Commit Graph

951 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
admin 1da2c9c6c6 docs(v0.223.0): REPORT, CONTEXT rulings, README severity contract
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
REPORT overwritten: the 1.1 sweep in full (one bad severity, nine legitimate
"warn" strings that are healthcheck statuses), the hub manifest's real location
since the task's premise was wrong, all five red-proofs with the layer each
guard sits at, the live walk in six steps with the hub's own records quoted, and
the absent-intent count (0 of 8).

Three things are reported that a tidier account would omit: red-proof 5 passed
first time because the mutation was INERT; Scenario G was silently refused twice
behind an HTTP 200; and the live Scenario A does NOT prove the customer gate,
because demo-hp has no prefs row at all.

CONTEXT records the severity vocabulary as a ruling with its mechanism, the
intent ruling with its three-way handling of unknown, both fences, and two traps
worth more than the fixes: a 200 can be a refusal, and a passing red-proof can
mean an inert mutation.

README: the event table said `app_start_failed | warn` - the defect, written
down as if correct. Now `warning`, with the vocabulary contract and who receives
what. `disk_critical` also corrected from `error` to `critical`, which is what
fillwatch has always sent.
2026-08-23 12:06:45 +02:00
admin 9832760027 v0.223.0: the app-down alarm reached nobody (R-329), and the stop nobody heard (R-386)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
R-329. NotifyAppStartFailures emitted severity "warn". The hub accepts exactly
{info, warning, error, critical} and silently coerces anything else to "info",
which severityNotifies then drops BEFORE both legs. Banner shown, event stored,
POST 200, no mail sent. One word.

This is the second time: DiskAlertKind.Severity emitted "warn" until v0.215.0
and its own comment records that every warning-level disk alert went to nobody.
A comment recorded the lesson and nothing enforced it. The guard is now an AST
walk over the whole controller - grep cannot work here, since "warn" appears
legitimately nine times as a healthcheck status vocabulary.

The sweep found exactly one bad severity. Its limits are stated: the walk cannot
follow a variable, so all six dynamic call sites are registered by name with the
values each can take, and a new one fails the test. Two of the six were found by
the guard, not by the hand sweep before it.

Also pinned: fillwatch.Band.Severity() returns "" for BandOK, which would vanish
the same way. It is unreachable because Check() notifies only on escalation -
but that safety lives in a different function from the one that looks unsafe, so
the test asserts the consequence rather than the mapping.

app_start_failed gains a customer toggle, DEFAULT OFF, per operator ruling. The
operator is mailed either way: processOperator never consults customer prefs.
It is deliberately NOT in operatorOnlyEvents, which would make the toggle a lie.

R-386. classifyRunStates decided "the customer stopped this" from the STATE, so
every stopped stack was assumed deliberate. Measured on demo-hp: privatebin
stopped out of band, nine scans, zero events, zero banner - while the comment
beside it claimed an out-of-band stop still alerts.

DesiredState already records the answer and has exactly one writer. Stopped ->
no alarm; Running -> alarm; absent -> UNKNOWN, keep today's behaviour AND say
so. Absent stays silent deliberately: reading it as "nobody asked" would email
about every app anyone ever stopped, fleet-wide, on the first cycle after
upgrade. The gap is bounded not silent - IntentUnknown is set and the names are
logged at INFO on the heartbeat cadence. failedRestart still lifts a Stopped
intent, or F-CRIT-1 re-opens. No new DesiredState writer.

Two settings toggles each governed two alarms. "Lemez figyelmeztetes (90%+)"
also wrote disk_critical, the drive-is-FAILING alarm. Now four honest toggles;
12 became 15. A no-op save stores the existing slice verbatim, so byte identity
is by construction - without that guard the defaults case reorders, which the
red-proof caught.

Test count 1504 -> 1522. Five red-proofs, five seen failing; one passed first
time and is reported - that mutation was inert, not the test weak.
2026-08-23 11:21:06 +02:00
admin 14137efac5 docs(v0.222.0): REPORT, CONTEXT decisions, README state table + the ordering
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
REPORT.md overwritten with the full run: baselines and the hub's four numbers,
the four red-proofs with the mutation and observed text for each, the five
IsDownState consumers walked and named, the live walk in full with the old and
new heartbeat lines quoted side by side, and the halt.

CONTEXT records the decision - a dead supervised member is asked about before a
failing healthcheck, because they are different questions and the second was
answering the first - plus the fence that IsDownState did not move, the trap
that three existing subtests pinned the defect, and R-386.

README gains the `degraded` row, which the state table never had, and a note
that the ORDER is load-bearing. Points at the new alarm-ladder architecture doc.
2026-08-23 07:58:09 +02:00
admin 5da11c4480 v0.222.0: ask whether a supervised member is DEAD before whether one is UNHEALTHY (R-384), and stop promising an undo copy nobody looked for (R-383)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
R-384. aggregateState returned StateUnhealthy the moment unhealthy > 0, and the
R-51 mixed-case block that asks "is a supervised member dead?" sat below it. A
two-container app whose database exits goes unhealthy BECAUSE it cannot reach
that database - so the symptom the dead database causes was what suppressed the
alarm for it. unhealthy is not a down state, so classifyRunStates never marked
the app down and app_start_failed never fired.

Measured live on demo-hp 2026-08-22: bookstack-db stopped at 21:27:01 and the
F-OBS heartbeat printed "0 currently down" throughout. R-51's 18-hour immich
failure, back through a different door.

Two things moved, and either alone leaves the defect standing: the supervised
test is hoisted above the unhealthy/starting/restarting returns, and "some
members are up" now counts ANY member not in the down bucket. The old guard was
running > 0, which made the R-51 block unreachable in exactly the case it was
written for.

IsDownState is byte-identical - unhealthy stays excluded, because an unhealthy
container is running and folding it in reintroduces the flapping that exclusion
exists to stop. No new state was minted. Only the ORDER changed. The priority
comment was rewritten because it asserted an ordering the code no longer has.

Three subtests in TestAggregateState_UnchangedBranches were AMENDED: they
asserted an unhealthy/starting/restarting member beat an exited peer on
unless-stopped, which pinned the defect as settled behaviour. They keep their
intent with the down member given a benign policy.

R-383. The double-failure message said the previous state's backup EXISTS,
built from the returned path without asking the filesystem - and a missing file
is one of the two ways that rollback fails. undoCopyPhrase now describes the
copy from disk: present, partial, missing (still naming where it should be), or
never written. Zero-length counts as missing.

Test count 1494 -> 1504. Four red-proofs planted, four seen failing; the two
halves of R-384 convict independently.
2026-08-23 07:25:00 +02:00
admin da75603553 R-385 record: v0.221.1 gets its own CHANGELOG heading
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
0.221.1 was built, baked and vouched on 2026-08-23 with no entry of its own.
The prune-ordering fix (commit 810b18a) was written inside the v0.221.0 entry,
so the newest heading in the record named 0.221.0 while the fleet ran 0.221.1.

The image was never in question - the record was. The reasoning is MOVED, not
rewritten: the paragraph is verbatim from the v0.221.0 entry, which no longer
claims it. The new entry also names the pinning test and its red-proof.

