a71cc58327
demo-felhom 9201 + demo-hp 9201 (G1 break-glass, secret shredded) both clean + healthy on 0.162.0 with the settle-gate GO line. Honest B' accounting recorded: the floor is in-memory (not persisted) so both above-floor boxes logged "awaiting floor knowledge" then GOed ~10s later once the report ACK landed — the report-ACK latency the 90s sub-bound is sized to, not a regression. The zero-wait-when-floor-known invariant stays unit-proven (test E). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7Drmtm2RzoqbkJZCNSFNQ
93 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
93 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
# REPORT — felhom-controller v0.162.0 (R-71a: the apply-bridge settle-gate)
|
||
|
||
**Date:** 2026-07-24 · **Task:** R-71(a) — structural fix for the F10 day-0 update-vs-bridge race
|
||
(consume-then-persist not crash-safe). **Scope:** `felhom-controller` only, ordering-only. No agent
|
||
(0.93.0 stays), no hub. MinAgent unchanged.
|
||
|
||
## The defect (DIAG-f10)
|
||
|
||
A fresh box boots below the operator floor (ISO 0.153.0 < floor 0.156.0). The apply-bridge consumes
|
||
the hub's single-use offsite password at boot; ~35 s later the managed **auto-floor update** replaces
|
||
the container mid-install → the new 0.156.0 process finds no installed key → `consume` → **404** →
|
||
offsite tier dead until an operator Re-issue. Recurs on **every** onboarding whose ISO floor lags the
|
||
managed floor; demo-felhom escaped by timing alone. Layering: the v1.25.0 golden≥floor build gate
|
||
PREVENTS the trigger for fresh installs, R-71c (hub) HEALS a burn, **this (a) removes the systematic
|
||
trigger for every restart shape.**
|
||
|
||
## What shipped (ordering only — consume/install/persist internals + the 404-no-oracle contract + the Consumer UNTOUCHED; R-71(b) stays rejected-by-design)
|
||
|
||
1. **Seam** `offsiteapply.SettleProvider.SettleState() (version, floor string, updateRunning,
|
||
floorKnown bool)` + `SettleFunc` adapter (seams.go) — a thin adapter over the self-updater's own
|
||
knowledge (`GetFloor()`/`IsUpdateRunning()`) in main.go. No second floor-fetch path.
|
||
2. **`Bridge.AwaitSettle`** — polls every 10 s BEFORE the 3-minute Reconcile context is created (the
|
||
deferral never eats the reconcile budget). Release table:
|
||
- `updateRunning` → wait (the swap's restart supersedes us).
|
||
- `floorKnown && version < floor` → wait (auto-floor update imminent — do NOT burn the password);
|
||
log `deferring offsite apply: managed update to floor <F> pending (we are <V>)`.
|
||
- `floorKnown && at/above floor` → **GO on the first poll, zero sleep** (the B′ invariant).
|
||
- `!floorKnown` past the 90 s sub-bound → GO + WARN (a hub that can't serve a floor can't serve a
|
||
consume → no burn risk).
|
||
- overall 5-min bound → GO + WARN (`R-71c self-heal is the belt`).
|
||
`ReconcileWhenSettled` runs the gate, then Reconcile under a fresh 3-min context.
|
||
3. **main.go** — the bridge goroutine MOVED to after the self-updater is constructed (so the adapter
|
||
can read it). Wired ONLY when an updater exists; otherwise `Settle` is nil = reconcile immediately
|
||
(no updater → no floor-update to race).
|
||
4. **Bounds** are named constants with rationale comments. The floor is in-memory
|
||
(report-ACK-derived), **NOT persisted** — so on any restart it is unknown until the first report
|
||
ACK. Source-confirmed latency: the startup report fires ~5 s after boot and `SetFloor` runs
|
||
synchronously in its ACK handler → floor normally known in ~5–10 s (≤~45 s across 3×15 s report
|
||
retries); the 90 s sub-bound is headroom over that worst case.
