Verify the standing picture against source: 12 downgrades, and the decay ran both ways
gates / gates (push) Successful in 21s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 21s
55 claims verified. Twelve moved, all downwards: walked 32 -> 20, built 5 -> 17. Register ceiling R-284 -> R-290. THE RULE DID NOT FIRE THE WAY IT WAS EXPECTED TO. Not one downgrade came from code moving under an old proof. All twelve came from step 1 of the same rule -- the cited evidence does not exist. Measured: of the 28 capability-map rows behind the page's claims, 8 carry a tests/ or audits/ path and 20 carry prose only. The green dots were drawn from rows that cite an argument, not a walk (R-290). The map, not the dataset, is what needs fixing -- it still says PROVEN-LIVE for all twelve. And once it ran backwards: fault.operator-email looked contradicted by R-182, but live source shows the backup_run_failures digest allowlisted, operator-only and templated, with recovery_unit_capture_failed now record-only. The claim is right and the REGISTER ROW is stale (R-289). The session went looking for stale proofs and found a stale defect. R-281 WITHDRAWN -- wrong in both directions, settled by the operator's mailbox. The tripwire DID fire (escrow_blob_served 10:19:41Z = 12:19 CEST) and false error-severity alarms fired too, for deliberate attended work (R-285). The measurement's cause is ESTABLISHED: the P7 query copied hub.db without hub.db-wal, and the signature is exact -- it reported "2 events all day, newest 00:30:07", and the rows at or before 00:30:07 number exactly 2. Timezone and wrong-key were tested and refuted. The control had been drawn from the same stale snapshot as the measurement, which is why it agreed (R-286). Part 4: NO WORKFLOW CHANGED, deliberately. The gate is not ref-sensitive -- it enumerates from the Gitea tags API, and both previous tag pushes passed. The red is TRUE: run 267 saw v0.120.0 downloadable, run 284 on the same commit saw 404. Who deleted the package is NOT established and is not guessed (R-287). The page is now generated from where-felhom-stands.yaml by scripts/render_stands.py: static, zero script tags, every moved status carrying a visible "changed, was X" chip. The React bundle -- whose content was gzip+base64 inside a JS module map -- is kept as a dated snapshot. scripts/check_stands.py gates the data and convicted 51 problems in my own first draft before the staged positive control ever ran.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -17,6 +17,12 @@ The Docker-only app-domain controller. Full per-area docs grounded in current so
|
||||
→ [`controller/README.md`](controller/README.md): module map, deploy & stack lifecycle, backup
|
||||
architecture, storage/monitoring/metrics, auth/hub/sync/integrations.
|
||||
|
||||
### Where we stand — `architecture/where-felhom-stands.*`
|
||||
The operator's one-page picture of what is proven, built, partial and missing.
|
||||
- [`architecture/where-felhom-stands.html`](architecture/where-felhom-stands.html) — **generated**; do not hand-edit
|
||||
- [`architecture/where-felhom-stands.yaml`](architecture/where-felhom-stands.yaml) — the data behind it; every claim cites its source. Gate: `scripts/check_stands.py`; regenerate with `scripts/render_stands.py`
|
||||
- [`architecture/where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html`](architecture/where-felhom-stands-2026-08-09-snapshot.html) — **a dated snapshot, NOT maintained.** The original React bundle, kept for the record; its statuses are those of 2026-08-09 before the verification pass
|
||||
|
||||
### Host agent & platform — `architecture/`, `proxmox-platform.md`
|
||||
The operator-tier agent and the Proxmox platform.
|
||||
- [`architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md`](architecture/01-topology-and-trust.md) — topology & trust model
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user