docs: R-168 is CLOSED — the "CI is still owed" sentence was stale (R-229 part 2)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
Corrected in all four instruction files across all four repos. Found while confirming this session own push by run ID, which is precisely the check that catches it. In felhom-agent/CLAUDE.md the sentence contradicted the same file release section, which already said R-168 mails the failure -- a contradiction inside one instruction file, the exact class the R-229 work exists to find. REPORT.md deliberately NOT overwritten in the sibling repos: a one-line docs correction must not destroy the record of their last real implementation.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ exiting non-zero if any fails.
|
||||
- **The pre-push hook** (`.githooks/pre-push`) runs it with `--fast` and refuses a failing push. It is
|
||||
per-clone — switch it on once with `git config core.hooksPath .githooks`, and a manual run WARNS
|
||||
when this clone is unarmed. `git push --no-verify` bypasses it deliberately; **say so in the session
|
||||
report when you use it.** Both facts are why CI is still owed (`OPEN-ITEMS.md` R-168).
|
||||
report when you use it** — CI re-runs the same entry point on every push and **emails the operator
|
||||
on failure**, so a bypass is noticed even though it is not blocked (R-168, CLOSED 2026-08-02).
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
WHY A RUNNER AND NOT SEVEN INVOCATIONS (2026-08-02, R-29) — rationale, not a directive.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
|
||||
## docs — the "CI is still owed" claim was stale; corrected (2026-08-06, R-229 part 2) — no version bump
|
||||
|
||||
**One sentence, no code.** This file asserted that continuous integration was still owed
|
||||
(`felhom.eu` `OPEN-ITEMS.md` R-168). **R-168 was CLOSED on 2026-08-02** — a Gitea Actions runner
|
||||
re-runs each repo's gate entry point on every push and emails the operator on failure. Found while
|
||||
confirming this session's own push by run ID, which is the check that caught it.
|
||||
|
||||
The same stale sentence was in four instruction files across all four repos and is corrected in all
|
||||
four. In `felhom-agent/CLAUDE.md` it **contradicted the same file's release section**, which already
|
||||
said R-168 mails the failure — a contradiction inside one instruction file, which is the exact class
|
||||
the R-229 work exists to find.
|
||||
|
||||
## docs — CLAUDE.md split into a core plus path-scoped rules (2026-08-06, R-229) — no version bump
|
||||
|
||||
**Documentation and gate registration only. No Go changed, no image built, no deploy.**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user