Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin c7446f2d6a R-225/R-227/R-228 Parts 2-4: unknown is not zero, the gateway speaks Hungarian, the set-aside is visible
R-225 — an unread store said '0 pillanatkép / 0 / 50 GB' above a card stating
it held backups under another key. An SFTP listing found snapshot f3d9cd67 and
12 535 KB really there; snapshot_count and repo_size_bytes were simply ABSENT
and the zero value spoke for them. StatsKnown is now NAMED, for the same reason
OffsiteInventory.Empty is: zero is what an unread store and an empty one both
look like, and on the wire 'absent' and '0' are the same bytes. The fill bar
renders only when the fill is known — a 0%-wide bar is a picture of emptiness,
and a picture is a claim. A measured zero still says zero.

R-227 — WHICH LAYER ANSWERS: traefik, and this repo generates its config. But
traefik v3 serves no static files, so a branded proxy page needs a new always-up
container for every 502 on the box — out of proportion, and scoped in the report
rather than built. Shipped instead: the unlock posts via fetch and answers a
gateway failure in Hungarian without leaving the page. Progressive enhancement —
with no JS the plain POST is unchanged and still shows the proxy's error, which
the report says plainly rather than implying otherwise.

R-228 — the set-aside history was recorded in orphaned_renamed_to and read by
nobody: a census found zero references in any template or handler, while 12 535
KB sat at that path. It is surfaced as two facts and stops. It does NOT promise
the history can be reopened, because it cannot be by anyone today (R-199's
inventory is unbuilt) — and the set-aside CONFIRMATION copy was corrected for
the same reason: 'a helyreállítási kód nélkül többé nem lesznek megnyithatók'
implied that WITH the code they could be. The field's own comment called it
'recovery-code-recoverable', which was the same over-promise in the code.

Tests: scenarios F, G, H as render tests per branch of each gate. Red-proofs,
each demonstrated failing then restored: remove the StatsKnown guards (F,
'R-225 RETURNED: an unread store reports a snapshot COUNT of zero'), delete the
set-aside block (H). The F assertion on the fill bar is scoped to the bar's own
container — a bare width:0% search matched unrelated elements and would have
passed for the wrong reason.

28 packages ok, vet clean, all controller gates OK (the emoji gate caught a
warning sign in a template comment).
2026-08-06 08:17:48 +02:00
admin a3499d1807 v0.201.0 — a correct recovery code is never called wrong again (CAMPAIGN-11) — MinAgent 0.125.0
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
R-216: the offsite key recovery is a coupled feature and now says so. featureProbes +
featureMinAgent 0.125.0 + a Supports gate at the unlock entry point, FAILING CLOSED — an
agent that cannot answer is named as such instead of the customer's code being blamed.
Measured live: a 404 from agent 0.120.0 came back as "we did not accept your recovery
code, check that all ten words", in 0.134 s, against a perfect code.

R-218: delete the repo-password short-circuit in needsOffsiteCredential. The declaration
stops when the TIER WORKS, not when a key exists — installing a key is the recovery
screen's whole job, so succeeding at recovery was switching off the mechanism that would
have delivered the coordinates to use it.

R-219: the unlock finishes the job — place the key, bring the tier up, then list. Without
it the promised listing could never render on the shape the screen exists for.

R-217: an unreadable store no longer claims to have opened with unattributable content
(the OffsiteInventory{} zero value). Opened / empty / unreadable are three states.

R-222: a code that is right about a RETAINED earlier package is named, not blamed. States
what the hub knows and promises nothing — no read path exists.

R-215: GET /recovery is gated on the same predicate as the interception.

Five red-proofs, each demonstrated failing and restored.
2026-08-05 17:48:08 +02:00
admin 636c51e542 R-193: the recovery screen — unlocking, and only unlocking (v0.200.0)
A customer whose machine was rebuilt had everything needed to get their data
back and no way to find out: the only route was a command line. This is the
screen that closes that.

IT UNLOCKS, AND ONLY UNLOCKS (operator ruling). It explains, takes the recovery
code, opens the repository and shows what is in there — apps, dates, sizes. It
restores nothing: restore is already per-app and lives in the backups area, and
a screen that unlocks and then offers to overwrite is two decisions wearing one
button.

ONE CORE, TWO CALLERS. RecoverInstallCore is split out of RecoverAndInstall; the
CLI wrapper keeps its exit codes and printed lines byte-identical, and the
handler drives the same function. Two implementations of the one operation that
can permanently lose a customer's data would drift, and only one would be
tested. Asserted from source on both sides by AST.

THREE WAYS OUT, none a dismiss button: recover; 'most nem' (the full page stops
interrupting, the backups-area entry point stays PERMANENTLY, bound to the offer
and never to the postpone flag); and 'I do not want the old data' — confirmed
TWICE and reaching the SHIPPED move-aside, which sets aside and never deletes.

THE CODE IS HANDLED NO MORE LOOSELY THAN ON THE COMMAND LINE: POST body only,
never logged, never persisted, never echoed, cleared on every path, no-store,
autocomplete off. No lockout — the code is a ten-word phrase, and locking a
customer out of their own data for a typo is worse than anything it prevents.

TWO DEFECTS THE TESTS CAUGHT, both fixed: an UNCLAIMED (legacy-open) box would
have been shown the page, because RequireAuth passes such a box through; and the
inventory nil-dereferenced when no off-site target was configured, which is
exactly the pristine rebuilt shape.
2026-08-05 12:45:48 +02:00