|
||
|
||
## Tests — all green (`go test ./...` clean, `go vet ./...` clean, gofmt clean)
|
||
|
||
Injectable clock (no real sleeps), fake `SettleState`, recorded `Consumer`
|
||
(`internal/offsiteapply/settlegate_test.go`):
|
||
|
||
- **A** below-floor defers (0 consumes while below) then GOes at floor → exactly one consume.
|
||
- **B** update-running defers then GOes when it finishes.
|
||
- **C** floor-unknown GOes at the 90 s sub-bound + the WARN line.
|
||
- **D** perpetually-below GOes at the 5-min overall bound + the WARN line.
|
||
- **E** (B′) at/above-floor GOes on **poll 1** with **zero** sleep consumed.
|
||
- nil-provider → immediate reconcile; cancelled gate → skips reconcile (no consume).
|
||
|
||
## Red-proofs — four, each OBSERVED failing then restored
|
||
|
||
| # | Break | Observed FAIL |
|
||
|---|-------|---------------|
|
||
| A | gate removed (early `return` in AwaitSettle) | `TestSettle_BelowFloorDefersThenGoes`: "expected the gate to defer while below floor (>=2 sleeps), got 0" — below-floor consumes immediately (the F10 burn) |
|
||
| B | `updateRunning` branch removed | `TestSettle_UpdateRunningDefersThenGoes`: mid-swap box GOes immediately (log shows GO, deferral line absent) |
|
||
| C | floor sub-bound branch removed | `TestSettle_FloorUnknownGoesAfterSubBound` + red-proof: "release near the sub-bound 1m30s, waited **5m0s**" — floor-unknown drags to the overall bound |
|
||
| D | overall bound check removed | `TestSettle_PerpetuallyBelowFloorGoesAtOverallBound`: **20 s test timeout** — perpetual below-floor loops forever in `AwaitSettle` |
|
||
|
||
## Ship / honesty
|
||
|
||
The deferral paths ship **unit-proven + red-proofed, NOT live-fired** — their precondition is now
|
||
structurally prevented by the v1.25.0 golden≥floor build gate, which is the point. **Layering: gate
|
||
prevents, (a) defers, (c) heals.** R-71 → SHIPPED with (a)+(c); (b) recorded rejected-by-design.
|
||
|
||
## Build + deploy + LIVE (2026-07-24)
|
||
|
||
Image `gitea.dooplex.hu/admin/felhom-controller:0.162.0` (sha `e6e1146f…`, 145M) built + pushed.
|
||
Deployed to **both** boxes, clean start, healthy:
|
||
|
||
- **demo-felhom (guest 9201, `ssh felhom-pve`)** — `Up (healthy)`:
|
||
```
|
||
05:50:44 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: awaiting floor knowledge (first report ACK) before offsite apply
|
||
05:50:54 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: GO — at/above floor 0.156.0 (we are 0.162.0), no managed update running
|
||
```
|
||
- **demo-hp (guest 9201, G1 break-glass; secret extracted file→file + shredded)** — `Up (healthy)`:
|
||
```
|
||
05:52:53 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: awaiting floor knowledge (first report ACK) before offsite apply
|
||
05:53:03 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: GO — at/above floor 0.156.0 (we are 0.162.0), no managed update running
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Honest accounting of the B′ live leg:** both above-floor boxes GOed correctly, but NOT literally on
|
||
the first poll — because the floor is **in-memory, not persisted**, it is unknown at the very first
|
||
poll (the report ACK hasn't landed) so the gate logged `awaiting floor knowledge`, then GOed on the
|
||
next poll (~10 s later) the instant the floor became known and confirmed at/above. This is exactly
|
||
the documented finding, not a regression: the gate correctly refused to consume while the floor was
|
||
unknown, and added ~10 s to a background reconcile (invisible to any user). The B′ zero-wait-when-
|
||
floor-known invariant is unit-proven (test E); the ~10 s live wait is the report-ACK latency the 90 s
|
||
sub-bound was sized against. The important live proof holds: **the gate did not burn the one-time
|
||
password before the managed-update picture was clear.**
|