admin
225afa0f30
The first real tester answered on Prohardver today. His domain is bought in his name (terms 1.1 §4), so his name, address, e-mail and phone leave this house - and the privacy notice did not say so. Now it does, before the purchase. Operator rulings, asked before the work and recorded in CONTEXT.md: - Registrar for a tester's .hu domain: Nethely Kft. - The tester's zone lives in FELHOM's Cloudflare account during the test. This is what the build already assumed (day0-install A.1 + the one-zone token guard of 01 §7 / R-138 option C) and nothing had recorded it; it answers open point 9 of the privacy draft. Privacy notice 1.1: - New §10 "A domained regisztrációja": exactly the four fields the .hu Domainregisztrációs Szabályzat §1.2.2.1 requires of a natural person (the optional mother's name, birth date and ID number are NOT asked for), by e-mail, to Nethely and the .hu registry (both named with seats), why, how long, and what is public - a natural person shows as "Természetes személy" only. - It also states whose Cloudflare account holds the zone and that the domain moves to the tester's own account when he leaves. - §11 (recipients) gained the two new names: a recipients list that omits two recipients is wrong. That is the one change beyond the new section. - 1.0 -> 1.1 diff: the only removed/changed lines are the record's title and derived-on date, the version line, and four renumbered headings. marketing/testers/kit/: five files + README, Hungarian, first person. Questions about the machine and the net (each traced to day0-install Part B or the FAQ), the domain data request, the tester's acceptance e-mail (no domain purchase before it arrives), the welcome e-mail with the recovery-code warning, and the operator's own step list. No personal data in any of it - placeholders only. Also: EMAIL-privacy-1.1.md for the existing testers, the legal README pointing at the 1.1 records, and one plural verb the voice sweep missed in the FAQ.
4.0 KiB
Legal texts — the closed-test set IS published; the rest are drafts. NOT legal advice.
Status, 2026-10-09: the closed-test set is LIVE. On the operator's ruling of 2026-10-09 — no company exists yet; publish a closed-test set now; the full ÁSZF, the impresszum and the lawyer's review wait for the company and the first paying customer — two pages went onto the website:
| Published | Live at | Source of record |
|---|---|---|
| Privacy notice | https://felhom.eu/adatkezeles | adatkezelesi-tajekoztato-1.1.md (1.0 kept as history) |
| Closed-test terms | https://felhom.eu/feltetelek | feltetelek-1.1.md (1.0 kept as history) |
The …-1.1.md files are derived from the published HTML so the record cannot drift from the
page. Version history: terms 1.1 added §4 (the domain) on 2026-10-10; privacy notice 1.1 added §10 (the
domain registration: which data goes to the registrar and the .hu registry, and that the zone sits in
Felhom's Cloudflare account during the test) on 2026-10-12, before the first tester's domain was bought. Every page of the website now links both in its footer, and the contact form's consent text was
replaced with the honest one.
Still not published and still pending the lawyer (R-802): the full ÁSZF, the impresszum (it needs company data that does not exist) and any English translation of the legal texts.
Not legal advice. These texts were written by an AI assistant from the system's own documents. A lawyer decides what is legally required, what legal basis applies, and what the final text says. They were published before that review, deliberately, on the operator's ruling above.
Status of the drafts: first drafts, written 2026-10-08 by Claude Code on the operator's request (Part E of that night's brief). Pending lawyer review.
These files are working drafts for register rows R-813 (the website collects personal data but
publishes no privacy notice, no terms and no imprint — owner: operator) and R-802 (the lawyer's
review before the first paying customer — owner: operator). The wider set of business papers
(customer contract, data-processing agreement, billing) is the intention R-809 in
documentation/backlog/ROADMAP.md.
| File | What it is |
|---|---|
adatkezelesi-tajekoztato-1.0.md |
PUBLISHED — the privacy notice as it stands on the website |
feltetelek-1.0.md |
PUBLISHED — the closed-test terms as they stand on the website |
DRAFT-aszf.md |
Általános Szerződési Feltételek — a structured skeleton; business terms are placeholders |
DRAFT-adatkezelesi-tajekoztato.md |
Adatkezelési tájékoztató — built from the architecture documents and the code, each line cited |
DRAFT-impresszum.md |
Impresszum — placeholders only |
DRAFT-kapcsolat-hozzajarulas.md |
A proposed replacement for the contact form's consent text, and the link it should carry |
Rules for these drafts
- Not legal advice. Written by an AI assistant from the system's own documents. A lawyer decides what is legally required, what legal basis applies, and what the final text says.
- Every fact the operator must supply is a visible placeholder like
[[CÉGNÉV]]. Nothing is invented.[[ELLENŐRIZNI]]marks a fact the code and the documents do not state. - The privacy notice is true to the system, not to a template. Each line carries an HTML comment
<!-- source: path:line -->. If the system changes (a new processor, a new retention), the notice must change with it. - Nothing is published until the operator says so. Publishing means a website change (
website/is served frommainby git-sync), a link from every page footer, and the contact form's consent text replaced. All three were done on 2026-10-09 for the closed-test set only, on the operator's word. The ÁSZF and the impresszum are still unpublished, and the rule still holds for them. - Each draft ends with the list of points the lawyer must check and every point where the draft had to guess.