Files
felhom.eu/REPORT.md
T
admin 955a4f07b7
gates / gates (push) Successful in 41s
REPORT + CONTEXT: A4 reverses its own premise, the naming half, and the first R-264 reader
A4's evidence contradicts the task's framing and the register now says so: peti-felhom
is a real machine with 482 reports and a real person behind it; david -> tester-1 is a
record that has never had a host, an escrow or a report. The risk is real; only the
word that named it was wrong.

CONTEXT gains three standing rulings: read the fact that carries the RISK (heals_last_hour,
not state) and decode the one that decides the question (heal_succeeded — R-260's lesson);
one secret in two situations keeps its name and changes its sentence, and the mail must
name the page the machine actually shows; and evidence dies in the INTERMEDIATE revert —
with the corollary that a durable citation may never point at a file whose contract is to
be overwritten, which is why the R-316 report was moved to audits/ before this one was
written.
2026-08-13 10:59:55 +02:00

394 lines
27 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# REPORT — the small debts paid, and one unread fact given a reader (2026-08-13, evening)
**Shipped: hub v0.104.0, live and verified.** Parts A and B complete; **Part C dropped**, named in §12.
No controller change, no agent change, no wire change — **so there was no bake and no approval**, as the
task expected.
---
## 1. A4 FIRST — what the fleet actually is, and the entry corrected
**The task's premise for A4 was wrong, and the evidence is not ambiguous.** It asked me to establish
the facts and not accept the framing; doing that reverses the conclusion. Two different records have
been called "the tester", and only one of them carries the risk.
**Read from the hub's own store** (`hub.db` + `-wal` + `-shm`, copied together — the WAL rule):
| | `peti-felhom` | `david``tester-1` |
|---|---|---|
| customer row | created 2026-02-27 | `david` created 2026-08-01, **deleted today 07:55:49**; `tester-1` created **07:56:47** |
| host row | `peti-felhom-86d37d`, deleted 2026-07-15 08:56:22 (`host_deletions` id 1) | **never, either name** |
| controller reports | **482**, 2026-02-27 → 2026-07-15 08:39:00 | **0** |
| host reports | present until deletion | **0** |
| escrow rows | none | none |
| events | staleness alarms after it went silent | **4 total** — three hub-side `expected_dbdump_missed` false alarms (R-195's subject) and its own deletion |
**So:**
- **"The tester" in this project's own vocabulary is Peti** — `documentation/pilot/PETI-tester-agreement.md`
says *"Operator: Viktor. Tester: Peti"* — and the machine is **a real 80-core Proxmox server
belonging to a real person**, running Felhom as a BYO guest. It reported for four and a half months.
`target-selection.md` puts it at **Tier 2 — protected**, *"because there is a real person behind it"*.
**The 3.6 GB with no key, no off-site copy and no local backup is REAL, and the entry keeps its rank.**
- **`tester-1` is a record with no machine** — no host, no escrow, no report, ever; and `david` before
it was the same. **A record with no machine behind it can lose nothing.**
**Reconciling this with what the operator said** (*"there is no actual tester yet — only a pre-created
customer, now renamed"*): both statements are true of different things. The **pilot programme** never
began — the agreement was drafted 2026-07-09, the onboarding runbook stopped at P1 — and the
pre-created record is `tester-1`. **Meanwhile the hardware and the data have existed the whole time.**
Nothing about the risk changed; only the word that names it.
**The corrected entry, as shipped** (`STATUS.md`, "Broken, or knowingly incomplete"):
> - **Peti's machine has no recovery route at all** — see the `PETI` row. **This is a real machine
> belonging to a real person**, not one of ours and not a record: it reported to the hub for four and a
> half months and has been silent since 15 July, when its host record was deleted. There is no key, no
> off-site copy and no local backup. **If that drive fails, everything on it is lost.** First act of the
> visit: copy the ~3.6 GB off before anything is reinstalled — it is currently the only copy in
> existence. Whether it stays parked is your call and is deliberately left open.
