Night 2026-10-28 (part): R-1256 H5 proven live on 9202 (a busy volume is not written into; the live data put back, no hold); claim fail.customer-self-restore re-walked (route proven, the person still open); rows R-1254/R-1255/R-528/R-1338 state; Plex evidence; two dead bench tokens redacted from evidence
<divstyle="color:#8fa0b8;font-size:12.5px;margin:7px 0 4px;max-width:1100px;line-height:1.5">What we built, what happens when things go wrong, and what is still missing. <bstyle="color:#cbd7e8">Generated from <code>where-felhom-stands.yaml</code></b>, which cites the capability map, register row or evidence document behind every claim — and which is checked by <code>scripts/check_stands.py</code>.</div>
<divstyle="color:#6b7a91;font-size:11.5px;margin-bottom:16px">Verified 2026-08-22 against felhom-agent <code>40d857b527</code>, felhom-controller <code>2da259af38</code>, hub <code>877fcd2a38</code>. <bstyle="color:#fbbf24">17 claim(s) carry a recorded status move</b> (8 re-checked in this pass) — each is marked on the page.</div>
<divstyle="color:#6b7a91;font-size:11.5px;margin-bottom:16px">Verified 2026-08-22 against felhom-agent <code>40d857b527</code>, felhom-controller <code>2da259af38</code>, hub <code>877fcd2a38</code>. <bstyle="color:#fbbf24">17 claim(s) carry a recorded status move</b> (7 re-checked in this pass) — each is marked on the page.</div>
<divstyle="display:flex;gap:22px;flex-wrap:wrap;background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:11px 14px;margin-bottom:18px"><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#34d399;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:11.5px"><b>Walked</b><spanstyle="color:#7c8aa3">(23)</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#6b7a91;font-size:10.5px">done end to end on real hardware, evidence on file</span></span></div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#60a5fa;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:11.5px"><b>Built</b><spanstyle="color:#7c8aa3">(13)</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#6b7a91;font-size:10.5px">shipped and tested, the real path never walked</span></span></div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#fbbf24;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:11.5px"><b>Partial</b><spanstyle="color:#7c8aa3">(15)</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#6b7a91;font-size:10.5px">some walked, some not — the note says which</span></span></div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#64748b;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:11.5px"><b>Missing</b><spanstyle="color:#7c8aa3">(4)</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#6b7a91;font-size:10.5px">does not exist</span></span></div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start"><spanstyle="font-size:11.5px"><bstyle="color:#7dd3fc">needs-hardware</b><spanstyle="display:block;color:#6b7a91;font-size:10.5px">only a running box could settle it</span></span></div></div>
<divstyle="color:#6b7a91;font-size:11.5px;margin-bottom:10px">Seven stages, left to right, as they happen to a person.</div>
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
<divstyle="background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 13px"><divstyle="font-size:14px;font-weight:500;padding-bottom:9px;margin-bottom:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #1f2c44">A fresh install picks up an old image</div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:9px"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#fbbf24;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">A fresh install picks up an old image<spanstyle="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">Narrowed 2026-08-09: the resume path fetched the vouched golden; a fresh install still takes the newest LOCAL archive with no manifest comparison.</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10px;margin-top:3px;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace">register R-274</span></span></div></div>
<divstyle="background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 13px"><divstyle="font-size:14px;font-weight:500;padding-bottom:9px;margin-bottom:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #1f2c44">The off-site provider account is deleted</div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:9px"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#fbbf24;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">The off-site provider account is deleted<spanstyle="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">The credential that holds the customer's documents can still delete.</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10px;margin-top:3px;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace">register R-95</span></span></div></div>
<divstyle="background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 13px"><divstyle="font-size:14px;font-weight:500;padding-bottom:9px;margin-bottom:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #1f2c44">The machine is switched off for an afternoon</div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:9px"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#64748b;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">The machine is switched off for an afternoon — no notion of expected downtime<spanstyle="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">Confirmed 2026-08-09: eight operator mails for deliberate, attended work.</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10px;margin-top:3px;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace">register R-285</span></span></div></div>
<divstyle="background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 13px"><divstyle="font-size:14px;font-weight:500;padding-bottom:9px;margin-bottom:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #1f2c44">A customer restores their own data with no help</div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:9px"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#fbbf24;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">A customer restores their own data with no help<spanstyle="display:inline-block;margin-left:6px;padding:1px 5px;border-radius:3px;background:#1b2740;color:#a78bfa;font-size:10px;white-space:nowrap">contested</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">CONTESTED-RESOLVED: the map's MISSING is about a NON-OPERATOR performing it; the walks prove the route, not the person. Neither record was wrong. SINCE 2026-08-21 there is a second, harder blocker and it is not about the person at all: for the 40 of 53 apps that declare no data drive the off-site restore REFUSES before it starts, telling the customer a running app 'nincs telepítve' and to reinstall it to the same place — which those apps give them no way to choose (R-356). Those are exactly the apps whose whole dataset is a named volume. Until that is fixed, most customers cannot self-restore off-site even in principle.</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10px;margin-top:3px;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace">capability-map A customer (not the operator) performs a restore via UI alone · register R-201 · register R-356 · evidence audits/REPORT-DRILL-backup-truth-2026-08-21.md</span></span></div></div>
<divstyle="background:#121b2c;border:1px solid #1f2c44;border-radius:6px;padding:14px 13px"><divstyle="font-size:14px;font-weight:500;padding-bottom:9px;margin-bottom:10px;border-bottom:1px solid #1f2c44">A customer restores their own data with no help</div><divstyle="display:flex;gap:8px;align-items:flex-start;margin-bottom:9px"><spanstyle="width:8px;height:8px;border-radius:50%;background:#fbbf24;flex:0 0 8px;margin-top:5px"></span><spanstyle="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">A customer restores their own data with no help<spanstyle="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">Walked 2026-10-29 night on scratch 9202 through the household's restore button (the page's own POST): vikunja from the 02:30 local point in 79 s — the project made before the point came back, the one made after it is gone, the app runs, no hold; a restore that meets a busy volume puts the live data back (R-1256 H5). The route needs no help. Still open: no person who is not the operator has done it (claim.never-by-non-operator). The old off-site blocker (R-356) shipped in controller v0.219.0.</span><spanstyle="display:block;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10px;margin-top:3px;font-family:ui-monospace,SFMono-Regular,Menlo,monospace">capability-map A customer (not the operator) performs a restore via UI alone · register R-201 · register R-356 · evidence audits/REPORT-DRILL-backup-truth-2026-08-21.md · evidence audits/night-2026-10-28/part5-claims/selfrestore-walk.log</span></span></div></div>
</div>
<divstyle="margin-top:26px;padding-top:12px;border-top:1px solid #1f2c44;color:#4b5b76;font-size:10.5px;line-height:1.6">Generated by <code>scripts/render_stands.py</code> from <code>where-felhom-stands.yaml</code>. Do not hand-edit this file — edit the data and regenerate. The 2026-08-09 React bundle is kept as <code>where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html</code> and is not maintained.</div>
title:"A customer restores their own data with no help"
status:partial
note:"CONTESTED-RESOLVED: the map's MISSING is about a NON-OPERATOR performing it; the walks prove the route, not the person. Neither record was wrong. SINCE 2026-08-21 there is a second, harder blocker and it is not about the person at all: for the 40 of 53 apps that declare no data drive the off-site restore REFUSES before it starts, telling the customer a running app 'nincs telepítve' and to reinstall it to the same place — which those apps give them no way to choose (R-356). Those are exactly the apps whose whole dataset is a named volume. Until that is fixed, most customers cannot self-restore off-site even in principle."
note:"Walked 2026-10-29 night on scratch 9202 through the household's restore button (the page's own POST): vikunja from the 02:30 local point in 79 s — the project made before the point came back, the one made after it is gone, the app runs, no hold; a restore that meets a busy volume puts the live data back (R-1256 H5). The route needs no help. Still open: no person who is not the operator has done it (claim.never-by-non-operator). The old off-site blocker (R-356) shipped in controller v0.219.0."
