due-checks gate (R-341), floor raise recorded (R-343), snapshot coverage (R-342)

PART 1+2 — dated checks stop being wishes. R-341 booked two measurements as
prose in a register row; nothing read those dates and nothing would have
objected when they passed. The dates now live in a DUE-CHECKS block INSIDE
OPEN-ITEMS.md (inside, so no sidecar can drift from it) and a new gate reads
them. Registered as #10 in repo_gates.py, --fast, so it runs in BOTH the
pre-push hook and CI.

  exit 0  nothing due (prints pending count + nearest date; empty block too)
  exit 1  a row is due/overdue (due <= today, UTC -- due TODAY counts), or a
          row names an item with no R-row
  exit 2  block absent/duplicated/unparseable -- INCONCLUSIVE, never 0

It REFUSES rather than warns, and its docstring states the limitation: it is
NOT a scheduler, it fires on the next push, not on the date.

37 tests. BOTH red-proofs run and reverted -- and the first one earned its
keep by catching a hollow assertion of MINE rather than confirming the gate:
flipping <= to < left a due-today row in neither bucket, min() raised on an
empty list, and the TRACEBACK exited 1, so "rc == 1" passed while the
boundary was wrong. An exit code cannot tell a verdict from a crash. The test
now asserts the conviction banner and the absence of a traceback, and the gate
returns 2 rather than crashing if that partition breaks again.

PART 3 — the floor raise, and the premise was WRONG. Read back from the store
(not the form): min_controller_version = 0.216.0 @ 12:36:58Z, zero
per-customer overrides, no "managed floor HELD" line. But read 5 shows the
raise was NOT a no-op: demo-felhom had been on 0.214.0 since 12 Aug and
auto-updated 0.214.0 -> 0.216.0 at 12:37:07Z -- NINE SECONDS after the save,
exactly the immediate action publish-train rule 2 documents. No error events
followed; it restarted clean.

R-343 is therefore filed OPEN, not CLOSED: the closing condition was all five
reads clean and no directive served. It went well, but a record calling it
inert when it moved a customer box is what misleads the next reader. The row
also states why the floor was behind -- rule 2 policy, not drift, earned by
the 2026-07-11 skew onto Peti's box -- and cites ResolveManagedFloor
(store.go:2068) plus the two build-felhom-iso.sh facts (build-time at :267,
fails open at :78-82) rather than asserting them.

Two boxes are below the floor and neither reports: drill-r50 (blocked,
powered off) and peti-felhom (host row deleted). peti-felhom was NOT
contacted -- its row records that a report from a deleted host 401s and is
not persisted, so the raise cannot reach it.

PART 4 — R-342 filed READY, quoting stop2-snapshot.txt verbatim: Hetzner
server snapshot 421440873 covers /dev/sda only; /mnt/pbs-datastore is a
separate Volume that snapshots exclude, so a rollback restores software state
and NOT the datastore. Fine for that upgrade; the safeguard for any future
procedure that could touch the datastore does not exist and is Viktor's call.

Also: CLAUDE.md's gate list named 6 of 10 registered gates -- completed
rather than appending a 7th to a wrong list (124 -> 128 effective, ceiling
200). Capability map deliberately unchanged; no row cites a floor or golden
version. repo_gates.py fully green, 10/10.

STATUS.md

@@ -43,6 +43,16 @@ record with no machine** — created 13 August, no host, no backups, nothing to
 
 ## Shipped
 
+- **The auto-update floor is current again** (R-343). You raised it to today's version this
+  afternoon. It was **not** left behind by accident — our own rule says the floor is raised *last*,
+  after the image is vouched, because it acts within seconds. It did: **one machine updated itself
+  nine seconds later** and came back up cleanly. Worth knowing that raising it is a fleet action, not
+  paperwork.
+- **A dated check can no longer be quietly missed** (R-341). When we write "measure this again on the
+  19th", that date is now read by the build system, and a push is refused once it passes. **It is not
+  a reminder service** — it speaks on the next push, not on the day — and that limit is written into
+  the check itself.
+
 - **A new machine installed today finally gets today's software** (R-334, closed). The pre-built image
   had been two releases behind since the 14th — anyone installing would have received a version
   missing last week's disk-warning fix *and* the follow-up that corrected it. A fresh image was baked