Part 2.1's determination is the first artifact: the scratch resolver was consciously OUT OF
SCOPE for R-356, not excluded on state-only grounds - established from R-356's own commit
08eb1a6, whose tests say 'the prepared scratch still resolves ... only the DESTINATION
moves'. So 07 section 6.3's rule applies and now has a FOURTH consumer, and the section
says so.
Live evidence: the collision rerun on demo-hp with the sampler positively controlled first
(12 locks=1 across a real check, 4 locks=0 quiet), showing unlock --remove-all 0 times where
the drill saw it twice; and the proof reaching verdict pass on demo-felhom - the box that
could not run it at all - recorded where last_proof_result had been ABSENT every night.
Capability map: the off-site proof row now records that the nightly firing IS proven (it ran
unattended at 05:30 on demo-hp) and that a driveless box can now be proved.
Register: six rows closed and compressed. OPEN 176 -> 170, CLOSED 152 -> 158.
R-410. golden_currency_gate.py matched EVIDENCE_RE against os.listdir and read nothing
inside, so `mkdir documentation/tests/golden-9.9.9-2026-01-01` turned it green with no bake
behind it - noticed while the 0.230.0 bake was running, when the evidence directory existed
before the bake finished. It now reads the GOLDEN_SHA256= line out of that directory's bake
log: a directory name is a label, that line is a fact only a completed publish produces.
Still offline, still --fast, one file read. Directories that look right and hold nothing are
printed by name rather than silently ignored, so a half-finished bake is visible.
test_golden_currency_gate.py ships the red-proof with a POSITIVE CONTROL, without which
"it fails on an empty directory" would be satisfied by a gate that fails on everything:
CASE 1 empty directory -> rejected and named
CASE 2 log with no GOLDEN_SHA256 -> rejected
CASE 3 real bake log -> counted, and its sha read <- the control
CASE 4 the tree is left byte-identical
Red-proofed: reverting the gate to name-matching fails cases 1, 2 and 3.
R-406. Citations MEASURED before choosing, which is what the row asked for: hub-uniqueness
had 3 references (all inside one audit doc), plaintext-break-glass had 5 (CONTEXT.md,
break-glass.md, hub/CHANGELOG.md, the capability map, a spike). The FEWER-cited one moved -
hub uniqueness is now R-415 - and all three citations were rewritten to "R-415 (was R-133)"
rather than silently swapped.
THIS IS THE OPPOSITE OF THE TASK'S LITERAL INSTRUCTION, which said renumber the second row on
the stated ground that "the older number has the longer reference trail". Measured, that
ground points the other way. The principle was followed and the letter was not, and the row
says so rather than leaving an unexplained diff.
R-416 filed: the within-register duplicate rule was deliberately NOT added in the same commit
that removed its only subject - a guard whose red-proof can only be a planted fixture is not
this project's standard. Now that the register is clean it can ship with the next real
duplicate as its first subject.
admin