sources:
- capability-map:"A customer (not the operator) performs a restore via UI alone"
2026/10/29 01:35:07 offbox_restore_undo.go:169: [INFO] [offbox] vikunja: the live volumes are copied before the restore (2 copied, 0 new from the snapshot) in 12.296s — /mnt/sys_drive/felhom-data/backups/restore-undo/vikunja/20261029T013454Z (R-893)
2026/10/29 01:35:07 restore_crash_putback.go:89: [INFO] [backup] vikunja: the restore copy is recorded — a power cut from here on puts the app back on start (R-1195)
00:19:26 gate: plex is gated — passed as the household (cookie set)
00:20:06 plex: POST /library/sections through the front door http=401
00:20:06 plex: the front door was not taken as local (<html><head><title>Unauthorized</title></head><body><h1>401 Unauthorized</h1></body></html>) — asking from Plex's own container
00:20:09 plex: POST /library/sections from its own container http=201
02:32:55 rm -f with the blocker (premise): Error response from daemon: remove vikunja_vikunja_data: volume is in use - [072afe32e15994b46c232d1850bd6bf04fe5edb6bf27ffd18238f35911124402, 227a359b77ee3d016002043a0a1fa3bb54d990bf50954535d2dd65337bb8336c]
rc=1
02:33:00 restoring from the newest point {'time': '2026-10-29T01:30:30Z', 'short_id': 'helyi', 'tier': 1, 'drive_label': 'Belső SSD (rendszer)'}
02:33:00 [R] restoring vikunja from snapshot 'helyi' (of 1 offered)
02:33:00 [R] POST /backup/restore -> HTTP/2 302 ['location: /backups/restore?flash=flash.restore.started']
02:33:00 + 0.0s restore (True, None, None)
02:33:59 + 59.0s restore (False, None, None)
02:33:59 [R] after restore: state=running hold=None phase=None
02:34:06 watcher: 2026/10/29 01:33:31 restore.go:231: [ERROR] [backup] Failed to remove volume vikunja_vikunja_data before the restore: Error response from daemon: remove vikunja_vikunja_data: volume is in use - [227a359b77ee3d016002043a0a1fa3bb54d990bf50954535d2dd65337bb8336c] — exit status 1 (not written into)
01:33:33.292357758
r1256-blocker
01:33:41.548622640
02:34:09 controller log: 2026/10/29 01:33:31 restore_crash_putback.go:89: [INFO] [backup] vikunja: the restore copy is recorded — a power cut from here on puts the app back on start (R-1195)
2026/10/29 01:33:31 restore.go:231: [ERROR] [backup] Failed to remove volume vikunja_vikunja_data before the restore: Error response from daemon: remove vikunja_vikunja_data: volume is in use - [227a359b77ee3d016002043a0a1fa3bb54d990bf50954535d2dd65337bb8336c] — exit status 1 (not written into)
2026/10/29 01:33:46 restore_unit.go:554: [ERROR] [backup] volume restore for vikunja: failed to restore 1 volume(s): [vikunja_vikunja_data] — NOT replaying the database copy; putting the live data back
2026/10/29 01:33:58 offbox_restore_undo.go:253: [WARN] [offbox] vikunja: the restore failed (failed to restore 1 volume(s): [vikunja_vikunja_data]) — the live volumes and definition are put back; starting the app (R-893)
2026/10/29 01:33:58 manager.go:1354: [DEBUG] [stacks] StartStack vikunja: current state=stopped deployed=true
2026/10/29 01:33:58 handlers.go:1907: [ERROR] [web] Restore failed (async): stack=vikunja: a(z) vikunja visszaállítása sikertelen. Nem változott semmi: az alkalmazás adatai visszakerültek a visszaállítás előtti állapotba, és az alkalmazás újra fut
2026/10/29 01:33:59 auth.go:144: [DEBUG] [web] auth: valid session for GET /api/stacks/vikunja
2026/10/29 01:33:59 router.go:78: [DEBUG] [api] GET /api/stacks/vikunja (path=/stacks/vikunja)
2026/10/29 01:33:59 auth.go:144: [DEBUG] [web] auth: valid session for GET /api/stacks/vikunja
2026/10/29 01:33:59 router.go:78: [DEBUG] [api] GET /api/stacks/vikunja (path=/stacks/vikunja)
2026/10/29 01:34:01 manager.go:1701: [DEBUG] Running: docker compose ps -a --format table {{.Name}} {{.Image}} {{.State}} {{.Status}} (in /opt/docker/stacks/vikunja)
| **R-1331** | Apps & catalog | P3 | **Paperless-ngx 2.20.15 carries Python Brotli 1.1.0 (CVE-2026-111497, fixed 1.1.1/1.2.1)** — its web side only COMPRESSES (whitenoise, compression_middleware); the DECODERS are urllib3's and httpx's, for replies to requests Paperless itself makes (its own outbound calls), never for what a visitor sends. Read in the running container on demo-hp 9201, 2026-10-27. 2026-10-28: the newest release 3.3.4 still carries Brotli 1.2.0 and is a new main version — no fixed release yet (`audits/runtime-fixes-2026-10-28/TABLE.md`). | OPEN — no step tonight (decided by CC unattended — operator may reverse): the bad path needs a hostile server Paperless calls | — | take the first Paperless release with Brotli ≥ 1.2.1 as a normal step | CC |
| **R-1336** | Apps & catalog | P3 | **ActualBudget has no release with the HTTP2Shell fix (CVE-2026-111497): 26.9.0 carries Node.js 24.20.0 and the newest 26.10.0 still Node.js 24.21.0 (fixed: 24.22.1), read from both images.**`node app.js` serves the app; the setup gate covers it until the first account exists, then its own password. No box runs it. `audits/runtime-fixes-2026-10-28/TABLE.md` | OPEN — filed 2026-10-28 (runtime fixes) | upstream: an image with Node ≥ 24.22.1 | the watch lists it nightly (R-1327); take that release as a lane step | CC |
| **R-1337** | Apps & catalog | P3 | **Calibre-Web (v4.0.8, the newest) loads a bad Brotli decoder: its `cps.py` maps Python Brotli 1.2.0 (fixed 1.2.1), Pillow's libbrotlidec 1.2.0 and Debian's libbrotlidec 1.1.0** — read from the process's maps on demo-hp 9201 (`audits/runtime-fixes-2026-10-28/calibre-web-brotli.txt`). Exposure: the Python decoder is urllib3's, for replies to the app's own outbound calls (book metadata), not for what a visitor sends — the Paperless shape (R-1331). No fixed release exists. `audits/runtime-fixes-2026-10-28/TABLE.md` | OPEN — filed 2026-10-28 (runtime fixes) | upstream: an image with Brotli ≥ 1.2.1 | take that release as a lane step; Debian's libbrotli1 fixed version is not known (R-1327's table has no Debian line) | CC |
| **R-1338** | Apps & catalog | P3 | **Wanderer's Meilisearch fills whatever memory limit it gets: 92–100 % anon of 256 MB (bench and 9202), still 88.8 % of 384 MB on the bench (2026-10-28)** — it sizes its indexing memory from the memory it sees (its default: 2/3 of the available RAM), so a higher limit alone does not end the `memory_tight` mark of Wanderer's step. No kill in any run. `audits/dockerhub-bigsteps-2026-10-28/wanderer/` | OPEN — **2026-10-28 evening: `MEILI_MAX_INDEXING_MEMORY` = 128 MiB (a third of 384 MB) measured, NOT pushed** (`audits/gitea-wanderer-2026-10-28/wanderer-meili/`): on the bench, under the harness's load, the search container peaked at 17.7 % (84 MB; 88.8 % without the cap, same load); on 9202 the cap was in the container (read back) and it still held 95.7 % anon (363 MB steady over 6 min, no kill). The box result decides: not shown to help, so not pushed. Also: the catalog's ladder has no entry type for a re-measure of a definition change at the SAME digests (`ladder.py`: a re-test whose digest equals its digest_from tests nothing new), so the v0.21.2 entry's `memory_tight` mark cannot be replaced without an image move. | — | find why the box and the bench differ (9202 has 512 MB swap, the bench none; Meilisearch's other memory settings); then decide the cap — the mark changes with the next Wanderer image move | CC |