Pushed alone and before anything else this session, so the record is correct
even if the rest of the session does not land.
2026-08-23 07:06:18 +02:00
admin f7881787f4 R-361 docs: CONTEXT decision, README, REPORT
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
Records the db_dumps decision with every consumer named, the trap that a stable
db_dumps lets CaptureRecoveryUnit's already-current early return fire (so
per-capture housekeeping must sit above it), and the NEGATIVE that a held app
does not raise the dead-app alarm - measured, not reasoned, so nobody re-derives
it.
2026-08-23 00:26:32 +02:00
admin 810b18ab8e R-361 follow-on: the undo-copy prune must run above the already-current check
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
Excluding pre-restore-* from db_dumps made that list stable across restores, so
CaptureRecoveryUnit's already-current early return began firing where it never
had - and the prune, which sat after it, stopped running in exactly the case it
exists for. Measured on demo-hp minutes after the change: four undo copies on
disk against a cap of three.

The prune is housekeeping on the dump directory and is independent of whether
the manifest needs rewriting, so it belongs above the check. Pruning cannot
disturb dbDumps, which no longer contains those names.

Pinned by TestR361_UndoCapHoldsWhenTheUnitIsAlreadyCurrent; its red-proof moves
the call back below the return and the cap fails at 5.
2026-08-23 00:02:32 +02:00
admin 968c968559 R-361: the safety dump destroyed the app's own database backup
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
writeSafetyDump called DumpOne into the app's OWN unit dir and renamed the result
to pre-restore-* afterwards. DumpOne writes <stack>-<dbtype>.sql - the app's
canonical dump - so every safety dump overwrote the app's real backup and then
moved it away, leaving the app with no database backup until the next nightly
run. A local restore-from-unit in that window tells the customer the app never
had a database.

The comment beside it asserted the rename meant it 'can never overwrite the app's
real dump'. False as written, and believed for four months. Measured live before
the fix: docmost and bookstack each held only pre-restore-* files and no
canonical dump.

DumpOneTo takes the final path and derives its own .tmp from it. DumpOne keeps
its signature and calls it with the canonical name. writeSafetyDump asks for its
own name directly; the rename is gone; the comment now states the invariant and
how it is enforced.

db_dumps no longer lists the undo copies. All three consumers of Manifest.DBDumps
were grepped and named - all inside recovery_unit.go, none reads it for recovery.
The files are neither deleted nor hidden.

Tests 1485 -> 1493. FIVE red-proofs, TWO PASSED first time and both are reported:
the behavioural tests inject the dump seam so a mutation inside DumpOneTo was
invisible, and 1.3 had no test at all. Guards added at the layer each defect
lives in; both mutations then convicted.
2026-08-22 23:39:59 +02:00
admin 2024ed9982 CONTEXT + README: the failure ladder and the operator ruling (v0.220.x)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
2026-08-22 18:40:33 +02:00
admin 1a2405e86f R-379: --clear-restore-hold now states the required restart
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
It runs as a second process: it clears settings.json but the running controller
keeps its in-memory copy and goes on refusing. Measured on demo-hp - clear
succeeded, file correct, start button still refused until a restart.

Also records the lost-update window between the two processes, and why clearing
through the running controller (the right shape) needs an operator tier the
controller's HTTP surface does not have.
2026-08-22 18:21:47 +02:00
admin 5b52a5964d R-379 fix: the rollback must re-discover the DB container
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
Found by v0.220.0's own live walk on its first real run. writeSafetyDump
captures its DiscoveredDB before the stop; the DB-only start then re-creates the
container with a new id, so the rollback's docker exec hit a dead container and
sat in waitDBReady for 30s. The app was held for an infrastructure reason while
its data was recoverable.

Re-discover and match by {stack, engine} - what reimportDBDumpsFrom already did.
Fail closed when the container cannot be found.

No unit test caught it because they all inject the import seam and never look at
container identity. The new test asserts the identity handed to the import.
2026-08-22 18:14:31 +02:00
admin 2c724c9283 R-379/R-380: put the customer's undo copy back when a database restore fails
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
R-379 and R-380 were one failure. Both ended with a half-restored database; the
only difference was whether it looked broken. Postgres emptied and crash-looped;
MariaDB applied part of the dump and reported health=healthy with a zero-row
schema-version table. Measured live on demo-hp 2026-08-22.

The undo copy was already taken and already good - proven by hand that day on
both engines. Nothing in the product could apply it. Now it does, with the same
ImportDump call, before any restart and inside the DB-only window.

The WHOLE undo set, matched on this run's stamp. writeSafetyDump returned one
path for an app with two databases; a rollback on that would restore one and
leave the other half-written.

When the rollback also fails the app is HELD STOPPED (operator ruling): a running
app on a half-written database lets the customer make the damage permanent. Every
start path refuses it - customer button, appstop Recover, boot sweep - via the
shared driveStartGate, checked ABOVE its driveless early return because these
apps have no drive. The marker is ended so nothing auto-restarts it. The row goes
red. Cleared with --clear-restore-hold, an operator CLI route.

--single-transaction is a belt on Postgres only; MariaDB DDL is not transactional
and that is why the rollback is the fix.

R-381: the engine's stderr stops reaching the customer (615 bytes on MariaDB, its
middle rows out of their own database) and starts reaching the operator log,
which never had it.
R-382: the summary log prints the volume count it already held.
Undo copies resolve to their own app, are marked IsUndo, and are capped at 3 per
app, pruned from the capture side. The reported render-as-an-app symptom did NOT
reproduce - the live page was read first and had zero occurrences.

Tests 1468 -> 1483. Eight red-proofs; ONE PASSED and is reported: the R-381
behavioural test injected below ImportDump. A guard at that layer now convicts.
2026-08-22 18:03:18 +02:00
admin 0f3cf0dbb2 CONTEXT: R-356 design decision (v0.219.0)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
2026-08-22 13:26:57 +02:00
admin c1dbb05ad6 README: where an off-site restore puts the data (R-356, v0.219.0)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
2026-08-22 13:26:44 +02:00
admin cbc3fa589c docs: R-356 CONTEXT + REPORT (v0.219.0, proven live on demo-hp)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
2026-08-22 13:25:36 +02:00
admin 08eb1a6e3a R-356: the off-site restore refused every app that has no data drive
gates / gates (push) Failing after 12s
ReconstituteFromOffsite and PlaceOffsiteRestore both resolved the restore
destination with the RAW HDD_PATH and read an empty answer as "the app is not
installed". For 40 of the 53 catalogue apps that answer is correctly empty and
permanent, so both actions refused forever for a running, healthy app — and told
the customer to reinstall it "in the same place", which those apps never offer.

Separate the two questions. "Installed?" is asked of ListDeployedStacks via a new
Manager.isStackDeployed that fails CLOSED on a nil provider. "Where?" is answered
by GetAppDrivePath — the same resolver CaptureRecoveryUnit wrote the snapshot
with, so the restore aims at the place the backup came from.

The 13 drive apps are unchanged: own drive, mismatch check, ack still required.
A third refusal, with its own sentence, covers installed-but-no-resolvable-root.

