R-224..R-228 CLOSED: registers, capability map, campaign annotation, STATUS
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 7s
Five closed in controller v0.202.0 + agent v0.126.0, each with its live or red-proof evidence in the row. Five explicitly still open and named as such rather than left to inference: R-214, R-220, R-221, R-213, R-202 — and R-220 is flagged as currently worked around BY HAND on the campaign venue, which is the only reason an app could be deployed there. The capability map's recovery row STAYS FAIL and says why: fixes are not a re-walk, nothing walked a customer end to end, and the customer-facing messages were NOT re-driven live because /recovery correctly retires itself once the old data is set aside — restoring that state is the reconfiguration the task forbade. The campaign document is ANNOTATED, not rewritten: it records what was true when it ran, and that is its value. workspace-CLAUDE.md gains comment-vs-code entry 9 — the escrow header said the errors were 'DISTINCT on purpose' and named THREE situations while a fourth was folded into one of them, and a green test named the defect and did not prevent it because it asserted a STRING one layer below the merge. ROADMAP needed no collapse — it carries no rows for these IDs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -20,6 +20,21 @@ Evidence: `../tests/campaign11-evidence-2026-08-05/` — `journal.md` (Phases 0,
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **ANNOTATION 2026-08-06 — what has since been fixed. The body below is NOT rewritten.** This
|
||||
> document records what was true when the campaign ran, and that is its value; the fixes are recorded
|
||||
> here and in `felhom-controller/REPORT.md`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **R-224, R-226, R-225, R-227, R-228 are CLOSED** in controller **v0.202.0** + agent **v0.126.0**.
|
||||
> The unlock path now classifies why it failed — from the value, never the text — and the message
|
||||
> that mentions typing is reachable only after a real refusal; anything unclassifiable renders a
|
||||
> neutral message rather than an accusation. Proven live on this venue: same wrong code, hub up →
|
||||
> `400`, hub REJECTed → `502` naming the connection and stating the code was **not used**, hub
|
||||
> restored → `400`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Unchanged by that work:** the campaign's verdict, the RTO, and the capability map's recovery row,
|
||||
> which stays **FAIL** until a re-walk passes. **R-214, R-220, R-221 remain open**, and R-220 is still
|
||||
> worked around by hand on this venue.
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Venue and baselines
|
||||
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user