The `PETI` register row carries the full disambiguation with every count measured, and ends
*"Wherever a document says 'the tester's machine', read `peti-felhom`."*
**What the fleet actually is, in one sentence, now on `STATUS.md`:** the hub holds **five customer
records and three machines** — `demo-felhom` and `demo-hp` (ours, disposable), `drill-r50` (a nested
drill VM, reverted and powered off); `peti-felhom` is a real machine we have not heard from since 15
July and has no host record; `tester-1` is a record with no machine.
---
## 2. The hub strings as shipped, with bytes confirmed
Enumerated at `file:line` before editing. All written from explicit bytes and verified as hex — no
non-ASCII crossed a shell chain; the mojibake check (`Ã`/`Å`/`â€`) is clean in every touched file.
| Where | Was | Is | Hex of the shipped name |
|---|---|---|---|
| `notify/templates.go:216` subject | „Jelszó-visszaállítási kód" | **„Beállító kód a jelszavad visszaállításához"** | `4265c3a16c6cc3ad74c3b3206bc3b364…` |
| `notify/templates.go:221` body | „Visszaállító kód: %s" | **„Beállító kód: %s"** | `4265c3a16c6cc3ad74c3b3206bc3b3643a202573` |
| `notify/templates.go` **new** `reenroll` | *(did not exist)* | subject **„Új beállító kód — újratelepült a szervered"**, body names **„A szerver beállítása"** | `224120737a6572766572206265c3a16c6cc3ad74c3a1736122` |
| `notify/templates.go:72` lockout | „beállító/visszaállító kód próbálkozás" | **„beállító kód próbálkozás"** | `…6265c3a16c6cc3ad74c3b3206bc3b364…` |
| `web/templates/customer_unified.html:476` | „Visszaállító kód küldése" | **„Beállító kód küldése"** | `4265c3a16c6cc3ad74c3b3206bc3b364206bc3bc6c64c3a97365` |
**The page-naming fix, established at `file:line` rather than assumed.** `ReissueForReenroll` sent the
**reset** mail (`claim/engine.go:181`), which directs the customer to an „Elfelejtett jelszó" page. A
**rebuilt** box has no password, so the controller computes `reset := s.authEnabled()` → false
(`felhom-controller/controller/internal/web/claim.go:279`), renders **„A szerver beállítása"**, and
serves **no login page at all** — the named route is not on their screen. Only the hub can tell the two
situations apart, because the hub chose which call site fired, so the fix is a **new `EmailKind`**, not
a reworded shared template. Same secret, same name, different sentence.
The re-enrol mail deliberately says **nothing** about apps or backups —
`TestFormatClaimEmail_ReenrollPromisesNothingAboutTheData` pins it. A clean-slate reinstall is
precisely where such a reassurance could be false, and this project has spent four register rows
removing promises it could not see were still true.
**Live-verified** (endpoint-level, the exact URL the operator UI serves; ClusterIP + Basic auth):
`GET /customers/demo-felhom`**„Beállító kód küldése" present, „Visszaállító kód" absent**.
### Had the claim guard ever scanned the hub? **No — never.**
`retrieval_promise_gate.py` lives in `felhom-controller/controller/scripts/`; its declared surfaces are
that repo's `internal/web/templates` plus **one** Go handler file, added on 2026-08-12 by R-311 on the
express ground that the highest-stakes customer copy *"had never been scanned"*. **The same sentence is
true one repo over** — the hub composes every customer e-mail, i.e. the copy a customer reads *before*
they see any box screen.
**I scanned it by hand with the gate's own four stems** (`visszaállíthat`, `visszaszerezhet`,
`visszahozhat`, `visszanyit`) across every non-test `.go`/`.html` under `hub/internal/`: **zero
occurrences.** So nothing was hiding, and my new strings contain no stem and need no registration.