Fixtures that marked an app "installed" by giving it an HDD path now state
deployment as its own fact. No assertion weakened.
2026-08-22 13:08:46 +02:00
admin 2da259af38 docs(v0.218.0): README names the volume leg and the compose-project attribution; CONTEXT records the blocker
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
The README's reconstitution sequence gains the volume replay it never had, and the AppBackup row
states that DiscoverDatabases now prefers the compose project label. CONTEXT records the thing an
operator most needs next: R-354's fix cannot reach the 40 apps that need it most until R-356 is
closed, because the off-site restore still refuses outright for every app that declares no data
drive. The live confirmation was therefore done on calibre-web and paperless-ngx.
2026-08-22 09:58:57 +02:00
admin 5ce3a44645 v0.218.0: attribute a DB container by its compose project, and replay volumes on the off-site restore
gates / gates (push) Successful in 11s
R-355 (first, because it is the only one where data can be lost for good). paperless-ngx's
PostgreSQL was dumped into backups/primary/paperless/db-dumps/ — a directory for a stack that
does not exist, on the system drive — while the app's own unit recorded db_dumps: null. The
same misattribution reached writeSafetyDump, so a destructive restore of that app took NO undo
copy and the fail-closed refusal was never reached. Fixed by reading the compose project label,
which is the stack name by construction (compose runs with cmd.Dir set to the stack dir and no
-p). The old derivation stays as the fallback and an unresolvable attribution is now loud.
Catalogue sweep, proven able to convict: one affected app of 53. The fix is in the controller,
not the catalogue.

R-354. ReconstituteFromOffsite skipped every unit placement and the volume archives live inside
the unit, so the off-site restore had no volume leg at all — proven live with planted files:
calibre-web's 1,422,848-byte config archive was in the unit, the snapshot and the checking
folder, and the restore reported success without it. For the 40 of 53 apps that declare no data
drive that archive is the whole dataset. restoreDockerVolumesFrom is the local path's own replay
with an explicit directory: ONE implementation, two callers. Volumes replay before the database
and inside the stopped window. VolumesReplayed reaches the message.

The comment beside the skip was half false and is corrected; the half that still holds — the
live unit is the local path's source — is named, and scenario D fingerprints the whole live unit
across the operation.

Seven red-proofs, each asserted applied and reverted. Two found defects in the tests, not the
code: scenario D passed with the unit guard removed because the fingerprint had been narrowed
and was blind to the unit root.
2026-08-22 09:43:22 +02:00
admin f94543ee5c v0.217.0: prefill from the app's own backup, where-the-data-goes on deploy, bounded inventory fan-out
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s
Completes R-351 and ships R-352's visibility half. Gates 11/11 OK, suite 28 packages ok,
go vet clean, -race clean on the changed package - all run and read BEFORE this commit.

PART 2 SCENARIO A - the deploy page prefills the address and data folder from the app's OWN
backup. backup.RecordedUnitForStack scans every readable namespace root (the app is NOT
installed in this case, so there is no own drive to ask) and reads manifest.json plus the
captured compose/app.yaml. Local file reads only: no network, no restic, no restore.
RecordedAddress.Known() requires BOTH halves on purpose - an absent SUBDOMAIN makes the live
deploy path substitute the CATALOG default (stacks/deploy.go:88-90), and offering that back as
"what your backup says" would be a fabricated fact. The prefill is labelled as coming from the
backup and stays editable: a memory, not a lock.

PART 1 VISIBILITY (R-352) - the deploy page now states where the app's data will live before
the button is pressed. Measured 2026-08-21: 13 of 53 catalogue templates declare a storage
field; the other 40 have none and their data goes to the system drive, which no screen said.
Metadata.HasDeployField answers "does this app have somewhere to PUT a recorded value?" - for
the 40-class a recorded placement is a fact to state, never a value written into a field that
does not exist. NO PLACEMENT CHANGED. NOTHING MIGRATED. The rest is a filed specification.

PART 4 - measured before theorising, on the live off-site target:
  snapshots --json 2605 ms once; stats 2697 ms PER APP, sequential, 5 app tags
  => 2605 + 5*2697 = ~16.1 s, matching the reported ten-to-fifteen seconds.
The cause is the shape already on file, so the per-app size calls now run concurrently,
BOUNDED TO 4. The bound is the safety property, not the speed one: the repository is a Hetzner
Storage Box with a session cap, and a refused size call returns SizeBytes 0 - a silent
UNDER-REPORT of the customer's data rather than a visible failure. Peak-in-flight is asserted.
OffsiteInventoryList had no test at all before this.

TEMPLATE SAFETY - every Restore* key is set UNCONDITIONALLY in the deploy handler, because a
template doing index/eq against an undefined key errors at RENDER time: green build, green vet,
green suite, 500 on the page. Four render tests, one per branch, because the existing deploy
render test only renders AutoFields and never reaches these blocks.

RED-PROOFS, mutation asserted applied then reverted to 0:
  A   three template guards dropped (count asserted 3) -> the blank form returned
  P4  inventorySizeConcurrency = 1 -> "peak in flight was 1", elapsed 282ms = sequential

DOCS: CHANGELOG v0.217.0 (MinAgent 0.129.0 unchanged), CONTEXT (the restore's own memory +
what is next), controller/README.md (Backup System), REUSE.md (4 new rows), REPORT.md
overwritten - the previous REPORT preserved to audits/REPORT-v0.216.0-2026-08-14.md first.

NOT fixed here, filed as R-353 and named the next session's first item: a restore whose unit
carries no db_dumps and no volume_dumps still reports a bare completion.
2026-08-21 21:29:01 +02:00
admin 985388c6e9 R-351: the restore compares where the backup says the data lived; second press cannot start a second run
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s
Part 3 (not droppable) and the engine half of Part 2. No version bump yet - one bump and
one bake at the end of the session.

PART 3a - a second press really did start a second run. Established with a test BEFORE any
change: both offboxReconstituteHandler and offboxPlaceHandler answered "...elindult" and
overwrote the first restore's op/stack. Cause: every restore handler gated on
backupMgr.IsRunning() - the CONCURRENCY flag, which the restore goroutine acquires AFTER the
handler returns (offbox_reconstitute.go:180, offbox_restore.go:393). Seven sites. The wizard
had read the correct flag since v0.154.0 and said so in a comment; the handlers never moved.
New Server.restoreOpBlocked() reads BOTH flags - the display flag covers the whole off-box
restore, the concurrency flag is the only one the nightly backup holds - and the refusal now
names the running app and a route.

PART 3b - the page DOES refresh; the defect was the RESULT. backups_shared.html gated the
terminal result on a page-local sawRunning flag, so a restore that finished before the page
was opened, or inside one 3s poll, was shown to nobody. The 2026-08-21 OpenGist restore took
8.666s and no screen ever said it completed - the answer existed only in docker logs.
RestoreOpStatus.LastRecent now carries the server's verdict. The 10-minute window moved to
internal/backup as RestoreResultWindow and internal/web's constant is an alias: one
expression, two surfaces. Also removed the wizard's self-contradiction, which said the state
refreshes automatically AND that you must refresh the page.

