Files
felhom.eu/documentation
admin 7efb7a53d3 Campaign 10 closeout Part 1: Q1 lowers R-158's rank; Q2 clears ValidateDump and kills C2's gate
Q1 - what the customer sees when a backup refuses for lack of space. The failure
IS customer-visible: /backups renders "Adatmentés sikertelen" with a cross mark.
It is absent from the dashboard, the launcher, the app detail page, and - the one
worth fixing - from /backups/apps, the per-app page where you would naturally ask
whether a given app is backed up.

Point 5 measured across three runs: it retries, stays failed while constrained
(marker persists, unit mtime unchanged at 07:30:50), and clears on recovery with a
fresh unit at 07:37:38. /backups/apps reading "Utolsó: 3 perce" tracks the unit's
REAL mtime, not the failed run, so it is honest about the age of the last good
unit rather than claiming a fresh one. Explicitly NOT the R-156 family.

So R-158 is a NOTIFICATION GAP, not a silent-failure defect, and ranks BELOW
R-157 - whose mechanism B leaves a deployed app not running while deadapp reports
"0 currently down", silent on every channel.

Q2 - ValidateDump was right and no bad dumps are shipping. The live DB genuinely
had zero accounts (only _prisma_migrations 129, cc_proof 82, instance_settings 1).
An empty table proves nothing, so an account was SEEDED as the task required: the
warning then stopped entirely and the dump provably contained the rows (c10acct 1,
c10user 2; 102766 -> 103029 bytes).

But that kills C2's proposed ordering. A fresh appliance legitimately has zero
accounts, so gating on "accounts has rows" would block the backups of every new
customer until someone registers. The validator's fact is right; its inference
("may predate the customer's data") is wrong - there was no data to predate. The
chain is therefore longer: a sound predicate first (compare the dump against the
LIVE db, per-table counts, not an absolute expectation), then warn->gate, then the
tar-drop. Until then the DB volume tar stays load-bearing - not because dumps are
bad, but because nothing can yet prove one is good.

No new R-n; register grepped. Nothing fixed. Part 2 (teardown) follows.
2026-08-02 09:39:27 +02:00
..

Felhom — Documentation

Felhom is a managed home-server service for Hungarian households, built on a three-component model over Proxmox:

  • Hub — operator backend on k3s (hub.felhom.eu). Repo: felhom.eu/hub/.
  • Host agent — one per Proxmox host; operator-tier; owns all Proxmox interaction. Repo: felhom-agent/.
  • In-guest controller — one per customer LXC; Docker-only; manages the customer's apps. Repo: felhom-controller/.

This directory is the central, code-verified documentation home for all three components plus the platform and the security-audit record.

Sections

Controller (in-guest) — controller/

The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current source (v0.59.0). → controller/README.md: module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.

Host agent & platform — architecture/, proxmox-platform.md

The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.

Hub (operator backend) — architecture/05

Security audits & remediation — audits/

Spike & test findings — tests/

Per-slice spike/validation findings (phases 05, slices 710). See tests/.

Conventions

  • Code-verified, not memory-derived. Architectural claims here are checked against the actual current source; if a claim can't be verified it is omitted and flagged, not guessed.
  • Per-repo operational working files (CLAUDE.md, CONTEXT.md, CHANGELOG.md, BUGHUNT.md, REPORT.md, TASK.md) live in their own repos — they are operational, not published docs.
  • Authoritative versions at last refresh: controller v0.59.0, agent v0.29.1, hub v0.11.0.