felhom.eu/STATUS.md

# STATUS — what works, what's broken, what's next

**Updated 2026-08-09.**

> **A view, not a source.** `documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md` is the authority; this page restates
> part of it in plain words, and **nothing may exist only here**. Not `CONTEXT.md`, which is technical
> state written for Claude Code. **Items, not paragraphs. One screen.** If it does not fit, something
> belongs in the register instead.
>
> *Rebuilt from the register on 2026-08-07, from 258 lines. The old "what shipped recently" log is what
> the per-repo `CHANGELOG.md` files and the register are for, and is not restated here.*

## What works

A blank machine boots the Felhom disc, installs itself unattended, and is claimed by the customer, who
sets their own password. They install apps from a catalogue of fifty-three, share files over the home
network, and open apps from a launcher or a shared link. Backups run on their own to three places — the
machine's drive, a second drive, and an encrypted off-site copy.

**The backup promise is proved, and so is getting the data back yourself.** A machine has been
destroyed on purpose and its files came back byte for byte identical — four times now. On
**2026-08-07 the household's own journey passed for the first time**: someone with a browser and
their recovery code got everything back with **no command line inside the machine at any point**,
in 72 seconds. The two rough edges that walk found are also gone. *(R-201, R-252, R-253 — closed.)*

## The rehearsal finished. The data came back byte for byte; the journey did not.

**We wiped a working demo machine and put it back. All four test files returned identical — including
the two with Hungarian accents, checked as raw bytes, not as text on screen.** The unlock took 21
seconds and the restore 13. **But it only finished because I could open a terminal twice.** A
household would have stopped, twice, and the second time the screen would have told them it was easy.

**The two walls, both fixed-or-fixable, neither about the data:**

- **The install died four steps in** — the agent version you approved had been published as a download
  but never given its version label, and the installer looks it up by that label. **Now unblocked** —
  I pushed the label after checking the published file matched what you vouched. *(R-273 — closed. The
  two guards that would stop it recurring are still owed.)*
- **A reinstalled machine cannot re-attach its own data drive.** Every route is a dead end, and the
  restore page cheerfully says „**Ez két kattintás**" while pointing at an empty list. The drive is
  fine and the machine can see it — it just is not offered, because the same drive is also the backup
  target. I got past it by typing an internal path no customer could know. **This is the one to fix
  before the tester's visit.** *(R-280)*

**Also broken, found on the way:**

- **Taking Felhom off a machine leaves the one thing that stops it going back on.** We install a small
  network service at setup; removing Felhom restarts it without its settings, it seizes the port the
  next install needs, and the next install then refuses — appearing to blame the owner's network.
  *(R-272)*
- **A machine we removed keeps its private line to us open.** *(R-276)*
- **The hub said nothing at all** while a machine was wiped, rebuilt, re-claimed and had its sealed
  backups opened. No false alarm — but also no word, and the alarm that exists for "someone is opening
  this customer's backups" stayed silent through a real one. *(R-281)*
- **A rebuilt machine may still come back on software from last week** — narrower than I first wrote:
  the resumed install fetched the right version, but a fresh one takes whatever copy is newest on the
  disk without checking it against what you approved. *(R-274)*
- **demo-felhom has not had an off-site backup in six days** and is waiting for a recovery code nobody
  has entered. demo-hp, rebuilt the same day, recovered by itself. *(R-278)*
- **One code, three different names**, and the email points at a page the machine is not showing —
  this cost us a wasted code today. *(R-282, R-283)*

## What's broken

- **Nothing else new is broken.** The *check* against a fourth secret-in-a-page covers 4 pages of 27, and
  the cheap one covering all of them is blind to the shape that shipped. *(R-255)*
- **An already-paired box is still told to pair itself**, 25 minutes on. *(R-214, R-235)*
- **A backup that covered nothing still calls itself „Sikeres".** *(R-240)*
- **A machine waiting for its recovery code can stop backing up off-site without alarming us.** *(R-243)*
- **The card offering to reopen set-aside backups promises more than we can deliver.** *(R-202)*
- **Deleting a customer leaves rows behind** while reporting a clean teardown — no secrets, but it
  accumulates. *(R-244)*
- **Putting restored files back where they belong is still manual.** *(R-213)*

## The rest of what the rehearsal found

Sixteen findings in one afternoon, **none of them visible from reading the code** — three sessions of
review had not seen any.

- Removing Felhom leaves five files holding old keys *(R-275)*, and rotating a leaked key does not
  revoke the old one until the service restarts *(R-269)* — the written recipe for it is a step short
  *(R-270)*, and the alarm it raises can never be closed because the fix it recommends is what
  silences the all-clear *(R-271)*.
- **It caught me being wrong twice, and that matters more than the count.** I told you the fleet's
  off-site backups were down; demo-hp had eighteen snapshots and I had read three misleading screens
  instead of asking the machine *(R-277)*. And I raised a leftover permissions file as a security
  hole, then tested it and refuted myself — it is inert.

