Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 1c47e3b6fd golden 0.203.0 baked + published; runbook acceptance markers fixed (R-233)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
Bake evidence: documentation/tests/golden-0.203.0-2026-08-06/ (bake.log + README).
sha256 3039c6ffa7a5a8b2d959daddb2895c58b44de70f8d4f4a7e12ad4b1c0d61dc88, verified
by an independent round-trip download and by reading /etc/felhom-controller-image
out of the published archive itself. NOT vouched — the hub still serves 0.201.0.

R-233: RUNBOOK-manual-build.md §4.1 named three pass markers, two of which the
script cannot print (`overlay2 OK` does not exist; `mp1` stopped existing in
build-golden.sh v3.0.0 under R-165), and a 404 pre-gate URL with the wrong
filename, which would 404 for the wrong reason and pass even when the version
already existed. A grep for an impossible string reads 0 forever and 0 is
indistinguishable from failure. Markers re-captured from the real log; token
handling moved off the command line into an in-VM runner script; a positive
control is now required on the token-leak grep; the vouch step rewritten as the
three-field change it is (golden_version + agent_version + min_agent).
2026-08-06 13:23:22 +02:00
admin b4edc087fa Tester gate: golden re-baked to 0.188.0, fresh-install proof PASSED — a fresh box is safe to hand to a tester
§7.2 answer: YES. A real day-0 from the existing v1.25.0 ISO reached a claimable,
app-serving box in ~10 minutes unattended, and an app's data came back from the
drive with the guest's app.yaml gone — proven readable by the application over
its own TCP path, with a discriminator (PRE-BACKUP row = 1, POST-BACKUP row = 0).

Part 0: NO ISO rebuild needed, verified against the ISO on disk rather than from
source. It bakes only felhom-bootstrap.sh, its unit and the secret-free pairing
env (full-base64 match, 1 hit each) and 0 hits for any installer, controller or
golden marker. The installer is fetched at run time; the live URL is byte-identical
to repo HEAD (v1.22.0, six days newer than the ISO) and the fresh box ran it.

Part 1: baked 0.188.0 rather than the brief's 0.187.0 — 0.187.0 lacks D5, which
is the very claim Part 2 step 6 tests. Published (404 pre-gate with a 200 control;
anonymous download, 649310288 bytes, sha match), vouched, and consumed by a real
box. R-120's gate exercised BOTH ways: 0.185.1 refused with no write, 0.188.0
allowed — evaluated, not silently skipped.

Part 3: RUNBOOK-manual-build.md cited a "RECORDED" qemu line that is itself
labelled reconstructed and whose source says it was never saved. The real
invocation is now captured from this bake as §4.0, with the bake/publish/teardown
steps; the old entry is marked SUPERSEDED.

Teardown all three layers, hub disposition stated: VM destroyed, scratch storage
removed with space returned exactly, customer sess-g DELETED via full cascade.
sess-f deliberately left (R-131) with its command recorded.

Filed, none fixed: R-128 (false ISO_VERSION invariant comment), R-129 (demo-hp's
"no baked SSH key" is stale — key auth works), R-130 (HARD_MIN_LVM_GIB warns and
proceeds), R-131 (fourth orphaned scratch customer), R-132 (curl's %{redirect_url}
printed the hub operator password into a transcript — HUB_PW needs rotating).
2026-07-31 08:27:36 +02:00
admin 29b2b8ad7c docs: DooPlex-local commands in PROMPT-TEMPLATE and the manual-build runbook 2026-07-19 12:27:44 +02:00
admin 22d04967b4 docs: relocate felhom build root to /mnt/5_hdd/felhom.eu (moved off DooPlex SSD 2026-07-18) 2026-07-18 09:51:29 +02:00
admin 10a7bf09f7 build runbook 2026-07-11 21:43:09 +02:00