**It is a scope gap, not a live defect — filed as R-322 rather than fixed**, because pointing a
controller gate at a sibling repo makes a controller gate fail on a felhom.eu edit, and G-1 already
taught this project what a cross-repo gate costs. *(A recommendation not followed gets its line: I
recommend a hub-side sibling in `repo_gates.py` sharing ONE stem list — two copies of a word list is
how the plural got past the singular in R-299.)*
---
## 3. The runbook correction, and where else the claim lived
`runbooks/day0-install.md` §C.1 said *"there is no release tag… pushing `scripts/felhom-host-install.sh`
publishes it."* **It has published nothing since R-110 shipped on 2026-08-03.** §C.1 now opens by naming
its own former error and states the three acts that actually publish:
1. bump `SCRIPT_VERSION` and push to `main`**publishes nothing**;
2. cut and push the tag `installer-v<new SCRIPT_VERSION>`;
3. move **BOTH** `--ref=installer-v…` pins in `manifests/webpage.yaml` — the git-sync **sidecar** and the
**init container** (lines 327 and 372) — commit, sync. **The one-pin trap is named**: the running pod
keeps serving until it restarts, and a fresh pod seeded by a stale init container then serves the OLD
script with no error anywhere.
**How to verify from outside**, since a push, a green sync and a correct-looking manifest are each
consistent with nothing having been published:
```
curl -fsS https://felhom.eu/scripts/felhom-host-install.sh | grep -m1 '^SCRIPT_VERSION'
```
**Measured while writing it: served `1.28.0`, `main` `1.28.0`, both pins `installer-v1.28.0`** — the
three agreeing is the observation; any one alone is not.
**Copied elsewhere? Yes, once, and it was hunted.**
`audits/SPIKE-universal-iso-3-2026-07-31.md:184` says the same thing **and cites `day0-install.md` as
its source** — which is how it spread. It was **true on the day it was written**, so the dated finding
is kept verbatim and carries a SUPERSEDED note; falsifying a dated record to tidy it is its own defect.
Two other hits are correct in context: `hostinstall_gates.py:198` states the consequence of the
manifest *losing* its tag, and the 2026-08-12 drill record already names the sentence as false.
---
## 4. The evidence rule, as written and where it lives
> **Evidence is copied off the machine at the end of the phase that produced it — before any revert,
> snapshot restore or teardown. Not at the end of the session.**
>
> **The mechanism, because a rule without one is a wish:** the last act of a phase that ran on a machine
> is `scp`/`pct pull` of its logs into the evidence directory on DooPlex — the same act that ends the
> phase, not a separate step to remember later.
>
> **When a session notices the evidence is already gone: say so plainly in the report and REPRODUCE it
> independently.** That is the documented expectation, not an improvisation invented under pressure.
**Four homes**, chosen so a session meets it before the revert rather than after:
1. `runbooks/workspace-CLAUDE.md`**standing rule 5**, so it loads in every session, with the
two-incident record in the R-96 rationale comment beneath it.
2. `runbooks/target-selection.md` — its own section, in the doc you read *before* picking a machine to
break. Tier 0 machines are disposable, which is exactly why nothing you need may be left on one.
3. `RUNBOOK-rehearsal-v3.md` — in the standing-rules block, flagged as applying to every phase boundary.
4. `PROMPT-TEMPLATE.md` — a new **report item 8**, so a session must state that it did this.
**Provenance, both occurrences verified, not recalled:** 2026-08-12 the retained-key drill lost its
Phase A logs to the revert to `virgin` between Phase A and Phase B
(`audits/DRILL-retained-key-2026-08-12.md` §11.5); 2026-08-13 R-316 lost its Part 1 logs, **same box,
same revert, same point** (§9 — *"the same mistake as Tuesday, in the same place"*). Both times the
existing "scp the log OUT first" was applied to the **final** teardown and not the **intermediate** one.
Filed as **R-320**.