**What worked, and should not be lost in the count:** the machine came up on its own at the approved
version; the setup page appeared unprompted, in Hungarian, naming the customer; **the recovery screen
appeared without being looked for** and said plainly that unlocking changes nothing; the restore told
the truth about putting files in a checking folder rather than back in place; and no false alarm fired.

Full account: `documentation/audits/REHEARSAL-byo-reinstall-2026-08-09.md`.

## Three rulings, written down so they stop living in a conversation

- **The managed-update floor.** It is deliberately parked, and the trigger to raise it is **the first
  machine that is not ours**; after that it moves with the publish train. Worth knowing alongside it:
  the updater always aims at the floor, never at the newest, so a machine at or above the floor
  updates to nothing. **Correction to the number that was going round: the floor is live at 0.200.0,
  not 0.156.0** — checked twice today, on the hub page and in both machines' own logs.
- **R-264 is decided.** Build a reader for guest-network health, the staged-update pair, the
  restore-test depth pair, and the two backup-integrity timestamps. Record a stated "no reader
  wanted" for the repaired-recently flag, the tier-applied timestamp, the config fingerprint, the
  per-stack object and the drive-migration marker. Decide the reporting-disabled flag on its own
  merits — if that is a state we support, it must be visible or a staleness alarm will one day fire
  on a machine that is fine. A "no" ends by changing the allowlist reason from *arguably owed* to
  *deliberately not consumed* — not by ripping out an emitter, which is a two-repo change that also
  breaks a shared fixture. **The implementation is its own session.** And **it is twenty facts, not
  twenty-one**.
- **R-268 is closed** — the leaked key is rotated, and the rotation is proved in both directions
  rather than assumed.

## Fixed 2026-08-08 — four things the machine knew and did not say

A rebuilt machine can set up its own recovery again *(R-221, agent 0.128.0 — proved on hardware)*; an
unreadable disk is no longer drawn as a healthy empty one *(R-259)*; a backup tick now answers about
*that* app *(R-258)*; our own alarm no longer points at a log that may not exist *(R-265)*. Still true
and not glossed: a failed disk reading still reaches us as "0 of 0 GB" — the quiet direction, it can
only miss a true alarm, never raise a false one *(R-266)*.

## What we're working on

- **Widening the check** so a fourth secret-in-a-page is caught by a machine. *(R-255)* · **R-264 is
  now decided** (above); building the readers is a session of its own.
- **Proving the hub really keeps the old sealed key** when a machine re-seals. *(R-198)* · Still open,
  none urgent: *(R-256, R-257, R-261…R-263, R-266)*

## Waiting on you

- **Nothing blocking.** The rehearsal is finished and demo-hp is back in service: agent 0.128.0,
  controller 0.210.0, claimed, off-site backups unlocked and intact.
- **One decision worth taking before the tester comes:** whether to fix the drive wall *(R-280)* now.
  It is the only finding that would stop his visit outright, and it is the difference between "his
  data comes back" and "his data comes back if someone types a path for him."
- **Two guards are still owed** so the install cannot break the same way twice: refuse to vouch a
  version whose label does not resolve, and check that a published version and its label ship
  together. *(R-273's tail.)*

## DooPlex infrastructure — separate from the product

*Kept under its own heading rather than dropped: these are real asks that need you, but they concern
the machine all this is built on, not what a customer receives. Mixing them in is why the page stopped
being readable.*

- **DooPlex's own backup keeps every copy inside the same box, and is silent when it fails.** *(R-232)*
- **193 old images exist only on this machine**, ~27 GB — clutter, not space. *(R-210)*
- **The hub password needs rotating** — a diagnostic printed it into a session log; nothing suggests
  anyone else saw it. *(R-132)*
- **After DooPlex next restarts**, read `/var/log/felhom-store-postboot-check.log` — the second-SSD
  move has never survived a reboot; on PASS, 34 GB comes back. *(R-209a)*
- **Backup scripts on DooPlex are unversioned host state** *(R-231)*, and the instruction-file
  follow-ups each need a decision rather than an edit *(R-229, R-230)*.
- **The Configuration page is fixed: 26 s → 0.14 s.** It was never hashing anything — the hashes
  are already stored and simply read. It was making 42 calls one after another. Now they overlap,
  connections are kept, the answer is held for a minute, and the old artifacts are gone. Worst case
  is 5 s, once a minute at most. **Your instinct to prune was right and my measurement said
  otherwise** — trimming to ten of each halved the slow path. *(R-267 — closed.)*
- **The access token I printed into a log yesterday is rotated**, and I checked it both ways: the old
  one is refused, the new one works, and the machine's own channel is back up. *(R-268 — closed.)*
- **Our build-check alarm has one gap left.** A run that hangs is now cut off after five minutes and
  the mail says how long it took — but **whether the alarm fires at all when the machinery kills a
  run outright is still unverified**, and we have not claimed otherwise. *(R-265)*