Night 2026-10-25 Parts 1–3: every named artifact still downloads; installer 1.36.1 published (operator yes) and its three refusal sentences seen live; D50 = A recorded (09 §3 262, CONTEXT, build skill); R-1284 and R-1290 closed; R-1261 rig evidence so far
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12m56s

This commit is contained in:
admin committed 2026-10-25 20:52:56 +01:00
1 parent b841192670
commit 68ee667a83
19 files changed
+378 -8

No files matched your search

+7
View File
@@ -26,6 +26,13 @@
---
## 2026-10-25 (evening) — installer 1.36.1 published; D50 (full text of the rows: `git show b8411926:documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md`)
| Row | What | Closed | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| **R-1284** | **The installer's preflight never words a refusal: `http_code` printed the status twice („401401"), so the 401 („passphrase REJECTED"), 404 („customer not found") and 409 (R-1167's live-box sentence) branches never matched — every refusal read „unexpected hub status 401401".** (P3) | CLOSED 2026-10-25 evening — **installer 1.36.1 published on the operator's yes:** tag `installer-v1.36.1` → `79ee3e33` (CI 2336 ✓), both git-sync refs in `manifests/webpage.yaml` (`b8411926`), ArgoCD sync of `Deployment/felhom-webpage` alone; `https://felhom.eu/scripts/felhom-host-install.sh` serves `SCRIPT_VERSION="1.36.1"`, sha256 `e18cdd17…` = the tag's file. Seen live on a throwaway Proxmox VM (demo-hp VM 9372): a wrong customer id → „customer … not found in hub (404)", a wrong passphrase → „passphrase REJECTED (401)", the right passphrase on a customer with a live box → „the hub answered 409 … already has a live box" — **R-1167's sentence, which could not show before 1.36.1, now shows.** | `audits/night-2026-10-25/` |
| **R-1290** | **The agent's CI is red since 2026-10-25 ~18:00Z: the registry no longer serves agent 0.159.0, 0.159.1, 0.159.2 and 0.160.0, while the `published` gate asserts the newest 10 released versions are downloadable (`felhom-agent/scripts/retention-policy.json`, „what the registry keeps").** (P3) | CLOSED 2026-10-25 evening — **D50 = A** (operator; `09` §3 decision 262): agent `feaaa0e` (CI 2339 ✓) — `retention-policy.json` keeps the newest 5 + `pinned` (MinAgent 0.158.1, day-0 0.165.0); `check-published-versions.py` asserts exactly those (a pin with no tag fails); three decoys, two of them LIVE HOLES on the old gate. Every artifact still named downloads (`audits/night-2026-10-25/part1-artifacts.txt`). | `audits/night-2026-10-25/` |
## 2026-10-25 — the attended release run (full text of the rows: R-1265, R-1266 `git show 9647f1d1:documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md`; the release closures `git show 36ef8dcd:documentation/backlog/OPEN-ITEMS.md`)
| Row | What | Closed | Evidence |
+2 -4
View File
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ match what the reader sees is how an instrument stops being believed (R-421). It
**nothing was proven on the day this line was drawn** and a stopping line that moves a status is a
stopping line that lies.
## Install & onboarding — 8 rows (P3 6, P4 2)
## Install & onboarding — 7 rows (P3 5, P4 2)
| ID | Category | Sev | What | State | Blocked on | Next action | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -123,7 +123,6 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-1273** | Install & onboarding | P3 | **An install that fails on the image registry's rate limit tells the household only „exit code 1”.** Catalog sweep 2026-10-24, code-server 16:01:37: `lscr.io … toomanyrequests` → the product cleaned up right (R-649) but the event and the card say „Alkalmazás telepítése nem sikerült: Code-Server — exit code 1”; nothing says the download server is busy and a later try works. The same install went through later (`audits/catalog-sweep-2026-10-24/code-server/`). | OPEN | — | Recognise `toomanyrequests` (and a pull timeout) in the deploy error and say „the app's download server is busy — try again in an hour”; a test with the stderr line | CC |
| **R-494** | Install & onboarding | P4 | **NARROWED 2026-09-14 by operator ruling → [P3-LOW] the hub COULD create the tunnel at customer creation, for a domain already on Cloudflare. Not blocking: every customer has their own domain and the operator creates the tunnel per day-0 A.1 (`architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md`).** *Original finding, kept:* **[P1-HIGH] A new customer's dashboard has NO reachable address unless the operator hand-makes a Cloudflare tunnel — the link in the setup-code mail is dead.** MEASURED 2026-09-14 on a fresh install from the public ISO (drill intervention **I1**): the claim mail points at `https://felhom.drill0242.felhom.eu`; that name has **no A and no AAAA** record (`dig @1.1.1.1`, control `felhom.enkisfelhom.hu` resolves); the hub has **no tunnel- or DNS-creation code** (`hub/internal/cloudflare/` holds only geo-rule removal; `cf_tunnel_token` is a pasted, optional form field, `configs.go:1478`) — day-0 runbook A.1 makes it a manual Cloudflare-dashboard step that nothing on the customer-create page asks for; the box's own split-horizon resolver on the appliance LAN IP answered `google.com` but not the dashboard name at 13:27:39Z; the agent applied the record at **13:27:44Z** (`lanresolver: applied split-horizon record … ip=192.168.0.158`, 3 m 46 s after the controller started), so the box CAN answer the name — **but only to a device that uses the box as its DNS server, and no document, screen or mail tells a household to do that**; the router and the installer-offered DNS answer nothing. The page was reachable only at the guest's LAN address with the name forced (`curl --resolve …:443:192.168.0.158`). **A volunteer could not have done that.** **What it needs:** an operator ruling — the hub creates the tunnel and DNS at customer creation, or the product gives a household a LAN address that works with no DNS change. | **READY — rank P3-LOW; owner: CC** **Re-ranked 2026-10-03: P3→P4: operator-side automation; the operator creates the tunnel by hand per the day-0 runbook.** | — | — | CC |
