Files
felhom.eu/hub/internal/offsite/offsite_test.go
T
admin d1a8edb332 R-196 / R-204 item 2: a re-issue no longer marks a healthy escrow stale (hub v0.95.0)
ReissueCredentials marked the escrow stale on every re-issue, on precautionary
grounds — the box's re-apply MIGHT mint a fresh repository password. It usually
does not. A stale flag withholds restic_pw_sha256 from the ACK, which stops the
controller's auto-confirm, which leaves EscrowState pending, which makes
OffboxRunnable false: every off-site backup refused on a box whose key was never
in doubt — and the customer told to re-run the one ceremony that would have
superseded the key just recovered.

The case it guessed at is measured elsewhere: the controller's Scenario-F
re-check compares the sealed hash against the live repo password on every ACK
(and the mark was BLINDING it by emptying that hash), and R-197's
offsite_repo_key_changed fires on a proven difference across a supersession.

offsite_reissued is unchanged. MarkEscrowStale is kept without a caller so a
future EVIDENTIAL writer has the mechanism, with a test pinning it live.
TestReissue_InvalidatesEscrow is replaced by its exact inverse.
2026-08-05 07:17:29 +02:00

488 lines
21 KiB
Go

package offsite
import (
"context"
"database/sql"
"encoding/json"
"errors"
"io"
"log"
"path/filepath"
"strings"
"testing"
"time"
"gitea.dooplex.hu/admin/felhom-hub/internal/hetznerapi"
"gitea.dooplex.hu/admin/felhom-hub/internal/store"
)
func newTestProvisioner(t *testing.T) (*Provisioner, *hetznerapi.Fake, *store.Store) {
t.Helper()
st, err := store.New(filepath.Join(t.TempDir(), "off.db"), log.New(io.Discard, "", 0))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
t.Cleanup(func() { st.Close() })
fake := hetznerapi.NewFake()
// ScanBackoff: empty (non-nil) → single scan attempt, no retries — tests that want the F2 retry set
// their own schedule (nil would select the ~60s production default and stall the suite).
return &Provisioner{API: fake, Store: st, Scanner: &fakeScanner{fp: "SHA256:testfp"}, PoolBoxID: 611421, Location: "fsn1", Logger: log.New(io.Discard, "", 0), ScanBackoff: []time.Duration{}}, fake, st
}
// flakyScanner fails the first `failures` calls (fresh-resource DNS lag), then succeeds.
type flakyScanner struct {
failures int
fp string
calls int
}
func (f *flakyScanner) Fingerprint(_ context.Context, _ string, _ int) (string, error) {
f.calls++
if f.calls <= f.failures {
return "", errors.New("dial tcp: lookup fresh.your-storagebox.de: no such host")
}
return f.fp, nil
}
// fakeScanner returns a fixed fingerprint (or an error) — no live SSH in tests.
type fakeScanner struct {
fp string
err error
}
func (f *fakeScanner) Fingerprint(_ context.Context, _ string, _ int) (string, error) {
return f.fp, f.err
}
// Scenario A — enable shared → sub-account provisioned, descriptor built, one-time password stored (NOT in
// ConfigJSON), password absent from the merged config.
func TestProvision_Shared(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-a", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 50})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("provision: %v", err)
}
if fake.CreatedSubaccounts != 1 {
t.Fatalf("want 1 subaccount created, got %d", fake.CreatedSubaccounts)
}
if d.Type != "shared" || d.Port != 23 || d.RepoPath != "/home/felhom-repo" || d.QuotaGB != 50 || d.User == "" || d.Host == "" {
t.Fatalf("descriptor wrong: %+v", d)
}
// one-time password stored + is NOT the descriptor / config
pw, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-a")
if err != nil || pw == "" {
t.Fatalf("one-time password not stored: %v", err)
}
merged, err := MergeDescriptor(`{"git":{"token":"x"}}`, d)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if strings.Contains(merged, pw) {
t.Fatal("the transient password LEAKED into ConfigJSON")
}
if !strings.Contains(merged, `"offsite"`) || !strings.Contains(merged, `"git"`) {
t.Fatalf("merge lost keys: %s", merged)
}
// descriptor struct has no password field at all
db, _ := json.Marshal(d)
if strings.Contains(strings.ToLower(string(db)), "password") {
t.Fatalf("descriptor carries a password field: %s", db)
}
}
// Part 0 — the descriptor carries the box host-key fingerprint (captured at provision).