PART 2 (engine) - every recovery unit manifest has carried drive and namespace_root since
schema 1, and NO non-test code read either back. The reconstitution opened the manifest and
took only the coherence stamp, then resolved its destination from the live app. A restore
into a different destination succeeded silently under a green message. New
backup/offbox_placement.go: CheckPlacement (pure, total), PlacementMismatchMessage,
recordedPlacementFromScratch. Compared before the safety dump and before the first byte.
A mismatch is NAMED and refused; ackPlacementChange lets the customer proceed deliberately -
a separate field from confirm=1, because one click must not carry two decisions. An UNKNOWN
recording is never a mismatch: refusing on an absence would strand every pre-field unit.
The not-installed refusal (R-253) now names the drive the backup recorded.

RED-PROOFS, each mutation asserted applied and reverted to 0:
  B  both guards removed (count asserted 2) -> the restore WAS seen starting with no drive
     attached: no error, full 3.00s run, wrote into /tmp/mutant-destination
  C  Mismatch forced false -> the silent divergent restore returned
  E  Known() forced true  -> the fabricated empty prefill appeared
  D  Mismatch forced true -> 8 ordinary reconstitute tests broke, proving reachability both ways
Note on D: the existing fixtures write a schema-1 manifest with NO drive, so they are
scenario-E shaped. The matching case is covered in the scenario table, not by them.

Gates 11/11 OK. Suite 28 packages ok. Hungarian verified as hex, no BOM, no mojibake sentinels.

NOT in this commit, still open: Part 2's scenario-A prefill UI, Part 1's deploy-page
visibility line, Part 1's specification document, Part 4's measurement.
2026-08-21 21:04:16 +02:00
admin 2fa1efc5e5 docs(REPORT): confirming cycle on v0.216.0, and persistence proven live
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
- 09:31:35Z on 0.216.0: '2 disk(s) evaluated, 0 alert(s)' — the count now
  matches the 2 persisted records, closing the disagreement that exposed R-335.
- The 0.215.0 -> 0.216.0 redeploy replaced the container and the state file
  came back with a changed_at written by the PREVIOUS version, so the new
  container loaded the pre-restart record instead of re-baselining. Scenario L
  observed on real hardware, not just through the production-path unit test.
- R-332 narrowed accordingly: what remains unproven is an already-ALERTED disk
  not re-alerting after a restart.
2026-08-14 11:33:11 +02:00
admin 330e4a051e docs(REPORT): v0.215.0 -> v0.216.0 run report
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
Includes the two clean live cycles, the warning-vs-warn notification_log proof,
the 13 red-proof outcomes (A reported as a finding — the spec's mutation for it
is not a valid red-proof), and section 14 on R-335, the aliasing defect found
live in v0.215.0 and fixed in v0.216.0.
2026-08-14 10:33:22 +02:00
admin 90f2545679 fix(disk-health): one physical disk must be evaluated once per run (R-335)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
Found on live hardware two hours after the v0.215.0 deploy, by noticing the
release's own positive observable disagreed with its own persisted artefact:
the check logged '3 disk(s) evaluated' while disk-health-state.json held two
records. demo-hp's c11-scratch and felhom-backup are the same NVMe and share
a durable id, so one disk was walked twice per run.

Not cosmetic. The loop writes a disk's record before the next entry reads it,
so the second copy of an aliased disk consumed the FIRST copy's write as its
prior: the disk sustained against ITSELF and reached Hiba on a first sighting,
defeating truth-table row 6 — the rule that separates a one-hour benign
excursion from a false critical. It would also have emitted two identical
events for one drive. Latent on demo-hp only because all counters are zero.

Each diskKey is now evaluated once per run. Both entries stay marked seen so
neither looks like a disappeared disk, and the card still renders both rows —
the dedup is about state and alerts, not display.

Red-proof run and reverted: deleting the guard makes the first sighting emit
Kind:2 (Hiba-from-sectors) at 8 sectors.
2026-08-14 10:30:22 +02:00
admin 8144a70a72 docs(v0.215.0): CHANGELOG, CONTEXT decisions, README feature, REUSE entries
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s
- CHANGELOG leads with the severity fix and the live warning-vs-warn proof.
- CONTEXT records the settled decisions so they are not re-litigated: Hiba is
  the label for predicted failure (no fourth word); sustain before count and
  why; the provenance of 64/55/60; phase 2 owns the new SMART attributes
  because they are a wire change under G-1; phase 1 state is one record per
  disk, not a series.
- README documents the 14-row ladder, the persisted state, the hourly cadence
  and the five message shapes.
- REUSE pins the severity wire contract on PushEvent — the defect's real home,
  so the next typo'd severity is caught at the table rather than in production
  — and records priorFor vs cardPriorFor, which differ by one observation and
  make the chip disagree with the email if mixed up.
2026-08-14 08:34:31 +02:00
admin 34d83f5a02 feat(disk-health): poll hourly, not 6-hourly — measured, not assumed
gates / gates (push) Successful in 9s
Part 4 was gated on a measurement. On demo-hp (Tier 0) the controller's real
/disks fetch — fetchDisks, the same path the check uses, not the 60s card
cache — costs min 0.805s / median 0.821s / max 0.841s over 10 calls, all HTTP
200, across 3 physical disk rows (2 distinct devices). Median is 6x under the
5s bar, so the <5s branch applies and the interval drops 6h -> 1h.

Why it matters: the one real failing drive's benign excursion lasted about ONE
HOUR and cleared completely. A 6-hourly sampler can land either side of an
excursion like that, see nothing, and then catch the terminal run half a day
late. The smartd history that produced the whole analysis sampled every 30
minutes and only just resolved the shape.
2026-08-14 08:21:55 +02:00
admin c24f1920d9 test(disk-health): Group L must run TWO checks after the restart
One check cannot distinguish a loaded state from a silent re-baseline — a
forgetful controller is also silent on its first check. It betrays itself on
the second, when the rebuilt prior makes the disk look newly sustained and it
alerts all over again. Caught while building the companion red-proof: with the
state load skipped, the single-check version still passed.
2026-08-14 08:12:44 +02:00
admin bb50e1293c fix(disk-health): the alert that never sent — severity, a real Hiba level, and a memory that survives a restart
Three defects made the disk-health feature silent in exactly the case it
exists for. Evidence: felhom.eu documentation/audits/DIAG-smart-passed-trap-2026-08-14.md

1. SEVERITY (the one that changes whether anything arrives at all).
   NotifyDiskHealthDegraded emitted severity "warn", which is NOT in the
   hub's accepted set {info,warning,error,critical}. The hub coerced it to
   "info" (hub/internal/api/handler.go) and severityNotifies dropped it
   (hub/internal/notify/dispatcher.go), so every Figyelmeztetes-level disk
   alert was filed as an informational notice and emailed to NOBODY, on the
   customer and the operator leg alike. Now "warning". DiskAlertKind.Severity()
   is exported so the contract is checkable from any package.

2. NO LEVEL ABOVE "worth an eye". smart_status.passed CANNOT fail on
   unreadable sectors (attrs 187/197/198 all carry thresh 0 and a normalized
   value floors at 1), so Hiba was unreachable for this whole fault class.
   DiskVerdictFor now takes a DiskPrior and implements a 14-row top-down
   ladder: sustained unreadable sectors, a count too large to be a blip (64),
   unreadable+remapping together, overheating, NVMe critical flag or spent
   endurance all reach Hiba. No fourth label — predicted failure is "Hiba".

