bc278944a3997f070c87a3a5c61f6592223d9dc9
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
e43b5ec07d |
v0.231.0 - the box proves its own off-site copy still holds something (R-87)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
R-87 re-scoped by its own spike and built as Option C. MinAgent 0.129.0 unchanged. THE QUESTION NOTHING ASKED. The weekly check proves the stored bytes are the bytes we stored; it cannot tell us we stored the WRONG thing. A hollow recovery unit backs up cleanly, checks cleanly at 100 percent depth, restores cleanly and gives the customer nothing back - measured on demo-hp 2026-08-31, 120082104 B to 7036 B in one nightly run recorded as a success (R-403). No tier and no cadence asked it. Now offsite-proof does, nightly, on one app. IT DOES NOT prove a restore puts data back into a running app. That stays drill work and 07 section 8 matrix row 4 is NOT moved. THE ACCEPTANCE RULE HAS TWO PARTS AND THE OBVIOUS ONE IS A TRAP. "Check the unit against its own packing list" PASSES a hollow unit, because a hollow unit declares nothing. So: (1) everything declared is present, AND (2) the manifest declares what the app is supposed to have. Part 2 is the whole value. RED-PROOFED: the naive rule makes the hollow-unit test read verdict "pass". THE EXPECTATION COMES FROM INSIDE THE UNIT, never the live box - the snapshot may predate the app's shape, and GetDockerVolumes describes the running app. Database half is DBServiceNames, the same discriminator RestoreFromRecoveryUnit uses. Volume half is ParseComposeNamedVolumes as an EXISTENCE check, not a name match: tars are <project>_<volume>.tar and ResolveDockerVolumeNames derives the project from the compose file's parent dir, which inside a unit is the literal string "compose". Measured on all eight real units on demo-hp the counts match exactly and the naming held every time - but "held on eight" is not "derivable" (R-355). Half a rule that is true beats a whole rule that is invented. THREE OUTCOMES: pass, fail (readable and empty), cannot judge. An app that legitimately has neither a database nor volumes PASSES. RED-PROOFED: alarming on any empty unit makes that test read verdict "fail". IT NEVER WRITES TO THE REPOSITORY and that is asserted on the ARGV as a non-effect: --no-lock, no unlockStale, and m.runner() rather than resticStep so the unlock --remove-all escalation is unreachable. RED-PROOFED: routing it the customer path's way makes the test fail on "unlock" appearing in the argv. IT TAKES acquireRunning ITSELF and skips rather than waits, because RestoreOffboxScratch does not take it (R-408) while offbox_integrity.go states that invariant as universal. DUE-NESS IS PER SNAPSHOT (R-86's model), never per clock. RED-PROOFED: recording a timestamp fails the stored-value test AND breaks the rotation - night 2 re-picks night 1's app. ITS SCRATCH IS A SEPARATE ROOT (backups/offsite-proof) and that is a safety decision, not tidiness: the job deletes its copy on every path, and sharing backups/offsite-restore/<app> would mean a nightly background job deleting the verification copy a CUSTOMER is looking at. It is also invisible to placement, so a proof copy can never be pushed into a live app. SHARED RATHER THAN FORKED: offboxScratchDirIn parameterises the scratch resolver on its ROOT builder, and unitOnlyHeadroom extracts the free-space gate, so the customer path and the proof refuse at the same floor with the same Hungarian sentence. RestoreOffboxScratch's behaviour is unchanged. NEW EVENT offsite_proof_empty, severity error, operator-only - deliberately NOT backup_integrity_failed, whose hub template says the store is DAMAGED. Here the store is sound and the content is absent: different cause, different action. The hub half shipped FIRST, in felhom.eu 1aeaa30 (hub v0.110.0, live and verified), because an unallowlisted type is 400'd and vanishes. 33 new tests, all groups green; full suite 1689 tests, 28 packages, rc=0. All 13 controller gates OK. Five red-proofs run and recorded in REPORT.md. A golden carrying 0.231.0 is OWED - the fleet is on 0.230.0. Viktor's call (R-242). |