**A side effect worth naming:** that second record lived in `REPORT.md`, which this report overwrites —
**writing tonight's report would have destroyed the record of a destroyed record.** It was preserved to
`audits/REPORT-r316-installer-v1.28.0-2026-08-13.md` first, and both citations now point there.
---
## 5. The three rulings, recorded as decided
**`STATUS.md`'s "Waiting on you" section is now empty**, and says so: *"Nothing. All three questions
that stood here were answered on 1213 August and have moved to Decided below."* A new **Decided**
section carries them, and each register row's status field changed from `READY` to `DECIDED`.
| Ruling | Trigger that reopens it |
|---|---|
| **R-312 — recovering an old backup stays a phone call.** Not built, deliberately; the operator path genuinely works (the 2026-08-12 drill restored planted files byte-identical by hand) | **A real need appearing — one request from a customer who is not us.** Until then R-304's honest position stands: retention is operator-only, and nothing may promise the customer can do it |
| **R-313 — the unopenable set-aside store on `demo-felhom` is KEPT, as a test fixture.** The specific advantage the operator accepted: it is the only state in existence where a set-aside store is present and **cannot be opened** — a case that cannot be manufactured without destroying another key on purpose | **Delete it when the work it is a fixture FOR ships, or is abandoned** — i.e. when R-312 is built, or when R-312's ruling is made permanent. On either event, delete deliberately and record why |
| **R-303 — a machine in two kinds of trouble says both things: left as it is.** Real-world likelihood unknown; the tidier fix risks hiding a genuine second failure | **An observation of the combined state occurring OUTSIDE a constructed test.** One sighting on a real machine reopens it |
---
## 6. B0 — do the facts arrive, and is this hub-only?
**Yes, and yes.** Both halves established before any code was written.
- **On the wire and in the database.** `demo-felhom-8363b5`'s newest `host_reports` row carries
`guest_net.checked_at` plus per-guest `vmid/state/mode/ip/has_route/dhclient_alive/checked_at/message`.
The agent's wire type (`felhom-agent/internal/hub/report.go:139-160`) additionally declares `healed`,
`heal_succeeded`, `last_heal_at`, `heals_last_hour`, `damped` — absent from the live rows only because
they are `omitempty` on a box that has never needed a repair.
- **Read by nothing.** The string `guest_net` occurred **nowhere** in `felhom.eu/hub/` — no struct, no
template, no checker. Stored as raw text inside `report_json`.
**So no wire change and no agent change were needed: hub-only.** The halt condition did not fire.
---
## 7. Reclassification counts — measured, not estimated
The register row said *twenty-one*; **the gate's allowlist held twenty.** Twenty is what the
dispositions account for, exactly:
| State | Count | Which |
|---|---|---|
| **Read** (removed from the allowlist) | **8** | `guest_net` + its seven children |
| **Deliberately not consumed** (new third kind, with the ruling and its date) | **5** | `mgmt_plane.healed_recently`, `pbs_dr.applied_at`, `config_hash`, `stacks`, `storage.migrated_to` |
| **Redundant** (decided on its own merits) | **1** | `reporting_disabled` |
| **Still owed a reader** (R-264, open) | **6** | `selfupdate_pending`, `selfupdate_pending_version`, `restore_tests.mount_parity`, `restore_tests.mount_inventory`, `backup.last_db_dump`, `backup.last_integrity_check` |
**The eight are REMOVED rather than re-labelled, and that is the point:** an allowlisted tag is
*skipped* by the gate, so leaving them would have meant the new reader's own fields were never checked
for reachability at all.
**A thing the task told me to re-read from the register, which was not there.** The operator's
dispositions were made on 2026-08-12; **R-264 still read `READY — owner Viktor` and all twenty
allowlist entries still said "arguably owed"**. A session told to re-read them from the register would
have found none. They are written down now, which is the point of writing them down.
