R-487: the local backup lists are keyed on the drives, not on what is
deployed — a removed app whose unit was kept is listed with the restore
that reinstalls it, the picker answers for it, and the restore opens the
unit where it sits. R-491: a removal clears the app's update hold.
R-490: /api/system/info reaches the API router and reads the default
storage path. R-489: volumes_removed is the real before/after difference,
[] when none. R-476: a Tier-2 copy is dated by its data, not its manifest.
R-456: the boot-orphan rule is pinned. Every fix red-proofed.
Every gate was DECOYED - the label constructed without the fact, the gate run, the verdict recorded.
No verdict here was reached by reading, because reading is exactly how the five prior instances hid.
SCOPE IS A FACT TOO, and it was the big one. Six gates decided what to look at with os.listdir - one
directory level. Every one was green AND CORRECT, because no template subdirectory exists today; every
one would have gone blind the moment anyone added templates/partials/, which is an ordinary act. A
single planted file carrying an emoji, a native confirm(), hand-rolled row markup, a dangling JS id
reference, a templated secret and an unregistered retrieval promise passed all six.
THE CONTROL IS WHAT MAKES THAT A MEASUREMENT: mojibake and docker-v already used os.walk, saw the
identical planted file, and convicted. So the cause was the listing, not the decoy.
COMMENTS ARE NOT CODE, AND COMMENTS ARE NOT CONTROLS. debug-routes matched `case subpath == "x"` in
raw text, so a case left in a commented-out block counted as a live handler - which is R-400's
original defect (seven dead controls on the page an operator opens when something is already wrong)
reached through the one door its own gate could not see. app-row-dedup's MUST_USE check had the same
shape: a commented-out {{template "app_list_row"}} satisfied it.
Stripping is deliberately crude in debug_route_gate, and that is correct there: its own docstring
insists on ten lines that cannot rot. A // inside a string literal truncates that line, which can
only ever HIDE a reference, never invent one - it fails in the safe direction.
NOT FIXED, and left open with its decoy rather than quietly patched: R-425, offbox-rename scans a
fixed three-entry FILES list, so banned NAS branding in a NEW offbox template passes. The scope was
correct when written and silently narrows every time the feature grows a file.
test_gate_decoys.py holds 10 decoys and declares COVERS, which felhom.eu's new decoy-coverage gate
AST-parses - a substring search for coverage would be the very shape this sweep exists to find.
No Go code. No version bump. No image. No golden owed.
Survey: felhom.eu/documentation/audits/AUDIT-gate-decoys-2026-09-01.md
MinAgent: 0.129.0
What was already right: the screen did not bluntly accuse. R-222/R-226 hedged,
naming both causes and the kept package, and saying it could not tell them apart.
That was honest - and it could not tell them apart because nothing ever looked.
Agent v0.129.0 looks, so the hedge becomes an answer.
New class RecoveryCodeOpensRetained on HTTP 422, gated by
FeatureRetainedRecoveryClass (MinAgent 0.129.0). The gate is SEPARATE from the
R-224 one because the two name different agent versions and a box can sit between
them, where a 422 is a shape we did not design. ClassifyRecoveryFailure therefore
takes both flags; the compiler found every call site.
The message says the code is correct, names the supersession date, says the
earlier package is kept, and says the CURRENT backups are unaffected - the half a
customer will otherwise assume wrong. It promises NO restore: there is no
in-product route to a set-aside store (R-312) and the retained package may itself
predate the repository-password field. It routes to support, which can do it.
The claim guard grew a surface and immediately convicted something. It scanned
templates only, while every recovery message is a Go string in a handler - the
highest-stakes copy in the product, never scanned. It now scans recovery_handlers.go
too, and found a PRE-EXISTING unregistered claim on its first run.
Six handler tests asserting which SENTENCE the customer sees; red-proofs asserted
applied, including: 422 unconditional makes an agent that never looked read as
having looked, and routing 400 to the new class congratulates a mistype.
The retrieval clause rendered unconditionally on every page and is false on a
reachable state - the same screen where the orphan card says we cannot tell.
The condition is a fingerprint PINNED at the decision, not a comparison against
the current key. The obvious proxy asks about the wrong key: the set-aside
copies were written under an older key the box no longer has, so on a
twice-rebuilt box the proxy promises about copies nothing can open. Demonstrated
- under the proxy, the replaced-package and legacy cases both flip back to
promising.
The pin is a recorded assumption and says so: nothing on the box records which
key wrote those copies. Empty is not a match. A countdown started before this
carries no pin and takes the cautious branch, not a backfill.
A sweep of all 36 templates found a fourth instance (backups page, same
condition applied) and a fifth (the confirmation screen, correctly left alone -
true at the moment of the decision).
New retrieval_promise_gate registers each claim with a reason rather than
banning a verb: a string ban failed twice, and the honest replacement copy
contains the stem.
admin