hub v0.105.0: the third name, a machine told to be quiet, and a guard for the hub's own words
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s

Hub only. No controller change, no agent change, no wire change — nothing to bake.
demo-hp untouched: the operator is re-deploying it this evening.

R-323 — the five-word phrase is „Tulajdonosi jelmondat". It was „Visszaállító
jelszó": one word from the name retired last week, and false besides — it restores
nothing, it proves the account owns the box being bound. Five sites, all in the hub;
felhom-controller and felhom-agent carry the name nowhere, so no halt and no bake.
Both suggested names were rejected with reasons: „Fiókjelszó" would collide with the
dashboard login (a DIFFERENT real secret), and „Összekötési jelszó" would leave the
two factors on this page separated only by kód-versus-jelszó — the exact shape being
removed, since the other factor is the „Párosító kód". The chosen name differs on
both axes, stem and noun. Naming only; the acceptance pin drives the real handler.

R-324 — the hub's customer copy is under a guard for the first time. Retired names
banned across all 95 hub files; retrieval stems registered in four declared customer
surfaces. The selftest found a defect in its own instrument on the first run. One
shared vocabulary in scripts/, drift-checked into the controller gate rather than
copied (R-325 removes the scaffold).

R-321 — a machine we told to be quiet is no longer reported as dead, and it was two
doors, not one: because the state is RECORDED rather than deleted, the morning
deadline check can skip it too. A deleted state returns "", which is not "down" —
R-195's shape returning through a second door. The clock runs from the report the hub
can see, so re-enabling starts it there and emits no recovery for an outage that never
happened. Three red-proofs; the one that matters showed a genuinely dead machine
sitting at "disabled" when the suppression was made unconditional.

R-326 — "which claims are unproven" is answerable by a command now. The nine I have
been repeating was the count of claims the 9 August pass DOWNGRADED, not the count of
unproven ones. The real figures: 55 claims, 23 walked, 32 not — and only 6 of those 32
cite evidence. Its first run found a stale claim (R-327).
This commit is contained in:
2026-08-13 15:50:32 +02:00
parent 955a4f07b7
commit b03a105375
14 changed files with 995 additions and 16 deletions
+3
View File
@@ -69,6 +69,9 @@ GATES = [
("instructions", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "instructions_gate.py"), [ROOT], True),
("golden-currency", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "golden_currency_gate.py"), [], True),
("wire-contract", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "wire_contract_gate.py"), [], True),
# R-324 — the hub composes every customer e-mail and renders the binding pages, and until
# 2026-08-13 no guard in either repo had ever looked at them. Fast: pure file reads.
("hub-copy", os.path.join(SCRIPTS, "hub_copy_gate.py"), [], True),
]
VERDICT = {0: "OK", 1: "FAILED", 2: "INCONCLUSIVE"}