**`reporting_disabled`, decided on its own merits — and the decision found a real defect the flag would
not have fixed.** The product does support the state: the controller sends one minimal report carrying
`reporting_disabled: true` **and** `health.status: "disabled"` (`cmd/controller/main.go:1246-1260`),
then goes quiet by design. The hub **already decodes** `health_status` and **already renders** that
customer as `disabled` (`web/rollup.go:25`) — so the flag is a second spelling of a fact already read:
**redundant**. But `StalenessChecker.Check` (`monitor/staleness.go:88+`) is **age-only**; its sole skip
is `IsCustomerBlocked`. **A deliberately-silent box still goes `node_stale` at 30 minutes and
`node_down` at 60** — exactly the false alarm B0 predicted. **Filed as R-321 and deliberately not fixed
here:** decoding the flag would have felt like progress and left the alarm firing. The fix belongs in
the checker, which already holds the status it needs.
---
## 8. The reader as built, and the alarm judgement
**`hub/internal/web/hosts.go`** — `parseGuestNet` / `guestNet` / `guestNetView`; rendered as a **Guest
network** card on the host-detail page, which is where a person looks at a machine.
**The signal is the repair count, not the state.** A guest the watchdog keeps repairing is healthy at
every instant anyone looks and is nevertheless failing; rendering `state` alone would give it a green
tick — the exact shape of the failed-disk-drawn-as-a-healthy-empty-disk defect. `heals_last_hour` sits
**beside** the state and drives the summary badge.
**`heal_succeeded` is decoded too, and that was a deliberate addition mid-build.** My first cut carried
the count and not the outcome — which is **R-260 exactly**: a hub decoder three fields short of the
agent, missing the one that decides the question. Six *failed* repairs is a guest that is down; six
successful ones is a nuisance.
**The four scenarios, and what the card shows for each — all four verified by test, and three of them
observed on the live fleet:**
| | Rendered | Live sighting |
|---|---|---|
| **A** healthy, no repairs | `healthy` badge, address, route, dhclient, `0` repairs | **`demo-felhom-8363b5`** — 9201 healthy, `192.168.0.149` (dhcp), swept `08:45:33Z`; **`demo-hp-bb76ea`** — 9201 healthy, `192.168.0.118`, swept `08:52:35Z` |
| **B** repaired repeatedly | `needs attention`; the **count** rendered as a warn badge with the last repair time; a sentence naming the 1 h 15 m incident | not yet on hardware — neither demo box has needed a repair since the watchdog shipped |
| **C** does not report it | **`unknown`, never healthy** — three absences, three different sentences | **`drill-r50-0a4f9a`** — *"A capable agent sent no guest-network stanza"*`unknown`. **The unknown branch fired on real data, not only in a test** |
| **D** malformed | `unknown`, and the page returns **200** | covered by test; the decode error is swallowed on purpose so one box's bad field cannot break the page for the fleet |
Two extra branches beyond the four: an unrecognised guest `state` renders unknown (the switch is an
allow-list, so adding a state to the agent can never silently paint it green), and an **empty guest
list with a fresh sweep is NOT silence** — the agent's contract says that means "the watchdog ran and
found nothing", which must stay distinguishable from "the watchdog is not wired", the shape the
v0.91.0 inert seam hid behind.
### The alarm judgement: **no email, deliberately**
I agree with the task's recommendation and did not add one. The reasoning, since it is a judgement:
- **The incident was a visibility failure, not a paging failure.** Nobody could *see* the condition for
1 h 15 m. A card fixes what actually broke.
- **A new alarm on a fleet of two demo machines is untested noise**, on a dispatcher whose severity
contract is exact-match lowercase and whose customer-message allow-list must move with it — a
two-place change that fires against no real population.
- **There is no calibrated threshold to alarm on.** Neither demo box has produced a single repair since
the watchdog shipped, so any number I picked would be invented. **The visible count is what will
supply the threshold** — which is the argument for building the card first and the alarm second.
