admin
c85262111c
gates / gates (push) Successful in 23s
Part 0 — floor raised to 0.260.0, MinAgent 0.131.0 declared. 3 boxes below, all down or blocked; both demo boxes SERVED. Part 1 (R-610) — the DANGEROUS power cut, measured three times with three apps and two cut mechanisms. All ended honest: resumed, completed, and pinned/installed/live compose/docker inspect all agreed. vikunja's 2.6.0 migration had ALREADY run 0.64 s after the cut decision and the seeded data read back intact — so the branch that is one step from old-binary-on-migrated-database is now evidence, not argument. Instrument limit stated: `starting` lasts under a second; all three landed in `verifying`, which RecoverUpdates handles in the same branch. Part 3 (R-611) — the night the previous session skipped without saying so. An app updated with nobody pressing anything; a terminally-refused app was pressed exactly once and never again over three passes. The unattended HOLD was NOT produced: the within-a-major rule correctly refused the broken edge before it was attempted, so Q4 still rests on the attended hold from slice 4. Said plainly rather than implied. Rows: closed R-608/609/610/611; opened R-612 (P1 wishlist unusable on a fresh install, and its error is a lie), R-613 (uptime-kuma healthy on its setup wizard), R-614 (stale update phase survives a redeploy). R-520's pointer corrected. Catalog: two drill pairs, both reverted; every image line byte-identical to ff9717d3. The alpine:3.20 negative control a security review flagged is cleared. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
30 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
30 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext
# 04b — INDEPENDENT CORROBORATION of scenario A, captured by the COORDINATOR
|
|
#
|
|
# WHY THIS FILE EXISTS, stated plainly: 25 minutes passed with no evidence written while the box
|
|
# already showed the update complete, so the main session took its own read-only capture rather than
|
|
# risk losing the measurement (R-320 — evidence off before it can be lost). The measuring agent's own
|
|
# file `04-scenarioA-starting-cut.txt` then landed and is FULLER and BETTER than this one: it has the
|
|
# timestamp table, the journal read off the stopped guest, and the seeded-data read-back.
|
|
#
|
|
# THIS FILE IS NOT A SECOND MEASUREMENT. It is the same box, read independently ~90 minutes later by
|
|
# a different reader with a different session. Its only value is that it agrees.
|
|
|
|
READ AT: 2026-09-21, after the scenario completed. Source: live guest 9202, read-only.
|
|
|
|
AGREES WITH 04-scenarioA-starting-cut.txt ON:
|
|
* the recovery line — interrupted in `verifying`, "the new version may have run; marking it
|
|
Updating and RESUMING the health wait", resumed, `up -d`, healthy after 0s, DONE in 1m26s;
|
|
* all FOUR version observables reading vikunja/vikunja:2.6.0 —
|
|
pinned_images, installed_images, the live compose `image:` line, and `docker inspect`
|
|
(created 2026-09-21T12:28:26Z, state running);
|
|
* end state: state=running, updating=False, update_phase=done, label 'Frissitve',
|
|
no update_error, no hold_reason, health_probe.healthy=True;
|
|
* the update journal ABSENT (cleared), with a positive control that the directory searched is the
|
|
real one — catalog-cache, debug-ring.log, encryption.key, metrics.db*, settings.json* beside it.
|
|
|
|
WHAT THIS FILE COULD NOT DO, and why — because a gap recorded is worth more than a gap hidden:
|
|
the seeded-data read-back. 02-seeding.txt records the canary task name but not the account it was
|
|
created under, and the coordinator would not guess credentials or read vikunja's database behind
|
|
the app's back. "Through the front door" is the condition the measurement is worth anything under.
|
|
The measuring agent had the credentials and did it: the task read back unchanged.
|