DRILL R-95: the recovery route does not exist — stopped before the destructive phase
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s

The drill was to delete demo-hp's off-site history and get it back out of a Storage
Box snapshot, filling row 10's blank RTO. Phase 1 found there is nothing to get it
back from: no snapshot is reachable from a sub-account BY ANY NAME.

Measured, read-only, no delete verb issued against any live store:
- 777,600 exact names in the vendor form YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS, nine full days at
  second granularity, plus 126 alternative shapes -> ZERO hits.
- The control is what makes that mean anything: the identical 600-name batch shape
  with one real path appended returned it, 6 of 6.
- Structural cause: /home (u629488-sub3) is st_dev 0,82; /.zfs/snapshot is st_dev
  0,276; /home/.zfs does not exist. A snapshot under /.zfs/snapshot belongs to a
  different dataset than the one holding felhom-repo.
- Three tools agree with controls in the same run: SFTP, the port-23 shell,
  rsync --list-only.

So yesterday's re-scope splits: clause (a) "the box cannot write into the snapshot
area" STANDS and is re-confirmed; clause (b) "the rest is recoverable file by file"
is NOT SUPPORTED. STOPPED before Phase 2 on the operator's ruling — with no recovery
leg the deletion would have destroyed real history to buy only an alarm test that
could not fire at the specified size. Store verified untouched at 69 snapshots.

R-432 ANSWERED (negatively; its panel-read next step withdrawn as unnecessary).
R-433 no snapshot reachable by any name — decides R-95's remedy and its rank.
R-434 the drop alarm's text promises a file-by-file recovery that cannot be performed.
R-435 the drop detector is blind to a single-app deletion (>50% of 69 needed, ~9 given).
R-436 LEAD: the provider offers `rclone serve restic --stdio` and restic 0.14.0 speaks
      `rclone:` (measured, controlled) — real prevention may need no new machine, IF
      the vendor pins --append-only. Ask before building.

07 §8 row 10: text corrected, status NOT moved, RTO still blank.
No code, no version bump, no image, no golden. REPORT.md's only copy of the R-331
report preserved as REPORT-r331-backup-card.md before overwrite.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LB8FmJaGd2cyjvy6dbEjpM
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-01 16:55:50 +02:00
parent 17d92e71a1
commit 10c223bdfe
23 changed files with 1018 additions and 162 deletions
+6 -2
View File
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ unconditional promise, which CAMPAIGN-11 §7 step 7 measured the customer-facing
| **E-2d** | **Prove E-2 on a fresh VM** — a real `felhom-host-install.sh` 1.22.0 run, Case B naturally, a claimable customer, then add a drive (the offer) and unplug it (`backup_target_absent` end-to-end) | **CLOSED — PARTIALLY PROVEN** (2026-07-29) | — | **C1, C2 proven** (`audits/E2D-fresh-vm-2026-07-29.md`); **C3, C4 proven live** (`audits/SESSION-C-2026-07-29.md`); **C5 FAILED → R-116** — the gate fires and an alarm reaches the hub, but it is the generic event, so the alarm and its recovery cannot be paired. **R-116 is the single named open leg**; per the Session-C runbook §9, decided in advance, a failed claim closes the item as partially proven rather than triggering a re-run. Both audits carry the full record — the `local-lvm` fence, the ISO/PAIRING derivation, the Phase 0 answers, the per-claim observables and the teardown evidence — and are the place to read it, not this cell. **The arc's actual definition of done is R-106 + R-109, R-108 and D5**, none of which this detour touched | CC |
| **R-121** | **A BOX's installed agent can sit releases behind the vouched one and nothing notices — the R-120 gate does not cover it.** demo-hp ran agent **0.113.0** while the hub vouched **0.116.0**, through the whole R-116/R-117 arc, and no signal existed on any channel | **READY (S) — NEW 2026-07-30** | — | **Fourth instance of the drift family** (R-111 golden's agent 17 releases behind, R-115 built+deployed but never published, R-120 golden a controller behind — and now installed-vs-vouched on a live box). **Confirmed at source that R-120's gate cannot catch it:** `hub/internal/web/configs.go:1165-1169` compares `goldenVer` against `store.NewestReportedControllerVersion()` — it is a **golden-artifact vs fleet-CONTROLLER** check and says nothing about the agent installed on a box. **`MinAgent` does not cover it either:** it is used to HOLD the controller floor for a box whose agent is too old (`hub/internal/api/handler.go:530-538`, `store.go:1857`) — protective, not an alarm — and demo-hp's 0.113.0 **equalled** `min_agent` 0.113.0, so even a floor comparison was satisfied. **The cost, measured:** R-117's whole subject is the R-113 