**Revisit when a third machine exists, or when a repair count is seen climbing on real hardware.**
---
## 9. Red-proofs — every mutation asserted applied before its run
Five in total: three mandated for B2, two for A2. Each mutation was **confirmed present by grep before
the test ran**, and confirmed **absent by grep after restoring**.
| # | Mutation | Asserted applied | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| **1** *(the one that matters)* | The unknown branches in the card's badge chain replaced by the healthy badge | `grep -c 'title="MUTATED">healthy'`**2** | **RED — both C sub-cases.** A silent machine seen rendering as healthy: *"a silent box must SAY it is unknown"* and *"an old agent's silence must be named as an old agent's silence"* |
| **2** | `RepairCount: 0` in the decoder — the climbing-repairs signal dropped | `hosts.go:385 RepairCount: 0, … // MUTATED` | **RED — B**: *"a guest repaired 6 times in an hour is reported as fine — the whole point of the card"* |
| **3** | `Degraded()` forced `true` — the healthy branch broken | `hosts.go:348 func … { return true /* MUTATED */ }` | **RED — A**: *"a machine that is fine is being alarmed on"* — the guard is reachable in **both** directions |
| **4** | `ReissueForReenroll` routed back to `EmailReset` | `grep` → line 195 reads `EmailReset` | **RED — two tests**: the new `TestReenrollSplit_ChangesTheMailNotTheSecret` **and** the pre-existing `TestReissueForReenroll` |
| **5** | „Visszaállító kód: %s" restored in the reset mail body | `grep -n``templates.go:241` | **RED — `TestFormatClaimEmail_OneNamePerSecret`** |
**After every restore the suite is green again**, and `grep -c MUTATED` returns **0** in both touched
files.
**A positive control that the reader is WIRED and not merely written**, independent of the tests: the
wire-contract gate's checked-tag count rose **182 → 190** and its skipped count fell **88 → 80** as the
eight allowlist entries came out. The gate still passes — meaning those eight tags are now genuinely
reachable in the hub.
---
## 10. Part C — **DROPPED**, and one part of it answered anyway
**Dropped, as the task's own drop order specifies.** The honest reason is not only time: **the task
names "nine claims" that are grey, and I could not identify which nine.** The capability map holds
**22** rows marked `IMPLEMENTED`, five `PARTIAL` and four `MISSING`, and nothing in the tree enumerates
a set of nine. Picking nine myself and reporting on them would have produced a confident answer to a
question nobody asked — the A4 failure mode, one section later.
**The one I can answer, because the task identified it precisely.** The self-heal claim is the
capability-map row *"Box survives an unattended app or guest-network failure… it is noticed, and where
safe it is repaired"*, and its best document does **not** argue against it. The 1 h 15 m outage
(`audits/INCIDENT-guest-dhclient-killed-2026-07-20.md`) is the row's **origin**, not its evidence: the
evidence is a **deliberate replay of that incident the next day**`kill -9` at 12:43:18, detected on
process liveness **57 s** later while the lease was still live, healed at 12:45:18 with the incident's
verbatim invocation, and **the tunnel never dropped** (`cloudflared Up 29 hours`). That is a walk, and
the outage was prevented rather than merely observed. **The claim does not need to move down.**
**What I would flag instead:** the row's *guest-network* leg was proven on the box and, until today,
**the hub could not see the condition at all** — which is the gap this session closed and which no
capability row expressed. My new row states its own status honestly as **IMPLEMENTED, not
PROVEN-LIVE**, because **no machine has ever been observed with a climbing repair count on this card.**
---
## 11. Versions, commits, deploy, CI
| | |
|---|---|
| **Shipped** | **hub v0.104.0** (`gitea.dooplex.hu/admin/felhom-hub:0.104.0`, 25 MB) |
| **Unchanged** | controller **0.214.0**, agent **0.129.0**, installer **1.28.0**, golden 0.214.0, floor 0.214.0, MinAgent 0.129.0 |
| **Commits** | `4d6ec7c` the work · `7c97c94` the manifest bump |
| **Manifest** | `manifests/hub.yaml:128``felhom-hub:0.104.0`, GitOps only — **no `kubectl set image`** |
| **Deploy** | ArgoCD hard-refresh + sync → `Synced / Healthy`; pod `hub-5c4d8d4b49-864dc` **1/1 Running**; deployment image confirmed `0.104.0` |
| **CI, confirmed by run ID** | run **334** (`7c97c949f6`) **success** · run **333** (`4d6ec7c7bb`) **success** |
| **Gates** | `repo_gates.py --fast` — all **8** OK, and again in the pre-push hook on both pushes. **No `--no-verify`.** |
| **Green gate** | `hub/`: build rc=0, vet rc=0, **test rc=0 across 18 packages**. Run separately from every commit |
**Live validation method — stated, as the fence requires:** endpoint-level. I invoked the exact URLs
the operator UI serves (`GET /hosts/<id>`, `GET /customers/<id>`) against the hub's ClusterIP with the
operator Basic-auth credential, so no server logic was skipped — only browser rendering.
