admin
e34b614e5b
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
R-182 CLOSED (controller v0.194.0 + hub v0.90.0/.1), proven live on demo-hp. The hub's notification_log for the run reads: two per-app failures RECORDED, one digest SENT naming both, and the customer channel SKIPPED with operator_only. Against the measured previous behaviour — two failures, one email naming one app, one leaving no trace anywhere. Scenario D proved itself on an event I had not planned: disk_critical alarmed on two filesystems, the second was collapsed by the cooldown, and that collapse is now visible WITH ITS KEY. Yesterday it would have left nothing at all. A gap the spec did not anticipate is recorded with its fix: the per-app event also fires from the periodic sweep, outside any run, so making it record-only would have created a NEW silence. The sweep emits a digest too, with no run_id, so it stays under the ordinary hourly cooldown. ep0: MEASURED on the box — 7757 MB (8 GB), 4 vCPU, and the 4 GiB swapfile SURVIVED the resize and is active (checked, because a resize is a stop/start). The 40 GB local disk is UNCHANGED, so no disk figure was touched anywhere. Five documents corrected — three of which the task's list did not name, found by searching. Two audit/evidence documents ANNOTATED, body untouched: they record what was true when written and that is their value. R-90 CLOSED. R-86 unblocked and re-ranked, stated honestly: 8 GB is comfortable, not unbounded — the original OOM was a 14.46 GB restore — so the restore-test cadence should still be paced, just not by fear of the endpoint. target-selection.md's "D-d did not name ep0 either way" is deliberately left standing. It is the operator's question, not CC's. STATUS.md 127 -> 83 lines, items rather than sentences.