conjunction, which landed in **0.114.0** — so the designated drill host could not exercise the code under investigation at all, and the R-117 spike had to route every predicate result through an out-of-repo probe built from `main` instead of the installed agent (`audits/SPIKE-r117-bind-liveness-2026-07-30.md` §1, §2.3). Discovered because the R-117 task made bringing the box current an explicit prerequisite. **Fix shape (not implemented):** the hub already receives `AgentVersion` on every host report, and already has semver comparison in Go — the missing piece is a checker comparing reported agent vs the **vouched** agent and surfacing it, operator-tier. Note the honest tension: a box legitimately lags between publish and deploy, so this wants a staleness window rather than an instant alarm | CC |
| **R-118** | **An absent drive's union row advertises the ROOT filesystem's capacity as its own.** In the absent-state payload the registry-union row reports `total_bytes: 49675956224 / used_bytes: 4584579072` — **byte-identical to the `local` row** (`durable_id: path:/var/lib/vz`, i.e. `pve-root`) in the same response. The real drive is **4 GB** | **READY (XS) — NEW 2026-07-30** | — | Cause: `statfsCapacity(d.MountPath)` (`disks.go:335-338`) statfs's `/mnt/cel`, which with the device gone is a **bare directory on the root filesystem**. `observe.go:176-183`'s comment warns about exactly this trap and guards the Observe path ("*an unmounted removable dir-storage's mountpoint reverts to a bare directory on root … catastrophic DR mis-id*"); **the union path has no equivalent guard.** **Not a DR mis-id** — `durable_id` on that row is still the correct `uuid:…`, so re-attach identity is safe. It is a **false capacity** reaching every consumer of `total_bytes`/`used_fraction` (fill monitors, storage cards): a detached 4 GB drive advertises 46 GiB at 9.2 % used. Same class as `role.go:180-181` — an absent drive's fields decaying to the root filesystem's. Evidence: `audits/DIAG-r116-disks-payload-2026-07-30.md` §12 | CC |
| **R-95** | restic offsite credential **can delete** (`readonly=False`, `forget --prune` runs from the box); SFTP cannot express append-only | **READY** | — | Root exposure still open. Mitigation now ARMED — split prune off-box or move to REST `--append-only` | CC **SPIKE 2026-09-01 — `audits/SPIKE-r95-offsite-delete-2026-09-01.md`. THE WORD "ARMED" ABOVE IS NOT SUPPORTED AND IS WITHDRAWN PENDING R-429:** no `.snapshots` is visible to either box's sub-account (measured, both machines, with controls), so the seven-day bound is unverified and unverifiable from the product side. **Q3 (documented, `hub/internal/hetznerapi/hetznerapi.go:38-45`): the sub-account API has ONE permission axis, `readonly` — there is no append-only, so the PBS shape does NOT transfer** (PBS is a server that can refuse; a Storage Box is a filesystem that runs nothing). **Q5 (measured): withdrawing delete does NOT wedge the store** — restic treats a dead owner's lock as stale and proceeds — so the constraint everyone feared is not the blocker; but `unlock --remove-all` lies about success (R-430), and the crash-lock window is UNKNOWN. **Q6 (measured): restic 0.14.0 DOES speak `rest:`** (control: `banana:` → invalid backend), and append-only is a rest-server flag, not a restic one — reachable, but it needs a machine in the recovery path and ep0 is protected. **Q7 (measured): detection is nearly free** — `snapshot_count` already reaches the hub and the hub APPENDS reports, so the comparison needs no box change. **RECOMMENDATION: answer R-429 first (Viktor, ten minutes), then build detection, then move retention off the box; defer the transport change.** Two `forget --prune` sites must be disarmed together — `offbox.go:1388` AND `offbox.go:1759` — or R-191 repeats. **RE-SCOPED 2026-09-01 — THE STORY WAS WORSE THAN THE TRUTH FOR TWO MONTHS.** The box can delete its own LIVE repository, **but it cannot write to the daily snapshots of it** — MEASURED, not cited: a write into `/.zfs/snapshot` is refused on both boxes while the same write to the account home succeeds (R-432). Seven daily snapshots are confirmed in the panel (R-429). **So a deletion costs at most the data written since the last daily snapshot, and the rest is recoverable — file by file, one customer at a time, with no effect on anyone else** (vendor: *"You can download individual files or entire directories as usual"*; *"It is not possible to write to the `/.zfs` directory or its subfolder"*). **NOT open-ended loss.** Two caveats kept honest: a panel-driven snapshot restore rolls back the WHOLE Storage Box and deletes newer snapshots, which is why the per-file route matters; and per-file recovery is **operator-only today** (R-432). **DETECTION SHIPPED hub v0.111.0 (R-431)** — an unexplained fall is noticed within a day. **THE RANKING IS VIKTOR'S:** this has been #1 since July on the old story. On the new facts I would rank it below the items that can still lose data outright, but I am not re-ranking it myself. `audits/SPIKE-r95-offsite-delete-2026-09-01.md` |
