docs: R-182 closed, R-90 closed on measurement, R-86 unblocked, ep0 record corrected
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
R-182 CLOSED (controller v0.194.0 + hub v0.90.0/.1), proven live on demo-hp. The hub's notification_log for the run reads: two per-app failures RECORDED, one digest SENT naming both, and the customer channel SKIPPED with operator_only. Against the measured previous behaviour — two failures, one email naming one app, one leaving no trace anywhere. Scenario D proved itself on an event I had not planned: disk_critical alarmed on two filesystems, the second was collapsed by the cooldown, and that collapse is now visible WITH ITS KEY. Yesterday it would have left nothing at all. A gap the spec did not anticipate is recorded with its fix: the per-app event also fires from the periodic sweep, outside any run, so making it record-only would have created a NEW silence. The sweep emits a digest too, with no run_id, so it stays under the ordinary hourly cooldown. ep0: MEASURED on the box — 7757 MB (8 GB), 4 vCPU, and the 4 GiB swapfile SURVIVED the resize and is active (checked, because a resize is a stop/start). The 40 GB local disk is UNCHANGED, so no disk figure was touched anywhere. Five documents corrected — three of which the task's list did not name, found by searching. Two audit/evidence documents ANNOTATED, body untouched: they record what was true when written and that is their value. R-90 CLOSED. R-86 unblocked and re-ranked, stated honestly: 8 GB is comfortable, not unbounded — the original OOM was a 14.46 GB restore — so the restore-test cadence should still be paced, just not by fear of the endpoint. target-selection.md's "D-d did not name ep0 either way" is deliberately left standing. It is the operator's question, not CC's. STATUS.md 127 -> 83 lines, items rather than sentences.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -229,7 +229,9 @@ as the hub 400ing an unknown event type. `verify-new` verifies each snapshot as
|
||||
`keep-last 2` that covers essentially the whole datastore and turns a dead check live, for a few
|
||||
minutes of ep0 CPU per weekly backup.
|
||||
|
||||
> Watch item: ep0 is a 3.7 GB CX23 with **no swap**, and inline verification runs within the backup
|
||||
> Watch item (**superseded 2026-08-03**: ep0 is now a **CX33, 8 GB RAM**, and it HAS a 4 GiB swapfile
|
||||
> which survived the resize — so the pressure below is much reduced, though the shape of the concern
|
||||
> stands). As written: ep0 is a 3.7 GB CX23 with **no swap**, and inline verification runs within the backup
|
||||
> window. Today's full forced verify completed fine (~250 MiB/s, 0 errors), but see
|
||||
> `RUNBOOK-ep0-datastore-volume-2026-07-27.md` for the rsync OOM on this same box.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -307,7 +309,7 @@ Untouched. Rollback remains a two-line `datastore.cfg` revert. Volume: 98 G, 13
|
||||
watching: it is the only thing that reclaims chunks, and nothing has ever exercised it here.
|
||||
4. **Hub PBS-DR gauge granularity** — 0.1 GB steps mean routine incremental backups are invisible to
|
||||
it. Not a fault, but it cannot be used as write-proof evidence for small deltas.
|
||||
5. **ep0 has no swap** (3.7 GB CX23) — see the volume runbook's OOM.
|
||||
5. ~~**ep0 has no swap** (3.7 GB CX23)~~ — **corrected 2026-08-03: ep0 is a CX33 with 8 GB RAM and an active 4 GiB swapfile.** See the volume runbook's OOM for the original incident.
|
||||
|
||||
## 11. Observations
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user