demo-felhom 9201 + demo-hp 9201 (G1 break-glass, secret shredded) both clean + healthy on 0.162.0 with the settle-gate GO line. Honest B' accounting recorded: the floor is in-memory (not persisted) so both above-floor boxes logged "awaiting floor knowledge" then GOed ~10s later once the report ACK landed — the report-ACK latency the 90s sub-bound is sized to, not a regression. The zero-wait-when-floor-known invariant stays unit-proven (test E). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01N7Drmtm2RzoqbkJZCNSFNQ
6.4 KiB
REPORT — felhom-controller v0.162.0 (R-71a: the apply-bridge settle-gate)
Date: 2026-07-24 · Task: R-71(a) — structural fix for the F10 day-0 update-vs-bridge race
(consume-then-persist not crash-safe). Scope: felhom-controller only, ordering-only. No agent
(0.93.0 stays), no hub. MinAgent unchanged.
The defect (DIAG-f10)
A fresh box boots below the operator floor (ISO 0.153.0 < floor 0.156.0). The apply-bridge consumes
the hub's single-use offsite password at boot; ~35 s later the managed auto-floor update replaces
the container mid-install → the new 0.156.0 process finds no installed key → consume → 404 →
offsite tier dead until an operator Re-issue. Recurs on every onboarding whose ISO floor lags the
managed floor; demo-felhom escaped by timing alone. Layering: the v1.25.0 golden≥floor build gate
PREVENTS the trigger for fresh installs, R-71c (hub) HEALS a burn, this (a) removes the systematic
trigger for every restart shape.
What shipped (ordering only — consume/install/persist internals + the 404-no-oracle contract + the Consumer UNTOUCHED; R-71(b) stays rejected-by-design)
- Seam
offsiteapply.SettleProvider.SettleState() (version, floor string, updateRunning, floorKnown bool)+SettleFuncadapter (seams.go) — a thin adapter over the self-updater's own knowledge (GetFloor()/IsUpdateRunning()) in main.go. No second floor-fetch path. Bridge.AwaitSettle— polls every 10 s BEFORE the 3-minute Reconcile context is created (the deferral never eats the reconcile budget). Release table:updateRunning→ wait (the swap's restart supersedes us).floorKnown && version < floor→ wait (auto-floor update imminent — do NOT burn the password); logdeferring offsite apply: managed update to floor <F> pending (we are <V>).floorKnown && at/above floor→ GO on the first poll, zero sleep (the B′ invariant).!floorKnownpast the 90 s sub-bound → GO + WARN (a hub that can't serve a floor can't serve a consume → no burn risk).- overall 5-min bound → GO + WARN (
R-71c self-heal is the belt).ReconcileWhenSettledruns the gate, then Reconcile under a fresh 3-min context.
- main.go — the bridge goroutine MOVED to after the self-updater is constructed (so the adapter
can read it). Wired ONLY when an updater exists; otherwise
Settleis nil = reconcile immediately (no updater → no floor-update to race). - Bounds are named constants with rationale comments. The floor is in-memory
(report-ACK-derived), NOT persisted — so on any restart it is unknown until the first report
ACK. Source-confirmed latency: the startup report fires ~5 s after boot and
SetFloorruns synchronously in its ACK handler → floor normally known in ~5–10 s (≤~45 s across 3×15 s report retries); the 90 s sub-bound is headroom over that worst case.
Tests — all green (go test ./... clean, go vet ./... clean, gofmt clean)
Injectable clock (no real sleeps), fake SettleState, recorded Consumer
(internal/offsiteapply/settlegate_test.go):
- A below-floor defers (0 consumes while below) then GOes at floor → exactly one consume.
- B update-running defers then GOes when it finishes.
- C floor-unknown GOes at the 90 s sub-bound + the WARN line.
- D perpetually-below GOes at the 5-min overall bound + the WARN line.
- E (B′) at/above-floor GOes on poll 1 with zero sleep consumed.
- nil-provider → immediate reconcile; cancelled gate → skips reconcile (no consume).
Red-proofs — four, each OBSERVED failing then restored
| # | Break | Observed FAIL |
|---|---|---|
| A | gate removed (early return in AwaitSettle) |
TestSettle_BelowFloorDefersThenGoes: "expected the gate to defer while below floor (>=2 sleeps), got 0" — below-floor consumes immediately (the F10 burn) |
| B | updateRunning branch removed |
TestSettle_UpdateRunningDefersThenGoes: mid-swap box GOes immediately (log shows GO, deferral line absent) |
| C | floor sub-bound branch removed | TestSettle_FloorUnknownGoesAfterSubBound + red-proof: "release near the sub-bound 1m30s, waited 5m0s" — floor-unknown drags to the overall bound |
| D | overall bound check removed | TestSettle_PerpetuallyBelowFloorGoesAtOverallBound: 20 s test timeout — perpetual below-floor loops forever in AwaitSettle |
Ship / honesty
The deferral paths ship unit-proven + red-proofed, NOT live-fired — their precondition is now structurally prevented by the v1.25.0 golden≥floor build gate, which is the point. Layering: gate prevents, (a) defers, (c) heals. R-71 → SHIPPED with (a)+(c); (b) recorded rejected-by-design.
Build + deploy + LIVE (2026-07-24)
Image gitea.dooplex.hu/admin/felhom-controller:0.162.0 (sha e6e1146f…, 145M) built + pushed.
Deployed to both boxes, clean start, healthy:
- demo-felhom (guest 9201,
ssh felhom-pve) —Up (healthy):05:50:44 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: awaiting floor knowledge (first report ACK) before offsite apply 05:50:54 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: GO — at/above floor 0.156.0 (we are 0.162.0), no managed update running - demo-hp (guest 9201, G1 break-glass; secret extracted file→file + shredded) —
Up (healthy):05:52:53 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: awaiting floor knowledge (first report ACK) before offsite apply 05:53:03 [INFO] [offsite-apply] settle-gate: GO — at/above floor 0.156.0 (we are 0.162.0), no managed update running
Honest accounting of the B′ live leg: both above-floor boxes GOed correctly, but NOT literally on
the first poll — because the floor is in-memory, not persisted, it is unknown at the very first
poll (the report ACK hasn't landed) so the gate logged awaiting floor knowledge, then GOed on the
next poll (~10 s later) the instant the floor became known and confirmed at/above. This is exactly
the documented finding, not a regression: the gate correctly refused to consume while the floor was
unknown, and added ~10 s to a background reconcile (invisible to any user). The B′ zero-wait-when-
floor-known invariant is unit-proven (test E); the ~10 s live wait is the report-ACK latency the 90 s
sub-bound was sized against. The important live proof holds: the gate did not burn the one-time
password before the managed-update picture was clear.