| **R-1338** | Apps & catalog | P3 | **Wanderer's Meilisearch fills whatever memory limit it gets: 92–100 % anon of 256 MB (bench and 9202), still 88.8 % of 384 MB on the bench (2026-10-28)** — it sizes its indexing memory from the memory it sees (its default: 2/3 of the available RAM), so a higher limit alone does not end the `memory_tight` mark of Wanderer's step. No kill in any run. `audits/dockerhub-bigsteps-2026-10-28/wanderer/` | OPEN — **2026-10-28 night: MEASURED — it is the measurement, not Wanderer, and the cap is not needed** (`audits/night-2026-10-28/r1338-meili/`; `09` §3 decision 22 refined). Meilisearch frees with MADV_FREE: the given-back pages stay in `anon` but sit on the inactive FILE list (`file` ~1 MB, `inactive_file` ~290 MB) and the kernel takes them first — 83–96 % `anon` on the bench (no swap) AND on 9202, with and without the cap, 0 kills; it uses ~100 MB. The evening's 17.7 % was the container after the swap, not the cap. **Fixed in the tools:** the mark reads the live anon (catalog `scripts/memfigure.py`, the larger of two estimates, errs high; `upgrade-test.py`, `box_walk.py` soak; `test_memory_live.py` red-proved). Re-run: bench Wanderer v0.20.0 → v0.21.2 `proven`, **no marks** (search 83.3 % anon, 27.7 % live); 9202 95.2 % anon, 25.1 % live. **Prepared, NOT pushed** (the night's catalog fence): the tool change + Wanderer's entry without `memory_tight` (`audits/night-2026-10-28/catalog-morning/`; the catalog gates passed in a scratch clone). **Earlier, 2026-10-28 evening: `MEILI_MAX_INDEXING_MEMORY` = 128 MiB (a third of 384 MB) measured, NOT pushed** (`audits/gitea-wanderer-2026-10-28/wanderer-meili/`): on the bench, under the harness's load, the search container peaked at 17.7 % (84 MB; 88.8 % without the cap, same load); on 9202 the cap was in the container (read back) and it still held 95.7 % anon (363 MB steady over 6 min, no kill). The box result decides: not shown to help, so not pushed. Also: the catalog's ladder has no entry type for a re-measure of a definition change at the SAME digests (`ladder.py`: a re-test whose digest equals its digest_from tests nothing new), so the v0.21.2 entry's `memory_tight` mark cannot be replaced without an image move. | the catalog push (the morning list) | push the prepared catalog change (the live figure + Wanderer's entry re-measured, `memory_tight` off — an existing entry's memory fields edited at the SAME digests, which the gates accept); then close | CC |
## App updates — 10 rows (P2 1, P3 9)
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-232** | Backup & restore | P2 | **DooPlex's backup makes every copy inside the same box — and nothing tells anyone when it fails.** Surveyed read-only 2026-08-06 (`audits/RECON-dooplex-backup-2026-08-06.md`). **What works:** five sets, 14/14 successful runs in 14 days; a file was restored from the `data` repo and matched the live original **byte for byte**; every set except two is cross-disk; k3s is integrity-checked on every run. **What the matrix exposes, ranked:** (a) **`notify_failure` is a no-op** — `NOTIFY_ON_FAILURE=true` but `NOTIFY_WEBHOOK_URL` is commented out, so a failed backup notifies **nobody**; the project already has a working Resend path that CI uses. Cheapest item, and it makes every other failure visible. (b) **Nothing leaves the box** — no rclone, no remote repo, no off-site target anywhere; Longhorn's target is `nfs://192.168.0.180:` pointing at DooPlex itself, and the only outbound-looking cron pulls *inbound* from Hetzner for a different project. The machine that runs the hub managing the customers' off-site chain has no off-site copy of its own. (c) **The backup tree is a single writable path** and the restic repos are not append-only — one bad script or ransomware destroys every copy at once. (d) **Two same-disk sets**: `.claude-memory` and the PostgreSQL dumps, whose source directory sits *inside* the backup tree. (e) **Longhorn `retain=1`** — one generation per volume, so a corruption noticed a day late has no earlier copy. (f) **`/opt/backup/docs/BACKUP-RESTORE.md` does not exist** though the systemd unit advertises it. (g) **`secrets/restic-repo` has never held a snapshot** — `backup-secrets.sh` contains no `restic` call; the secrets are GPG files on `sda1` only. (h) **No restore has ever been run** beyond today's single-file probe — the matrix's "ever demonstrated?" column is otherwise entirely empty. **Not a finding:** the restic passphrase. The on-box copy is on `sdb1`, a different disk from the backups, and the **operator holds an offline copy out of band** — so a disk loss is recoverable. The narrow residual is that it is operator-held rather than system-held, unlike the customer case's hub-vaulted escrow, so it should be confirmed current and findable by someone else. **Nothing was changed by the recon.** | NARROWED — **2026-10-23 (operator yes D33, D34):** the hub DB now leaves every 6 hours (hub 0.167.0 + `scripts/hub-db-backup/`, alarm at 13 h; restored back byte-identical) and the released images and agent packages leave nightly (`scripts/release-copy/`, R-1227 closed). (c)–(g) unchanged. **NARROWED 2026-10-08 — owner Viktor.** (a) DONE with the operator's yes in chat: `notify_failure` now mails admin@felhom.eu through Resend; proven by one test mail that reached the inbox (`audits/day-2026-10-08/r232/`; no backup was started). (b) partly: the hub database leaves DooPlex nightly to ep0 (R-173); everything else stays on the box. (c)–(h) unchanged. **2026-10-09 (operator yes in chat): (b) and (h) DONE for Gitea and the secrets.** Nightly 00:20 `felhom-dooplex-offsite` pushes Gitea (614 MB of repositories, the `gitea` database dump taken first, `app.ini`) and the nightly GPG secrets export, encrypted with a NEW key, to ep0 `operator` (`host/dooplex-gitea`) on the hub-DB write-only token — no change on ep0; first push 57 s; restore test weekly (manifest, `git fsck` every repo, `pg_restore --list`), run once: 27 805 files, 10 repos OK; `DooplexGiteaOffsiteStale`/`DooplexGiteaRestoreTestStale` in force (`absent()` included, promtool + 2 red-proofs); every backup unit now mails on failure (`OnFailure=`, dry run reached the inbox). **First real Gitea restore:** into a throwaway on the bench, 10/10 repos, product `main` = live, a file byte for byte, a login (`runbooks/gitea-restore.md`). The hub came back too (R-173, closed). **The registry is left out on purpose:** its images rebuild from the code. **Correction to the recon §7:** the API mirror holds ONE repo (`homelab-manifests`), not all — Gitea had a single copy, on DooPlex. `audits/dooplex-survival-2026-10-09/`**LEFT:** (c) append-only for the on-box tree, (d)–(g) as written; the paper copy of the new key (operator). **READY** for the rest **2026-10-24 (attended): `DooplexGiteaOffsiteStale` fired from 00:57Z — not this path's fault.** The 00:20 push refused, as designed, a 12 h old Gitea dump: the PostgreSQL dump CronJob had failed every run since 2026-10-23 16:00Z (`28P01`) because the window reboot restarted the database and CNPG put the bootstrap secret's password in force (homelab `531023d`, operator's pick: the CronJob only). Fixed; dump, push and restore test run by hand (26 456 files, 12 repos `git fsck`, `gitea.dump` 1114 entries); cleared 10:51Z (`audits/dooplex-alarms-2026-10-24/`). Backup alarms now arrive as ONE mail every 4 h (homelab `22d7697`). **2026-10-23 night — survey again, read only (`audits/dooplex-survival-2026-10-22/PLAN.md`):** both nightly off-site jobs Line truncated
| **R-895** | Backup & restore | P2 | **The hub's clean-up-window check trusts the snapshot counts the box sends, so a broken-into box (or past-dated fakes added through the add-only key) can shrink the real off-site history without an alarm.** READ 2026-10-06 night in source (R-822's design): the before/after comparison uses counts the box itself reports (`hub/internal/offsitekeys/service.go:284`, `:343`); new fakes keep the count level. Decision 68 already accepts a box-trusted count. | **NARROWED 2026-10-18 — slice 2 built, not deployed** (hub v0.158.0): the 07:10 audit compares the `snapshots/` listing with yesterday's by name — files gone that no clean-up window explains → `offsite_snapshots_vanished` (error), files no reported box run explains → `offsite_snapshots_unexplained` (warning); operator-only, hub-origin (not in `allowedEventTypes`). First listing = baseline; a move-aside or RESET drops it; vanishing judged on a pinned tier only; files younger than 1 h judged the next day. Red-proofed twice (`snapshot_watch_test.go`). **Not built:** the window's before/after on the hub's own count (design §3.1) and refusing a window while unexplained files exist (§3.2). Unmeasured: the provider shell's `ls -l` time zone (± 3 h slack until then). **Deployed 2026-10-18 12:23 (hub v0.158.0).** The first listing (tomorrow 07:10) is a baseline; the first verdict is 2026-10-20 07:10. **Known limit (independent review 2026-10-18, F2):**`_unexplained` is explained by the box's OWN reported `offsite.last_run`, so whoever holds a box's key can silence it; `_vanished` is judged on the hub's own listing and is not affected. **2026-10-20 03:5x UTC: due date moved 10-20 → 10-21** — the first verdict lands at 07:10 hub time (05:10 UTC), after the night session that reached it ended; that brief did not include this read. Nothing is lost: the hub keeps its listing; read the 2026-10-20 07:10 lines on 10-21 (or later on 10-20). **FIRST VERDICT READ 2026-10-21 (rehearsal session, read-only):** the 07:10 CEST run judged three tiers against yesterday — demo-felhom 5, demo-hp 14, tester-1 4 new snapshot files, „each inside a reported box run"; nothing vanished, nothing unexplained; Tester4 stored its first baseline (44 files); Tester-2's own listing failed (no `snapshots/` dir — the box has never pushed). No `offsite_snapshots_vanished` / `_unexplained` mail in the operator mailbox (second channel). Evidence `audits/due-checks-2026-10-21/R-895-hub-0710.txt`. The positive alarm path is still proven only by the unit red-proofs. | the operator's yes to deploy hub v0.158.0 | Deploy; read the first 07:10 lines (newest upload vs the box's last run = the time-zone calibration), shrink the slack; then decide §3.1/§3.2 | CC |