3. IT SPOKE ONCE, AND FORGOT ON RESTART. The baseline was in-memory, so a box
   that rebooted while a disk was failing never alerted again; and between 8
   and 352 sectors nothing was emitted at all. State is now persisted
   (disk-health-state.json, atomic tmp+rename), the decision compares against
   the last ALERTED verdict (collapsing flaps to one alert while letting a
   genuine escalation fire immediately), and a disk already at Hiba re-alerts
   once it has BOTH doubled its count and waited out a 24h cooldown.

The card replays the same prior the check used (diskRecord.PriorSawUncorrectable)
so the chip and the email cannot disagree — the property the shared verdict
function exists to guarantee, now pinned rather than asserted.

Tests: 12 scenario groups A-L. Group L builds the Server through web.NewServer,
the same call main.go makes, over a real file.
2026-08-14 08:10:59 +02:00
admin 3e3ee94b7b REPORT: live 422 proven on hardware; R-308 withdrawn (my quoting bug, not a stale credential)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
2026-08-12 19:05:23 +02:00
admin ae10f64806 REPORT: controller v0.214.0 — the screen stops hedging, and the claim guard grew a surface
gates / gates (push) Successful in 18s
2026-08-12 18:49:56 +02:00
admin 3ed5e3e770 v0.214.0 — the recovery screen stops hedging about a code it can now check (R-311)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
MinAgent: 0.129.0

What was already right: the screen did not bluntly accuse. R-222/R-226 hedged,
naming both causes and the kept package, and saying it could not tell them apart.
That was honest - and it could not tell them apart because nothing ever looked.
Agent v0.129.0 looks, so the hedge becomes an answer.

New class RecoveryCodeOpensRetained on HTTP 422, gated by
FeatureRetainedRecoveryClass (MinAgent 0.129.0). The gate is SEPARATE from the
R-224 one because the two name different agent versions and a box can sit between
them, where a 422 is a shape we did not design. ClassifyRecoveryFailure therefore
takes both flags; the compiler found every call site.

The message says the code is correct, names the supersession date, says the
earlier package is kept, and says the CURRENT backups are unaffected - the half a
customer will otherwise assume wrong. It promises NO restore: there is no
in-product route to a set-aside store (R-312) and the retained package may itself
predate the repository-password field. It routes to support, which can do it.

The claim guard grew a surface and immediately convicted something. It scanned
templates only, while every recovery message is a Go string in a handler - the
highest-stakes copy in the product, never scanned. It now scans recovery_handlers.go
too, and found a PRE-EXISTING unregistered claim on its first run.

Six handler tests asserting which SENTENCE the customer sees; red-proofs asserted
applied, including: 422 unconditional makes an agent that never looked read as
having looked, and routing 400 to the new class congratulates a mistype.
2026-08-12 18:42:02 +02:00
admin 3168a78935 REPORT: v0.213.0 pinned-fingerprint condition, red-proofs, claim guard
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
2026-08-12 15:39:08 +02:00
admin 89712563a0 R-302: the abandon banner promises only what the box can still see is true
gates / gates (push) Successful in 10s
The retrieval clause rendered unconditionally on every page and is false on a
reachable state - the same screen where the orphan card says we cannot tell.

The condition is a fingerprint PINNED at the decision, not a comparison against
the current key. The obvious proxy asks about the wrong key: the set-aside
copies were written under an older key the box no longer has, so on a
twice-rebuilt box the proxy promises about copies nothing can open. Demonstrated
- under the proxy, the replaced-package and legacy cases both flip back to
promising.

The pin is a recorded assumption and says so: nothing on the box records which
key wrote those copies. Empty is not a match. A countdown started before this
carries no pin and takes the cautious branch, not a backfill.

A sweep of all 36 templates found a fourth instance (backups page, same
condition applied) and a fifth (the confirmation screen, correctly left alone -
true at the moment of the decision).

New retrieval_promise_gate registers each claim with a reason rather than
banning a verb: a string ban failed twice, and the honest replacement copy
contains the stem.
2026-08-12 15:27:29 +02:00
admin 1b66010298 REPORT: v0.212.0 orphan card second promise
gates / gates (push) Successful in 16s
2026-08-12 14:05:45 +02:00
admin 68f3e12398 R-299: the orphan card's second promise, and a guard that matched one inflection
gates / gates (push) Successful in 14s
The explanation paragraph - the always-visible half of the card - still ended
'a hozzajuk tartozo helyreallitasi koddal kesobb visszaallithatok lehetnek',
the same unevaluable claim v0.211.0 removed from the confirm block below it.

It survived because the spec called that line accurate, and because the
regression guard asserted the SINGULAR form while the card carried the plural,
which does not contain that substring. The guard now matches the stem, so any
conjugation fails it. The two accurate halves are kept.

Also: the guard's failure message sliced rendered HTML at a byte offset and cut
Hungarian mid-character; it now slices on rune boundaries.
2026-08-12 13:49:15 +02:00
admin f87be3575f REPORT: correct installer publication status
gates / gates (push) Successful in 12s
2026-08-10 14:20:22 +02:00
admin 38f4535bfa REPORT: golden 0.211.0 baked and published; only the Day-0 vouch remains
gates / gates (push) Successful in 14s
2026-08-10 14:20:08 +02:00
admin 397d62136f REPORT: v0.211.0 written, not delivered - bake and Day-0 approval outstanding
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
2026-08-10 13:58:45 +02:00
admin 86a78c6767 R-294/R-295: orphan card stops promising restorability; one name per secret
gates / gates (push) Successful in 14s
The orphan card told a customer their set-aside off-site history may be
restorable later with their recovery code. The discriminator lives on the hub
and no wire field carries it, so the box rendering that card cannot evaluate the
promise. Copy replaced per the spec: state what happens, decline what we cannot
know and say why, name a route.

The claim page called the same three-word dashboard code two different names
depending on branch, one of which collides with the ten-word escrow code.
Retired 'Visszaallito kod'; the name is now constant and the sentence changes.
Naming only - a test pins that a reset code is still accepted.

secret_in_markup_gate no longer convicts Go template comments, which are
stripped before render; still convicts a real rendered secret.
2026-08-10 13:53:21 +02:00
admin b762a37097 R-280: attach list from mounted-but-unregistered filesystems; two-clicks promise made conditional
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s
After a reinstall the data drive could not be re-attached through any dashboard
route: both candidate lists came from the agent's unclaimed-disk scan, and the
rebuilt box's drives are claimed. The restore page said it was two clicks while
pointing at an empty picker.

The attach list now also carries the controller's own mounted-but-unregistered
filesystems. initialize is untouched, so the format wizard's system/backup
protection is unchanged. The 'two clicks' sentence is conditional on the picker
being non-empty, and says something true and actionable when it is not.
2026-08-10 13:41:32 +02:00
admin c732fe1283 v0.210.0 — R-259 and R-258: two pictures that were not true
gates / gates (push) Successful in 18s
Both are one shape: something the box already knows, drawn as its opposite.

