felhom.eu/scripts/observations_gate.py

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""Observations gate — an observation with no row behind it refuses the push.

Run from the repo root:  python3 scripts/observations_gate.py [path/to/REPORT.md]
Exit 0 clean · 1 convicted (an observation is neither filed nor declared) · 2 inconclusive.

WHY THIS EXISTS, and what it cost to learn.

On 2026-08-23 a session measured, on live hardware, that **only the first broken app per hour reaches
the operator** — the notification cooldown keys on the event type and not on the app. It was real, it
was reproducible, and it was written in a numbered item under `## Observations` in `REPORT.md`. **It
was written nowhere else.** There was no register row. `REPORT.md` is overwritten every session by
this project's own convention, so the finding had a lifetime of exactly one session.

That is R-341's shape one surface over — a commitment recorded in prose that nothing enforces — and
it is why gate 10 exists. The same argument applies here and nothing was reading this section.

**The instruction invited it.** `documentation/PROMPT-TEMPLATE.md` §15 asked for "observations:
out-of-scope items noticed, documented, not acted on". "Documented" was satisfied by the paragraph.
The template was corrected in the same session that added this gate; **this gate is the mechanism
that correction points at**, because a rule without a mechanism is a wish.

── THE RULE ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

Every numbered item in a `REPORT.md` observations section must carry exactly one explicit marker:

  * ``FILED: R-NNN``        — this observation is filed, as that row. The row MUST resolve in
                              `OPEN-ITEMS.md` or `CLOSED-ITEMS.md`.
  * ``NOT-A-FINDING:``      — deliberately not filed, followed by a reason on the same item.

── WHY A MARKER AND NOT "MENTIONS AN R-NUMBER", WHICH IS WHAT WAS ASKED FOR ──────────────────

The specification for this gate said an item may "cite an R-NNN that resolves". **That rule would
have passed the exact item this gate was built to catch**, and the discrepancy is recorded here
rather than quietly resolved:

    "This is R-182's known cooldown-key shape; it was harmless while app_start_failed was
     undeliverable and is not any more. Not fixed here."

`R-182` resolves. It is cited as an **analogy** — the family the defect belongs to — not as the row
that files it. No parser can tell a citation-as-precedent from a citation-as-filing by reading prose,
and a gate that guesses would either miss this item or convict every item that mentions history.

So the marker is explicit and the burden is one token. **The cost is a format requirement on one
section of one file; the benefit is that the failure mode which produced this gate cannot recur
silently.** This is the same trade `due_checks_gate.py` made: dates moved out of prose and into a
machine-readable block, inside the register so no sidecar can drift.

── BOUNDARIES, stated so they are not silently re-decided ────────────────────────────────────

  * **No observations section → PASS, quietly.** Most pushes do not touch `REPORT.md`, and a gate
    that taxes every push is one that gets disabled within a week. Absence of the section is not
    evidence of a hidden finding.
  * **No `REPORT.md` at all → INCONCLUSIVE.** This gate is registered per-repo precisely because the
    repo has one; if it has vanished, that is worth a word rather than a silent pass.
  * **A section present but with no parseable items → INCONCLUSIVE, naming what it could not read.**
    Fail closed on ambiguity in the RULE, fail open on ambiguity in the PARSE — but INCONCLUSIVE is
    never a silent pass, and the runner reports 2 distinctly for exactly that reason.
  * **REFUSES, does not warn.** Gate 10's reasoning applies unchanged: a warning is the thing that
    gets scrolled past, and this repo has the census to prove it.
  * **Both markers, or two of one, on a single item → conviction.** An item that is both filed and
    declared-not-a-finding is not a parse problem, it is an undecided author.
  * **A passing run still says what it looked at** (workspace standing rule 3): it prints the item
    count and how each was satisfied, so a gate that silently examined nothing is visible.

Stdlib only; no network, no subprocess — `--fast`, so it runs in BOTH the pre-push hook and CI. A
non-fast gate would run in neither, which is the R-29 failure the runner ended.
"""
import os
import re
import sys

ROOT = os.path.dirname(os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__)))

# `## 10. Observations — recorded, not acted on`, `### Observations`, `## Observations:` …
HEADING_RE = re.compile(r"^(#+)\s*(?:\d+[.)]\s*)?observations\b", re.IGNORECASE)
ITEM_RE = re.compile(r"^\s*(\d+)[.)]\s+(.*)$")
FILED_RE = re.compile(r"\bFILED:\s*(R-\d+)", re.IGNORECASE)
NOT_A_FINDING_RE = re.compile(r"\bNOT-A-FINDING:\s*(\S.*)$", re.IGNORECASE | re.MULTILINE)

