admin
9dc26459ea
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s
R-218's declaration half shipped in v0.201.0 and works. Its consume half never existed. Reconcile ran exactly twice per process — at start-up and when the recovery screen drives it — and BOTH fire before the hub has anything staged, because the hub stages in RESPONSE to the declaration those runs precede. Measured on the R-201 re-walk: unlock reconcile 11:43:07, hub staged 11:44:57 saying 'next cycle', a full report cycle ran 11:55:46, still unconsumed at 12:06. A guest command line applied it in 18 seconds — everything correct except the trigger. Bridge.RetryIfDeclared re-runs the SAME reconcile on a 5-minute tick, driven from the box's own published declaration (OffboxReportStatus().State) — the very statement the hub acts on, so the two cannot disagree. Poll, not an ACK flag, decided on the promise: the no-target message says 'amint megvannak' (no deadline) and the card says 'within a day'. Five minutes is inside both by a wide margin and needs no hub change. It stops by construction — a healthy box does no work and logs nothing — and the settle gate is deliberately kept via ReconcileWhenSettled. The marker was investigated and left alone: applied_marker lives in the guest's DataDir, which a rebuild destroys, so it cannot suppress a legitimate re-run. R-220's customer half: the refusal no longer tells the customer to choose from a list that may be empty. It names the rebuild, points at the Meghajtók page, and promises no outcome. Red-proofs: remove the retry -> credential uncollected (the dead end reproduced); drop the stop condition -> a healthy box hammers the hub; call Reconcile instead of ReconcileWhenSettled -> settle gate bypassed; restore the old sentence -> the impossible action returns. 28 packages ok, vet clean, all controller gates OK.