marketing/facebook: a phone has TWO views of the cover, not one (R-919)

You saw the cover uncropped signed out, after R-919 said the sides are cut.
Both are true; my first measurement was one view generalised to "the phone".

SIGNED IN, confirmed on your real phone (Chrome/Android, 1080 px): the crop is
real. The cover band is 708 px tall across 1080 = 1.525:1 against the file's
2.628:1, and solving the laptop frame's left edge against that scale puts the
window at x 351..1298 where the emulated Pixel 9 said 351..1289 -- the left edge
to the pixel. R-919 is confirmed on hardware, not replaced.

SIGNED OUT, measured from your screenshot: the box is 412x132 = 3.121:1, WIDER
than the file, so the height is cut, not the width -- and the file's blue top
rule is still visible at the top edge, which puts the cut at the BOTTOM: the top
525 px of 624 survives. The circle is far bigger and higher: x 486..1150 from
y 232, 41% of the width.

So the sides are cut for one visitor and the bottom for the other. build.py now
carries both views; SAFE is their intersection, (391,40)-(1249,485).

Two changes made that workable rather than merely safe:
- the circles are modelled as DISCS, not rectangles running to the bottom. Near
  its top a disc is a few pixels wide; the rectangle was discarding most of the
  lower cover for nothing, which is much of why the frame looked empty.
- TWO LAYERS. The READ layer (catchphrase, wordmark) must survive every view and
  the check fails on it. The DECOR layer may be cropped or covered, and the build
  REPORTS the cost instead of forbidding it (B 39%, C 62%). Before the split one
  check governed both, so no laptop big enough to read could ever pass.

Red-proof again: the two-view geometry convicted all three covers as they stood
-- A 908 content px under a circle (its wordmark sat inside the signed-out
circle), B 1715 plus content past the cut bottom, C 1962. control_old_window
still convicts the pre-R-919 layout, so there are two controls now.

Covers redrawn: C is your laptop idea -- catchphrase and wordmark left, the
dashboard at 640 px (was 370) running off the right edge, readable at last. B's
home motif grew the same way. A lifted into the tighter band. Capitals 48/45/43
against the 25 px floor. Profile pictures untouched, not in the diff.

Still VERIFY: three views measured, all disagreeing with each other and with
Meta's help page, and the Facebook APP is still the one nobody has measured.

documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md

@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ stopping line that lies.
 | **R-915** | Business & legal | P4 | **The Meta app `felhom.eu` is in development mode, so posts it makes are seen only by people with a role on the app.** READ 2026-10-08 (Meta docs, cited in the spike); not measured. MEASURED: development mode does not refuse posting (both test writes HTTP 200). Live needs display name, contact e-mail, a Terms of Service URL, an app icon, a category and the app purpose (privacy-policy and data-deletion URLs listed beside them). The robot's Page assignment, missing at first, was done by the operator the same day. | **WAITING-ON-OPERATOR** | R-813 (the Terms of Service URL) | Before real public posts: switch the app to Live in the Meta developer page. If nothing is done: posts stay invisible to the public. After Live: CC adds the Page link to the website footer (not before — a link to a Page nobody can read is worse than none) | operator |
 | **R-916** | Business & legal | P4 | **The logo has no usable vector master: `website/assets/logo.svg` sets „felhom.eu" as live text in the fonts „M+ 2c" and „Vremena Grotesk", which DooPlex does not have, so every renderer here draws other letters.** SEEN 2026-10-08 (Facebook pictures task): librsvg drew the lettering in DejaVu; `fc-match` resolves the family to DejaVu Sans. The PNG (645 x 408) is the only faithful copy, which caps every picture made from it at about that size (`marketing/facebook/README.md`). | **WAITING-ON-OPERATOR** | the machine with the fonts | In Inkscape on that machine: select the lettering → Path → Object to Path → save as `website/assets/logo-master.svg`; then `marketing/facebook/build.py` can use it. If nothing is done: the PNG stays the master; larger prints will be soft | operator |
 | **R-917** | Business & legal | P4 | **`COPY.md` §2, the Page's longer description (867 characters), has nowhere to go: Facebook's current Pages experience has no long-description field at all.** FOUND 2026-10-08 (Page setup task, `audits/facebook-page-setup-2026-10-08/`). Looked in four places, all on the live Page as its admin: the Page's „Névjegy" tab (Rövid áttekintés / Személyes adatok / Részletek — only a 255-character „Bemutatkozás" and the pinned category), Business Suite's „Oldal módosítása" dialog (profile picture, cover, Bemutatkozás, category, phone, e-mail, address, website, social links — and nothing else), Facebook settings → „Oldal adatai" (redirects to the same Névjegy tab) and settings → „Oldal beállítása" (name, access, type, history, status, recommendation, messaging, data sharing). MEASURED by Graph with the Page token: `description`, `general_info` and `bio` all read `null`. Writing `description` by API would need `pages_manage_metadata`; the robot key's scopes are `read_insights, pages_show_list, business_management, pages_read_engagement, pages_read_user_content, pages_manage_posts, pages_manage_engagement, public_profile`, and the task's fences forbid adding a permission. So §2 is written, reviewed and unplaceable. **Options for the operator:** (a) leave §2 unused and let the 99-character intro plus the website carry it; (b) shorten §2 to ≤ 255 characters and make it the „Bemutatkozás" instead of §1 — but §1 was written for exactly that slot, so this is really „rewrite one of the two"; (c) publish §2 as the Page's first pinned post once the app is Live (R-915), which is where a long text actually gets read; (d) ask Meta support whether the field still exists for this Page type. Recommended (c) — the text reads like a post already. | **WAITING-ON-OPERATOR** | the choice a/b/c/d; (c) also waits on R-915 | Pick a/b/c/d. If nothing is done: §2 stays in `COPY.md` unused and the Page carries only the 99-character intro | operator |
-| **R-919** | Business & legal | P3 | **On a phone the Facebook Page cuts the left edge of the cover: the „s” of „saját szabályaid” and the „f” of „felhom.eu” are gone.** MEASURED 2026-10-08 on the live Page in Chrome DevTools device mode, Pixel 9 (412 × 924, mobile user agent, after a reload so Facebook serves the mobile bundle): `audits/facebook-page-setup-2026-10-08/C2-phone-headline-cut-closeup.png`. The mobile Page header is **412 × 274 = 1,504:1**, so Facebook keeps our cover's full height and shows only the centre **938 px of its 1640 px width (57,2 %)** — **351 px cut from each side**. `marketing/facebook/build.py` builds to a safe area of the centre **1028 × 544** (306 px clear of each edge), which is **45 px wider per side than the phone actually shows**; the light text in `out/cover-c.png` runs from x 333 to x 997, and the left crop edge is x 351, so the first **18 px** of the text are cut. Covers A and B are built from the same safe area and will have the same edge. Two further facts this measurement establishes: **Meta's own help page is wrong about its own rendering** — it states the mobile cover is 2,4:1 where the Page header measures 1,504:1 — and the mobile profile circle is far bigger than assumed (172 px, centred, overlapping the bottom 112 px of the 274 px cover, i.e. source x 637–1030 × y 369–624 is hidden). Not re-cropped on Facebook, per the task's fence. **-- 2026-10-09, FIXED in the build:** `marketing/facebook/build.py` now takes the phone view from the measurement (`PHONE_HDR = (412, 274)` -> the centre 938 px), so SAFE is (391, 40)-(1249, 584) and the phone profile circle is the measured CENTRED box (637, 369, 393) rather than a left-anchored one. Every cover is drawn in a derived `BAND` (408, 48)-(1249, 340), and a `cap` check holds each headline's capital at >= 4 % of the cover height. The red-proof runs on EVERY build (`control_old_window`): it draws the headline where the old 640 x 360 assumption put it, x 328, and the check must reject it -- the phone's crop edge is x 351, so 23 px were cut. Against the three covers as committed at `a76207945e` the new check convicted 3 of 3 (A 23/22 px over the left/right edges, B 63/58 px plus 1017 content pixels under the phone circle, C 63/82 px plus 1778). The profile pictures are untouched -- sha256 identical before and after. **-- 2026-10-09 (operator refinements, same day):** the profile picture now carries the logo MARK only (the lettering was unreadable at 176 px; the mark grew 69 % -> 76 % of the circle, canvas 932 -> 648), and the covers set the headline the way `site.css` sets `.page-index .hero-text h1` (Bold 700, letter-spacing -0.03em, not ExtraBold 800 untracked) with „felhom.eu” drawn from the logo's OWN lettering instead of typed. No geometry changed; every R-919 check and the red-proof stand. | **VERIFY -- rebuilt on `main` 2026-10-09; NOT proven until the operator looks in the Facebook app.