R-259 — A DISK WE FAILED TO READ WAS DRAWN AS A HEALTHY EMPTY DISK. readDiskUsage
(internal/system/info_linux.go) logged a statfs failure at DEBUG and returned, leaving the caller's
TotalGB/UsedGB/AvailGB/Percent at zero — and usageColor(0) is "nominal". The dashboard's
most-looked-at meter therefore rendered "0.0 GB / 0.0 GB (0%)" with a 0%-wide bar in the healthy
colour. "We could not look" and "there is plenty of room" were the same picture.

readDiskUsage now returns whether the measurement succeeded; SystemInfo gains DiskKnown and
HDDKnown (HDDConfigured is not a substitute: it says a path was configured, not that reading it
worked); and the template draws NO figure, NO percentage and NO meter fill when unknown, saying
"A tarhely merete most nem olvashato ki." instead. A healthy box is byte-identical, colour band
included.

This session rules the convention (felhom.eu CONTEXT.md S-39): an explicit `...Known bool` companion
beside the figures, checked in the template — the shape Offbox.StatsKnown already uses, whose own
comment says "a 0%-wide bar over an unread store is a picture of emptiness, and a picture is a
claim". Pointers and separate error fields are both legitimate Go, but a codebase with three
dialects cannot be gated (ROADMAP G-3 was blocked on exactly this). Existing call sites NOT
converted.

R-258 — THE PER-APP BACKUP TICK WAS GREEN ON PRESENCE, AND RED ONLY ON A GLOBAL CONDITION.
buildAppBackupRows set Tier1LastStatus from status.LastDBDump.Success, which is the box's single
most recent dump RUN, whichever app it belonged to. An app whose own dump failed showed a tick as
long as some other app dumped successfully afterwards; an app with no database took the nil branch
and went green on the mere existence of a restore point.

appDumpVerdict now reads THIS app's own entries in DBDumpStatus.Results (matched on
DumpResult.DB.StackName, failure = non-nil Error). Three states: any failing database -> error; all
clean -> ok; no result recorded -> NO verdict and no icon, titled "Errol a mentesrol nincs
eredmenyunk." The recovery unit carries no per-run outcome of its own, so green cannot honestly be
derived from presence. The global tier1DBStatus label is untouched — it is correct as a global.

RECENCY IS DELIBERATELY NOT ADDED. A tick over a three-week-old restore point is a real weakness,
but an age threshold means inventing a number and the time is already printed beside the icon.
Recorded as an observation, not changed.

AN EXISTING TEST WAS ASSERTING THE DEFECT AND WAS CORRECTED, NOT DELETED:
TestBuildAppBackupRows_Tier1FromRestorePoints expected "ok" for a status with no LastDBDump at all —
green from nothing but a file's existence. It now expects no verdict; its real subject, the
Tier1LastRun time, is unchanged.

The dashboard test EXTRACTS the meter block from the shipped template rather than copying it: a
copied block drifts, and a drifted copy passes while the page it claims to cover has changed — the
fixture-is-not-the-wire mistake this project has now hit twice.

Six red-proofs across both parts, each with the mutation asserted applied.

No new tag on any declared wire — report/builder.go maps into its own types and is untouched;
wire_contract_gate.py confirmed green.

go build / go vet / go test ./... green (28 packages), controller_gates --fast all OK, both run
separately from this commit.
2026-08-08 16:29:52 +02:00
admin fcffaf573a v0.209.0 — R-247: the box stops saying a false thing about its own recovery package
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s
The answer was on the wire and was discarded at the boundary, for the third time.

The hub has sent `escrow_stale` in the report ACK since v0.57.0 (json:"escrow_stale,omitempty").
report.EscrowStatus had no field for it, so encoding/json dropped it, and an empty restic_pw_sha256
had exactly one possible reading here: "hash-less supersession".

On demo-hp that reading was false in EVERY clause for four days, and the box told the customer so in
its own words. The hub HAD the hash and was withholding it because the escrow row carries a stale
flag (R-246); there had been no supersession; and the bundle DID cover the password — the hashes
matched exactly.

Fixed by receiving the field. EscrowStatus.Stale decodes, and reconcileEscrowed tells the two
conditions apart: a withheld hash now reports that the hub has flagged the row and is withholding,
that this box therefore cannot verify its bundle either way, and that it is NOT established that the
bundle fails to cover the password. The genuinely hash-less case keeps its wording.

Deliberately NOT changed, and said rather than skipped: the stale verdict itself (the hub's flag is
still the hub's verdict; runs still continue), and the customer-facing Hungarian card copy. Clearing
the wrong flag is an operator act hub-side (R-246); re-wording the card is UI work with its own
review path. This change is the wire and the diagnosis.

Found by felhom.eu/scripts/wire_contract_gate.py (G-1), which was built first and seen failing on 40
fields before anything was fixed, and which now refuses any new field of this shape.

go build / go vet / go test ./... green, run separately from this commit.
2026-08-08 08:46:29 +02:00
admin 37b5ba08a7 REPORT: v0.208.0 — both R-254 sites, the guard's measured holes, and what the live read could not prove
gates / gates (push) Successful in 13s
Records the deliverables, and is explicit about the limit on the live half: the
curl of an app info page could not be done, and names exactly what was tried —
crafty-controller is the only app declaring initial_credentials and is deployed
nowhere, and demo-hp's dashboard password in ~/.config/credentials no longer
authenticates (200 with no session cookie). A probe of the new routes was
discarded because its control killed it: real and bogus paths both 302 behind the
auth middleware.

§7.2's answer including the part that contradicts the task's premise: no line in
the repo says 'no silent auto-fill'; the rule is CONTEXT.md:2070 about accidental
EMPTY-password deployments. The hidden input is deliberate and untouched.

§7.4's measurement: the gate covers all 36 templates and catches a launder through
a local variable, but is blind to a secret under a neutral page-data key — the
exact shape of site two. Runtime coverage is 4 of 27 pages. Filed as R-255 rather
than described as complete.

§7.3: no evidence of actual exposure on the fleet, with the limit stated — it is a
current-state measurement and nothing recorded reads, which was part of the fault.

Also corrects v0.207.0's report: html/template STRIPS HTML comments; they do not
ship in the response body. Measured.
2026-08-07 21:29:13 +02:00
admin 27d1165962 v0.208.0 — R-254: the last two secrets leave the page source, plus a gate against a fourth
gates / gates (push) Successful in 17s
Site one. app_info.html rendered {{.InitialCreds.Password}} into a hidden span —
a REAL per-install credential, read live out of the running container, in the
response body of every render. The page now carries the non-secret half plus a
boolean; the value comes from POST /apps/<slug>/initial-credentials/reveal, which
RE-READS the container rather than serving a cached copy (caching it in the
handler would put it back in the body one layer in). no-store, CSRF-covered,
logged as an act. Both buttons go through it. A reveal that cannot read the value
SAYS SO rather than returning an empty string that renders as a blank password.

Site two, established before changing. The hidden input is NOT the defect and was
left alone: it fires only pre-deploy, and README §318 documents why the value must
round-trip — the customer notes the generated secrets down and submitting them
back is what makes the saved value the same one they saw. The defect was the
neighbouring READONLY input, which on an ALREADY-DEPLOYED app rendered the secret
into a page with nothing to submit. Fixed by POST /stacks/<name>/auto-field/reveal,
authorised by requiring a type:secret auto-field of that stack. Both directions
pinned.

