The census answers no, three receipts found, and the prune was on file all along
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
CENSUS (read-only, hub store, tester's machine not contacted): no machine that is not ours can be in the state that cost demo-felhom its history. The hub holds escrow for three hosts; both demo boxes lost their pre-fix key in the same four hours on 2026-08-04; peti-felhom and david have no host row and no escrow at all. A control ran FIRST and had to pass -- the query returned "present (572 bytes)" for a host known to have material and "absent (NULL)" for one known not to. Corrected my own instrument on the way: a date-only comparison mislabelled both losses as after the fix, so the in-force moment is now pinned from the hub's first post-fix escrow row (11:11:37Z), which independently agrees with the register. PART 1 ESTABLISHED. The prune is recorded inside R-267 -- the row about the Configuration page being slow -- because pruning artifacts is what made that page fast. Arithmetic checks (23+7=30, plus three versions that only surfaced after the first thirty moved them onto page one = 33) and the PAGINATED listing shows both generics at exactly ten. R-291's blocking condition is released: the operator was being asked to establish something already written down. And my counter-argument yesterday was wrong in exactly the way R-267 warns about -- "containers hold 19" came from an unpaginated query; paginated they hold 270 and 169. RECEIPTS: three restored (drives.enrol, backup.tier1, fail.lost-recovery-code), each citing the document that walked it; the map already read PROVEN-LIVE for all three, so this follows the map rather than raising a status in the view. NINE HONEST GREYS. fault.selfheal's best hit argues against it -- an incident recording self-heal's absence through a 1h15m outage. THE DECAY RULE FIRED FOR THE FIRST TIME. backup.restore-proof has a receipt from 28 July and is superseded anyway: demo-hp's restore-test failed 5 August and the box has since been rebuilt. A claim about a continuing behaviour cannot rest on an old observation. The capability map still reads PROVEN-LIVE and is now the thing out of step -- recorded, not silently rewritten. PART 4 specified, not implemented. The orphan card promises restorability the box rendering it cannot evaluate: the discriminator is on the hub and no wire field carries it. A conditional promise the system cannot evaluate is the same defect as an unconditional false one, so the copy stops promising, says what happens, and names a route. Ships with the next controller change so one bake covers both.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -93,9 +93,16 @@ def claim_html(c):
|
||||
body = ['<span style="font-size:12px;line-height:1.45;color:#b8c4d6;text-wrap:pretty">',
|
||||
esc(c.get("title", ""))]
|
||||
if c.get("changed"):
|
||||
ch = c["changed"]
|
||||
if ch.get("also_moved"):
|
||||
# Moved twice. Say so — a second move rendered as a first one hides the fact that a
|
||||
# status is unsettled, which is exactly what a reader needs to see.
|
||||
label = "moved twice: %s, then 2026-08-10 back to %s" % (
|
||||
esc(ch["also_moved"]), esc(c.get("status", "?")))
|
||||
else:
|
||||
label = "changed 2026-08-09, was %s" % esc(ch.get("from", "?"))
|
||||
body.append('<span style="display:inline-block;margin-left:6px;padding:1px 5px;border-radius:3px;'
|
||||
'background:#3a2a12;color:#fbbf24;font-size:10px;white-space:nowrap">changed 2026-08-09, was %s</span>'
|
||||
% esc(c["changed"].get("from", "?")))
|
||||
'background:#3a2a12;color:#fbbf24;font-size:10px;white-space:nowrap">%s</span>' % label)
|
||||
if c.get("v_verdict") in ("needs-hardware", "contested"):
|
||||
col = "#a78bfa" if c["v_verdict"] == "contested" else "#7dd3fc"
|
||||
body.append('<span style="display:inline-block;margin-left:6px;padding:1px 5px;border-radius:3px;'
|
||||
@@ -104,6 +111,10 @@ def claim_html(c):
|
||||
if c.get("note"):
|
||||
body.append('<span style="display:block;color:#7c8aa3;font-size:11px;margin-top:3px">%s</span>'
|
||||
% esc(c["note"]))
|
||||
decay = c.get("decay") or (c.get("changed") or {}).get("decay")
|
||||
if decay:
|
||||
body.append('<span style="display:block;color:#c08a3e;font-size:11px;margin-top:2px">'
|
||||
'proof decay: %s</span>' % esc(decay))
|
||||
if c.get("changed", {}) and c["changed"].get("reason"):
|
||||
body.append('<span style="display:block;color:#9a7b3a;font-size:11px;margin-top:2px">why it moved: %s</span>'
|
||||
% esc(c["changed"]["reason"]))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user