Website: a page for people who search „felhő tárhely" (R-1033..R-1035)

Search Console (3 months, read 2026-10-14): 48 impressions, 1 click, average
position 73.6; the top query is „felhő tárhely" (19). No page on the site used
the phrase — Google was showing the home page by accident.

New pair /sajat-felho-tarhely + /en/own-cloud-storage: what cloud storage is and
the three ways to have one; what to do when the Google or iCloud storage is full
(the free clean-up first, linked to Google's and Apple's own help; the paid
options second); a five-year cost table; where the data sits; who should NOT
choose this; the closed test. Registered in site_gates.py TWINS/URL/SHELL, both
URLs in sitemap.xml (22 -> 24). FAQPage JSON-LD derived from the visible text.

Prices each read 2026-10-14 on the provider's own Hungarian page, with the URLs
and the date in an HTML comment and a visible „Árak" line: Google AI Plus (2 TB)
— Google One's 2 TB plan — 35 990 Ft/év (behind the „Éves" toggle; a plain fetch
sees only the monthly 3 590 Ft), iCloud+ 2 TB 4 490 Ft/hó, Microsoft 365 Családi
(2 TB shared, no longer 1 TB per person) 46 499 Ft/év.

Felhom's own cost follows what the site already said (operator ruling): machine
and install one-off, power, off-site storage monthly by volume, operation
OPTIONAL, no fee during the closed test. Power is stated as an idle measurement
(nyugalmi állapotban 7-9 W, ~75 kWh/év, from audits/night-power-2026-10-13) and
the page says a year with daytime use is more; no daytime figure and no
electricity tariff are given, because neither is measured or sourced.

FAQ corrected (both languages, JSON-LD re-derived): the cost answer carried
unsourced, undated prices and summed Spotify and a password manager into a
storage comparison; and the page contradicted itself on electricity („havi
néhány ezer forint" vs „évi 5.000–15.000 Ft"). App count 60 -> 62 in the four
places that were stale.

Three defects found on the rendered page and fixed: a .vs-row link fell back to
the browser-default blue (contrast 1.99 -> 7.17); 24px of horizontal scroll at
390px because .method-pros li is a nowrap flex row and the new items contain
links (each item's content wrapped in one span); .info-card and .method-pros
were scoped to the pages that first used them. site.css ?v=31 on all 26 pages.
The shared .content-section padding was NOT changed — it is identical on every
page; the new page only lacked the alt-bg alternation, and now has it.

R-1033 the apps page lags the catalog by two apps (plant-it, wger); R-1034 gate
17 checks the FAQ JSON-LD on two hard-coded pages only; R-1035 the SEO result,
with dated checks on 2026-11-11 and 2026-12-09.