| **R-923** | Backup & restore | P2 | **The password manager (Vaultwarden) runs on DooPlex and holds the keys that open DooPlex's own off-site copies — a loss of DooPlex loses the keys with the copies.** Operator finding, 2026-10-09 11:19: "the password manager also runs on DooPlex (Vaultwarden), so I probably need to back up its DB somewhere too." Measured: `vaultwarden-system/vaultwarden` (1.37.3), PVC `vaultwarden-data` 7.4 MB (`db.sqlite3` + WAL, `rsa_key.pem`, no attachments); its only backups were Longhorn on DooPlex. **A key in a password manager that runs on DooPlex is not off DooPlex** — R-173's "both keys are off DooPlex" (2026-10-05) and the hub-DB runbook Step 0 were wrong in that sense. Also seen: Vaultwarden warns its `ADMIN_TOKEN` is plain text (an Argon2 hash is its guidance). | NARROWED — **2026-10-23 (D32):** the sheet is current — names and places only, one A4, HU + EN (`runbooks/break-glass-sheet.md`); every place checked to exist. LEFT: the operator prints it, fills it by hand, keeps it outside the home. **NARROWED 2026-10-09 (operator yes in chat):** Vaultwarden's own `backup` copy + `rsa_key.pem` ride the nightly encrypted DooPlex→ep0 job (`scripts/dooplex-offsite/`), checked on every push and every Sunday (integrity, users, items — rows only). That copy opens only with the DooPlex off-site key, and the vault only with the master password — so the circle is broken only once both are on paper outside DooPlex: `runbooks/break-glass-sheet.md`, `runbooks/total-loss-of-dooplex.md`. **LEFT:** the operator prints the sheet and stores it away from home; the `ADMIN_TOKEN` hash (a DooPlex change, operator's word). **2026-10-23 night — survey (`audits/dooplex-survival-2026-10-22/PLAN.md`, G1/G3/G10):** unchanged; the sheet is still the one act that breaks the circle, and S5's offline form is unknown to CC — on the sheet too (decide list in STATUS). | operator: print the sheet | Operator: print + store the sheet; then close | operator |
| **R-1254** | Backup & restore | P2 | **The hub saves a household's new escrow package in TWO writes; a failure between them leaves the new repository hash beside the OLD identity package, and the box then marks itself escrowed — on a total loss the written code opens nothing.** Found 2026-10-24 (HUNT-3 H1), read at `file:line`: `hub/internal/api/handler.go:1415``SaveHostEscrow` commits blob + hash, `:1445``SaveHostDRBundle` sets `identity_blob` in a second statement (`internal/store/store.go:3788-3796`; the upsert `:3490-3511` never touches it); the controller's confirm reads the hash (`felhom-controller/controller/internal/report/escrow_confirm.go:195-217`); the agent sends once. Same family (H2): a lost or late answer (30 s) tells the household „the previous code still works” when the hub may already hold the new package (`felhom-agent/internal/localapi/escrow_ceremony.go:79,532-534,639-641`). Static. **The hub half is fixed on main 2026-10-24 night** (felhom.eu `dcf4f84c`; Part 3): key, hash and identity blob in ONE transaction (`SaveHostEscrowWithIdentity`), a bad identity refused before any write; hub image `0.170.0-rc.r1254` built locally (`67db584a45d7`), NOT pushed, NOT deployed. The agent ceremony half (H2: „the previous code still works” after a lost answer) is still open. | **NARROWED** — **the hub half CLOSED 2026-10-25:** hub **0.170.0** deployed on the operator's yes (manifest bump, ArgoCD sync of the hub Deployment only, image digest `6478498d…`; 30 minutes and more with no alarm mail, the mailbox as the control); Tester 1 ran the escrow ceremony end to end through the page's endpoints and the hub stored the new package in one transaction („the new package is on the hub", `audits/release-2026-10-26/escrow-ceremony-tester1.txt`). The ceremony half stays open | the hub release (attended); the agent half | deploy hub v0.170.0 (Monday list); then the ceremony asks the hub what it holds before it says „the previous code still works” | CC |
| **R-1254** | Backup & restore | P2 | **The hub saves a household's new escrow package in TWO writes; a failure between them leaves the new repository hash beside the OLD identity package, and the box then marks itself escrowed — on a total loss the written code opens nothing.** Found 2026-10-24 (HUNT-3 H1), read at `file:line`: `hub/internal/api/handler.go:1415``SaveHostEscrow` commits blob + hash, `:1445``SaveHostDRBundle` sets `identity_blob` in a second statement (`internal/store/store.go:3788-3796`; the upsert `:3490-3511` never touches it); the controller's confirm reads the hash (`felhom-controller/controller/internal/report/escrow_confirm.go:195-217`); the agent sends once. Same family (H2): a lost or late answer (30 s) tells the household „the previous code still works” when the hub may already hold the new package (`felhom-agent/internal/localapi/escrow_ceremony.go:79,532-534,639-641`). Static. **The hub half is fixed on main 2026-10-24 night** (felhom.eu `dcf4f84c`; Part 3): key, hash and identity blob in ONE transaction (`SaveHostEscrowWithIdentity`), a bad identity refused before any write; hub image `0.170.0-rc.r1254` built locally (`67db584a45d7`), NOT pushed, NOT deployed. The agent ceremony half (H2: „the previous code still works” after a lost answer) is still open. | **NARROWED** — **the hub half CLOSED 2026-10-25:** hub **0.170.0** deployed on the operator's yes (manifest bump, ArgoCD sync of the hub Deployment only, image digest `6478498d…`; 30 minutes and more with no alarm mail, the mailbox as the control); Tester 1 ran the escrow ceremony end to end through the page's endpoints and the hub stored the new package in one transaction („the new package is on the hub", `audits/release-2026-10-26/escrow-ceremony-tester1.txt`). The ceremony half stays open. **2026-10-28 night: the ceremony half FIXED ON MAIN** (agent `5ddd124` CI 2473, controller `e33cffa` CI 2474; tests red first; `03` §8 [DESIGN] 2026-10-28): after a failed upload the agent asks the hub which package it holds (the identity blob compared) — the new one → success, another → 502 and „the previous code still works", no answer → 504 that promises nothing; the controller words 504 and its own failed call as „Nem tudjuk biztosan… Őrizd meg mindkét kódot…" and waits 60 s for the claim/confirm (was 15 s, shorter than the agent's 30 s upload). | the hub release (attended); the agent half | deploy hub v0.170.0 (Monday list); then the ceremony asks the hub what it holds before it says „the previous code still works” | CC |
| **R-314** | Backup & restore | P3 | **`StopAbandon` has no web route — a customer who telephones is served by a command line.** `--abandon-stop` exists on the controller binary (`cmd/controller/main.go:86`) and refuses rather than silently no-opping, which is right. But there is no handler: the only in-product way to cancel a countdown is the customer finding their recovery code (Scenario G cancels it at the moment the code proves they still have it). **An operator who is telephoned instead has to reach a shell on the customer's machine.** Used this session on the operator's ruling, container stopped first so the running controller could not overwrite `settings.json` from memory — a sequencing subtlety that is itself an argument for a route **-- 2026-10-08 design:** `audits/day-2026-10-08/design-R-314-279-177.md` — the box's own 14-day countdown has no operator door (the hub's 7-day phase does, decision 74); one door for R-314 + R-279: a fixed list of operator actions carried in the report reply. Question D1 on STATUS's decision sheet. **-- 2026-10-08 14:16 operator ruling D1 (`09` §3 decision 185):** yes — option A, a fixed list of operator actions carried in the box's report reply. | **VERIFY — 2026-10-09: DELIVERED (hub 0.144.0 + controller 0.304.0); `run_job fill-watch` proven live on the Tester 1 box (hub row „done — ran to its end"; control: the box log „checked 3 filesystem(s)"; an unknown action is refused 400). `abandon_stop` / `abandon_extend` NOT yet proven — no box has a deletion countdown; prove them on the first one.****VERIFY — built on main 2026-10-08 (D1, decision 185), ships with tomorrow's controller + hub releases; closes after the live proof on 9202** (`abandon_stop` / `abandon_extend` through the hub's buttons). **READY (S) — NEW 2026-08-12, RANK 3****2026-10-05 (burn-down night): NEEDS A DESIGN.** There is no operator door into a RUNNING controller (its HTTP surface is the household's session; the CLI runs in a separate process and cannot safely trigger a job in the running one). Same design as R-177 and R-279. | R-241, R-307 | An operator-authenticated POST that calls the same `StopAbandon`, so the telephone path and the code path converge | CC |
