felhom.eu/documentation/audits/redesign-2026-10-10/ki-all-mogotte.md

„Ki áll mögötte" — the draft text, and where each sentence comes from

STOP 2 artifact. Nothing here reaches a page before the operator approves this file.

Where it ended up (operator, 2026-10-11, after seeing the preview)

The full block lives on /kapcsolat and /en/contact, not on the home page. The operator's reading, which was right: on the home page it sat between the dashboard gallery and „Hogyan működik?", interrupting what it does → how you get it with a life story. And the last sentence, „Ha írsz, én válaszolok", is a contact-page sentence — it belongs beside „Válaszidő".

A dedicated /rolam page was considered and rejected: five sentences cannot carry a page, and the only way to fill one would have been to invent biography.

The home page keeps a compact trace in the closing call to action: a 56×70 portrait, one line and a link to the full block. That is deliberate — the audit's R-11 finding was „nobody is behind it" on the home page, and removing every human trace would have re-opened exactly that. The trace now sits where someone decides to write.

The English twin was written in the same commit and uses the site's established „the box” rather than a new term; it promises nothing the Hungarian does not.

The draft

Ki áll mögötte

Nagyfenyvesi Viktor vagyok. Tíz éve tervezek hálózatokat és infrastruktúrát, ma DevOps mérnökként dolgozom, otthon pedig évek óta megy a saját szerverem; a mostani nagyjából egy éve fut.

A Felhom onnan indult, hogy ilyen szolgáltatást itthon nem találtam. Saját szervert sokan meg tudnak építeni, de utána menteni, frissíteni és figyelni is kell valakinek. Ezt a részét vállalom át.

Ha írsz, én válaszolok, és nem ígérek olyat, amit a doboz ma nem tud.

Five sentences, first person, informal te. No em dash. No word from the banned list (professzionális, ipari szintű, megoldás, …).

Where every claim comes from

Sentence	Source	Check
„Nagyfenyvesi Viktor vagyok."	Already public in the site footer (Üzemeltető: Nagyfenyvesi Viktor)	no new disclosure
„Tíz éve tervezek hálózatokat és infrastruktúrát"	CV: Network/Voice operator 2016-2018 → Senior Network Designer 2018-2022 → Network Architect 2022- . A continuous ten-year run	deliberately not "20+ év informatika" — the CV has a 2008-2015 shop-manager stretch, so the larger number would not survive a careful reader
„ma DevOps mérnökként dolgozom"	Operator's own words, confirmed by the CV's most recent role	kept employer-free
„otthon pedig évek óta megy a saját szerverem"	Operator: „Running home-server as a hobby for years now"	—
„a mostani nagyjából egy éve fut"	Operator: „Latest server is running since about a year now"	—
„ilyen szolgáltatást itthon nem találtam"	Operator: „maybe this is a service which doesn't exist yet"	softened from a market claim to a personal observation, which is what he can actually vouch for
„menteni, frissíteni és figyelni is kell valakinek. Ezt a részét vállalom át."	The service the site already describes (nightly backup, cautious app updates, remote monitoring)	every part already claimed on today's page
„nem ígérek olyat, amit a doboz ma nem tud"	The existing „Ismert korlátok" card	reinforces a promise already made

Deliberately left out

• Employer names (Deutsche Telekom, BT, IBM, Copyguru, Eastron). Not authorised, and a household does not care.
• Address, phone number, e-mail from the CV. The page already has info@felhom.eu.
• The certification list (CKA, AWS SA, CCNA, VCP, Azure). See decision 3.
• k3s / DooPlex / homelab-manifests. True, and meaningless to the audience this page is for.
• Anything about his family or what is stored on his own server. He did not say it, so it is not written.

Three things the operator must settle

1. „Ha írsz, én válaszolok" is a NEW promise. Today's site promises support but never that one named person answers. It is the most trust-building sentence in the draft and the easiest to regret at 30 customers. Keep, soften, or cut.
2. én here vs mi everywhere else. The rest of the page says „mi segítünk", „Figyeljük a doboz állapotát". A first-person section sitting inside a first-person-plural page is normal for a one-person business and is not dishonest, but it is a visible seam. Recommendation: leave the service copy as mi and let this one section be én; switching the whole page to én is a bigger copy change than this round should carry.
3. A credential line, or none. One sentence could be added, e.g. „Kubernetes rendszergazdai vizsgám van (CKA)". Recommendation: leave it out. For a household it reads as a CV, and the ten-year sentence already does the work.

The photograph

photo/operator-portrait.webp — 720 × 900, 93 KB, WebP q78.

• Source: E:\felhom-photos\20231018_173058.jpg, 3264 × 2448. The original stays outside the repo.
• Crop box (340, 131) → (2047, 2265), 4:5, head and shoulders, resized to 720 wide.
• Metadata: the original carried no GPS tag (GPS IFD: 0 entries). It did carry the phone make and model (samsung SM-A705FN), the firmware build and the exact timestamp. The brief's premise that the phone photo would carry a location turned out not to hold for this file; everything was stripped regardless.
• Verified by read-back of the written file: 0 EXIF tags, 0 GPS IFD entries, info keys only ['background', 'loop'] (WebP container defaults), and none of the byte sequences EXIF, XMP , ICCP, samsung, SM-A705FN, 2023:10:18 appear anywhere in the file.
• Built by re-writing the pixels into a fresh Image object rather than saving the decoded original, so nothing from the source's info dict can travel with it.