The premise that this contradicted a repo rule does not hold: the rule is
CONTEXT.md:2070 'Password fields require explicit input — prevents accidental
empty-password deployments', about EMPTINESS. No line in the repo says 'no silent
auto-fill'.

The gate. scripts/secret_in_markup_gate.py, registered in controller_gates.py,
convicts any template expression that names a secret unless allowlisted with a
reason. Its limits are MEASURED and in its docstring: it catches a launder through
a local variable (the assignment names the secret) but is blind to a secret
arriving under a neutral page-data key — verified both ways. That is the shape of
site two, which this gate would NOT have caught. The runtime body assertion covers
all shapes but only 4 of 27 page templates; the other 23 are R-255, filed rather
than glossed. Two nets, different holes, both named.

Correction to v0.207.0's report: HTML comments do NOT ship in the response body
here — html/template strips them, text/template does not. Measured. A red-proof
planting a secret in a comment therefore correctly does not fail.
2026-08-07 21:20:26 +02:00
admin 62998aab4f REPORT: v0.207.0 — R-249 before/after on a live box, the census, and what was NOT proven live
gates / gates (push) Successful in 18s
Records the deliverables: the raw response body before (1 occurrence, v0.206.0)
and after (0, v0.207.0) with a positive control in both directions; the §7.1
census finding two more instances of the render-then-hide pattern (R-254, one a
real per-install secret); §7.2's decision and why the promise was the wrong half;
every changed Hungarian string; all eight tests with their red-proof outcomes.

States plainly what was NOT proven live: R-252/R-253's notices could not be
rendered on VM 325 because both states are rebuild-only and the box re-registers
a drive on restart — the live run therefore exercised Scenario E instead, and the
notices are pinned at the template + predicate level with red-proofs.

Also records that red-proof D caught a fault in my own work: the explanatory HTML
comment quoted the old sentence, and HTML comments ship in the response body, so
the contradiction was still on the page and the assertion forbidding it could
never fail.
2026-08-07 18:33:37 +02:00
admin 8dbbc98ff2 v0.207.0 — R-249: the retrieval passphrase leaves the page body; R-252/R-253: two refusals learn to say what to do
gates / gates (push) Successful in 18s
R-249. settings_security.html rendered the passphrase into a display:none
span behind a Megjelenit button. That toggle stops a browser DRAWING the value
and nothing else — the plaintext was in the response body of every render, so a
curl of the page returned it. Found by exactly that: it landed in a session
transcript while driving the documented rebuild path.

The codebase already stated this rule for the recovery code and this page did not
follow it (escrow_handlers.go: 'reveal (claim XHR only — R is NEVER templated
server-side into HTML)'). The page now carries only HasRetrievalPassword; the
value comes from POST /settings/retrieval-password/reveal — CSRF-covered because
POST, no-store, and LOGGED as an act, which reading it off the markup never was.

The tests assert the RAW RESPONSE BODY. Every test that asked what the customer
sees passed while the bytes carried the secret; that is why this survived.

Census: the render-then-hide pattern appears twice more — app_info.html (a real
per-install app password in a hidden span) and deploy.html. Filed as R-254, NOT
fixed here.

R-252. A rebuilt box keeps its drives but loses their REGISTRATION. The restore
page now states that before the customer presses anything, says the backups and
drives are both still there, and links to Tarhely > Meghajtok. Page and resolver
ask ONE question — HasRestoreDestination() reads the same
GetSchedulableStoragePaths() the scratch resolver reads.

R-253. The list promised 'a visszaallitas elobb ujratelepiti' three lines above a
refusal that fired BECAUSE the app was not installed. The promise was the wrong
half: reconstitution writes to the app's own GetStackHDDPath, which exists only
once the CUSTOMER has chosen a drive at deploy time. Auto-reinstalling would mean
the product making that choice for them. Copy now says to install first and routes
to /stacks/<app>/deploy.

Both notices are conditional — a healthy box renders as before, pinned by a test
that fails if either becomes unconditional.
2026-08-07 18:04:26 +02:00
admin 3d3b4496f3 REPORT.md — R-241 fixed, deployed, live-validated on both demo boxes
gates / gates (push) Successful in 22s
Scenario A's live result first: on demo-hp in the rebuilt shape, no key was
minted on the real start-up offsite-apply path, and the hub received the state
it reports instead - offsite.state=awaiting_recovery_key with enabled:false.
Key restored byte-identical afterwards.

Includes Q4's seven rows mapped to the three states, the SEC 7.2 choice and
why, SEC 7.3's answer on the new-code button, every changed Hungarian string
quoted, all nine red-proofs with what was mutated, the R-245 reasoning, and
three observations noticed but not acted on.
2026-08-07 12:23:55 +02:00
admin 0a9158d53e docs for v0.206.0: CHANGELOG, CONTEXT, REUSE, README
gates / gates (push) Successful in 19s
CHANGELOG v0.206.0 with the ruling that reversed the fix, the three changes,
the SEC 7.2 staleness decision, Q7's closed trap, and the two bugs the tests
caught rather than review.

CONTEXT carries the three rules this session established, in the form the next
session needs them:
  - a box does not create a repository key while the hub holds a sealed
    package for it;
  - the fact that answers a question must be kept where the question is asked;
  - fix the state, do not remember that it is wrong.

REUSE gains four rows, each carrying the trap rather than just the signature:
the mint guard is a CONJUNCTION and t.Enabled is load-bearing in the derived
predicate; the discriminator ships INERT unless wired in main.go's confirmer
literal; the countdown removes BOTH halves or neither and must be driven by an
injected clock; and the epoch must be synced FIRST and unconditionally or the
falling edge is lost.

README documents the three customer-visible changes and the operator levers.

No version literal was edited: the controller version is ldflags-only.
2026-08-07 12:12:35 +02:00
admin 72368654e4 R-241 part 5: escalating reminders, and operator levers for a running countdown
REMINDERS (SEC 2.3). The offer epoch now stamps when it began, and the
undecided reminder escalates in EMPHASIS at 1, 3, 7 and 14 days.

THE READING IS STATED BECAUSE THE SPEC IS AMBIGUOUS, and it is written into
the code where it can be corrected. For an ABANDONING box, 5/3/1 are
unambiguously days REMAINING before a deletion. An undecided box has no
deadline - nothing counts down to anything, because SEC 7.5 deliberately does
NOT auto-abandon - so 14/7/3/1 cannot be "remaining" and are taken as days
ELAPSED, with the wording firming up rather than the bar appearing and
disappearing. If the operator meant something else, one function changes.

The stamp is re-set on every entry into the offered state, so a box that
settles and is later rebuilt starts its ladder again instead of inheriting an
old one.

OPERATOR LEVERS (SEC 7.5). --abandon-status, --abandon-extend=N and
--abandon-stop on the controller CLI, beside the existing operator
subcommands. They exist because the path that ACTUALLY happens is the customer
telephoning, and support needs something to press.

They live on the CLI and not in the customer UI deliberately: extending a
deletion the customer asked for is an operator judgement, and a customer who
wants it stopped already has the self-service route - they recover with their
code, which cancels it.