| **R-95** | restic offsite credential **can delete** (`readonly=False`, `forget --prune` runs from the box); SFTP cannot express append-only | **READY** | — | Root exposure still open. Mitigation now ARMED — split prune off-box or move to REST `--append-only` | CC **SPIKE 2026-09-01 — `audits/SPIKE-r95-offsite-delete-2026-09-01.md`. THE WORD "ARMED" ABOVE IS NOT SUPPORTED AND IS WITHDRAWN PENDING R-429:** no `.snapshots` is visible to either box's sub-account (measured, both machines, with controls), so the seven-day bound is unverified and unverifiable from the product side. **Q3 (documented, `hub/internal/hetznerapi/hetznerapi.go:38-45`): the sub-account API has ONE permission axis, `readonly` — there is no append-only, so the PBS shape does NOT transfer** (PBS is a server that can refuse; a Storage Box is a filesystem that runs nothing). **Q5 (measured): withdrawing delete does NOT wedge the store** — restic treats a dead owner's lock as stale and proceeds — so the constraint everyone feared is not the blocker; but `unlock --remove-all` lies about success (R-430), and the crash-lock window is UNKNOWN. **Q6 (measured): restic 0.14.0 DOES speak `rest:`** (control: `banana:` → invalid backend), and append-only is a rest-server flag, not a restic one — reachable, but it needs a machine in the recovery path and ep0 is protected. **Q7 (measured): detection is nearly free** — `snapshot_count` already reaches the hub and the hub APPENDS reports, so the comparison needs no box change. **RECOMMENDATION: answer R-429 first (Viktor, ten minutes), then build detection, then move retention off the box; defer the transport change.** Two `forget --prune` sites must be disarmed together — `offbox.go:1388` AND `offbox.go:1759` — or R-191 repeats. **RE-SCOPED 2026-09-01 — THE STORY WAS WORSE THAN THE TRUTH FOR TWO MONTHS.** The box can delete its own LIVE repository, **but it cannot write to the daily snapshots of it** — MEASURED, not cited: a write into `/.zfs/snapshot` is refused on both boxes while the same write to the account home succeeds (R-432). Seven daily snapshots are confirmed in the panel (R-429). **So a deletion costs at most the data written since the last daily snapshot, and the rest is recoverable — file by file, one customer at a time, with no effect on anyone else** (vendor: *"You can download individual files or entire directories as usual"*; *"It is not possible to write to the `/.zfs` directory or its subfolder"*). **NOT open-ended loss.** Two caveats kept honest: a panel-driven snapshot restore rolls back the WHOLE Storage Box and deletes newer snapshots, which is why the per-file route matters; and per-file recovery is **operator-only today** (R-432). **DETECTION SHIPPED hub v0.111.0 (R-431)** — an unexplained fall is noticed within a day. **THE RANKING IS VIKTOR'S:** this has been #1 since July on the old story. On the new facts I would rank it below the items that can still lose data outright, but I am not re-ranking it myself. `audits/SPIKE-r95-offsite-delete-2026-09-01.md` **DRILL 2026-09-01, LATER THE SAME DAY — THE RE-SCOPE'S SECOND HALF IS WITHDRAWN.** The drill that was to walk the recovery found there is no route to walk: **no snapshot is reachable from a sub-account by ANY name** (R-433) — 777,600 exact names in the vendor format over nine days, zero hits, with a passing control, plus the structural reason (`/home` st_dev 0,82 vs `/.zfs/snapshot` st_dev 0,276, and `/home/.zfs` absent). **Clause (a) stands: the box can delete the live repo and cannot write into the snapshot area.** Clause (b) — *"the rest is recoverable file by file"* — is NOT SUPPORTED. **The drill was STOPPED before its destructive phase on the operator's ruling**, because with no recovery route the deletion would have destroyed real history to buy only an alarm test that could not fire at the specified size (R-435). Nothing was deleted; the store is verified untouched at 69 snapshots. **So the comfort that lowered this row rested on an unwalked route, and the route does not exist.** Two new leads decide what happens next: **R-433** (can the MAIN account see them? nobody here holds that credential) and **R-436** (`rclone serve restic --stdio` is offered server-side and restic speaks `rclone:` — measured — which could make real prevention cheap, IF the provider pins `--append-only`). **The rank stays Viktor's. Plainly: the argument that moved this row down is the argument the drill removed.** `audits/evidence-drill-r95-recovery-2026-09-01/` |