| **R-504** | Install & onboarding | P4 | **[P3-LOW] `iso.felhom.eu` cannot show an index page on its own — its root returns 404, and the download page lives on the website instead.** MEASURED 2026-09-14: `https://iso.felhom.eu/` and `/index.html` → 404; only named objects answer. The host is an R2 bucket behind a custom domain; whether R2 would serve an uploaded `index.html` at `/` was **not measured** (uploading anything to the public bucket is a publication). The ISO v1.27.0 task puts the Hungarian download page at `felhom.eu/letoltes` (published with the ISO, after the operator's yes). **Remaining:** a redirect from `iso.felhom.eu/` to that page needs a Cloudflare rule the session has no credential for. | **WAITING-ON-OPERATOR — rank P3-LOW; owner: operator (Cloudflare rule)** **Re-ranked 2026-10-03: P3→P4: households are sent to the website's download page; the bare address is cosmetic.** | — | — | operator |
| **R-1284** | Install & onboarding | P3 | **The installer's preflight never words a refusal: `http_code` printed the status twice („401401"), so the 401 („passphrase REJECTED"), 404 („customer not found") and 409 (R-1167's live-box sentence) branches never matched — every refusal read „unexpected hub status 401401".** Seen live 2026-10-25 on the BYO test VM (attended release run) with installer 1.36.0: a wrong id read `404404`, a wrong passphrase `401401`. R-1167 was CLOSED 2026-10-20 on a publish whose 409 sentence could not show. With `-f`, curl prints `-w` and exits 22 on a 4xx, and the fallback curl printed the code again (line 1833 already worked around it by keeping the last 3 characters). | OPEN — **fixed on main, NOT published:** installer 1.36.1 (`http_code`: one curl without `-f`, never failing); `test_http_code_prints_one_status_on_a_refusal`, seen failing on the old helper (`audits/release-2026-10-26/redproof/installer-http-code-doubled.txt`). | the publish is a DooPlex change (tag + webpage git-sync pins + the webpage sync) — the operator's | publish installer 1.36.1 (cut `installer-v1.36.1`, bump both `--ref` in `manifests/webpage.yaml`, sync the webpage alone); then a preflight with a wrong passphrase reads „passphrase REJECTED (401)"; then close | operator |
## Apps & catalog — 16 rows (P3 6, P4 10)
@@ -353,7 +352,7 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-990** | Business & legal | P4 | **Operator: read `documentation/audits/forum-research-2026-10-12/FELHOM.md` §5 and rule on each recommendation.** READ-ONLY research 2026-10-12: three years (#7943–#11092, 2,908 posts, 195 people, 82 beginner threads) of the public PROHARDVER! topic „Home server / házi szerver építése”, tagged and counted by person (`FINDINGS.md`, method and spot-check in `METHOD.md`; no username or post text in git). Ten ranked recommendations, none acted on; the top three: a „which machine works” page (8 of 33 beginners who name their hardware own only a Synology, a router disk or a Raspberry Pi — the installer cannot run there; the same gap is R-989's first recommendation from a different source, and the shipped-page half is R-991), „you do not choose an operating system — we do” (the biggest beginner question, 20 of 82 threads), and „bring your old office PC” as the cheap entry. Catalog gap (≥ 3 people): a DLNA server (7), an ad/DNS blocker (5), a camera recorder (5). | **WAITING-ON-OPERATOR** — filed 2026-10-12 | the operator's reading | Operator: rule on each of the ten (yes / no / later). If nothing is done: nothing changes; the research ages | operator |
| **R-1035** | Business & legal | P4 | **Did the „felhő tárhely” page earn anything? Two dated checks.** **Baseline (reported by the operator from Search Console, 2026-10-14, last 3 months):** 1 click, 48 impressions, CTR 2.1 %, average position **73.6**; „felhő tárhely” 19 impressions, „felhőtárhely” 5, „felhő alapú tárhely” 3. CC measured separately that the phrase „felhő tárhely” appeared **0 times** on the home, FAQ and backup pages — Google was showing the home page for those queries by accident. `/sajat-felho-tarhely` + `/en/own-cloud-storage` published **2026-10-14**; full baseline, price sources and the power provenance in `audits/seo-2026-10-14/BASELINE.md`. **What to measure, both times:** impressions and average position for „felhő tárhely” and „saját felhő tárhely”, plus the new page's own impressions, clicks and position. **A null result at +4 weeks means nothing on its own** — a new page on a site at position 73.6 takes weeks to months to move, and „felhő tárhely” alone is held by Microsoft, Google and the big list sites; the page aims at the two longer phrases. That is why there are two checks and not one, and why neither should be read as a verdict on the copy. **There is no Search Console connector in this project, so CC cannot read these numbers** — the operator reads them, CC records and compares. **Blocked until the operator asks for indexing** (Search Console → URL-ellenőrzés → the URL → „Indexelés kérése”): until that happens, or Google finds the page itself, both checks read zero for a reason that is not the page. **This is a slow channel and does not replace talking to people.** | **WATCHING** | operator: request indexing, then supply the Search Console read | 2026-11-11: first read (+4 weeks); 2026-12-09: second (+8 weeks), compared with the first | operator + CC |
## Process & tooling — 33 rows (P3 8, P4 25)
## Process & tooling — 32 rows (P3 7, P4 25)
| ID | Category | Sev | What | State | Blocked on | Next action | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -389,7 +388,6 @@ stopping line that lies.