func TestProvision_HostFingerprint(t *testing.T) {
p, _, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-fp", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if d.HostFingerprint != "SHA256:testfp" {
t.Fatalf("descriptor must carry the host fingerprint, got %q", d.HostFingerprint)
}
}
// Part 0 — a host-key scan failure is fail-closed (no descriptor served).
func TestProvision_ScanFailClosed(t *testing.T) {
p, _, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
p.Scanner = &fakeScanner{err: errors.New("keyscan timeout")}
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-sf", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10})
if err == nil || d != nil {
t.Fatalf("a keyscan failure must fail-closed, got d=%+v err=%v", d, err)
}
// the resource may have been created + password stored, but no verifiable descriptor is served
_ = st
}
// Scenario D (F2) — a fresh sub-account's DNS lags creation: the scan is retried and the FIRST save
// serves the descriptor.
func TestProvision_ScanRetriesThroughDNSLag(t *testing.T) {
p, _, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
p.ScanBackoff = []time.Duration{0, 0, 0} // instant retries in tests
sc := &flakyScanner{failures: 2, fp: "SHA256:late"}
p.Scanner = sc
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-dns", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("the first save must survive DNS lag via scan retries, got: %v", err)
}
if d.HostFingerprint != "SHA256:late" || sc.calls != 3 {
t.Fatalf("want fingerprint after 2 failed + 1 good scan, got fp=%q calls=%d", d.HostFingerprint, sc.calls)
}
}
// Scenario D (F2) — a scan that keeps failing past the budget still fails CLOSED (no descriptor).
func TestProvision_ScanExhaustedFailsClosed(t *testing.T) {
p, _, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
p.ScanBackoff = []time.Duration{0, 0}
sc := &flakyScanner{failures: 99, fp: "SHA256:never"}
p.Scanner = sc
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-dns2", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10})
if err == nil || d != nil {
t.Fatalf("an exhausted scan budget must fail closed, got d=%+v err=%v", d, err)
}
if sc.calls != 3 { // 1 initial + 2 retries
t.Fatalf("want 3 attempts (1 + 2 retries), got %d", sc.calls)
}
}
// Scenario A (F4) — re-issue resets the labelled sub-account's password and stores a FRESH one-time
// secret (the consumed-password dead-end recovery).
func TestReissue_SharedFreshSecret(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-r", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
pw1, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-r") // the original is spent (the dead-end premise)
if err != nil || pw1 == "" {
t.Fatal("harness: no initial secret")
}
if err := p.ReissueCredentials(context.Background(), "cust-r", "shared"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("reissue: %v", err)
}
if fake.ResetCalls != 1 {
t.Fatalf("want exactly 1 sub-account password reset, got %d", fake.ResetCalls)
}
pw2, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-r")
if err != nil || pw2 == "" {
t.Fatal("a FRESH one-time secret must be stored after reissue")
}
if pw2 == pw1 {
t.Fatal("the re-issued password must differ from the spent one")
}
}
// Scenario A (F4) — the dedicated path resets the labelled box's password.
func TestReissue_DedicatedFreshSecret(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-rd", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "dedicated", BoxType: "bx11"}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
_, _ = st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-rd")
if err := p.ReissueCredentials(context.Background(), "cust-rd", "dedicated"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("reissue dedicated: %v", err)
}
if fake.BoxResetCalls != 1 {
t.Fatalf("want exactly 1 box password reset, got %d", fake.BoxResetCalls)
}
if pw, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-rd"); err != nil || pw == "" {
t.Fatal("fresh secret must be stored after a dedicated reissue")
}
}
// Scenario A WRONG-guard (F4) — an ambiguous label lookup (≠1 resource) must REFUSE: no reset, no secret.
func TestReissue_RefusesAmbiguousLookup(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
// two sub-accounts labelled for the same customer (should never happen — refuse rather than guess)
fake.Subaccounts[1] = hetznerapi.Subaccount{ID: 1, StorageBox: 611421, Username: "u-sub1", Labels: map[string]string{"felhom-customer": "cust-amb"}}
fake.Subaccounts[2] = hetznerapi.Subaccount{ID: 2, StorageBox: 611421, Username: "u-sub2", Labels: map[string]string{"felhom-customer": "cust-amb"}}
err := p.ReissueCredentials(context.Background(), "cust-amb", "shared")
if err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "exactly 1") {
t.Fatalf("ambiguous lookup must refuse, got %v", err)
}
if fake.ResetCalls != 0 {
t.Fatal("NO reset may run on an ambiguous lookup")
}
if _, cerr := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-amb"); cerr == nil {
t.Fatal("NO secret may be stored on a refused reissue")
}
// zero resources → also refuse (nothing provisioned)
if err := p.ReissueCredentials(context.Background(), "cust-none", "shared"); err == nil {
t.Fatal("reissue with nothing provisioned must refuse")
}
}
// SCENARIO C (R-196 / R-204 item 2, hub v0.95.0) — re-issuing the offsite PROVIDER credential must
// LEAVE A HEALTHY ESCROW ALONE.