REGISTERS = [
    os.path.join(ROOT, "documentation", "backlog", "OPEN-ITEMS.md"),
    os.path.join(ROOT, "documentation", "backlog", "CLOSED-ITEMS.md"),
]


def find_registers():
    """Locate the registers. They live in felhom.eu; sibling repos reach across, as other gates do."""
    found = [p for p in REGISTERS if os.path.isfile(p)]
    if found:
        return found
    sibling = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(ROOT), "felhom.eu", "documentation", "backlog")
    return [p for p in (os.path.join(sibling, "OPEN-ITEMS.md"),
                        os.path.join(sibling, "CLOSED-ITEMS.md")) if os.path.isfile(p)]


def known_rows(paths):
    """Every R-number that has a row in the registers."""
    rows = set()
    for p in paths:
        with open(p, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
            for line in fh:
                m = re.match(r"^\|\s*\*\*(R-\d+)\*\*\s*\|", line)
                if m:
                    rows.add(m.group(1).upper())
    return rows


def observation_items(text):
    """(items, heading) — each item is (number, its full text). heading is None when absent."""
    lines = text.split("\n")
    start = None
    depth = 0
    for i, line in enumerate(lines):
        m = HEADING_RE.match(line)
        if m:
            start, depth = i, len(m.group(1))
            break
    if start is None:
        return None, None

    body = []
    for line in lines[start + 1:]:
        hm = re.match(r"^(#+)\s", line)
        if hm and len(hm.group(1)) <= depth:
            break
        body.append(line)

    items, cur = [], None
    for line in body:
        m = ITEM_RE.match(line)
        if m:
            if cur:
                items.append(cur)
            cur = [m.group(1), m.group(2)]
        elif cur is not None:
            if line.strip() == "" and cur[1].endswith("\n\n"):
                continue
            cur[1] += "\n" + line
    if cur:
        items.append(cur)
    return items, lines[start].strip()


def main():
    # The argument is a REPO ROOT (how the sibling runners invoke every shared gate) or, for tests
    # and one-off checks, a REPORT.md path directly. Both are accepted so the controls in this
    # session's evidence and the runner call the same code.
    report = os.path.join(ROOT, "REPORT.md")
    if len(sys.argv) > 1:
        arg = sys.argv[1]
        report = os.path.join(arg, "REPORT.md") if os.path.isdir(arg) else arg

    if not os.path.isfile(report):
        print("OBSERVATIONS GATE INCONCLUSIVE: no REPORT.md at %s" % report)
        print("  This gate is registered here because this repo keeps one. If it was removed "
              "deliberately, unregister the gate in the runner rather than leaving it unreadable.")
        sys.exit(2)

    with open(report, encoding="utf-8") as fh:
        text = fh.read()

    items, heading = observation_items(text)

    if items is None:
        print("observations gate OK — %s has no observations section (nothing to check)"
              % os.path.basename(report))
        sys.exit(0)

    if not items:
        print("OBSERVATIONS GATE INCONCLUSIVE: found the section %r but no numbered items under it."
              % heading)
        print("  Items must be a numbered list (`1.`, `2.` …). If the section is deliberately empty, "
              "remove the heading — an empty section reads as coverage while providing none.")
        sys.exit(2)

    rows = known_rows(find_registers())
    if not rows:
        print("OBSERVATIONS GATE INCONCLUSIVE: could not read any register rows from "
              "OPEN-ITEMS.md / CLOSED-ITEMS.md — cannot verify that a cited R-number resolves.")
        sys.exit(2)

    convictions = []
    satisfied = []
    for num, body in items:
        filed = FILED_RE.findall(body)
        declared = NOT_A_FINDING_RE.findall(body)
        first_line = body.split("\n")[0].strip()
        short = (first_line[:78] + "…") if len(first_line) > 78 else first_line

        if filed and declared:
            convictions.append((num, short,
                                "carries BOTH `FILED:` and `NOT-A-FINDING:` — decide which it is"))
            continue
        if len(filed) > 1:
            convictions.append((num, short,
                                "carries %d `FILED:` markers (%s) — one observation, one row"
                                % (len(filed), ", ".join(filed))))
            continue
        if filed:
            r = filed[0].upper()
            if r not in rows:
                convictions.append((num, short,
                                    "`FILED: %s` does not resolve — no row for %s in OPEN-ITEMS.md "
                                    "or CLOSED-ITEMS.md" % (r, r)))
            else:
                satisfied.append("%s. FILED %s" % (num, r))
            continue
        if declared:
            reason = declared[0].strip()
            if len(reason) < 12:
                convictions.append((num, short,
                                    "`NOT-A-FINDING:` carries no reason — the reason is the whole "
                                    "point of the marker"))
            else:
                satisfied.append("%s. NOT-A-FINDING" % num)
            continue

        convictions.append((num, short, "neither `FILED: R-NNN` nor `NOT-A-FINDING: <reason>`"))

    # Print the evidence unconditionally — a gate that only speaks when it fails teaches nobody what
    # it is watching (workspace standing rule 3).
    print("  report            : %s" % report)
    print("  section           : %s" % heading)
    print("  observation items : %d" % len(items))
    for s in satisfied:
        print("      OK  %s" % s)

    if convictions:
        print("")
        print("OBSERVATIONS GATE FAILED: %d observation(s) with nothing behind them." % len(convictions))
        for num, short, why in convictions:
            print("")
            print("  item %s: %s" % (num, short))
            print("     %s" % why)
        print("")
        print("An observation that lives only in REPORT.md has a lifetime of ONE SESSION — this file "
              "is overwritten every time. That is how the cooldown-grain finding was lost on "
              "2026-08-23 and had to be re-derived the next day.")
        print("Fix: add `FILED: R-NNN` naming the row you opened for it, or `NOT-A-FINDING: <why "
              "this is not worth a row>`. Opening the row is the default; declaring is the exception "
              "and needs its reason stated.")
        sys.exit(1)

    print("observations gate OK — every observation is either filed or explicitly declared")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()