Nested VM 9310 on felhom-pve (throwaway vmbr9 rig): re-point bridge-ports -> ifreload (0.36s, raises the port itself) -> dhclient lease 3.3s -> hub HTTPS 302 in 160ms; a dead candidate costs exactly its timeout bound (rc=124 at 20s). Bonus finding: the auto-installer picks the NIC that leases and bakes the lease as STATIC — so wrong-NIC boxes come in two variants (192.168.100.2 fallback bake vs truth-changed-after-install), and the gate must trigger on hub-unreachable, never on the fallback signature. Eight design inputs (F-P1..F-P8) recorded for the Part-3 gate. STOP-0 discharged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UuFPHmHNrCJj1VhY6QdDMU
7.5 KiB
SPIKE — first-boot NIC sweep mechanics (R-59/R-60 Phase-0), 2026-07-22
Question: on a Proxmox box that installed against the wrong NIC (the demo-hp shape: no DHCP on
any cable-bearing port at install time → the installer bakes its 192.168.100.2 static fallback
into vmbr0 and completes), does this sequence work, and is it bounded:
re-point vmbr0's bridge-ports to a candidate NIC → reload networking → bounded DHCP on vmbr0 →
hub HTTPS probe?
Verdict up front: GO. The whole success leg is ~4 s; a dead candidate costs exactly its DHCP bound (20 s in the probe). Details and the design inputs below.
Vehicle: PVE-in-a-VM on felhom-pve (nested VM 9310, throwaway), installed from the v1.24.0
pairing ISO (uncommitted nested-probe profile = nested-vm + the ops SSH key for dead-network
access). Guest: PVE 9.2, ifupdown2 3.3.0-1+pmx12, isc-dhcp-client 4.4.3-P1-8. NICs: ens18
(net0) / ens19 (net1).
Access-path deviation (recorded): the probe needs a shell on a box whose network is by
definition dead. The plan was to use the installer's fallback address as the way in (host carries
192.168.100.1/24 on the port-less throwaway vmbr9, ssh root@192.168.100.2 over the dead
bridge, root key = the probe profile's baked ops key). The run then took a different door (below),
but the vmbr9 address was mounted and stays part of the Part-4 drill plan.
Reproduction — and an unplanned second trap variant
The plan was both NICs dark from qm start. In practice the tap re-point to the dead bridge landed
~1–2 min after start, and the installer had already leased on ens19 (192.168.0.141) in that
window — after which the flip cut it off. What that accident bought:
- The auto-installer picks the NIC that leases, not the first by name.
bridge-ports ens19(net1, the second NIC) was baked, with the lease written as a STATIC stanza (address 192.168.0.141/24,gateway 192.168.0.1). So the t740's "picked wrong" is not name-order bad luck: at that site the 4-port card was the only cabled thing, no NIC leased, and the installer fell back. Two distinct wrong-NIC install variants therefore exist:- no lease anywhere → 192.168.100.2 fallback baked static (demo-hp, live-proven 2026-07-21; README t740 trap) — R-59's detection signature;
- a lease existed at install time but the truth changed after (cable moved / switch port died) → a plausible-looking static config that is nonetheless dead — no 192.168.100.2 to key on. The gate must therefore key on "hub unreachable", not on the fallback signature; the signature is a diagnosis detail for the screen/log, not the trigger.
- The silent surface is real and was watched live for 30 minutes:
felhom-bootstrapin the pairing loop loggedregistration did not go through (no network yet?) — retryingevery ~42 s (≈12 s curl DNS failure + 30 s sleep), unitactivating, console showing only the login prompt. Nothing on the physical screen names the problem — exactly R-59's complaint.
