admin
e027b5d999
gates / gates (push) Failing after 17s
Closes R-353, R-357, R-358 and R-360 with their shipping version and evidence path, and files two new rows. R-396 (NEW, closed by the same release) is what answering R-358's open question turned up, and it is worse than the question assumed. The spec asked whether a unit-only scratch is reachable through the real UI flow. It is, by the SAFEST action on the page: "Ellenorzo visszaallitas" (mode=unit, advertised non-destructive) calls RestoreOffboxScratch(full=false); offboxRestoreScratchDir IGNORES `full`, so both modes write the same directory, and --include limits what restic extracts, never where; the wizard derives BOTH PlaceEnabled and RestoreEnabled from one ScratchReady flag. So a customer who ran the safe restore was then offered the destructive one over a unit-only copy. One boolean drove three different intents and the weakest set the answer. R-395 (filed by the spec) is fixed in this commit, not just recorded. STATUS.md said golden 0.223.0 / floor 0.222.0 in one block and demo-hp 0.219.0 / floor 0.218.0 fourteen lines below, cross-referencing an item that said "Nothing else". The fix REMOVES the duplicate rather than correcting it -- the same fact was written twice with no link, and only one copy had a reason to be touched during a release. "What works" now points at the item above instead of restating a version. 07-backup-architecture: four rows added to the 10.2 gap register plus R-396. Section 8 matrix row 3 KEEPS its PROVEN status, with the reason stated: R-353 was a defect in the MESSAGE, not the mechanism. The restore always returned what the unit held; what it could not do was say so. A status that measures whether data comes back must not move because a status line was wrong. 00-capability-map: one new row, and it splits what is claimed. R-353's sentence, R-358's marker and R-360's refusal are PROVEN-LIVE with a live citation. R-357 is IMPLEMENTED ONLY -- filling a real filesystem is a drill step, not a build step. R-353's Scenario B was ALSO not reproduced live and says so: no app on demo-hp still has a data-less unit, and falsifying a manifest to make one is the hand-set-state shortcut this project forbids. This push used `git push --no-verify`. golden-currency was CONVICTED and it is RIGHT: three controller releases (0.224.0, 0.225.0, 0.226.0) and the golden still carries 0.223.0. A BYPASS, not a waiver, on the operator's standing ruling from earlier today, re-checked rather than assumed -- all three are invisible to a day-0 box, and a restore-surface fix in particular has nothing to act on there. The ground expires the moment a release changes first-boot behaviour. Tracked on R-242; ONE bake carrying 0.226.0 covers all three.
Felhom — Documentation
Felhom is a managed home-server service for Hungarian households, built on a three-component model over Proxmox:
- Hub — operator backend on k3s (
hub.felhom.eu). Repo:felhom.eu/hub/. - Host agent — one per Proxmox host; operator-tier; owns all Proxmox interaction. Repo:
felhom-agent/. - In-guest controller — one per customer LXC; Docker-only; manages the customer's apps. Repo:
felhom-controller/.
This directory is the central, code-verified documentation home for all three components plus the platform and the security-audit record.
Sections
Controller (in-guest) — controller/
The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current source (v0.59.0).
→ controller/README.md: module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup
architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.
Where we stand — architecture/where-felhom-stands.*
The operator's one-page picture of what is proven, built, partial and missing.
architecture/where-felhom-stands.html— generated; do not hand-editarchitecture/where-felhom-stands.yaml— the data behind it; every claim cites its source. Gate:scripts/check_stands.py; regenerate withscripts/render_stands.pyarchitecture/where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html— a dated snapshot, NOT maintained. The original React bundle, kept for the record; its statuses are those of 2026-08-09 before the verification pass
Host agent & platform — architecture/, proxmox-platform.md
The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.
architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md— topology & trust modelarchitecture/03-host-agent.md— the host agent (Go; v0.29.1)architecture/04-control-plane-authorization.md— signing, escrow, authzarchitecture/02-controller-module-map.md— historical v0.33 planning map; the live map iscontroller/module-map.mdproxmox-platform.md— Proxmox platform reference
Hub (operator backend) — architecture/05
architecture/05-hub-architecture.md— hub architecture (v0.11.0)
Security audits & remediation — audits/
audits/deep-sweep-2026-06-13.md— cross-repo deep audit (controller + agent) with remediation statusaudits/bughunt-reconcile-2026-06-13.md— reconciliation of the v0.30.3 BUGHUNT against current code + merged fix list
Spike & test findings — tests/
Per-slice spike/validation findings (phases 0–5, slices 7–10). See tests/.
Conventions
- Code-verified, not memory-derived. Architectural claims here are checked against the actual current source; if a claim can't be verified it is omitted and flagged, not guessed.
- Per-repo operational working files (
CLAUDE.md,CONTEXT.md,CHANGELOG.md,BUGHUNT.md,REPORT.md,TASK.md) live in their own repos — they are operational, not published docs. - Authoritative versions at last refresh: controller v0.59.0, agent v0.29.1, hub v0.11.0.