| **R-191** | **Every weekly offsite backup UPLOADS successfully and then FAILS the job on a prune the box is deliberately not allowed to do — on both demo boxes.** Measured on demo-felhom 2026-08-04 06:49–06:53: the upload completed (223 s, 629 MiB of 1.874 GiB, **67.2 % reused incrementally**), then `ERROR: prune 'ct/9201': proxmox-backup-client failed: Error: permission check failed - missing Datastore.Modify\|Datastore.Prune on /datastore/felhom-offsite/demo-felhom` → `ERROR: Backup of VM 9201 failed - error pruning backups` → `TASK ERROR: job errors`. The hub raised `whole_guest_backup_failed` | **CLOSED — SHIPPED 2026-08-04** (installer **1.25.0**; both live boxes corrected) | — | **This is R-89's rule not reaching the config.** R-89 moved PBS pruning SERVER-SIDE — *"boxes set `keep_last: 0`, ep0 runs prune jobs; box tokens stay write-only, never widen the grant"*. The token behaves exactly as designed: it refuses. But **both** demo boxes still arm the offsite tier with `keep_last=2 prune_pbs_allowed=true` (`backup_targets: [{target_id: felhom-pbs, cadence_seconds: 604800, keep_last: 2}]`), so every run asks for a prune that must fail. **The data is SAFE and that is why this is not a P1:** the snapshot lands before the prune is attempted; what is wrong is the job's VERDICT and the weekly operator e-mail it produces. **But it is corrosive in the specific way this project keeps finding:** a backup that reports FAILED while succeeding trains the operator to discount `whole_guest_backup_failed`, which is the same alert that would carry a real one — and it is exactly the failure the R-100 corollary warns about, an alarm whose text is true and whose trigger is not the thing you would act on. **Fix is one config line per box** (`keep_last: 0` on the PBS tier) plus whatever writes it on a fresh install; **deliberately NOT applied in this session** — the session was a runbook with an explicit "change nothing, and if a change appears necessary, stop and report" rule, and a retention field on a live backup tier is not a change to slip into an observation run. **Check before fixing:** whether ep0's prune jobs actually cover these two namespaces, or the snapshots simply accumulate once the box stops asking **THE GATE WAS RUN FIRST, AND IT MATTERED.** Before disabling anything, ep0 was read (read-only, Tier 2): prune jobs `prune-demo-felhom` and `prune-demo-hp` exist on datastore `felhom-offsite`, one per namespace, `schedule 03:30`, `keep-last 2`, comment *"R-82 retention keep-last=2, server-side (box tokens are write-only)"* — and they have run **every day since 2026-07-27: 18 tasks, all `status=OK`**. The newest task log reads `retention options: --ns demo-felhom --max-depth 0 --keep-last 2` / `keep ct/9201/2026-07-27…` / `keep ct/9201/2026-07-28…` / `TASK OK`. Retention happens, and it happens there. **A METHODOLOGICAL WARNING WORTH MORE THAN THE FIX.** Three separate queries said the OPPOSITE — *no prune jobs have ever run* — and **all three were broken instruments**: `worker-type` where the field is `worker_type`; the value `prune` where the worker type is `prunejob`; and `journalctl -u proxmox-backup` where the unit is `proxmox-backup-proxy`. A fourth reading (3 snapshots under keep-last 2) was mis-framed by CC and self-corrected — the third snapshot had landed AFTER that day's 03:30 window. Acting on any of them would have disabled the only pruning ATTEMPT while reporting that nothing prunes: a weekly false alarm traded for unbounded growth on the protected endpoint, invisible for months. **The gate is what caught it, and only because it demanded evidence rather than a verdict.** **Shipped:** installer **1.25.0** writes `keep_last: 0` on the offsite tier (the agent's existing guard `allowPBSPrune = !primary && keep_last > 0` already reads that as *never prune from the box* — no agent change), the justifying paragraph is rewritten to say where retention lives and cite R-89, and `hostinstall_gates.py` asserts it (red-proved: pinning `keep_last: 2` back fails the gate). **Both live boxes corrected in their own config** — `backup tier armed target=felhom-pbs … keep_last=0 … prune_pbs_allowed=false` on demo-felhom and demo-hp, with the local tier untouched at `keep_last=3`. Served over HTTPS at `1.25.0` with `"keep_last":0` in the served bytes. **STILL TO OBSERVE:** the next weekly offsite run completing OK end-to-end. The change removes the failing step; the *schedule* proving it is next week's event, and this row should carry that line when it happens. | CC |