** The phone geometry is measured on ONE device (Pixel 9 emulated, 412 px, the mobile WEBSITE); the app may crop differently. | — | Operator: upload the rebuilt cover by hand (same option as now unless `out/preview.html` suggests otherwise -- the pictures cannot be set by API, R-914), then open the Page in the Facebook APP on a phone and say whether the headline and „felhom.eu” are whole. Close on that word. If the app still cuts them, re-measure there and move `PHONE_HDR`; the build follows it. If nothing is done: the Page keeps today's cover, which IS cut on phones | CC |
+| **R-919** | Business & legal | P3 | **On a phone the Facebook Page cuts the left edge of the cover: the „s” of „saját szabályaid” and the „f” of „felhom.eu” are gone.** MEASURED 2026-10-08 on the live Page in Chrome DevTools device mode, Pixel 9 (412 × 924, mobile user agent, after a reload so Facebook serves the mobile bundle): `audits/facebook-page-setup-2026-10-08/C2-phone-headline-cut-closeup.png`. The mobile Page header is **412 × 274 = 1,504:1**, so Facebook keeps our cover's full height and shows only the centre **938 px of its 1640 px width (57,2 %)** — **351 px cut from each side**. `marketing/facebook/build.py` builds to a safe area of the centre **1028 × 544** (306 px clear of each edge), which is **45 px wider per side than the phone actually shows**; the light text in `out/cover-c.png` runs from x 333 to x 997, and the left crop edge is x 351, so the first **18 px** of the text are cut. Covers A and B are built from the same safe area and will have the same edge. Two further facts this measurement establishes: **Meta's own help page is wrong about its own rendering** — it states the mobile cover is 2,4:1 where the Page header measures 1,504:1 — and the mobile profile circle is far bigger than assumed (172 px, centred, overlapping the bottom 112 px of the 274 px cover, i.e. source x 637–1030 × y 369–624 is hidden). Not re-cropped on Facebook, per the task's fence. **-- 2026-10-09, FIXED in the build:** `marketing/facebook/build.py` now takes the phone view from the measurement (`PHONE_HDR = (412, 274)` -> the centre 938 px), so SAFE is (391, 40)-(1249, 584) and the phone profile circle is the measured CENTRED box (637, 369, 393) rather than a left-anchored one. Every cover is drawn in a derived `BAND` (408, 48)-(1249, 340), and a `cap` check holds each headline's capital at >= 4 % of the cover height. The red-proof runs on EVERY build (`control_old_window`): it draws the headline where the old 640 x 360 assumption put it, x 328, and the check must reject it -- the phone's crop edge is x 351, so 23 px were cut. Against the three covers as committed at `a76207945e` the new check convicted 3 of 3 (A 23/22 px over the left/right edges, B 63/58 px plus 1017 content pixels under the phone circle, C 63/82 px plus 1778). The profile pictures are untouched -- sha256 identical before and after. **-- 2026-10-09 (operator refinements, same day):** the profile picture now carries the logo MARK only (the lettering was unreadable at 176 px; the mark grew 69 % -> 76 % of the circle, canvas 932 -> 648), and the covers set the headline the way `site.css` sets `.page-index .hero-text h1` (Bold 700, letter-spacing -0.03em, not ExtraBold 800 untracked) with „felhom.eu” drawn from the logo's OWN lettering instead of typed. No geometry changed; every R-919 check and the red-proof stand. **-- 2026-10-09 (second measurement):** a phone has TWO views and they disagree. SIGNED IN the sides are cut (confirmed on the operator's REAL phone, Chrome/Android: the window solves to x 351..1298 against the emulator's 351..1289 - the left edge to the pixel). SIGNED OUT the FULL width is shown but the cover is top-anchored and only the top 525 px survives (the bottom 99 px is cut; the file's blue top rule is still visible, which is how the side was established), with a much bigger, higher circle at x 486..1150 from y 232. `build.py` now carries both views, models the circles as DISCS rather than rectangles running to the bottom, and splits the artwork into a READ layer (must survive every view) and a DECOR layer (may be cropped or covered; the build reports the cost - B 39 %, C 62 %). The two-view geometry convicted all three then-current covers before the redraw (A 908 px under a circle, B 1715, C 1962). Covers redrawn: C is the operator's laptop idea with the dashboard at 640 px (was 370), B's motif grown to match. | **VERIFY -- rebuilt on `main` 2026-10-09; three views measured, the Facebook APP still is not.** The three measured views disagree with each other and with Meta's help page, so the app is the one that decides. | — | Operator: upload the rebuilt cover (and the profile picture) by hand, then open the Page in the Facebook APP on a phone and say whether the headline and „felhom.eu” are whole. Close on that word. If the app crops differently again, send a screenshot - the last two were solved straight out of the picture - and move `PHONE_IN_X` / `PHONE_OUT_Y` / `PHONE_CIRCLES`; the designs follow them | CC |
 
 ## Process & tooling — 23 rows (P3 3, P4 20)