# STATUS — what works, what's broken, what's next

**Updated 2026-08-13 (late — the third name, a machine told to be quiet, and a picture you can query).**

> **A view, not a source.** `documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md` is the authority; this page restates
> part of it in plain words, and **nothing may exist only here**. **Items, not paragraphs. One screen.**
> If it does not fit, it belongs in the register instead.

## Waiting on you

*Nothing. All three questions that stood here were answered on 12–13 August and have moved to
**Decided** below. A decided question left in the deciding list is how a person loses track of what is
actually waiting.*

## Decided — and what would reopen each

*A decision with no trigger becomes a permanent silence, so each one names what would make us look
again.*

- **Getting old backups back yourself: NOT BUILT, deliberately.** A customer in that position is a
  support conversation, and we can do it by hand. **Reopens if:** a real customer actually asks —
  one request from a person who is not us. *(register: R-312)*
- **The unopenable old copy on `demo-felhom`: KEPT, as a test fixture.** Not for sentiment: it is the
  only state in existence where a set-aside store is present and cannot be opened, which is the case
  any future handling of lost backups has to face honestly. **Delete it when:** that work ships, or is
  abandoned. Until then it is a fixture, not an accumulation. *(register: R-313)*
- **A machine in two kinds of trouble says both things: LEFT AS IT IS.** Its real-world likelihood is
  unknown, and hiding one card risks hiding a real second failure. **Reopens if:** it is observed
  happening outside a constructed test. *(register: R-303)*

## What works

Both demo machines are home, healthy and reporting on the approved pair — **controller 0.214.0, agent
0.129.0**, delivered by the floor rather than by hand. Off-site is credentialed on `demo-hp` and its
repository still opens with the machine's own key. `drill-r50` is reverted to `virgin`, powered off.

**What the fleet actually is, because two summaries have now been misread:** the hub holds **five
customer records and three machines**. The machines are `demo-felhom` and `demo-hp` (both ours, both
disposable) and `drill-r50` (a nested drill VM on DooPlex, reverted and powered off). **`peti-felhom`
is a real machine we have not heard from since 15 July** and has no host record. **`tester-1` is a
record with no machine** — created 13 August, no host, no backups, nothing to lose.

## Shipped

- **The removal now genuinely reverses the installation** (R-316, `installer-v1.28.0` published). The
  second reinstall used to hit our own leftover; it was watched failing on the cycle that actually
  fails, then watched passing.
- **A correct recovery code is no longer called wrong** (R-311, three components). If a customer types
  the code for an older set of backups, the machine now checks the packages we kept, recognises it, and
  says so: *your code is correct, it belongs to an earlier package, we kept it, your current backups are
  fine, write to us*. It deliberately promises no restore, because there is no button yet.
- **The drive can be re-attached after a reinstall** (R-280), and **the orphan card and the countdown
  banner stop promising retrieval they cannot see is still true** (R-294, R-299, R-302).
- **One name per secret — now both halves** (R-295). The dashboard code is „Beállító kód" everywhere,
  on the machine *and* in the hub's emails; „Visszaállító kód" is retired. It collided with the escrow
  „Helyreállítási kód" and cost a real code.
- **The hub can see whether a machine's guest still has working networking** (R-319, first reader built
  against R-264). A machine quietly repairing its own network over and over is now visible instead of
  being a green tick; a machine that does not report it is drawn as unknown, never as healthy.
- **The third secret has its own name** (R-323, on your ruling). The five-word phrase that proves an
  account owns the box being linked is „Tulajdonosi jelmondat". It was „Visszaállító jelszó" — one word
  from the name we retired last week, and false besides: it restores nothing. Five places, all in the
  hub; no machine touched.
- **A machine we tell to be quiet is no longer reported as dead** (R-321). It went stale, then down,
  then e-mailed you twice about a silence you asked for. It turned out to be two alarms, not one — the
  morning backup reminder had the same blind spot and is fixed with it.
- **The hub's own words are under a guard** (R-324). Every customer e-mail and the linking pages are
  now checked for a retired name, and the guard has been watched catching one, ignoring an
  explanation of one, and going quiet again.
- **The countdown on `demo-felhom` is cancelled** on your ruling (R-307). Nothing was deleted.

## Broken, or knowingly incomplete

- **Peti's machine has no recovery route at all** — see the `PETI` row. **This is a real machine
  belonging to a real person**, not one of ours and not a record: it reported to the hub for four and a
  half months and has been silent since 15 July, when its host record was deleted. There is no key, no
  off-site copy and no local backup. **If that drive fails, everything on it is lost.** First act of the
  visit: copy the ~3.6 GB off before anything is reinstalled — it is currently the only copy in
  existence. Whether it stays parked is your call and is deliberately left open.
- **Kept backups can be opened — but still only by us** (R-304 partly closed, R-312 decided-not-built).
  Today the honest answer is "your code is right, write to us" — and we can.
- **The agent picks dnsmasq by looking at a file another package owns** (R-317). The box installs fine;
  only LAN name resolution goes missing, and quietly. One line, deliberately not taken tonight.
- **The storage page has its own separate reason for showing an empty list** (R-298), untouched.
- **Three more facts the machines send still have no reader** (R-264): a staged-but-unapplied agent
  update, how deep a restore test actually went, and the two backup-integrity timestamps. Five others
  are now recorded as deliberately unread, which is honest rather than fixed.
- **Two thirds of the standing picture is still unproven, and now you can ask** (R-326).
  `python3 scripts/unproven.py` lists it: of 55 claims, **23 are walked and 32 are not** — and of
  those 32, only 6 point at an evidence document. **The "nine" I have been repeating was wrong**: nine
  is how many claims the 9 August review *lowered*, which is a different question.
- **The picture still describes one defect we have since fixed twice** (R-327) — the naming claim. Its
  status may only be raised after the capability map moves first, which is a separate judgement.

## Working on next

`demo-hp` is yours this evening — **this session did not touch it**. After that: the three remaining
R-264 readers, now that one has been built and we know what one costs; R-317 (one line in the agent);
R-327 (decide what the naming claim's status should be); then the 2026-08-09 batch (R-279 … R-292),
still untriaged against everything since.