From 172584c26f71bc128b5dda352bb14c93384c972c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kisfenyo Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 06:11:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] REPORT: record CI run 348 by id, and what could not be read Checklist item "confirm your own push's CI run by run ID". Run 348, head_sha ebfd0967c, conclusion failure, elapsed 13 s -- the inherited golden-currency conviction (R-334), not a new fault: CI's only step is the same repo_gates.py --fast entry point, and 13 s is the honest-failure band rather than R-265's reap band. Stated plainly that the run LOG could not be read (runs/348/logs and tasks/348/logs both 404 authenticated as admin, runs/348/jobs empty, web endpoint 302), so naming the gate is an inference from the local run plus gates.yml -- not CI's own words. Standing rule 2: a "no access" claim names what was tried. Also notes the [felhom CI] gates FAILED mail run 348 will send, so it is not read as a second incident alongside this morning's backup alerts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016p1PTCzb8rF5G9Aa1qhpBN --- REPORT.md | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/REPORT.md b/REPORT.md index 1f3bdfe..6ac6a82 100644 --- a/REPORT.md +++ b/REPORT.md @@ -101,6 +101,20 @@ one-sided job CC can finish. **This push therefore used `git push --no-verify`, stated here per `.claude/rules/gates.md`.** R-334 is updated in the register with the new numbers rather than left reading 0.215.0. +**CI checked by run ID, as the checklist requires: run `348`, `head_sha ebfd0967c`, conclusion +`failure`, elapsed 13 s** (04:09:45→04:09:58Z). Expected and inherited — CI's only step is +`python3 scripts/repo_gates.py --fast`, the same entry point that convicts golden-currency locally, +with the sibling repos fetched. The 13 s runtime places it in the workflow's own "honest gate +failure" band rather than the R-265 reap band, so the result is the gate speaking, not the runner. +**I could not read the run log to name the gate from CI's own mouth** — `actions/runs/348/logs` and +`actions/tasks/348/logs` both 404, `actions/runs/348/jobs` returns an empty list, authenticated as +`admin`, and the web log endpoint 302s. So this is an inference from the local run plus the workflow +definition, not a direct reading, and it is stated as such. + +**Expect one `[felhom CI] gates FAILED in admin/felhom.eu` mail for run 348** — the workflow alarms +on failure by design. It is this push, and it is the golden-currency row, not a new fault; the same +mails on 12 and 14 August have the same cause. + *(Noted for accuracy: the first gate run was piped to `tail`, which returned `rc=0` — `tail`'s exit code, not the gate's. It was re-run unpiped to read the real `rc=1`. That is standing rule 1's trap in its smaller form, and the number reported above is the unpiped one.)*