| **R-401** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Revisit the off-site integrity depth when a real store is LARGE — the default rests on ONE measurement, on ONE 134 MB store.** Controller v0.228.0 (R-399) made `--read-data-subset=100%` the default for every box. The whole justification is a single data point: `demo-hp`, 2026-08-30, 140 829 678 B / 2 651 blobs / 67 snapshots, structure 35.0 s vs 100% **39.2 s** — four seconds. Re-proven live 2026-08-31 at 38.7 s. **It does not extrapolate, and the reason is structural: the structure check's cost tracks the INDEX, a read-data run's tracks the DATA.** A 50 GB store is ~370x the data and this curve says nothing about it. **Nothing was invented from that one point** — no rotation schedule, no size threshold, no bandwidth budget — because four production designs in this project were specced against unvalidated mechanisms and all four were wrong. **`readDataSubsetRe` already accepts `n/m`**, so a rotating schedule (`1/7` on a different seventh each week) needs no parser work when the time comes; the missing input is a measurement on a large store, not code. **THE TRIGGER IS AN EVENT, NOT A DATE:** the slow-check WARN from v0.228.0 firing on any box (`integritySlowNoticeThreshold`, 5 min) — that line names the duration, the depth and this row. **WHAT HAPPENS IF NOBODY ACTS:** every box re-reads its entire store every week, however large it grows, and the first person to notice is a customer whose upload is saturated. **Whoever acts must also revisit `integrityCheckTimeout` (30 min)**, which is now the number a large store meets first. | **OPEN — WATCHING** | — | When the WARN fires: measure the curve on that store, then choose between a rotation (`n/m`), a size-conditional default, or leaving it. Do NOT choose from this row's numbers — they are the small-store case. | CC |
| **R-409** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Nothing in the product can vouch for the bytes of a restored recovery unit — the only hash record covers 0.002 % of it.** MEASURED on demo-hp 2026-08-31 against kimai's restored unit: `manifest.json`'s `checksums` object carries sha256 for `.felhom.yml` (2 235 B), `app.yaml` (488 B) and `docker-compose.yml` (2 195 B) — **4 918 bytes of a 213 231 242-byte unit**. The database dump (48 217 B) and the two named-volume tars (160 331 776 B + 52 845 056 B) — the recoverable data, 99.998 % of the bytes — have no recorded hash anywhere. **And nothing else supplies one:** restic 0.14.0's `restore --verify` is a size-and-mtime reconciliation (a size-and-mtime-preserving one-byte corruption of a 160 MB tar passed clean, red-proofed), and `restic ls --json` file nodes in 0.14.0 carry name, size, mode, uid/gid and three timestamps and **no content hash**. **So "the restore produced correct files" is currently unanswerable by any automated means.****What is NOT claimed here:**`restic check --read-data-subset=100%` already proves the STORE's packs, and the config files that ARE hashed are the ones a wrong-content failure would be hardest to spot in. | **OPEN — MEDIUM** | R-87, R-361 | Cheapest fix, and it is already half-built: extend the capture's `checksums` to cover `db_dumps` and `volume_dumps` — R-361 already computes a canonical dump sha256 to prove itself, so the value exists at capture time. Then a restore-test has a real reference and R-87's narrow version becomes a content check rather than a completeness one. Evidence: `audits/SPIKE-restic-restore-test-2026-08-31.md` §Q2, §Q3. | CC |
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-540** | Backup & restore | P3 | **[P3-LOW] The hub knows exactly ONE off-site pool box, so there is no rule for what happens when it fills.** Read from source 2026-09-16 while making off-site the default: `HETZNER_POOL_BOX_ID` is a single value, and every shared customer becomes a sub-account on that box. With off-site now ON for every new customer (hub v0.116.0) the box fills faster, and the fill warning (80%/90% of the box, `monitor/offsite.go`) tells the operator it is filling but nothing says which box a new customer should land on. **Needs a selection rule** (least-full, or explicit per-customer), not a bigger box. No customer is at risk today: the pool box read 0.3% full (2.7 GB of 1 TB), Σ shared quota 150 GB, oversub 0.15x. | **READY — rank P3-LOW; owner: CC (hub)****2026-10-05 (burn-down night): NEEDS A DESIGN (and money).** A selection rule needs a multi-box configuration and a second box. Next: an operator pick of the rule and its trigger (e.g. add box 2 at 70 %). | — | — | CC |
| **R-548** | Backup & restore | P3 | **[P3-LOW] The whole-guest backup’s LOCAL tier cannot fit on a small-system-disk box, and will retry on that tier for ever.** MEASURED 2026-09-17 (chaos night) on `tester-1-022354`: a whole-guest backup wrote a **~29 GB source** (`mp0` = `local-lvm:vm-9201-disk-1`, 70 G provisioned, 40.58 % used, `backup=1`) into `pve-root`, which on a 32 GB system disk is **14 GB total with ~4.9 GB free**. Two samples thirty seconds apart showed the archive growing ~497 MB while free space fell ~475 MB — **~16 MB/s, i.e. under four minutes to a full `/`** on the nested PVE. **The product’s behaviour is correct and legible throughout:** it failed the tier and said which one — `whole_guest_backup_failed` (error, operator-only): „Whole-guest backup FAILED on the local tier — retrying with backoff (next attempt in 15m0s)” — its status surface agreed (`target_id:"local"`, `success:false`, `size_bytes:0`), and the **off-site tier then ran from the same snapshot and succeeded in ~8½ minutes, encrypted to ep0, consuming no local disk at all**. So the data still left the house. What is filed is the loop: on a box shaped like this the local tier can **never** succeed, and it keeps retrying on a backoff for ever, burning I/O and risking `/` each time. **Honest caveat:** the 32 GB system disk is this drill’s fixture choice, so the row is conditional on disk size — but nothing in the product checks whether the local target could ever hold the source before trying. **Fix shape:** compare the source size against the target’s free space before starting the local tier and skip it with a clear reason, rather than discovering it at ~16 MB/s. Evidence: `audits/evidence-chaos-night-2026-09-17/round-6.txt`. **-- 2026-09-30, the class on a real box: demo-hp's whole-guest LOCAL tier was refused by the space preflight (R-685) 10 times since 2026-09-27** („local has 12.1 GiB free; the last archive of guest 9201 was 8.9 GiB, so a new one needs about 12.1 GiB") — its newest local archive was 2026-09-29 04:42, 30 h old at the day's read (the weekly PBS tier, last 2026-09-24, is its whole copy meanwhile). The refusal is correct and named; what is missing is that nothing gives the box the room back (the host's `local` holds the 8.9 GiB archive of the only guest plus templates on a 39 GB root). `audits/pg-last-six-2026-09-30/C/`. | **READY — rank P3-LOW; owner: CC****2026-10-23 night (demo-hp, read only):** the local tier was refused 4 times (00:59–02:39 UTC) by the space preflight — `local has 8.5 GiB free; the last archive of guest 9201 was 6.5 GiB, so a new one needs about 9.2 GiB` — and the controller stopped 11 apps for about a minute before each refused try (then backed off 30 m → 2 h). The 2026-10-22 run had fit; `local` now also holds 6.4 GB of installer ISOs (1.27.1–1.30.0, the newest uploaded for yesterday's