BOTH REFUSE RATHER THAN NO-OP, in two situations: when no countdown is
running, and when the store has already been deleted. A silent success is the
thing an operator most easily mistakes for "handled" - they would tell the
customer their data was safe when it is gone. Pinned by two tests.

--abandon-extend counts from NOW, not from the old due date, and a test proves
the old date passes without deleting anything.

Green: go build, go vet, go test ./... all pass; controller gates OK.
2026-08-07 12:08:11 +02:00
admin de39e47f53 R-241 part 4: the three-state surface, and the copy tells the truth about the date
FULL PAGE ONCE PER ENTRY, NOT ONCE EVER. "Most nem" used to set a flag that
nothing ever cleared, so a box that abandoned its history and was rebuilt
months later - a genuinely NEW situation - would never see the page again. The
offer now carries an EPOCH, advanced on the edge into the offered state, and a
dismissal is recorded against the epoch it was made in. A fresh entry passes
the dismissal by arithmetic, with nothing to clear and nothing that can be
forgotten to clear.

That is NOT the flag the operator's ruling forbids. The forbidden thing
remembers that the customer decided so the screen can be suppressed while the
state stays wrong. This records WHICH SITUATION a dismissal was about.

A REAL BUG, caught by the test and not by review: the first draft returned
early from recoveryInterrupts when the offer was false, so the FALLING edge
was never recorded, RecoveryOfferActive stayed true through a settled period,
and the next entry counted as a continuation. The page never came back - the
exact defect the epoch exists to fix, reintroduced inside the fix. The sync is
now unconditional and the ordering is commented as load-bearing.

THREE LEVERS, THREE SCOPES, and none of them removes the route:
  - clicking the bar away  -> a browser SESSION cookie, cleared on login, so
    the reminder is genuinely back at the next login. Nothing persisted.
  - "ne emlekeztessen ujra" -> durable, epoch-scoped, silences the BANNER ONLY.
    It starts no countdown, abandons nothing, and a fresh entry reminds again.
  - "most nem" -> suppresses the full page only, as before.
The entry point on /backups/remote is bound to the OFFER and to nothing else,
pinned by a test that fires all three dismissals and asserts it survives.

SEC 7.3 / Q7 - THE TRAP DOES NOT SURVIVE THIS SESSION. While a recovery is
outstanding the "Helyrealitasi kod letrehozasa" button is UNAVAILABLE, not
merely captioned: creating a new code seals the current key, demotes the
package that opens the earlier history to retained custody that no shipped
path can read (R-199), and re-enables the recovery screen through the orphan
route while invalidating the code that screen accepts. A warning beside a
button is a warning people click past. The card now explains and points at
/recovery instead.

SEC 2.4 - the abandon confirmation changes with the behaviour. It used to
promise "felretesszuk - nem toroljuk". It now states the grace in days (from
the constant the countdown actually uses, never a literal in prose), that the
sealed package goes with it, that the customer can change their mind, where
the date is visible, and that the question does not come back afterwards.

The countdown is shown on /backups/remote for the WHOLE window - the bar
elsewhere is a nudge, this is the record, and a deletion date must be findable
on a quiet day too.

Tests: once-per-entry across a full settle-and-re-enter cycle; the banner
dismissal proven to be a session cookie (MaxAge 0, no Expires) and to persist
nothing; the opt-out proven to silence the banner while leaving the offer, the
route and the countdown untouched, and to remind again on a fresh entry; the
entry point surviving all three dismissals; a settled box showing nothing; and
the back-redirect refusing "//evil.example".

An existing test (TestRecovery_E) was updated: it asserted the legacy boolean,
which the epoch replaces. It now asserts the dismissal landed on the current
epoch, which is the stronger property.

Green: go build, go vet, go test ./... all pass; controller gates OK.
2026-08-07 12:01:30 +02:00
admin a5d90ff801 R-241 part 3: abandoning starts a 14-day countdown that ends the question
Until now "set aside" renamed the remote store and touched neither the escrow
nor the key, so the hub went on holding a sealed package for a key the box no
longer used. Shape (c) compares those two, finds them different, and offers
recovery - correctly, and for ever. A customer who had already said "I do not
want the old data" would be asked again at every login.

The operator's ruling is that the answer is NOT a "they decided" flag: fix the
state, do not remember that it is wrong. So the decision starts a countdown,
at the end of which the set-aside store and the sealed package that protects
it are removed TOGETHER. Afterwards shape (c) has nothing to compare and the
offer falls silent on its own - because the state is right, not because
something remembers it once was not.

THE GRACE IS REAL. The recovery offer stays reachable for the whole 14 days;
that is the change-of-mind path, and a grace in which recovery is impossible
would be decorative.

BOTH HALVES OR NEITHER. Removing only the store leaves a package that opens
nothing; removing only the package leaves ciphertext nobody can ever decrypt.
The two cannot be atomic across two machines, so it is a two-phase commit:
delete the store, record a durable marker, and keep DECLARING
offsite.abandon_purge_requested until the hub's ACK stops reporting a
superseded package. A crash between the halves re-declares on the next sweep;
it never leaves the pair half-removed and silent.

HUB HALF - SEC 8.2 ANSWERED: yes, the hub was needed, and only for this.
store.PurgeSupersededEscrowForCustomer is the one place R-198's retention is
ever undone, and it never touches host_escrow (the package covering the key
the box uses now). The handler acts on the DECLARATION, never an inference,
and is placed immediately BEFORE the ACK is built - so
GetEscrowStatusForCustomer reads the effect and the SAME response closes the
box's two-phase commit. No second round-trip and no window where the box
thinks it is still owed. felhom-agent was NOT touched.

The countdown starts in ResetOrphanedRepo, NOT in the shared helper: the
helper is also the unclaimed auto-reset path, where nobody decided anything,
and an as-delivered box tidying a stranger's leftover store must not get a
customer's deletion clock. Pinned by a test.

Cancellation is wired into the recovery unlock, BEFORE the tier-up and the
listing - those can fail, and a countdown surviving a successful unlock
because a later step errored would delete the history the customer just
proved they can open.

The sweep is a Daily job at 05:10, not on the backup leg: it must run on a box
whose tier is not configured for runs. Quiet by construction on every box with
no countdown, and that silence is asserted.

Tests (all clock-injected; SEC 7.4 forbids shortening a live timer):
Scenario E (aside + package kept + countdown + offer still reachable, and
NOTHING deleted), Scenario F (both halves, the declaration repeating, the
close-out), Scenario G (cancel, path still nameable, no later deletion),
plus: not closed out while the package remains, a transport failure leaves the
countdown due and retrying, the no-op sweep issues zero remote commands, and
the unclaimed auto-reset starts no countdown.

RED-PROOFS, each with the mutation confirmed present in the file first:
  F1) store deletion skipped -> Scenario F FAILS (no rm issued)
  F2) declaration dropped from the report -> Scenario F FAILS (the hub is
      never asked; the package would outlive the store for ever)
  G)  CancelAbandon made a no-op -> Scenario G FAILS (uncancellable countdown)

Green: controller and hub both build, vet and test clean; controller gates OK.
NOTHING WAS DELETED ANYWHERE - the terminal step has only ever run against
in-test fakes.
2026-08-07 11:47:42 +02:00