Probe log — the sweep walked by hand (detached; /root/probe-sweep.log)
Shape at probe time (the "cable move"): vmbr0 configured for ens19 = dead (tap on vmbr9),
ens18 = live (tap on vmbr0, site DHCP + internet available). Script scheduled via
systemd-run --on-active=45s, both taps flipped, box left alone.
| Step | Result | Wall time |
|---|---|---|
Leg 1: timeout 20 dhclient -1 -v vmbr0 on the DEAD shape |
rc=124 (killed by timeout; dhclient never gives up on its own) |
20.00 s (the full bound, exactly) |
Rewrite bridge-ports ens19 → ens18 (tmp + mv, original kept) |
one-line diff | ~10 ms |
ifreload -a |
rc=0; raised the admin-DOWN candidate itself, port forwarding immediately (STP off, fd 0) |
0.36 s |
timeout 30 dhclient -1 -v vmbr0 |
DISCOVER→OFFER→REQUEST→ACK, bound 192.168.0.245 | 3.32 s |
curl -fsS --max-time 15 https://hub.felhom.eu/ |
HTTP 302, rc=0 | 0.16 s |
Post state: box reachable again at its baked static address over the new port (the static stanza
was deliberately not touched — the probe changed only bridge-ports); dhclient's lease sits as a
second address on vmbr0; default route unchanged.
Findings (design inputs for Part 3)
- F-P1 — the sequence works and is tightly bounded. Success ≈ 4 s; failed candidate = its DHCP
bound + ε. With a 20 s bound: worst case ≈
NICs × ~21 s+ one hub-probe timeout each. GO. - F-P2 — unused physical NICs are admin-DOWN and their carrier is unreadable while down
(
/sys/class/net/*/carrierreads empty). A carrier-based candidate filter mustip link set <nic> up+ settle (~2 s) before reading.ifreload -abrings the configured bridge-port up on its own, so the sweep proper needs no manual link handling — only the diagnosis table (NIC/MAC/cable) needs the raise-first step. - F-P3 — carrier is necessary but not sufficient (virtio on a dead bridge shows carrier=1; a cabled port on a router with a dead uplink would too). Carrier selects/orders candidates; only DHCP-lease + hub-probe decides. Fine — that is the R-60 design anyway.
- F-P4 —
dhclient -1must be externally bounded (timeout N dhclient -1); on a dead segment it retries past any useful window (rc=124 at whatever bound is set). After a killed attempt,pkilldhclient before the next candidate — the second run then starts clean (proven: leg 2's dhclient ran without pidfile/lease complaints after leg 1's kill + pkill). - F-P5 — treat ANY HTTP response as "hub reachable". The hub answers
/with a 302;-fonly fails ≥ 400, and even a 4xx would prove TLS+HTTP reachability. The gate's probe should key on "got an HTTP status" (curl rc 0, or rc 22 with a status code), not on 200. - F-P6 — the trigger is "hub unreachable", never the 192.168.100.2 signature (see variant 2 above). The signature is named in the log/screen when present, as the likely cause.
- F-P7 — persisting only
bridge-portsis enough to restore reachability in variant 2 (the static address stays valid when the cable moved ports). In variant 1 (fallback bake) the address itself is garbage — after a candidate wins, the persisted config must also carry the working addressing. Simplest shape that covers both: persistbridge-ports <winner>+iface vmbr0 inet dhcp(the winner is by definition a leasing NIC — DHCP is what proved it). Note for the R-59 screen loop: a box that self-healed onto DHCP addressing keeps working across router reboots; the operator can still pin it later. - F-P8 (observation, out of scope): the pairing loop's register-failure line prints every cycle (~42 s) — the v1.21.0 quieting covered the 204 wait but not the no-network register path. The Part-3 gate makes this moot on the no-network path (the gate holds before register), but it is worth knowing the line exists.
Cleanup state after the probe
Nested VM 9310 stopped (destroyed in Part 4 after the drill re-uses the rig); vmbr9 +
host-side 192.168.100.1/24 still mounted for Part 4; felhom-pve /etc/network/interfaces
untouched throughout (imperative ip link bridge only; pre-task copy sha
c7ace087183cb72e031ad0cd1974b9239d539747528dd19523d993f8e9c4ec7a — final diff happens at Part-4
cleanup). The probe box self-registered at the production hub as an unclaimed appliance while its
network was up (expected; the record can be discarded, or will simply be superseded by the Part-4
drill box's registration).