Files
felhom.eu/documentation/audits/seo-2026-10-14/BASELINE.md
T
admin e62fc00edc
gates / gates (push) Successful in 6m19s
SEO audit: live read-back and the price evidence (the Google yearly price is not in the page HTML)
The 2 TB yearly figure sits behind a JS toggle, so a plain fetch sees only the
monthly 3 590 Ft; the screenshot is what a re-check has to compare against, and
Google's tier branding (Google AI Plus) has already changed once. Live read-back
recorded: 12 requests on two hosts, no horizontal scroll at 390px, JSON-LD equal
to the visible text, console clean.
2026-10-14 18:55:13 +02:00

6.1 KiB
Raw Blame History

SEO baseline — 2026-10-14, the day /sajat-felho-tarhely was published

What this file is: the numbers as they stood before the page existed, so the two dated checks (R-1035, +4 and +8 weeks) have something to compare against. Nothing here is a prediction.

1. Search Console, last 3 months (read 2026-10-14)

Provenance: these figures were read from Search Console by the operator and supplied in the task brief for this session. CC did not open Search Console — there is no connector for it in this project — so this is a reported figure, not one this session measured. The two dated checks have the same constraint: the operator reads the numbers, CC records and compares them.

value
Clicks 1
Impressions 48
CTR 2.1 %
Average position 73.6 (page 8)

Top queries that showed felhom.eu:

query impressions
felhő tárhely 19
felhőtárhely 5
felhő alapú tárhely 3

2. What the site said before this change (measured by CC, 2026-10-14)

  • „felhő tárhely" (two words) appeared 0 times on index.html, gyik.html and biztonsagimentes.html. „felhőtárhely" (one word) appeared twice, both in gyik.html.
  • So the page Google was showing for those queries was the home page, by accident: no page targeted the phrase, and no page used it.
  • Measured with ASCII-folded fragments plus an accented control, per the Hungarian-search rule.

3. What was published today

Hungarian https://felhom.eu/sajat-felho-tarhely
English twin https://felhom.eu/en/own-cloud-storage
Title Saját felhő tárhely otthon – Google One helyett | Felhom.eu
Target phrases „saját felhő tárhely" (Google's own „Mások ezeket keresték még"), „Mit tegyek, ha a Google tárhelyem megtelt?" (Google's „Mások ezeket a kérdéseket is felteszik"), and „felhő tárhely" itself
Structured data FAQPage, 4 questions, each question and answer verbatim in the visible text
Sitemap both URLs added; 22 → 24

The honest expectation, recorded now so the first check is not misread: a new page on a site averaging position 73.6 takes weeks to months to move, and „felhő tárhely" alone is held by Microsoft, Google and the big list sites. The page aims at the two longer phrases, not at beating them. A null result at +4 weeks means nothing on its own — that is why there are two checks.

4. The prices the page quotes, and where they came from

All three read on 2026-10-14, each on the provider's own Hungarian page.

plan price source
Google AI Plus (2 TB) — Google One's 2 TB plan 35 990 Ft/év one.google.com/about/plans?hl=hu, with the „Éves" toggle
iCloud+ 2 TB 4 490 Ft/hó support.apple.com/hu-hu/108047
Microsoft 365 Családi (2 TB shared) 46 499 Ft/év microsoft.com/hu-hu/microsoft-365/buy/compare-all-microsoft-365-products

Two naming notes, because both will age:

  1. Google's 2 TB tier is branded „Google AI Plus" on the card, while the site is Google One and Google's own body copy calls these „Google One-csomag". The page carries both names for that reason. If the branding changes again, the page is wrong until someone re-reads it.
  2. Microsoft 365 Családi is 2 TB SHARED, not 1 TB per person as it was. The Személyes plan (1 TB, one person) is 35 499 Ft/év — not used in the table, which compares 2 TB tiers.

Google's yearly figure is not in the page HTML of a plain fetch: it sits behind a JS toggle. It was read in Chrome with the toggle switched to „Éves", and screenshotted. An agent re-checking this with a plain HTTP fetch will see only the monthly 3 590 Ft and should not conclude the yearly price is absent.

5. The power figure on the page

75 kWh/év, stated on the page as an idle measurement, from audits/night-power-2026-10-13/README.md: the N100 at rest is 7.3 W median / 8.5 W average, and a normal night was 66 Wh over 7.8 h. 8.5 W × 8760 h = 74.5 kWh.

The page says explicitly that a year with daytime use is more, and gives no daytime number — there is no measurement for one. No electricity tariff is quoted anywhere: this session could not source a 2026 Hungarian residential Ft/kWh rate it would stand behind, so the page says „néhány ezer forint" and leaves the arithmetic to the reader.

6. What the operator still has to do

Search Console → URL-ellenőrzés → https://felhom.eu/sajat-felho-tarhely → „Indexelés kérése". Until that is done (or Google finds the page on its own), both dated checks will read zero for a reason that has nothing to do with the page.

7. Evidence in this directory

file what it proves
google-one-annual-2tb-2026-10-14.jpg the Google plan page with the „Éves" toggle selected: the 2 TB card reads „Google AI Plus / 2 TB / 35 990 Ft/év / Éves számlázás", with the Google One logo and nav above it. This is the load-bearing one — the yearly price is not in the page HTML, and Google's tier branding has already changed once.
live-sajat-felho-tarhely-2026-10-14.jpg the published Hungarian page on felhom.eu
phone-390px-price-table-2026-10-14.png the cost table at 390 px, after the flex fix

8. Live read-back, 2026-10-14 (after the push)

check result
/sajat-felho-tarhely, /en/own-cloud-storage HTTP 200, UTF-8 BOM intact
title, canonical, hreflang (hu / en / x-default) correct on both, cross-named
FAQPage JSON-LD parses; 4 questions, every question and answer verbatim in the visible text, both pages
requests 12, all 200, two hosts only — felhom.eu (9), stats.felhom.eu (2), plus one data: URI. No CDN, no Google Fonts; the privacy promise holds
horizontal scroll at 390 px none on either page (scrollWidth == clientWidth == 380)
contrast headings 16.67, table link 7.17, body text 6.96 — the same 6.96 as the existing technologiak.html, so no regression
console clean
site.css?v=31, sitemap (24 URLs) served
em dash (U+2014) 0