| **R-1236** | Process & tooling | P3 | **Gitea (the code and the registry) is OOM-killed at its 1 GiB limit — 4 restarts in 17 days, the last at 06:41:10 UTC on 2026-10-23, six seconds after the global floor moved three boxes to a new controller image.** Read 2026-10-23 (`kubectl get pod`: `lastState.terminated.reason OOMKilled`, exit 137; kernel: „git invoked oom-killer”; limit `memory: 1Gi`, request 256Mi; 620 Mi in use at rest). During a restart a box update, an agent package fetch, a CI clone or a push fails. Not changed: DooPlex's configuration is the operator's. | OPEN | the operator's yes (a DooPlex change) | Operator: raise the limit (e.g. 2 GiB; DooPlex has the RAM) — CC's pick; or keep it and accept a restart in release hours | operator |
| **R-1264** | Process & tooling | P4 | **Skills tooling (review round 2, DOC-B U7/S22):** the grandfathered skill has no size cap — felhom-build-deploy is 240 lines while R-394 recorded 179 (`scripts/check_skills.py:45-47,98-101`); a NEW skill folder (`skills/felhom-web-design`) is not live until `install_skills.py` runs again (not run: no DooPlex change in this unattended run). | OPEN | — | cap the grandfathered entry at its current size; run install_skills.py in an attended session | CC |
| **R-1277** | Process & tooling | P4 | **The catalog's box fixtures drifted from the apps they test** — fixed only in the sweep's copy (`audits/catalog-sweep-2026-10-24/tools/upgrade_fixtures_box.py`, marked SWEEP COPY): OpenGist 1.15 signs up at `/-/register`; Calibre-Web's admin is the generated ADMIN_USER; Mealie's after_install replaces the factory password (the seed raced it); Papra 26.6 needs an Origin header; Rallly 4.15 closed password sign-up (no fixture possible by password); Vaultwarden 1.37.4 answers 404 on `POST /identity/accounts/register` (the fixture was written on 1.36; the admin invite works, the invited sign-up has no route — the newer clients' register/finish flow);the read-back through a family gate needs a fresh cookie after the setup gate opens (Grimmory stayed inconclusive). New fixtures for Homebox, Immich, Komga, Jellyfin, Ghost, Radarr, Sonarr in `tools/sweep_fixtures.py`; `box_walk.py` gained a `sweep` target. | OPEN | — | Port them into `app-catalog-felhom.eu/scripts/` with the bench tests | CC |
| **R-1290** | Process & tooling | P3 | **The agent's CI is red since 2026-10-25 ~18:00Z: the registry no longer serves agent 0.159.0, 0.159.1, 0.159.2 and 0.160.0, while the `published` gate asserts the newest 10 released versions are downloadable (`felhom-agent/scripts/retention-policy.json`, „what the registry keeps").** Measured 2026-10-25 (attended release run): CI job 2326 (`4697f8a`, after the 0.165.0 upload) green; job 2334 (`6b6ba0c`, docs only) red on those four (HTTP 404); the registry lists 7 versions — 0.158.1, 0.161.0–0.165.0 and a test build `0.163.0-step1`. Our scripts delete only the version they re-upload (`publish-agent.sh:77`), so the prune is outside the repos (a Gitea package clean-up rule or a hand prune on DooPlex — not CC's to change). No box needs those versions (all run 0.165.0; MinAgent 0.158.1 is served), but every agent push now mails a CI failure and hides a real one. | OPEN | the operator (DooPlex's Gitea) | the operator: name what pruned on 2026-10-25 and its keep rule; then CC sets `generic_versions_kept` to that rule (or bounds the gate on the hub's MinAgent, R-287's follow-up) in one commit, and CI is green again by hash | operator |
<!-- DUE-CHECKS-BEGIN — machine-readable. Parsed by scripts/due_checks_gate.py.
One row per dated check. The R-number must have a row above. Dates are UTC.