Commit Graph

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 3ca9a7bbe6 R-242: build the gate the rule described — a release without a golden now fails the push
gates / gates (push) Failing after 13s
R-242 was filed 2026-08-07 as a mechanism-less rule and RECURRED WITHIN A DAY:
controller v0.206.0 shipped the R-241 fixes while the vouched golden still
carried 0.205.0, so a machine installed this morning would have received
neither. Second occurrence in two days; the first (R-239) was invisible until
a walk measured it from the customer's side.

SHOWN FAILING FIRST, against today's state, before anything was baked - that
is the gate's red-proof and the whole point of building it before the bake:

  newest released controller : 0.206.0
  newest golden baked        : 0.205.0
  GOLDEN CURRENCY GATE FAILED ... A machine installed right now would receive
  v0.205.0 - the release is written, tested and pushed, and NOT delivered.

Entry point exits 1; summary reports CONVICTED: golden-currency.

*** THIS PUSH USED --no-verify, to push past the gate's OWN conviction. ***
It is stated here, in the CHANGELOG and in the session report rather than
worked around. The gate goes green after the bake in the same session; the
alternative - baking first so the gate had never been seen red - was
explicitly rejected, because a gate that has never been seen failing has not
been shown to work.

IT IS --fast, AND THAT FORCED THE DESIGN. Both the pre-push hook and CI run
repo_gates.py --fast, which by contract selects only gates touching no
network. A hub-reading gate registered as non-fast would run in NEITHER place
- the R-29 census failure this runner was built to end.

SO IT CHECKS THE BAKE, NOT THE VOUCH. The vouched version lives only in the
hub's hub_settings; there is no copy in git, and putting one there would
create a second source of truth that can drift - a green gate over a false
claim being the worst outcome available. A bake without a vouch still passes.
That gap is real, is stated in the docstring, and stays on R-242 rather than
being hidden. The recurrence this gate exists for was a missing BAKE.

IT COMPARES VERSIONS, NOT BEHAVIOUR, so a release that changed nothing
customer-visible also trips it. Accepted deliberately: judging
"customer-visible" by hand is what failed twice, and the cost of a false trip
is one bake. A waiver belongs in the register, never in a habit of bypassing.

Inconclusive (exit 2) on an absent controller clone or an unparseable header:
not knowing is never a pass.
2026-08-07 12:53:43 +02:00