| **R-194** | **PVE's permission cache delays every grant-state verdict by an unknown amount, so "the agent can read it" and "the ACL exists" are not the same measurement.** Observed twice while validating R-190's self-repair on demo-felhom 2026-08-04: both ACL rows for `/storage/felhom-backup` were deleted, and `GET /access/permissions` continued to report `Datastore.AllocateSpace` present — for **~40 s** in one run and **~16 minutes** in another. During that window the capability probe reads healthy and the self-repair does not fire | **OPEN** | — | **Why it matters beyond the delay:** it puts a floor under how fast a lost grant can be noticed, it makes any single permission read a lagging indicator, and — the interesting part — **it is a candidate contributor to R-190's own timeline**: a grant removed at an unknown moment could keep working until a cache expiry, which is exactly the shape of *worked at 04:44, refused at 09:24*. That does not explain what removed it, but it may explain when the refusal SURFACED, and the two have been treated as the same instant. **Not a defect in our code** — it is PVE behaviour, and the mitigation already tolerates it (the repair fires on the next probe after the cache clears). **What is worth deciding:** whether the store-grant probe should ALSO consult the storage content listing as a second signal, since that appeared to reflect the loss immediately (`{"data":[]}` while the permission read still said present) — two signals disagreeing is itself information, and today only one of them is read | CC |
| **R-200** | **The DR password-injection seam has a handler, a route and tests — and no form.** `POST /backup/offbox/inject-password` is routed (`controller/internal/web/server.go:510`) to `offboxInjectPasswordHandler` (`offbox_handlers.go:174-196`) → `InjectOffboxPassword` (`backup/offbox.go:541`). **No template in the repository contains that path or any form posting to it** (grep over `internal/web/templates/`: one unrelated hit, an XSS comment) | **PLUMBING COMPLETE** (controller **v0.196.0**); **the FORM is not built — still open** | — | **The tenth instance of this project's built-but-never-wired class, and the exact shape `CLAUDE.md` and `felhom.eu/CLAUDE.md`'s seam-wiring rule were written for:** handler tests that POST directly (`offbox_escrow_test.go:167,180`) prove nothing about reachability. To use the only implemented recovery seam today, a person must hand-craft an authenticated POST with a session cookie and CSRF token. **Note the layering while fixing it:** this form takes a **64-hex repo password**, not a recovery code (`offboxRepoPwPattern`, `offbox.go:543`) — they are different secrets at different layers, and the operator's 2026-08-04 ruling asks for a form that takes **R**. Build the R form and treat this one as the operator/DR fallback it was written as, but **ship it with a render test per branch of whatever gate it sits behind**. Source: `audits/RECON-offsite-dr-chain-2026-08-04.md` §3 link 9 **THE DIAGNOSTIC HALF IS DONE AND IT ANSWERED THE QUESTION.** `--recover-offsite-check` is a `docker exec` escape hatch in the shape of `--print-reset-code`: R on **STDIN** (never argv, never `ps`, never shell history, never a transcript), fetch+unseal via the agent, and a verdict of **two sha256 hashes**. **It compares and never installs** — the recovered password is not written to `offbox/repo_password`; a test asserts the data dir is byte-unchanged and its red-proof (adding the install call) fails it. Confirmed live: `repo_password` mtime still `2026-08-03 07:18:02` after the successful check at `2026-08-04 11:49`. **Exit codes are load-bearing** — `0` match, `2` a clean MISMATCH, `1` a step failed; "it failed" and "it worked and disagreed" must never share a status because only one is a finding about the system. A box with no local password reports distinctly (the rebuilt-box shape, where the next step is to INSTALL rather than compare). **WHAT IS NOT BUILT, deliberately:** no card, no form, no preview, no customer-facing text — building an interface on top of a chain nobody had walked is how the preceding three weeks went wrong. **What remains for this row:** link 9 (the recovered password placed so `WriteOffboxSecrets` keeps it) and the customer-facing shape the operator ruled on 2026-08-04 (yell → R form → preview → proceed), which is now priced against a chain that exists rather than one that is assumed **PART 0 SHIPPED 2026-08-04 (v0.196.0):** `--recover-offsite-install` is the sibling of the check — same fetch/unseal path, same STDIN discipline for R — and it **places** the recovered password via `InjectOffboxPassword`. The confirmation is a SECOND invocation (`--confirm-install`): without it, both hashes print and nothing is written, so the operator sees the comparison before a write is possible. Three outcomes named distinctly: **installed** (no local password — the rebuilt-box shape), **unchanged** (identical key, nothing written), **refused** (a DIFFERENT key present — installing would clobber the key the current repository is encrypted under; exit 2, no force offered). It re-reads the file after writing rather than trusting the call. **Red-proof observed:** removing the confirmation gate makes the dry run write the password. The R-persistence test carries a **positive control** (a planted copy found, then removed and not found). **NOT YET EXERCISED AGAINST A LIVE RECOVERY** — the R-201 drill halted before step 9, so this is unit-proven only. **What remains for this row:** the customer-facing shape the operator ruled on 2026-08-04 (yell → recovery-code form → preview → proceed) | CC |
