admin/felhom.eu
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs+scripts: TASK-E parts 4-7 - operator one-pager, rulings, hub build.sh adoption

Browse Source 
PROMPT-TEMPLATE: standard 'For the operator' plain-language section, mandatory
for M+ tasks and anything with a STOP.

ROADMAP rulings (operator, 2026-07-21): R-25b full-teardown cascade with three
acks + typed name (M-sized, spec to follow, no longer blocks R-3); R-11 channel
= direct Messenger, doc is the architect's; R-42 option (a), sidecars follow the
app; R-17 delete the archive - spike-lite found NO tooling verb targets it, so
it is an operator console action; R-4 complete (freemail.hu verified).
R-55 + R-41 slice 1 marked shipped; new R-56 (app difficulty classification -
the constructive half of the glance ruling).

scripts/build-hub.sh v1.23.0: the hub build script was outside any repo. Adopted
verbatim + versioned; the build-dir path is now a symlink to it.

felhom-testing skill: the ~1/5 recovery-code 'known flake' is retired - it was a
real defect the test was correctly detecting.
This commit is contained in:
authentik Default Admin
2026-07-21 15:32:56 +02:00
parent ef7d94eb2e
commit af8a7a58a4
6 changed files with 283 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
skills/felhom-testing/SKILL.md
+7 -2
View File
@@ -57,8 +57,13 @@ classifier functions get fixture tables (agent `classifyClaim` style).
go build ./... && go vet ./... && go test ./...
```
Run it in the module dir: `felhom.eu/hub/`, `felhom-controller/controller/`, `felhom-agent/` root.
Known flake: agent `TestGenerateRecoveryCode_EntropyAndFormat` fails ~1/5 (hyphenated wordlist word) —
re-run before diagnosing; it is not a regression.
**No known flakes.** The long-standing agent `TestGenerateRecoveryCode_EntropyAndFormat` ~1/5 failure
was **fixed in agent v0.93.0 (2026-07-21)** — and it was never a flaky test. It was a real defect the
test was correctly detecting and everyone had been told to re-run past: the EFF wordlist contains four
hyphenated entries, so a recovery code could come out reading as 11 words instead of 10. If it fails
now, it is a regression. **The lesson generalises: "known flake, just re-run it" is a diagnosis, and
it needs the same evidence as any other one.** A test that fails at a stable, explainable rate is
usually telling the truth about a rare input, not misbehaving.
## Live validation doctrine (after unit-land)