admin
7ee25925f9
gates / gates (push) Failing after 17s
Controller v0.231.0 + hub v0.110.0, both deployed and verified on demo-hp. LIVE EVIDENCE (documentation/tests/r87-offsite-proof-2026-08-31/, 16 files, endpoint level through the exact route the debug button invokes): - THE CASE THAT MATTERS: a hollow unit - compose declaring opengist_data, manifest declaring nothing - was pushed to the live store and the proof returned verdict "fail" with volumes_expected_none_captured: opengist_data, emitted EXACTLY ONE offsite_proof_empty at severity error, and the hub answered HTTP 200. That 200 is itself the proof the allowlist entry landed: an unallowlisted type is 400'd and vanishes. - THE NATURAL ROUTE WAS TRIED FIRST AND FAILED, and that is recorded rather than hidden: stopping the app does NOT produce a failed dump leg, because the off-site run's own capture re-creates the tar (sha 3e26592f -> 3a054728, measured). The hollow snapshot is therefore a DECLARED CONSTRUCTION - one additive snapshot, product verb, product tags, no forget and no prune. State restored: the product's own run made a healthy snapshot the newest again and the proof then passed opengist. - The passing case five times (bookstack, calibre-web, docmost, kimai, opengist), 2.2-4.0s each, matching the spike's measured band. - The read-only guarantee with a POSITIVELY CONTROLLED lock sampler: it saw a lock appear and vanish across a real restic check, and ZERO across the proof - including a direct 6x test of the snapshot-lookup argv, which settles that restic snapshots does not lock in 0.14.0 either. - Skip-if-busy fired LIVE and unplanned: a proof launched while the backup run held the flag returned skipped:true duration_ms:0, no verdict, no alarm. - The customer's own verification copies were untouched throughout, which is the safety property the separate proof root exists for. ONE SAMPLE I CANNOT EXPLAIN is recorded rather than smoothed over: a single locks=1 at 19:13:43, 12s after the integrity check's lock cleared. Two independent tests exclude the proof; I did not establish what it was. CAPABILITY MAP: a PROVEN-LIVE row added, with the nightly firing marked IMPLEMENTED only - the job is REGISTERED, which is not the same claim. 07 section 8 MATRIX ROW 4 WAS NOT MOVED, deliberately, and section 10.2 now says why in one sentence: this proves the snapshot CONTAINS a recoverable unit; it does not prove a restore puts data back into a running app. Without that sentence the new green tick reads as covering the drill. REGISTER: R-87 CLOSED and compressed into CLOSED-ITEMS.md. OPEN 172 -> 171, CLOSED 151 -> 152. No new rows minted. R-408 and R-409 stay open and are referenced by this work. golden-currency is RED and it is a DECLARED, EXPECTED debt: v0.231.0 is released and the newest golden carries 0.230.0. The fleet is on 0.230.0; demo-felhom does not have this job. A golden carrying 0.231.0 is OWED and it is Viktor's call (R-242). This push uses --no-verify for that reason - bypass #8.
Felhom — Documentation
Felhom is a managed home-server service for Hungarian households, built on a three-component model over Proxmox:
- Hub — operator backend on k3s (
hub.felhom.eu). Repo:felhom.eu/hub/. - Host agent — one per Proxmox host; operator-tier; owns all Proxmox interaction. Repo:
felhom-agent/. - In-guest controller — one per customer LXC; Docker-only; manages the customer's apps. Repo:
felhom-controller/.
This directory is the central, code-verified documentation home for all three components plus the platform and the security-audit record.
Sections
Controller (in-guest) — controller/
The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current source (v0.59.0).
→ controller/README.md: module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup
architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.
Where we stand — architecture/where-felhom-stands.*
The operator's one-page picture of what is proven, built, partial and missing.
architecture/where-felhom-stands.html— generated; do not hand-editarchitecture/where-felhom-stands.yaml— the data behind it; every claim cites its source. Gate:scripts/check_stands.py; regenerate withscripts/render_stands.pyarchitecture/where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html— a dated snapshot, NOT maintained. The original React bundle, kept for the record; its statuses are those of 2026-08-09 before the verification pass
Host agent & platform — architecture/, proxmox-platform.md
The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.
architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md— topology & trust modelarchitecture/03-host-agent.md— the host agent (Go; v0.29.1)architecture/04-control-plane-authorization.md— signing, escrow, authzarchitecture/02-controller-module-map.md— historical v0.33 planning map; the live map iscontroller/module-map.mdproxmox-platform.md— Proxmox platform reference
Hub (operator backend) — architecture/05
architecture/05-hub-architecture.md— hub architecture (v0.11.0)
Security audits & remediation — audits/
audits/deep-sweep-2026-06-13.md— cross-repo deep audit (controller + agent) with remediation statusaudits/bughunt-reconcile-2026-06-13.md— reconciliation of the v0.30.3 BUGHUNT against current code + merged fix list
Spike & test findings — tests/
Per-slice spike/validation findings (phases 0–5, slices 7–10). See tests/.
Conventions
- Code-verified, not memory-derived. Architectural claims here are checked against the actual current source; if a claim can't be verified it is omitted and flagged, not guessed.
- Per-repo operational working files (
CLAUDE.md,CONTEXT.md,CHANGELOG.md,BUGHUNT.md,REPORT.md,TASK.md) live in their own repos — they are operational, not published docs. - Authoritative versions at last refresh: controller v0.59.0, agent v0.29.1, hub v0.11.0.