Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 9167cf53af hub v0.118.0: the household's e-mails follow the household's language (R-558 Part A)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
The hub has written every customer e-mail in Hungarian whatever the box was set
to. The box has published its language since controller v0.247.0; nothing read
it. Now it does.

Nothing an operator reads changes. The Hungarian mails are byte-identical, and
that is a diff rather than a reading: 56 goldens per language captured from
v0.117.0 BEFORE any string moved, and all 56 Hungarian ones pass unchanged after
every sentence was routed through the new bundle.

- internal/i18n: flat bundle, 79 keys, hu authoritative + hu fallback, ceiling 0.
- customerMessages/severityLabels are DERIVED from the bundle, so a sentence is
  written in one place and all 40+ tests that read those maps still work.
- Language order: last reported -> created-with -> hu. reports.language defaults
  to EMPTY, never hu: "never told us" is not "chose Hungarian".
- message_customer on POST /api/v1/event, additive and optional forever, for the
  sentences the box composes and the hub cannot translate.
- The bind page is per-language, and its `expired` state stays Hungarian: it is
  the state an unknown token lands in, so rendering a real English customer's
  token in English would make the LANGUAGE answer what the TEXT refuses to.

Two defects found inside the release:
- R-581: the newest report was picked by received_at, which has SECOND
  granularity, so same-second reports tied and the winner was arbitrary. Ordered
  by the autoincrement id now. GetCustomers() still has the shape - row open.
- R-582: the English copy-guard stems, ported word for word from Hungarian,
  convicted 141 honest sentences. The English claim is a phrase with a modal.

R-555 closed: the language allowlist entry is out of wire_contract_gate.py.
hub_copy_gate.py follows the sentences into the bundle - without that it would
have scanned four files that no longer hold any customer text and reported
success. Three new decoys incl. an innocent control.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
2026-09-18 16:20:11 +02:00
admin 2d88776227 R-428: the gate that hunts label-matching was matching a label (and CI proved it)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 20s
decoy_coverage_gate.py identified a repository by os.path.basename(root), looked up in a RUNNERS
map. Gitea's act-runner checks the repo out into a directory called `hostexecutor`, so on its FIRST
CI run the gate reported "unknown repo 'hostexecutor'" and went INCONCLUSIVE - correctly refusing to
pass, and blind.

A NAME standing in for a FACT, in the first ten lines of the main loop of the gate written that same
morning to catch exactly that, by a session with the four shapes on screen. That is the point of
R-428 and why it is recorded rather than quietly patched: this class is not carelessness.

FIXED: the repo is now identified by which registered runner FILE exists under the root. Verified
under a renamed directory - 14 gates found where the name-based version found none.

CI also now fetches app-catalog-felhom.eu. The meta-gate walks all four runners, and a gate that
cannot see part of its subject must not report a pass on it - the same reasoning, and the same fix,
as the two sibling fetches already in the workflow.

NOTE ON THE OTHER THREE RED RUNS, all mine and all ordering: felhom-agent and felhom-controller cite
R-421, and I pushed them BEFORE felhom.eu carried that row, so instructions_gate correctly convicted
"cites R-421, which appears in neither register". The register lives in felhom.eu; any repo citing a
new row must be pushed after it. Re-run below.
2026-09-01 12:45:42 +02:00
admin 574f5df107 the decoy sweep: 29 gates read, 16 fooled, 10 fixed - and a gate that refuses the next one (R-421)
gates / gates (push) Failing after 17s
THE CLASS, now a row: an instrument that matches a LABEL rather than the fact it names. Five
instances - R-410, R-400, R-378, R-419, R-94 - and EVERY ONE was found by accident, by someone
looking at something else. The gates enforce every other rule in this project, including the rule
that findings must be written down rather than left in prose. Nothing had ever checked the gates.

METHOD, and it is the transferable part: for each gate, construct the label WITHOUT the fact - a
directory with the right name and no bake log, a handler case that exists only in a comment, a note
whose prose mentions the marker it lacks - run the gate, record what it says. No verdict was reached
by reading. Reading is how all five hid.

RESULT: 29 distinct scripts (35 registrations; three are shared across three runners). 19 sound, 4
holes left OPEN with rows, 6 that no plausible decoy could be built for and are named UNTESTED rather
than called sound. A gate nobody tried to fool is UNKNOWN.

SCOPE IS A FACT TOO - the largest single cause, and mundane. Eight gates decided what to look at with
os.listdir, one level. Every one was green AND CORRECT today, and every one would have gone blind the
moment anyone added a subdirectory. mojibake and docker-v already used os.walk, caught the identical
planted file, and are the control that proves the cause was the listing and not the decoy.

IN THIS REPO: hub-confirm and manifest-bearer now walk. observations_gate (R-419, CLOSED) requires a
marker at a line start or after a sentence boundary and strips inline code spans - a note SAYING it
carries no marker no longer satisfies the marker test. closed-register now CONVICTS on a row it
cannot parse instead of warning: FOUR rows were in that state, TWO of them written by the session
that closed them the day before, and every one was exempt from the only check that reads that file.
The rows were repaired first and the conviction added second - registering a failing gate refuses
every push.

THE META-GATE: decoy_coverage_gate.py refuses a gate registered without a decoy or a named exemption.
It convicted ITSELF the moment it was registered, which is how it came to have one. Coverage is a
DECLARATION the gate AST-parses, never a grep - searching a test file for a gate's name would be the
very shape this sweep exists to find. The 20 uncovered gates are listed by name (R-426).

NOT FIXED, each with a row and a decoy asserting TODAY's behaviour so the fix must be deliberate:
R-422 reuse-refs (only 7 extensions; a rotted .md citation is invisible), R-423 site (PAGES is a
hardcoded list of 7), R-424 one-register (a defect parked as `idea`), R-425 offbox-rename (fixed
FILES list). R-427: closed_register_gate checks ONE direction - twelve open rows carry a closed
verdict and were NOT moved, because telling finished from partly-finished is a judgement and R-378
is the record of a machine getting it wrong.

FIVE DECOYS WITHDRAWN AS ILLEGITIMATE, mine, named in the audit. A decoy nobody would write proves
nothing, and manufacturing a finding to fill a row is worse than an honest NO.

No product code. No version bump. No image. No golden owed. All four runners green.
Register: OPEN 172 -> 178, CLOSED 160 -> 161.
2026-09-01 12:39:45 +02:00