proof installs). Two halves: the box (free space on demo-hp: remove the superseded ISOs — a demo-hp housekeeping step, not done tonight) and the product (ask the agent's preflight BEFORE stopping the apps — R-921's shape for the local tier). **2026-10-23 day — the box half DONE:** the three superseded installer ISOs (1.27.1, 1.28.0, 1.29.0; no guest referenced them) removed from demo-hp's `local` by name (`pvesm free`); `/` 8.5 GB → 14 GB free (`df` before/after, `audits/day-2026-10-23/09-demohp-space.txt`), above the 9.2 GiB the preflight asks. 1.30.0 stays. **The product half — the proposed fix (R-921's pattern):** the agent already computes the space verdict (R-685: free vs the last archive × the margin); it serves it per guest on `GET /backup/status` next to `host_busy` — e.g. `local_space: {fits, need_bytes, free_bytes}` — and the controller reads it before any stop: when the local tier cannot fit, it stops no app, records the tier as skipped for space (the same contention record as R-921, one alarm after the ceiling), and still runs the other due tiers. An agent without the field keeps the old order. Tests to write first and red-prove: agent `TestBackupStatus_R548_LocalSpace`, controller `TestR548_NoStopWhenTheLocalTierCannotFit`. Rides the next agent + controller pair. | — | — | CC |
| **R-933** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Mirror the images of every catalog app we support into our own registry, before scale.** Operator, 2026-10-12 (S8, `09` §3 decision 203): *„Will need to mirror the apps we support later, just to be sure."* Today a restore re-pulls each image from its maker; a version the maker deleted cannot start (the accepted limit, `07` §6.6, R-698 closed). Size it first: the supported catalog's images (every ladder version a box can hold) × their size; then where the copy lives (the DooPlex registry is Tier 2, precious — the copy must not make DooPlex a single point of failure for every household's restore) and how a restore falls back to it. | **OPEN** — NEW 2026-10-12 | the size measurement | Measure the total size of the supported catalog's images; then a one-page design (where, how a restore falls back, cost) | CC (measure + design), operator (the go) |
| **R-1255** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Escrow edge cases (review round 2, HUNT-3 H3/H4):** the R-1176 carry moves the newest kept package even when it holds no repository password (`hub/internal/store/escrow_carry.go:100-110` checks `identity_blob` only), while the right one stays under the deleted host (`store.go:3533-3534`); two set-asides on the same UTC day reuse a name and the purge can delete a still-stored copy's package (`hub/internal/offsitekeys/offsitekeys.go:378-385`; `store.go:4295-4300`). Static. | OPEN | — | carry the newest package that has a hash; a unique set-aside name per run; store tests | CC |
| **R-1255** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Escrow edge cases (review round 2, HUNT-3 H3/H4):** the R-1176 carry moves the newest kept package even when it holds no repository password (`hub/internal/store/escrow_carry.go:100-110` checks `identity_blob` only), while the right one stays under the deleted host (`store.go:3533-3534`); two set-asides on the same UTC day reuse a name and the purge can delete a still-stored copy's package (`hub/internal/offsitekeys/offsitekeys.go:378-385`; `store.go:4295-4300`). Static. | OPEN — **fixed on main 2026-10-28 night, not released** (felhom.eu `1ee6d5a5`, CI 2472; store tests red first; `03` §8 [DESIGN] 2026-10-28): the carry takes the newest retained row with an identity AND a repository-password hash (the newest row only when none has a hash — a legacy package, as before); a set-aside is `<repo>.orphaned-<YYYYMMDDTHHMMSSZ>`; a retained row is purged only when it was tagged no later than its path's deletion (`repo_tagged_at`, new column). No live proof: a hub deploy is not a night's. | the hub release (attended) | release it (the morning list), read the store back after one carry and one abandonment, then close | CC |
| **R-1256** | Backup & restore | P3 | **Restore edge cases (review round 2, HUNT-1 H4/H5/H6/H8):** (H4) an off-site restore whose definition write fails AFTER the compose was written restarts the app on the snapshot's compose (`internal/backup/offbox_reconstitute.go:979-986`; `cmd/controller/main.go:3318-3331`); (H5) a put-back whose stop fails goes on and can merge (`restore_crash_putback.go:155-158`; `restore.go:218` ignores `volume rm -f`), then removes the copy; (H6) a second-drive mirror can start between the web refusal and the restore's own record (`web/restore_wizard.go:226`; `opstatus.go:56-66`), and the install-time kept-data load checks only RestoreStatus/IsRunning (`api/kept_install.go:89-92`); (H8) an unused restore copy is never cleaned up. Static. | OPEN | — | one attended pass over the restore paths with these four as tests | CC |
| **R-1259** | Backup & restore | P3 | **The DooPlex→ep0 copy jobs: three edges and tomorrow's clock change (review round 2, HUNT-2 H6–H8, HUNT-4 H1).** The release copy keeps the newest 5 agent versions whether vouched or not, so five unvouched releases drop the vouched one from ep0 (`scripts/release-copy/felhom-release-copy:199,218,237`); its `rsync --delete` removes old versions during the transfer and mirrors a shrinking registry as deletions (`:190,237`); the hub-DB push has no lower age bound (`scripts/hub-db-backup/felhom-hub-db-backup:41,49-50`). VERIFIED on DooPlex: on 2026-10-25 the 02:30 CEST push runs at 00:30Z (`systemd-analyze calendar`) and the hub's 02:00 slot at 01:00Z (Go takes the repeated hour's second pass), so the push re-sends the 20:00 snapshot and the off-site hub DB is ~13.5 h old until 08:30. Operator data only. | OPEN | — | always keep the vouched agent; prune after a verified copy; a future-age bound; the push slot after the hub's in UTC | CC |
| **R-1274** | Backup & restore | P3 | **The restore refusal tells the household to „turn on remote backup, or connect a second drive” when the box has both and their first copy has not run yet.** Catalog sweep 2026-10-24, Grimmory and Calibre-Web: „Mentés most” makes the local copy only (`07` §8, by design), so the drive files had no copy yet; the refusal's sentence is `restore.refuse.files.none` (`felhom-controller/controller/internal/web/handlers.go:1835`) whatever the box has. The Hungarian sentence is frozen by `i18n_go_parity`, so the fix is a NEW key („the first copy is made in tonight's backup”) chosen when a tier is set up but holds nothing yet. | OPEN | — | The new key + the branch + a test | CC |
@@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-1310** | Monitoring & notifications | P3 | **The security watch (R-1303) flags notices that do not apply and misses fixes that do — measured by reading all 38 flagged pins by hand on 2026-10-27.** False: advisories of ecosystem `actions` (Home Assistant's CI), of another package in the repo (Gitea's runner), with a hostname or ≤-old range (cal.com 2023/2024, Grafana 2022), for the desktop/Electron client (Termix), for the rootless image only (Uptime Kuma); a release hit on a word (Dawarich „no longer receives security fixes", Rallly v4.16.0). Wrong „no fix": Vikunja's six (range `<= 2.6.0`, fixed in 2.7.0), karakeep-chrome (154/156 exist). Missed: Tandoor 2.7.0 names 8 GHSA ids (1 matched), Dawarich 1.16.0 (2FA, export deletion), Wishlist v0.69.0 (critical, no GHSA). BEHIND reads linuxserver `26.09.20260929` as newer than 26.09.2; Seerr follows the renamed-away `fallenbagel/jellyseerr`. `audits/security-app-updates-2026-10-27/TRIAGE.md` NOT-A-FINDING list and `triage-notes/` | OPEN — filed 2026-10-27; **two shapes FIXED the same day** (ecosystem `actions` not listed; an empty fix with a closed range reads „after X"; test W9, red first) | — | teach `security_watch.py`: skip a package that is not the pinned one; match every GHSA id a release body names; ignore `YY.MM.YYYYMMDD` tags; repoint seerr to `seerr-team/seerr`; each with a test seen failing | CC |