@@ -603,7 +603,11 @@ class (an image `VOLUME` at an unmounted path) is still live — `immich-server`
| **R-427** | **`closed_register_gate.py` checks ONE direction only: an open word in a CLOSED row. The mirror — a CLOSED verdict on a row still sitting in `OPEN-ITEMS.md` — is unchecked, and there are TWELVE.** MEASURED 2026-09-01 during the decoy sweep, by reading the leading verdict of every open row with the gate's own predicate: **R-385, R-387, R-341, R-378, R-405, R-88a, R-88b** read unambiguously closed; **R-123, R-190, R-352** read `PARTLY CLOSED` / `MITIGATION SHIPPED` and almost certainly belong where they are. **The rows were NOT moved by this session** — telling a finished row from a partly-finished one is a judgement, and R-378 is itself the record of what happens when a machine makes that judgement on a substring (six still-open rows moved out of the register). **This is R-405's finding mirrored:** that row exists because R-87 sat in the CLOSED file while its state read READY, and the gate written for it looks only the way it was bitten. Fix: the same leading-verdict predicate applied to `OPEN-ITEMS.md`, reporting rather than convicting until the twelve are adjudicated by a person — a gate registered while twelve rows fail it would refuse every push. | **OPEN — 12 rows named; the adjudication is Viktor's, the gate is mine** |
| **R-428** | **The decoy-coverage gate — written to catch instruments that match a NAME instead of a fact — identified a repository by its DIRECTORY NAME.** MEASURED on its own first CI run (felhom.eu job 490, 2026-09-01): `os.path.basename(root)` looked up in a `RUNNERS` map, and Gitea's act-runner checks the repo out into a directory called `hostexecutor`, so the gate reported *"unknown repo 'hostexecutor'"* and went INCONCLUSIVE. **The gate that hunts label-matching was matching a label, in the first ten lines of its own main loop, and it shipped that way.** FIXED the same day: it now identifies a repo by which registered runner FILE exists under the root, which is a fact. **Recorded rather than quietly patched because it is the strongest evidence in the sweep that this class is not a matter of carelessness** — it was written by a session that had spent the morning reading 29 gates for exactly this, with the four shapes on screen. Verified under a renamed directory before and after. | **CLOSED 2026-09-01 — fixed, and kept as the class's best example** |
| **R-430** | **`restic unlock --remove-all` printed `successfully removed locks` while the lock was still there.** MEASURED 2026-09-01 in a throwaway local repo (no live store touched), under a faithful append-only model — a sticky locks directory owned by root holding a root-owned lock, restic run as `nobody`; both controls passed first (create allowed, delete refused). The command reported success, returned, and `ls` showed the lock present. **`resticStep`'s crash-lock self-heal is built directly on this call** (`felhom-controller/controller/internal/backup/offbox.go:~768`), and its licence to escalate rests on the escalation actually working. **A self-heal that cannot fail is a self-heal that cannot be trusted** — this is this project's *"exit codes that lie"* class, in the one path that runs unattended against the customer's off-site history. It is harmless TODAY because the credential can delete and the removal really happens; it becomes load-bearing the moment delete is withdrawn, which is what R-95 is about. **Not yet established:** whether restic reports success because it removed zero locks by design, or because it did not check. Settling it: read restic 0.14.0's unlock source, or re-run with `--verbose`. | **OPEN — precondition on any R-95 build** |