//
// THIS TEST REPLACES `TestReissue_InvalidatesEscrow`, which asserted the opposite and was wrong on a
// false premise: a re-issue resets the storage-provider account password and cannot touch the restic
// REPOSITORY password, which is generated on the box and never leaves it except sealed under R. The
// old assertion looked right because the EFFECT it checked (a stale escrow) was real — nobody checked
// the CAUSE. Kept as one test rather than deleted so the inversion is visible in `git log -L`.
//
// WHAT IT ASSERTS IS THE CONSEQUENCE, not the mechanism: not "MarkEscrowStale was not called" but
// "the ACK still carries the hash", because the hash is what the controller's auto-confirm needs and
// its absence is what blocked every off-site backup during the 2026-08-04 drill.
//
// RED-PROOF: restore the marking — put back
//
// if host, _ := p.Store.GetHostByCustomer(customerID); host != nil {
// if esc, _ := p.Store.GetHostEscrow(host.HostID); esc != nil { p.Store.MarkEscrowStale(host.HostID) }
// }
//
// in ReissueCredentials → es.Stale becomes true, the hash is withheld, and this test fails on both.
func TestReissue_DoesNotMarkAHealthyEscrowStale(t *testing.T) {
p, _, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
const cust = "cust-esc"
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), cust, Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// A host + a key-escrow blob whose sealed repo-password hash the hub serves for auto-confirm.
if err := st.UpsertHost(&store.Host{HostID: cust + "-01", CustomerID: cust, APIKey: "k"}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, _, err := st.SaveHostEscrow(cust+"-01", []byte("opaque-blob"), "SHA256:fp", "zero_knowledge", "2026-07-16T00:00:00Z", "OLDHASH"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
es, err := st.GetEscrowStatusForCustomer(cust)
if err != nil || es == nil {
t.Fatalf("escrow status (before): %v", err)
}
if es.Stale || es.ResticPwSHA256 != "OLDHASH" {
t.Fatalf("pre-reissue escrow must be current: stale=%v hash=%q", es.Stale, es.ResticPwSHA256)
}
// Re-issue the offsite PROVIDER credential. The box still holds its repo_password file, so the
// repository password does NOT change — this is the ordinary re-issue shape.
if err := p.ReissueCredentials(context.Background(), cust, "shared"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("reissue: %v", err)
}
es, err = st.GetEscrowStatusForCustomer(cust)
if err != nil || es == nil {
t.Fatalf("escrow status (after): %v", err)
}
if es.Stale {
t.Fatal("a re-issue marked a HEALTHY escrow stale — this blocks every off-site backup and asks the customer for a ceremony that would supersede a good key (R-196)")
}
if es.ResticPwSHA256 != "OLDHASH" {
t.Fatalf("the sealed hash must keep flowing to the ACK so the controller can auto-confirm; got %q", es.ResticPwSHA256)
}
// The customer is still TOLD the credential moved — removing the false alarm must not remove the
// true notice. `offsite_reissued` is untouched by this change.
ev, eerr := st.GetLatestEventByType(cust, "offsite_reissued")
if eerr != nil || ev == nil {
t.Fatalf("offsite_reissued must still fire on every re-issue (err=%v ev=%+v)", eerr, ev)
}
// …and the false alarm is gone.
if bad, _ := st.GetLatestEventByType(cust, "escrow_stale"); bad != nil {
t.Fatalf("a re-issue must not raise escrow_stale on a healthy escrow: %+v", bad)
}
}
// The other half of Scenario C: the stale MECHANISM is intact and still does its job when something
// legitimately sets it. Without this, "nothing marks stale any more" could decay into "stale no longer
// works", and the next evidential caller would ship inert (the seam-built-but-never-wired shape).
