admin
9e079c7883
Question A: YES, no code change. customer.domain is a trimmed string with no UNIQUE, no CHECK, no format rule (store.go:114, configs.go:673), copied verbatim into controller.yaml (configgen.go:48), and every one of its 30 consumers on the box interpolates it without parsing. Zero hits for registrable/eTLD/publicsuffix across both repos. Nothing creates DNS records (zero hits for dns_records) — the two Cloudflare clients are WAF-only. And the zone-ownership assumption is a SWITCH, not a requirement: traefik.yml.tmpl selects DNS-01 when cf_api_token is set and HTTP-01 when it is empty. The real blocker is Cloudflare, proven live: the edge certificate covers exactly one wildcard level (SAN = demo-felhom.eu, *.demo-felhom.eu), so a two-label hostname — which a per-tester subdomain forces — gets "tls alert handshake failure" and no peer certificate at all. That makes Advanced Certificate Manager a prerequisite of the separate-domain plan, not an optional extra. Whether ACM is available on the account could not be established read-only: the only Cloudflare tokens in reach are the Zone:DNS:Edit tokens on the demo boxes, which the fence forbids using. Question C, measured rather than reasoned: r.Cookie returns the FIRST match and never tries the others (BOGUS+real = 302, real+BOGUS = 200), so a tossed cookie wins outright — DoS and confusion, not takeover, since it fails closed on mutations. CSRF is a single choke point (server.go:256) and the token carries the whole load against a same-registrable-domain attacker. But it is SKIPPED entirely when no session cookie is present, which with browser-cached Basic auth is cross-origin CSRF on every mutating route (R-135). Agreeing with the separate-domain recommendation, with the caveat the brief asked for: it is necessary but not sufficient. It does not solve Question D, because that is a shared-zone problem and the new domain is a shared zone. Filed R-133..R-138: duplicate domains accepted; hub/controller zone-resolvers disagree on depth; CSRF skipped on the no-cookie path; __Host- rename (one line, preconditions verified met); geo-WAF rules zone-scoped and non-namespaced (four cross-tenant faults, blocks shared-zone onboarding); shared-zone cf_api_token is a zone-wide DNS-write capability on a customer's box. Nothing created: no customer, DNS record, tunnel, route or code change.
Felhom — Documentation
Felhom is a managed home-server service for Hungarian households, built on a three-component model over Proxmox:
- Hub — operator backend on k3s (
hub.felhom.eu). Repo:felhom.eu/hub/. - Host agent — one per Proxmox host; operator-tier; owns all Proxmox interaction. Repo:
felhom-agent/. - In-guest controller — one per customer LXC; Docker-only; manages the customer's apps. Repo:
felhom-controller/.
This directory is the central, code-verified documentation home for all three components plus the platform and the security-audit record.
Sections
Controller (in-guest) — controller/
The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current source (v0.59.0).
→ controller/README.md: module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup
architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.
Host agent & platform — architecture/, proxmox-platform.md
The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.
architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md— topology & trust modelarchitecture/03-host-agent.md— the host agent (Go; v0.29.1)architecture/04-control-plane-authorization.md— signing, escrow, authzarchitecture/02-controller-module-map.md— historical v0.33 planning map; the live map iscontroller/module-map.mdproxmox-platform.md— Proxmox platform reference
Hub (operator backend) — architecture/05
architecture/05-hub-architecture.md— hub architecture (v0.11.0)
Security audits & remediation — audits/
audits/deep-sweep-2026-06-13.md— cross-repo deep audit (controller + agent) with remediation statusaudits/bughunt-reconcile-2026-06-13.md— reconciliation of the v0.30.3 BUGHUNT against current code + merged fix list
Spike & test findings — tests/
Per-slice spike/validation findings (phases 0–5, slices 7–10). See tests/.
Conventions
- Code-verified, not memory-derived. Architectural claims here are checked against the actual current source; if a claim can't be verified it is omitted and flagged, not guessed.
- Per-repo operational working files (
CLAUDE.md,CONTEXT.md,CHANGELOG.md,BUGHUNT.md,REPORT.md,TASK.md) live in their own repos — they are operational, not published docs. - Authoritative versions at last refresh: controller v0.59.0, agent v0.29.1, hub v0.11.0.