both rendered as "this code does
not open your package", in 0.056 s and 0.030 s — no unseal attempted. The
agent's own err field distinguishes them exactly and it is discarded at the
HTTP boundary; the R-216 capability gate answers source=version and cannot
see reachability.
- R-217's fix HOLDS under exactly its fault (F5), verified with the false-claim
strings absent and accented positive controls present.
hub/CHANGELOG.md: v0.97.1 had no heading of its own — the change was written
into the v0.97.0 entry while the deployed tag is 0.97.1. Given its own entry,
marked as added retroactively. Second occurrence of the class (agent 0.90.1).
Evidence: documentation/tests/campaign11-evidence-2026-08-05/journal-phase24.md
No product code changed.
The first vouch of agent 0.125.0 was REFUSED by R-120's gate: the artifacts form saves as
a unit, and golden 0.192.0 was older than the newest controller the fleet reports. The
golden had been stale since before controller 0.193.0, so the Day-0 manifest had been
effectively unvouchable for days and nobody had cause to notice. Correcting STATUS.md and
OPEN-ITEMS, which said "one dropdown".
Golden 0.201.0 baked in the drill VM, round-trip verified from Gitea
(e730d7cab343eb35...f007654, 658165766 B), teardown clean, 0 token hits in the saved log.
Manifest now agent=0.125.0 golden=0.201.0 min_agent=0.125.0, read back after the save.
The held floor: the HOLD is established positively (hub log + the box's own "floor still
unknown"). Its RELEASE is not — no HELD line and no dashboard reason are both absences,
the served path logs nothing by design, and the box-side positive needs a restart the
venue cannot take before Phase 2. Recorded as deduction plus a pinned test, not a live
positive.
Registers and evidence for the campaign and its fix pass.
OPEN-ITEMS: R-214..R-223. Six SHIPPED (R-215/216/217/218/219/222); three deliberately
still open and each blocks a real flow (R-214 console banner, R-220 drives unenrollable
after a rebuild, R-221 a rebuilt box cannot run the escrow ceremony); R-223 minted and
WAITING-ON-OPERATOR (vouch agent 0.125.0). R-213 and R-202 untouched.
Capability map: a new row for the customer's UNAIDED journey, recorded FAILED and staying
failed until a re-walk passes — fixes are not a journey. The existing rebuild row is
corrected where it said R-198's retention was unit-proven only: it was proven in production
on the first supersession since the fix, identity_blob retained at 572 B byte-length exact.
CLAUDE.md comment-vs-code table: eighth entry — ResolveManagedFloor, the first where the
false invariant was a GUARD rather than a comment alone.
STATUS: the headline is now "the backup promise is proved, the recovery journey is not",
and the one thing waiting on the operator.
admin