All 28 walked on scratch guest 9202 against the private drill catalog. 26 deployed, 6 proven,
5 inconclusive, 14 with no upstream edge, 1 failed honestly (outline 1.9.1->1.10.1, HELD with the
right sentence), 2 undeployable - one (plant-it) by design, refused by the lifecycle gate, proven
live for the first time. Each app also got the half the update night skipped: a restore from its own
copy with the seed read back again - 21 restored, 2 correctly REFUSED per 07 6.2.
R-630 RAISED TO P1 by measurement: a stack with NO probe container does not skip verifying - it
waits out the full health timeout and HOLDS, stopping an app whose three containers read healthy.
The controller's own words: "not healthy within 5m0s (last: no probe container)".
R-633 opened: a remove sent during a restore reports success and leaves a container restarting with
a live public route. The product already refuses that clash for update and for restore, naming the
blocker; remove has no such guard.
R-634 opened: an app can be running, healthy and serving while recorded as deployed=false, and is
then unremovable. Reproducible alone on sparkyfitness; concurrency-linked on two others.
R-631 and R-632 CLOSED. Register 321 -> 323. Seven interventions, six of them my own harness -
named, with what each cost. No product code. The live catalog's image: lines are byte-identical to
the start of the night.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
The drill is complete. Teardown done in three layers plus Gitea; the live catalog's every `image:`
line is proven identical to before.
WHAT WAS MEASURED. 21 edges across 19 apps, on scratch guest 9202 through the product's own
guarded Update, against a PRIVATE DRILL CATALOG so the live catalog carried no test reference at
any point: 14 proven, 3 failed, 4 inconclusive. Each app seeded and read back through its OWN
front door, with a negative control on every readback. Ten of the fourteen printed a verbatim
migration line. Up from the three apps this project had ever measured.
THE RESULT THAT MATTERS. R-618, P1: three of the 53 templates name a health probe the app does not
answer, and because the guarded update WAITS on that same probe, a SUCCESSFUL update ends by
STOPPING a working app. tandoor was measured serving HTTP 200 on the new version at four samples
across five minutes, docker's own healthcheck green, and was then stopped and the household sent
to a restore they did not need. zipline and wger are the same defect, both confirmed live. The
gate that catches all three is static and cheap: both health checks already sit in the same file.
WHAT THE NIGHT ANSWERED that was open. The UNATTENDED HOLD (312.9 s, pressed once, never again) —
which needed a purpose-built image store, because the rule that makes automatic updates safe is
the same rule that refuses the obvious way to break one. MariaDB across a major through the real
button, all four observables, first time. PostgreSQL across a major, refusing exactly as predicted,
with the conversion costed at ~9 s of engine work. There is NO single-flight: five updates ran at
once and all ended honest. And the two EARLY power-cut phases nobody had cut in.
TWELVE NEW ROWS (R-615..R-626), register 303 -> 315, and eight existing rows updated with what was
measured — including two CORRECTIONS: R-606 records the pre-flight refusals as reaching an English
household in English and they do not, and R-446/R-458 are both narrower than their rows state.
Two instrument fixes were needed before anything could be trusted: the unattended caller turned
every success into a timeout (R-623), and one of my own reproductions was wrong and is kept
labelled with what it actually measured.
Interventions: zero. No controller, agent or hub code written. The hub was never touched beyond
the floor the operator asked for.
Gates: repo_gates.py --fast, all 15 OK.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
admin