| **R-432** | **A customer's own sub-account can REACH the snapshot door and is REFUSED writes to it — but sees it EMPTY, so per-file recovery is not product-reachable.** MEASURED 2026-09-01 on BOTH live boxes, over the credential each already holds, with a positive and a negative control in the same run. **What is now PROVEN rather than cited:** `/.zfs` lists (`shares`, `snapshot`) from inside the jail; a write into `/.zfs/snapshot` is **REFUSED** — `dest open …: Failure` — while the identical write to the account home **succeeds** and was cleaned up. **That is the append-only property, measured, and it is the sentence the whole R-95 re-scope rests on.** **What is NOT available:** `/.zfs/snapshot` lists **empty** (link count 2) on both boxes, while the same Storage Box demonstrably holds seven snapshots — `storage-box-pool-1` IS `u629488` (`RUNBOOK-ep0-datastore-volume-2026-07-27.md:386`), the box these sub-accounts live on. So the contents are filtered from a sub-account. **CONSEQUENCE: recovery from a snapshot is an OPERATOR act in a browser, not something the product can drive** — which decides whether R-95's remedy can ever be customer-facing. **Cheapest next step, and it is Viktor's:** read one snapshot's name from the panel; a single `ls /.zfs/snapshot/<name>` from a box then settles whether a named snapshot can be entered even though the directory does not list (ZFS allows exactly that). If it can, per-file recovery becomes product-reachable and this closes cheaply. | **OPEN — one panel read settles it** |
| **R-432** | **A customer's own sub-account can REACH the snapshot door and is REFUSED writes to it — but sees it EMPTY, so per-file recovery is not product-reachable.** MEASURED 2026-09-01 on BOTH live boxes, over the credential each already holds, with a positive and a negative control in the same run. **What is now PROVEN rather than cited:** `/.zfs` lists (`shares`, `snapshot`) from inside the jail; a write into `/.zfs/snapshot` is **REFUSED** — `dest open …: Failure` — while the identical write to the account home **succeeds** and was cleaned up. **That is the append-only property, measured, and it is the sentence the whole R-95 re-scope rests on.** **What is NOT available:** `/.zfs/snapshot` lists **empty** (link count 2) on both boxes, while the same Storage Box demonstrably holds seven snapshots — `storage-box-pool-1` IS `u629488` (`RUNBOOK-ep0-datastore-volume-2026-07-27.md:386`), the box these sub-accounts live on. So the contents are filtered from a sub-account. **CONSEQUENCE: recovery from a snapshot is an OPERATOR act in a browser, not something the product can drive** — which decides whether R-95's remedy can ever be customer-facing. **Cheapest next step, and it is Viktor's:** read one snapshot's name from the panel; a single `ls /.zfs/snapshot/<name>` from a box then settles whether a named snapshot can be entered even though the directory does not list (ZFS allows exactly that). If it can, per-file recovery becomes product-reachable and this closes cheaply. **ANSWERED 2026-09-01 (DRILL, `audits/evidence-drill-r95-recovery-2026-09-01/`) — NO, AND THE PANEL READ IS NOT NEEDED.** The named-entry hypothesis was tested exhaustively and fails: **777,600 exact names** in the vendor-documented format `YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS` (nine full days, second granularity) plus 126 alternative shapes, **zero hits**, with a control proving the identical batch shape returns a path that does exist (6/6). **And there is a structural reason:** `df` reports `u629488-sub3` mounted on `/home` at **st_dev 0,82** while `/.zfs/snapshot` is **st_dev 0,276** — a different filesystem — and `/home/.zfs` does not exist. A ZFS snapshot under `/.zfs/snapshot` belongs to the dataset owning that `.zfs`, not to the child at `/home`, so a correctly-named snapshot there **could not contain `felhom-repo`**. Three tools agree with controls in the same run (SFTP, the port-23 shell, `rsync --list-only`). The empty listing is not a display toggle hiding a reachable tree — from a sub-account there is no tree. **CONSEQUENCE: per-file recovery is not "operator-only", it is unreachable from the box entirely** → R-433. | **ANSWERED 2026-09-01 — negatively; the panel-read next step is WITHDRAWN as unnecessary** |
| **R-433** | **A sub-account cannot reach ANY Storage Box snapshot, by any name — so clause (b) of the 2026-09-01 R-95 re-scope ("the rest is recoverable file by file") is NOT SUPPORTED.** MEASURED 2026-09-01 on `demo-hp` over the credential the box already holds, read-only, no delete verb issued. **The sweep:** a batched `stat -c %n` over Hetzner's port-23 restricted shell (500–600 paths per round trip, stdout carrying only paths that exist) tried **777,600** names of the vendor form `YYYY-MM-DDTHH-MM-SS` across nine full days at second granularity, and 126 alternative shapes — **zero resolved.