documentation/audits/seo-2026-10-14/BASELINE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+# SEO baseline — 2026-10-14, the day `/sajat-felho-tarhely` was published
+
+**What this file is:** the numbers as they stood *before* the page existed, so the two dated checks
+(R-1035, +4 and +8 weeks) have something to compare against. Nothing here is a prediction.
+
+## 1. Search Console, last 3 months (read 2026-10-14)
+
+**Provenance:** these figures were read from Search Console by the operator and supplied in the task
+brief for this session. **CC did not open Search Console** — there is no connector for it in this
+project — so this is a *reported* figure, not one this session measured. The two dated checks have
+the same constraint: the operator reads the numbers, CC records and compares them.
+
+| | value |
+|---|---|
+| Clicks | 1 |
+| Impressions | 48 |
+| CTR | 2.1 % |
+| Average position | 73.6 (page 8) |
+
+Top queries that showed felhom.eu:
+
+| query | impressions |
+|---|---|
+| felhő tárhely | 19 |
+| felhőtárhely | 5 |
+| felhő alapú tárhely | 3 |
+
+## 2. What the site said before this change (measured by CC, 2026-10-14)
+
+- **„felhő tárhely" (two words) appeared 0 times** on `index.html`, `gyik.html` and
+  `biztonsagimentes.html`. „felhőtárhely" (one word) appeared twice, both in `gyik.html`.
+- So the page Google was showing for those queries was the home page, by accident: no page targeted
+  the phrase, and no page used it.
+- Measured with ASCII-folded fragments plus an accented control, per the Hungarian-search rule.
+
+## 3. What was published today
+
+| | |
+|---|---|
+| Hungarian | `https://felhom.eu/sajat-felho-tarhely` |
+| English twin | `https://felhom.eu/en/own-cloud-storage` |
+| Title | Saját felhő tárhely otthon – Google One helyett \| Felhom.eu |
+| Target phrases | „saját felhő tárhely" (Google's own „Mások ezeket keresték még"), „Mit tegyek, ha a Google tárhelyem megtelt?" (Google's „Mások ezeket a kérdéseket is felteszik"), and „felhő tárhely" itself |
+| Structured data | FAQPage, 4 questions, each question and answer verbatim in the visible text |
+| Sitemap | both URLs added; 22 → 24 |
+
+**The honest expectation, recorded now so the first check is not misread:** a new page on a site
+averaging position 73.6 takes weeks to months to move, and „felhő tárhely" alone is held by
+Microsoft, Google and the big list sites. The page aims at the two longer phrases, not at beating
+them. **A null result at +4 weeks means nothing on its own** — that is why there are two checks.
+
+## 4. The prices the page quotes, and where they came from
+
+All three read on **2026-10-14**, each on the provider's own Hungarian page.
+
+| plan | price | source |
+|---|---|---|
+| Google AI Plus (2 TB) — Google One's 2 TB plan | 35 990 Ft/év | `one.google.com/about/plans?hl=hu`, with the „Éves" toggle |
+| iCloud+ 2 TB | 4 490 Ft/hó | `support.apple.com/hu-hu/108047` |
+| Microsoft 365 Családi (2 TB shared) | 46 499 Ft/év | `microsoft.com/hu-hu/microsoft-365/buy/compare-all-microsoft-365-products` |
+
+**Two naming notes, because both will age:**
+
+1. Google's 2 TB tier is branded **„Google AI Plus"** on the card, while the site is Google One and
+   Google's own body copy calls these „Google One-csomag". The page carries both names for that
+   reason. If the branding changes again, the page is wrong until someone re-reads it.
+2. **Microsoft 365 Családi is 2 TB SHARED**, not 1 TB per person as it was. The Személyes plan
+   (1 TB, one person) is 35 499 Ft/év — not used in the table, which compares 2 TB tiers.
+
+Google's yearly figure is **not in the page HTML** of a plain fetch: it sits behind a JS toggle. It
+was read in Chrome with the toggle switched to „Éves", and screenshotted. An agent re-checking this
+with a plain HTTP fetch will see only the monthly 3 590 Ft and should not conclude the yearly price
+is absent.
+
+## 5. The power figure on the page
+
+**75 kWh/év**, stated on the page as an **idle** measurement, from
+`audits/night-power-2026-10-13/README.md`: the N100 at rest is **7.3 W median / 8.5 W average**, and
+a normal night was 66 Wh over 7.8 h. 8.5 W × 8760 h = 74.5 kWh.
+
+**The page says explicitly that a year with daytime use is more, and gives no daytime number** —
+there is no measurement for one. No electricity tariff is quoted anywhere: this session could not
+source a 2026 Hungarian residential Ft/kWh rate it would stand behind, so the page says
+„néhány ezer forint" and leaves the arithmetic to the reader.
+
+## 6. What the operator still has to do
+
+**Search Console → URL-ellenőrzés → `https://felhom.eu/sajat-felho-tarhely` → „Indexelés kérése".**
+Until that is done (or Google finds the page on its own), both dated checks will read zero for a
+reason that has nothing to do with the page.