admin
c04f933d0b
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
CENSUS (read-only, hub store, tester's machine not contacted): no machine that is not ours can be in the state that cost demo-felhom its history. The hub holds escrow for three hosts; both demo boxes lost their pre-fix key in the same four hours on 2026-08-04; peti-felhom and david have no host row and no escrow at all. A control ran FIRST and had to pass -- the query returned "present (572 bytes)" for a host known to have material and "absent (NULL)" for one known not to. Corrected my own instrument on the way: a date-only comparison mislabelled both losses as after the fix, so the in-force moment is now pinned from the hub's first post-fix escrow row (11:11:37Z), which independently agrees with the register. PART 1 ESTABLISHED. The prune is recorded inside R-267 -- the row about the Configuration page being slow -- because pruning artifacts is what made that page fast. Arithmetic checks (23+7=30, plus three versions that only surfaced after the first thirty moved them onto page one = 33) and the PAGINATED listing shows both generics at exactly ten. R-291's blocking condition is released: the operator was being asked to establish something already written down. And my counter-argument yesterday was wrong in exactly the way R-267 warns about -- "containers hold 19" came from an unpaginated query; paginated they hold 270 and 169. RECEIPTS: three restored (drives.enrol, backup.tier1, fail.lost-recovery-code), each citing the document that walked it; the map already read PROVEN-LIVE for all three, so this follows the map rather than raising a status in the view. NINE HONEST GREYS. fault.selfheal's best hit argues against it -- an incident recording self-heal's absence through a 1h15m outage. THE DECAY RULE FIRED FOR THE FIRST TIME. backup.restore-proof has a receipt from 28 July and is superseded anyway: demo-hp's restore-test failed 5 August and the box has since been rebuilt. A claim about a continuing behaviour cannot rest on an old observation. The capability map still reads PROVEN-LIVE and is now the thing out of step -- recorded, not silently rewritten. PART 4 specified, not implemented. The orphan card promises restorability the box rendering it cannot evaluate: the discriminator is on the hub and no wire field carries it. A conditional promise the system cannot evaluate is the same defect as an unconditional false one, so the copy stops promising, says what happens, and names a route. Ships with the next controller change so one bake covers both.
Felhom — Documentation
Felhom is a managed home-server service for Hungarian households, built on a three-component model over Proxmox:
- Hub — operator backend on k3s (
hub.felhom.eu). Repo:felhom.eu/hub/. - Host agent — one per Proxmox host; operator-tier; owns all Proxmox interaction. Repo:
felhom-agent/. - In-guest controller — one per customer LXC; Docker-only; manages the customer's apps. Repo:
felhom-controller/.
This directory is the central, code-verified documentation home for all three components plus the platform and the security-audit record.
Sections
Controller (in-guest) — controller/
The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current source (v0.59.0).
→ controller/README.md: module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup
architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.
Where we stand — architecture/where-felhom-stands.*
The operator's one-page picture of what is proven, built, partial and missing.
architecture/where-felhom-stands.html— generated; do not hand-editarchitecture/where-felhom-stands.yaml— the data behind it; every claim cites its source. Gate:scripts/check_stands.py; regenerate withscripts/render_stands.pyarchitecture/where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html— a dated snapshot, NOT maintained. The original React bundle, kept for the record; its statuses are those of 2026-08-09 before the verification pass
Host agent & platform — architecture/, proxmox-platform.md
The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.
architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md— topology & trust modelarchitecture/03-host-agent.md— the host agent (Go; v0.29.1)architecture/04-control-plane-authorization.md— signing, escrow, authzarchitecture/02-controller-module-map.md— historical v0.33 planning map; the live map iscontroller/module-map.mdproxmox-platform.md— Proxmox platform reference
Hub (operator backend) — architecture/05
architecture/05-hub-architecture.md— hub architecture (v0.11.0)
Security audits & remediation — audits/
audits/deep-sweep-2026-06-13.md— cross-repo deep audit (controller + agent) with remediation statusaudits/bughunt-reconcile-2026-06-13.md— reconciliation of the v0.30.3 BUGHUNT against current code + merged fix list
Spike & test findings — tests/
Per-slice spike/validation findings (phases 0–5, slices 7–10). See tests/.
Conventions
- Code-verified, not memory-derived. Architectural claims here are checked against the actual current source; if a claim can't be verified it is omitted and flagged, not guessed.
- Per-repo operational working files (
CLAUDE.md,CONTEXT.md,CHANGELOG.md,BUGHUNT.md,REPORT.md,TASK.md) live in their own repos — they are operational, not published docs. - Authoritative versions at last refresh: controller v0.59.0, agent v0.29.1, hub v0.11.0.