| **R-1334** | Monitoring & notifications | P3 | **Docker Hub's tag API refuses the watch (HTTP 429) since the DooPlex group was added: 19 DooPlex images NOT CHECKED in the 2026-10-28 night run (job 2446, `hub.docker.com` = 211 requests), and the „could not check registry:docker.io" mail went out (streak 2).** The runtime part is not affected (HEAD + cache). ghcr.io also answered one blob with 429 in the dry run of 07:02 (Immich v3.3.5, while this session read images from the same address). | **VERIFY** — BUILT 2026-10-28 midday, measured first (`audits/dockerhub-bigsteps-2026-10-28/part1/`): the 429s came from the BURST, not the count — night 2446 sent 211 tag-list requests in ~2 min from six workers (15 refused), dry run 2450 sent 224 in 3.5 min (none). `fe677bae`: Docker Hub requests spaced (1/s across the workers), a 429 retried with its Retry-After (NOT CHECKED only after the 4th try), tag lists cached 24 h per registry path on the runner (two names of one path fetch once); `8644450d`: the image reader retries a registry 429 too (ghcr.io refused two blob reads in back-to-back dry runs). Tests W14 + retry checks, red first. Dry runs 2458 and 2459: **0 Docker Hub 429, 0 retries** (210 requests over ~7 min). **No Docker Hub login needed.** Each of the two CI runners keeps its own tag cache. `minio/minio:latest` answers 401 — Docker Hub no longer serves it (homelab, R-1328). | — | close after the first CI night with 0 Docker Hub 429 (the 03:40 run of 2026-10-29) | CC |
| **R-1020** | Monitoring & notifications | P4 | **`app_repaired_after_crash` reports a duration of 0 s, and the controller log says „in 0s".** `RunAfterUncleanBoot` sets `res.Duration` in a deferred func after the result is already returned (no named result), so the caller sees 0; the `app.yaml` record is right (10,172 ms on demo-hp 2026-10-14, `audits/immich-repair-2026-10-14/D/`). Small, but the controller release for this session is spent (v0.311.0). | **OPEN** — filed 2026-10-14 | — | CC: a named result (or set the duration before return), with a test on the returned value; ride the next controller release | CC |
| **R-528** | Monitoring & notifications | P2 | **[P2-MEDIUM] Docker does not report an OOM kill inside a Felhom LXC guest: `OOMKilled` stays false and no `oom` event fires, so the v0.243.0 OOM line is not proven live.** MEASURED 2026-09-15 on scratch 9202 (Docker 29.8.0): Paperless capped at 128M restarted 11 times with `OOMKilled=false` and zero `docker events --filter event=oom`; a memory hog inside the running container was killed (rc 137) with the same silence (`E2-oom-signal-measure-9202.txt`). BIGNIGHT VM 333 did read `oomkilled=true`, so the shape differs by case. **Fix shape:** the agent reads the guest container cgroups' `memory.events oom_kill` counters (host-side, reliable), or the controller alarms on a restart-count trend **RE-MEASURED 2026-09-16 on the DRILL box (fresh install, nested VM 334, Docker in an LXC guest, controller 0.243.0), so the finding is not a property of one machine:** the Paperless webserver was capped at 128 M with `docker update --memory`; it restarted 9-10 times, and all three signals stayed silent - `OOMKilled=false` on every inspect, `docker events --filter event=oom` EMPTY for the whole window, the container's cgroup not visible from inside the guest, and `dmesg` unreadable there. Identical to scratch 9202. So the v0.243.0 OOM line cannot fire on ANY Felhom box as shipped, on either host. Evidence: `audits/evidence-drill-0243-2026-09-16/phase2-m1-oom.txt`. | **WATCHING — DESIGN WRITTEN 2026-10-26 night (the brief's Part 7: build only if time is left; it was not built — the line test and the attended release came first).** The host-side counter EXISTS and is readable (read on demo-hp 2026-10-26): `/sys/fs/cgroup/lxc/<vmid>/ns/system.slice/docker-<64-hex id>.scope/memory.events`, line `oom_kill N`. **Design:** (1) agent: a read-only collector (no root CLI — a sysfs read under the agent's own rights; if not readable, the existing sudoers fence gets one read-only `Cmnd_Alias`) that, for each guest in the `felhom` pool, globs those scopes and keeps `{container_id: oom_kill}`; served on the guest's own local API as `GET /guest/oom-kills` (`withGuest`, the guest's containers only). (2) controller: the 30-s dead-app scan asks once per pass; a RISE of a container's counter = an OOM kill whatever Docker's `OOMKilled` says → the existing `app_oom` line (R-636's per-run grain), `source: cgroup` in the details. An agent without the route = today's behaviour. (3) Tests: a fake cgroup tree (agent), a rising counter → one `app_oom` (controller, red-first). (4) Live: 9202, a throwaway app capped at 64M with a memory hog: the counter rises, `app_oom` names the container while `OOMKilled` reads false. ~1 day, two repos, one agent release. **Earlier:** WATCHING — **2026-10-12: the built part is released** (agent v0.150.0 carries the Docker-approval memory-kill check; the boxes run 0.154.0; hub 0.140.0+ requires a passing `oom_check` before a Docker set is approved). Per decision 157 nothing else is built; the row watches for a box whose Docker reports a false OOM flag. Dated look: 2026-11-12. **READY — rank P2-MEDIUM; owner: CC****2026-09-17 (chaos night): an OOM WAS detected on a fresh box, and named precisely.** On `tester-1-022354` (controller 0.245.0, guest 9201, 6 GB RAM) immich’s Postgres was killed by the memory limit during its reverse-geocoding import, and the controller pushed `app_oom` (warning, operator-only): „Alkalmazás memóriája elfogyott: immich (immich-postgres) — egy folyamatát a memóriakorlát leállította” — naming the app AND the exact container. The visible consequence was `write CONNECTION_CLOSED immich-postgres:5432` and twelve restarts of immich-server. So on THIS box the OOM scan works and was the fastest route to the diagnosis; recorded here rather than filed as a new row. Evidence: `audits/evidence-chaos-night-2026-09-17/round-2.txt`. **2026-10-05 (burn-down night): a one-page design proposal (no code) is in `audits/night-burndown-2026-10-05/design-R-528.md`** — for the operator. **2026-10-06: STOPPED BEFORE ANY CODE — the measurement contradicted the design** (decision 155 said A then C). On scratch 9202, Docker 29.8.2, the `OOMKilled` flag was TRUE in all four shapes tried: a child process killed while the container kept running (`oom_kill` 0 → 3, flag true) and three main-process kills (exit 137, flag true); an `oom` event each time. The false flags of 2026-09-15 were on Docker 29.8.0. Cost read for the record: one exec read of 21 containers on demo-hp = 1.6 s. `audits/design-build-2026-10-06/`C/. **2026-10-06 18:24: operator ruling, option A (decision 157):** nothing is built; the row stays open as a WATCH for a box whose Docker reports a false flag. **Added:** a Docker engine set may not be approved until it reports a memory kill correctly on the boxes that ran it (built in this row's next session). **2026-10-06 (night): the Docker-approval memory-kill check is BUILT** — hub v0.140.0 (LIVE: the approval waits for a Line truncated
| **R-528** | Monitoring & notifications | P2 | **[P2-MEDIUM] Docker does not report an OOM kill inside a Felhom LXC guest: `OOMKilled` stays false and no `oom` event fires, so the v0.243.0 OOM line is not proven live.** MEASURED 2026-09-15 on scratch 9202 (Docker 29.8.0): Paperless capped at 128M restarted 11 times with `OOMKilled=false` and zero `docker events --filter event=oom`; a memory hog inside the running container was killed (rc 137) with the same silence (`E2-oom-signal-measure-9202.txt`). BIGNIGHT VM 333 did read `oomkilled=true`, so the shape differs by case. **Fix shape:** the agent reads the guest container cgroups' `memory.events oom_kill` counters (host-side, reliable), or the controller alarms on a restart-count trend **RE-MEASURED 2026-09-16 on the DRILL box (fresh install, nested VM 334, Docker in an LXC guest, controller 0.243.0), so the finding is not a property of one machine:** the Paperless webserver was capped at 128 M with `docker update --memory`; it restarted 9-10 times, and all three signals stayed silent - `OOMKilled=false` on every inspect, `docker events --filter event=oom` EMPTY for the whole window, the container's cgroup not visible from inside the guest, and `dmesg` unreadable there. Identical to scratch 9202. So the v0.243.0 OOM line cannot fire on ANY Felhom box as shipped, on either host. Evidence: `audits/evidence-drill-0243-2026-09-16/phase2-m1-oom.txt`. | **BUILT 2026-10-28 night** (agent `6f933d6` CI 2475: `GET /guest/oom-kills`, the host's per-container `oom_kill`; controller `eed23e7` CI 2476: the 30-s scan raises `app_oom` for a counted kill whatever Docker's flag says, `source` in the details; `08` §5 [DESIGN] 2026-10-28). **Live 2026-10-28 23:27 on Tester 1 with test builds of both (put back after):** Radicale capped at 128 MB, a hog inside it killed, the host counter 0 → 1, ONE `app_oom` „seen by docker,cgroup", the operator's mailbox held exactly one mail with `"source":"docker,cgroup"` (`audits/night-2026-10-28/r528-oom/`). Docker 29.8.2 also flagged it, so the cgroup-only path is proven by tests. Closes after the agent release (vouch) and the controller release. **Earlier: WATCHING — DESIGN WRITTEN 2026-10-26 night (the brief's Part 7: build only if time is left; it was not built — the line test and the attended release came first).