func TestEscrowStaleMechanism_StillWithholdsAndClears(t *testing.T) {
_, _, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
const cust = "cust-stale-mech"
if err := st.UpsertHost(&store.Host{HostID: cust + "-01", CustomerID: cust, APIKey: "k"}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if _, _, err := st.SaveHostEscrow(cust+"-01", []byte("blob"), "SHA256:fp", "zero_knowledge", "2026-07-16T00:00:00Z", "OLDHASH"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if err := st.MarkEscrowStale(cust + "-01"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("MarkEscrowStale: %v", err)
}
es, _ := st.GetEscrowStatusForCustomer(cust)
if es == nil || !es.Stale || es.ResticPwSHA256 != "" {
t.Fatalf("a marked escrow must read stale AND withhold the hash: %+v", es)
}
// A fresh ceremony (new blob sealing the new password) clears stale + serves the new hash.
if _, _, err := st.SaveHostEscrow(cust+"-01", []byte("blob-2"), "SHA256:fp", "zero_knowledge", "2026-07-16T01:00:00Z", "NEWHASH"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
es, _ = st.GetEscrowStatusForCustomer(cust)
if es == nil || es.Stale || es.ResticPwSHA256 != "NEWHASH" {
t.Fatalf("a fresh ceremony must clear stale + serve the new hash: %+v", es)
}
}
// Scenario E (SLICE 4) — the freeze lever flips ONLY readonly on the exactly-1 labelled sub-account
// (SSH stays on — a freeze must not cut access, just writes); ambiguity refuses; unfreeze reverses.
func TestFreeze_SharedTogglesReadonlyOnly(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-fz", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if err := p.SetOffsiteFrozen(context.Background(), "cust-fz", true); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("freeze: %v", err)
}
subs, _ := fake.ListSubaccounts(context.Background(), 611421, "felhom-customer=cust-fz")
if len(subs) != 1 || !subs[0].AccessSettings.Readonly {
t.Fatalf("freeze must set readonly on the labelled sub-account: %+v", subs)
}
if !subs[0].AccessSettings.SSHEnabled {
t.Fatal("freeze must NOT disable SSH — only readonly flips")
}
if err := p.SetOffsiteFrozen(context.Background(), "cust-fz", false); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unfreeze: %v", err)
}
subs, _ = fake.ListSubaccounts(context.Background(), 611421, "felhom-customer=cust-fz")
if subs[0].AccessSettings.Readonly {
t.Fatal("unfreeze must clear readonly")
}
// nothing provisioned → refuse
if err := p.SetOffsiteFrozen(context.Background(), "cust-none", true); err == nil {
t.Fatal("freeze with no labelled sub-account must refuse")
}
// ambiguous → refuse
fake.Subaccounts[71] = hetznerapi.Subaccount{ID: 71, StorageBox: 611421, Labels: map[string]string{"felhom-customer": "cust-amb2"}}
fake.Subaccounts[72] = hetznerapi.Subaccount{ID: 72, StorageBox: 611421, Labels: map[string]string{"felhom-customer": "cust-amb2"}}
if err := p.SetOffsiteFrozen(context.Background(), "cust-amb2", true); err == nil || !strings.Contains(err.Error(), "exactly 1") {
t.Fatalf("ambiguous freeze must refuse, got %v", err)
}
}
// Scenario B — enable dedicated → box provisioned.
func TestProvision_Dedicated(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-b", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "dedicated", BoxType: "bx11"})
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("provision: %v", err)
}
if fake.CreatedBoxes != 1 {
t.Fatalf("want 1 box created, got %d", fake.CreatedBoxes)
}
if d.Type != "dedicated" || d.BoxType != "bx11" || d.User == "" || d.Host == "" || d.RepoPath != "/home/felhom-repo" {
t.Fatalf("descriptor wrong: %+v", d)
}
if pw, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-b"); err != nil || pw == "" {
t.Fatalf("one-time password not stored: %v", err)
}
}
// Scenario C — idempotent re-save does NOT create a second resource.
func TestProvision_Idempotent(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-c", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 20}); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
d2, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-c", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 20})
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if fake.CreatedSubaccounts != 1 {
t.Fatalf("re-provision created a SECOND resource (%d) — not idempotent", fake.CreatedSubaccounts)
}
if d2.User == "" || d2.Type != "shared" {
t.Fatalf("idempotent descriptor wrong: %+v", d2)
}
}
// Scenario D — a provisioning error surfaces; nothing is recorded (fail-closed). Companion: the caller must
// not mark offsite provisioned — modelled here by asserting no descriptor + no stored password on error.
