The hub has written every customer e-mail in Hungarian whatever the box was set
to. The box has published its language since controller v0.247.0; nothing read
it. Now it does.
Nothing an operator reads changes. The Hungarian mails are byte-identical, and
that is a diff rather than a reading: 56 goldens per language captured from
v0.117.0 BEFORE any string moved, and all 56 Hungarian ones pass unchanged after
every sentence was routed through the new bundle.
- internal/i18n: flat bundle, 79 keys, hu authoritative + hu fallback, ceiling 0.
- customerMessages/severityLabels are DERIVED from the bundle, so a sentence is
written in one place and all 40+ tests that read those maps still work.
- Language order: last reported -> created-with -> hu. reports.language defaults
to EMPTY, never hu: "never told us" is not "chose Hungarian".
- message_customer on POST /api/v1/event, additive and optional forever, for the
sentences the box composes and the hub cannot translate.
- The bind page is per-language, and its `expired` state stays Hungarian: it is
the state an unknown token lands in, so rendering a real English customer's
token in English would make the LANGUAGE answer what the TEXT refuses to.
Two defects found inside the release:
- R-581: the newest report was picked by received_at, which has SECOND
granularity, so same-second reports tied and the winner was arbitrary. Ordered
by the autoincrement id now. GetCustomers() still has the shape - row open.
- R-582: the English copy-guard stems, ported word for word from Hungarian,
convicted 141 honest sentences. The English claim is a phrase with a modal.
R-555 closed: the language allowlist entry is out of wire_contract_gate.py.
hub_copy_gate.py follows the sentences into the bundle - without that it would
have scanned four files that no longer hold any customer text and reported
success. Three new decoys incl. an innocent control.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
Hub only. No controller change, no agent change, no wire change — nothing to bake.
demo-hp untouched: the operator is re-deploying it this evening.
R-323 — the five-word phrase is „Tulajdonosi jelmondat". It was „Visszaállító
jelszó": one word from the name retired last week, and false besides — it restores
nothing, it proves the account owns the box being bound. Five sites, all in the hub;
felhom-controller and felhom-agent carry the name nowhere, so no halt and no bake.
Both suggested names were rejected with reasons: „Fiókjelszó" would collide with the
dashboard login (a DIFFERENT real secret), and „Összekötési jelszó" would leave the
two factors on this page separated only by kód-versus-jelszó — the exact shape being
removed, since the other factor is the „Párosító kód". The chosen name differs on
both axes, stem and noun. Naming only; the acceptance pin drives the real handler.
R-324 — the hub's customer copy is under a guard for the first time. Retired names
banned across all 95 hub files; retrieval stems registered in four declared customer
surfaces. The selftest found a defect in its own instrument on the first run. One
shared vocabulary in scripts/, drift-checked into the controller gate rather than
copied (R-325 removes the scaffold).
R-321 — a machine we told to be quiet is no longer reported as dead, and it was two
doors, not one: because the state is RECORDED rather than deleted, the morning
deadline check can skip it too. A deleted state returns "", which is not "down" —
R-195's shape returning through a second door. The clock runs from the report the hub
can see, so re-enabling starts it there and emits no recovery for an outage that never
happened. Three red-proofs; the one that matters showed a genuinely dead machine
sitting at "disabled" when the suppression was made unconditional.
R-326 — "which claims are unproven" is answerable by a command now. The nine I have
been repeating was the count of claims the 9 August pass DOWNGRADED, not the count of
unproven ones. The real figures: 55 claims, 23 walked, 32 not — and only 6 of those 32
cite evidence. Its first run found a stale claim (R-327).
admin