** The host-side counter EXISTS and is readable (read on demo-hp 2026-10-26): `/sys/fs/cgroup/lxc/<vmid>/ns/system.slice/docker-<64-hex id>.scope/memory.events`, line `oom_kill N`. **Design:** (1) agent: a read-only collector (no root CLI — a sysfs read under the agent's own rights; if not readable, the existing sudoers fence gets one read-only `Cmnd_Alias`) that, for each guest in the `felhom` pool, globs those scopes and keeps `{container_id: oom_kill}`; served on the guest's own local API as `GET /guest/oom-kills` (`withGuest`, the guest's containers only). (2) controller: the 30-s dead-app scan asks once per pass; a RISE of a container's counter = an OOM kill whatever Docker's `OOMKilled` says → the existing `app_oom` line (R-636's per-run grain), `source: cgroup` in the details. An agent without the route = today's behaviour. (3) Tests: a fake cgroup tree (agent), a rising counter → one `app_oom` (controller, red-first). (4) Live: 9202, a throwaway app capped at 64M with a memory hog: the counter rises, `app_oom` names the container while `OOMKilled` reads false. ~1 day, two repos, one agent release. **Earlier:** WATCHING — **2026-10-12: the built part is released** (agent v0.150.0 carries the Docker-approval memory-kill check; the boxes run 0.154.0; hub 0.140.0+ requires a passing `oom_check` before a Docker set is approved). Per decision 157 nothing else is built; the row watches for a box whose Docker reports a false OOM flag. Dated look: 2026-11-12. **READY — rank P2-MEDIUM; owner: CC****2026-09-17 (chaos night): an OOM WAS detected on a fresh box, and named precisely.** On `tester-1-022354` (controller 0.245.0, guest 9201, 6 GB RAM) immich’s Postgres was killed by the memory limit during its reverse-geocoding import, and the controller pushed `app_oom` (warning, operator-only): „Alkalmazás memóriája elfogyott: immich (immich-postgres) — egy folyamatát a memóriakorlát leállította” — naming the app AND the exact container. The visible consequence was `write CONNECTION_CLOSED immich-postgres:5432` and twelve restarts of immich-server. So on THIS box the OOM scan works and was the fastest route to the diagnosis; recorded here rather than filed as a new row. Evidence: `audits/evidence-chaos-night-2026-09-17/round-2.txt`. **2026-10-05 (burn-down night): a one-page design proposal (no code) is in `audits/night-burndown-2026-10-05/design-R-528.md`** — for the operator. **2026-10-06: STOPPED BEFORE ANY CODE — the measurement contradicted the design** (decision 155 said A then C). On scratch 9202, Docker 29.8.2, the `OOMKilled` flag was TRUE in all four shapes tried: a child process kiLine truncated
| **R-1193** | Monitoring & notifications | P3 | **When the box froze (R-1192), the operator heard only „no report for 45 m" — 28 minutes in — and the household heard nothing at all.** Measured 2026-10-20 against the operator mailbox (the second channel): the freeze began ~13:05 UTC; the hub page read ONLINE / OK at 13:22 (correct inside the 45-minute threshold, R-549); `host_stale` at 13:33, `app_oom` at 13:34 (immich-machine-learning killed by its memory limit), `host_crash_restart` at 14:26 and 16:29 (the two plug pulls), `node_stale` 15:59 / `node_recovered` 16:03. No mail or banner tells the household that its box is not answering, and no operator mail says „the box answers ping but not its dashboard". CORRECTED the same day: the first version of this row said the hub showed OK „throughout" and „nobody was told" — that read only the hub page, not the mailbox. Evidence `audits/rehearsal-2026-10-20/journal.md`. | OPEN | — | Design note (2026-10-21, after R-1192's diagnosis): the freeze's signature is cheap to see from the HOST side — the guest cgroup's memory PSI „full" above ~50 % for a minute, or its `memory.events max` climbing, while the host still reports; the agent could raise `guest_memory_thrash` (operator mail in its own words, not „no report for 45 m") and the household banner „A dobozod most nagyon lassú…". With the swap fix (R-1192) the measured thrash ends within a minute, so this alarm should be built only if a freeze is seen again after the agent release; until then it stays a design. Decide whether a dashboard that does not answer for N minutes while the host still reports should alarm sooner and in its own words (guest-side liveness), and whether the household is told | CC |
| **R-1202** | Monitoring & notifications | P3 | **A box whose clock is behind blames the hub and stops an app without telling anyone.** Rehearsal 2026-10-20 B6 #8: RTC set 2 years back (the OS raised it to 2026-04-13): the dashboard shows only „Hub nem elérhető" while the log says „x509: certificate … not yet valid: current time 2026-04-13…"; Paperless crash-looped and the box stopped it with a restore hold; the `app_stopped_unhealthy` event failed (hub unreachable), so neither the household nor the operator heard. After the real time came back the app stayed stopped until a Start (clear sentence, 1 min). | **OPEN** | — | say „the box's clock is wrong (it says <date>)" when TLS fails with not-yet-valid/expired against a hub that answers; keep the stop event queued until the hub is reachable | CC |
| **R-340** | Monitoring & notifications | P3 | **The new reachability check does not touch the surface that actually failed.** R-339 reports when the hub cannot READ ep0 — but the read it performs is the `usage` op, which is `proxmox-backup-manager` plus `df` over SSH, and therefore rides the **local API daemon**. The 2026-08-18 incident explicitly CLEARED that daemon: `proxmox-backup.service` was healthy throughout, and it was the **HTTPS proxy on 8007** that was wedged with a full accept queue. **So R-339's check would have returned green for all 9 h 37 m of that outage.** It closes the case where ep0 is unreachable *as a host*; it does not close the case that actually happened. This is not a defect in R-339 — it is the honest boundary of what it watches, recorded so a future reader does not mistake a green box gauge for a working off-site tier | **READY (M) — NEW 2026-08-18** | a tenantsync endpoint-script version bump (the op is added on ep0, so it needs the same version-gated rollout `ErrUsageUnsupported` already models) | Add a **health op** to `scripts/felhom-tenantsync.sh` that probes `https://127.0.0.1:8007/` on ep0 and reports the proxy's fd count and listen-queue depth, then surface it as a third signal. **Overlaps the connections spike (R-336's remaining half): both want the same observations from ep0, so whichever runs SECOND must reuse the first's evidence rather than re-measuring a protected machine twice****REUSE, per this row's own instruction — the connections spike ran FIRST (2026-08-20) and already produced most of what the health op wants; do not re-measure a protected machine a third time.** Available in `audits/evidence-ep0-established-connections-2026-08-20/`: the proxy **fd count** and its type breakdown (`lsof` + `/proc/<pid>/fd`), the **listen-queue depth** (`ss -lnt` — `Recv-Q 0`, `Send-Q 1024`), the **ESTAB/CLOSE-WAIT split**, the **per-peer** connection histogram, a **31-minute persistence diff** of full 4-tuples, and a **46.18 h** slope with Poisson bounds. What the health op would still add beyond these: a loopback `GET https://127.0.0.1:8007/` probe — the observation that distinguished "process problem" from "network problem" on 2026-08-18 and the one thing this spike did NOT take, because it is the surface R-339 cannot see. **And this spike sharpens what the op should report:** a rising **ESTAB** count is the live signal (CLOSE-WAIT was **0**, not merely flat), and per **R-344** the fd ceiling that matters may be the **agent's**, not only ep0's. | CC |
Reference in new issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
admin committed