`claude-in-chrome` is not available on DooPlex; a click-through remains the operator's.
**Files:** `hub/internal/web/hosts.go`, `hub/internal/web/templates/host_detail_body.html`,
`hub/internal/claim/engine.go`, `hub/internal/notify/templates.go`, `hub/internal/web/configs.go`,
`hub/internal/web/templates/customer_unified.html`, `scripts/wire_contract_gate.py`, plus
`hub/internal/web/hosts_guestnet_test.go` (**new**, 7 tests) and `hub/internal/claim/naming_test.go`
(**new**, 6 tests). Tests **+13**.
**Register:** R-319, R-320, R-321, R-322 minted (ceiling was R-318, grepped first). R-264, R-309, R-312,
R-313, R-303 and the `PETI` row updated. `STATUS.md` and the capability map updated.
---
## 12. What was dropped, and observations
**Dropped — named plainly, nothing silently shortened:**
- **Part C in full**, except the self-heal verdict in §10. Reason in §10: the nine were not identifiable,
and inventing them would have been worse than the gap.
**Nothing else was dropped.** Part A is complete (A1A5), Part B is complete (B0, B1, and the one reader
B2 asked for — not four).
### Observations — noticed, not acted on
- **A "0 bytes" answer was nearly a wrong verdict, twice in one hour.** `demo-hp`'s host page came back
empty from a `kubectl run` curl pod, which reads exactly like "the card does not render". Retrying with
a clean pod name returned **HTTP 200** and a correct card. *An empty listing is not evidence of
emptiness* — the instrument was the fault, and the rule caught it.
- **R-264's count was wrong**: the row says twenty-one facts, the allowlist held twenty. The row is now
written against the measured number.
- **The wire gate does not detect a stale allowlist entry.** Its sibling `retrieval_promise_gate.py`
fails on one; this one silently skips. Had I re-labelled the eight `guest_net` entries instead of
deleting them, the gate would have reported a coverage it did not have and said nothing. Worth the
same treatment.
- **A third secret sits one homograph away from the two that collided.** The hub's self-bind flow calls
the **five-word** retrieval passphrase „**visszaállító jelszó**" (`web/selfbind.go:255,261`;
`notify/templates.go:285`) — *jelszó*, not *kód*, so it is outside R-295's ruling and I left it alone.
But „Visszaállító kód" was just retired for being a near-homograph of „Helyreállítási kód", and this
is a near-homograph of the name that was retired. **Three secrets, three names, and two of them still
begin with the same word.** A ruling for it is the operator's, not mine.
- **`agents.md`-style version drift in project memory**: `instructions_gate` emits 32 version-literal
warnings against `MEMORY.md`. Not a failure and not mine to fix tonight, but it is aimed at the next
model to edit that file — which is worth someone acting on before it is noise nobody reads.