** **The control is what makes the zero mean anything:** the identical 600-name batch with one real path appended returned it in 6 of 6 batches. **The structural cause:** `/home` (the customer data, `u629488-sub3`) is **st_dev 0,82**; `/.zfs/snapshot` is **st_dev 0,276**; `/home/.zfs` does not exist. A snapshot under `/.zfs/snapshot` belongs to a different dataset than the one holding `felhom-repo`. **What still stands:** clause (a) — the box can delete its live repository but cannot WRITE into `/.zfs/snapshot` — is unchanged and re-confirmed. **What is now open again:** the only routes to the older copy are a panel rollback of the WHOLE Storage Box (deletes newer snapshots, hits every customer on it) and the provider API (fenced by §11-D, and `hub/internal/hetznerapi/hetznerapi.go` has **no snapshot method at all**, so it needs new code regardless). **NOT ESTABLISHED, and it is the question that decides whether per-file recovery exists for anyone:** whether the MAIN account can see the snapshots. No main-account credential exists in this project. **The ranking is Viktor's; I am not re-ranking R-95 — but the argument that moved it down is the argument this drill removed.** `audits/evidence-drill-r95-recovery-2026-09-01/` | **OPEN — decides R-95's remedy and its rank** |
| **R-434** | **The snapshot-drop alarm promises a recovery that cannot be performed.** `hub/internal/monitor/offsite.go` `emitSnapshotDrop` ships this text, live in hub **v0.111.0**: *"The daily Storage Box snapshots are read-only and still hold the older copy, **so this is recoverable file-by-file**; it is NOT confirmed data loss."* The first clause is true. The second is not reachable: not by the product (R-433), and not by the operator without a browser and a main-account credential that does not exist here. Its own comment states the intent — *"THE MESSAGE MUST NOT SAY THE DATA IS LOST, because after the 2026-09-01 measurement that is usually false"* — and the measurement it rests on was superseded the same day. **This is this project's own corollary landing on the alarm shipped that morning:** when a verdict changes which fact it counts from, the alarm text has to change with it, or the operator acts on a promise nobody can keep. **Fix is text-only and must not be made before R-433 settles what IS true** — an alarm rewritten twice in a week is worse than one rewritten once. | **OPEN — text-only, blocked on R-433** |
| **R-435** | **The snapshot-drop detector is blind to a single-app deletion — the exact shape the box can produce.** `snapshotDropFraction = 0.5` and `snapshotDropFloor = 5` (`hub/internal/monitor/offsite.go`) require a fall of MORE than half the previous count. demo-hp's baseline is **69** across 9 apps, so ~35 snapshots must go before it speaks; **one app's tag is ~9 and is invisible.** `offbox.go:1388` runs `forget --prune` **grouped by host,tags** — a per-tag wipe is precisely the shape a faulty retention or a targeted deletion produces. **This is deliberate, not accidental:** the constant's own comment argues the insensitivity, and *"a detector that cries wolf is switched off within a fortnight"* is a lesson this project paid for. **So this row is NOT a demand to lower the threshold.** It is a demand that the blind spot be written where the operator reads it, because "an unexplained fall is noticed within a day" (R-431, and `STATUS.md`) is true only of falls above half. **Discovered by arithmetic while planning the drill's Phase 2/3 pairing, which could not have worked:** Phase 2 deletes one app and Phase 3 expects the alarm to fire. | **OPEN — documentation, not a threshold change** |
| **R-436** | **LEAD, NOT A DEFECT — append-only may be reachable without a new machine, which would make R-95's real prevention far cheaper than the spike concluded.** Hetzner's port-23 restricted shell advertises, in its own `help`, these server-side backends: `borg`, `rsync`, `scp`, `sftp`, **`rclone serve restic --stdio`**. And restic 0.14.0 **recognises the `rclone:` backend** — MEASURED 2026-09-01 with a control: `banana:` → `Fatal: parsing repository location failed: invalid backend`, while `rclone:` → `exec: "rclone": executable file not found in $PATH` (i.e. the backend parsed and it tried to run the helper). rclone is **not** in the controller image today. `rclone serve restic` carries an **`--append-only`** flag. **Why this matters:** the R-95 spike's option 3 was priced at a new always-on service in the recovery path plus either a mount in the hot path or migrating every customer's history — and it was deferred on that price. This route needs neither: the server side already runs at the provider. **THE CAVEAT, STATED FIRST because it may kill the idea:** the **client** supplies the server command line, so a compromised guest could simply omit `--append-only` unless the provider pins it. **NOT ESTABLISHED:** whether Hetzner pins the flag or accepts client-supplied arguments. **That is a vendor question and it is cheap** — it should be asked before any code is written, because if the answer is "client-supplied" this lead is worth nothing. | **OPEN — ask the vendor before building anything** |
<!-- DUE-CHECKS-BEGIN — machine-readable. Parsed by scripts/due_checks_gate.py.
One row per dated check. The R-number must have a row above. Dates are UTC.