func TestProvision_FailClosed(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
fake.FailCreate = errors.New("hetzner 500")
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-d", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10})
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("a create failure must return an error (fail-closed)")
}
if d != nil {
t.Fatalf("no descriptor may be returned on error, got %+v", d)
}
if _, cerr := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-d"); cerr != sql.ErrNoRows {
t.Fatal("no one-time password may be stored on a failed provision")
}
// action-failure path (create ok, action errors) is also fail-closed
fake.FailCreate = nil
fake.FailAction = true
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-d2", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "dedicated", BoxType: "bx11"}); err == nil {
t.Fatal("a failed create-action must return an error")
}
}
// Scenario E — the one-time password is consumable exactly once.
func TestOneTimeSecret_ConsumedOnce(t *testing.T) {
_, _, st := newTestProvisioner(t)
if err := st.SaveOneTimeSecret("cust-e", "secretpw"); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
got, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-e")
if err != nil || got != "secretpw" {
t.Fatalf("first consume: got %q err %v", got, err)
}
if _, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("cust-e"); err != sql.ErrNoRows {
t.Fatalf("second consume must be ErrNoRows, got %v", err)
}
if _, err := st.ConsumeOneTimeSecret("never-provisioned"); err != sql.ErrNoRows {
t.Fatalf("absent consume must be ErrNoRows, got %v", err)
}
}
// Disable → {Enabled:false}, no deprovision (no API delete).
func TestProvision_DisableNoDeprovision(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
d, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-f", Input{Enabled: false})
if err != nil || d == nil || d.Enabled {
t.Fatalf("disable must return {enabled:false}, got %+v err %v", d, err)
}
if fake.DeletedSubaccounts != 0 || fake.DeletedBoxes != 0 {
t.Fatal("disable must NOT deprovision (data-loss guard)")
}
}
// Customer RESET (v0.61.0) — Deprovision DESTROYS the labelled shared sub-account, and is idempotent
// (a second call finds nothing and succeeds). This is the deliberate teardown the disable-guard above
// deliberately does NOT do.
func TestDeprovision_SharedIdempotent(t *testing.T) {
p, fake, _ := newTestProvisioner(t)
if _, err := p.ProvisionOffsite(context.Background(), "cust-d", Input{Enabled: true, Type: "shared", QuotaGB: 10}); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("provision: %v", err)
}
if fake.CreatedSubaccounts != 1 {
t.Fatalf("precondition: want 1 subaccount, got %d", fake.CreatedSubaccounts)
}
if err := p.Deprovision(context.Background(), "cust-d", "shared"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("deprovision: %v", err)
}
if fake.DeletedSubaccounts != 1 {
t.Fatalf("want 1 subaccount deleted, got %d", fake.DeletedSubaccounts)
}
// Idempotent: nothing labelled now → success, no extra delete.
if err := p.Deprovision(context.Background(), "cust-d", "shared"); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("second deprovision (idempotent) errored: %v", err)
}
if fake.DeletedSubaccounts != 1 {
t.Fatalf("idempotent re-run deleted again: %d", fake.DeletedSubaccounts)
}
}
// ClearProvisionedDescriptor keeps the tier CHOICE (enabled/type/quota/box_type) and drops every
// PROVISIONED field — the pre-first-install shape a RESET returns the customer to.
func TestClearProvisionedDescriptor(t *testing.T) {
in := `{"git":{"token":"x"},"offsite":{"enabled":true,"type":"shared","host":"u1-sub3.your-storagebox.de","user":"u1-sub3","port":23,"repo_path":"/home/felhom","quota_gb":100,"box_type":"","host_fingerprint":"SHA256:abc"}}`
out, err := ClearProvisionedDescriptor(in)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if !strings.Contains(out, `"enabled":true`) || !strings.Contains(out, `"type":"shared"`) || !strings.Contains(out, `"quota_gb":100`) {
t.Errorf("tier choice lost: %s", out)
}
for _, gone := range []string{"your-storagebox.de", "u1-sub3", "repo_path", "host_fingerprint", `"port"`} {
if strings.Contains(out, gone) {
t.Errorf("provisioned field %q survived: %s", gone, out)
}
}
if !strings.Contains(out, `"git"`) {
t.Errorf("unrelated config keys dropped: %s", out)
}
// No-op-safe: absent offsite block returns input unchanged.
if got, _ := ClearProvisionedDescriptor(`{"git":{"token":"x"}}`); got != `{"git":{"token":"x"}}` {
t.Errorf("no-offsite clear mutated config: %s", got)
}
}