Two defects E-2d found on a real box, fixed in this order deliberately: the
message is corrected BEFORE it is put on screen, because switching on a banner
that lies is worse than a silent one.
R-114 — the third state. resolveBackupTargetState had two outcomes: a disk
claims the target (healthy), or nothing does (degraded, "the backup is on the
system disk"). The state "configured, and its drive is gone" had no branch, so
it fell into the second and inherited its message AND its offer. Observed live
with the target detached: degraded:true, target:"felhom-backup" plus the
system-disk copy (false -- the backup was on a drive that had vanished) plus
offer_path naming that same vanished drive as the remedy.
New BackupTargetState.TargetAbsent discriminates. Degraded keeps its meaning
("is there a problem") so the wire contract is unchanged for every consumer;
TargetAbsent answers "which problem", because the two have opposite remedies --
attach any second drive, versus reconnect THAT one. Copy routed through
degradedMessageFor so one place still decides what a customer reads. The offer
is suppressed on the branch itself, NOT left to firstOfferableDrive's
Disconnected skip: that flag is set by the agent-side gate in another repo
(R-113), and this state must be correct independently of it.
R-112 — the state finally has a consumer. The endpoint was byte-correct and
nothing in the product ever asked for it: templates fetch 18 distinct
/api/storage/* endpoints and backup-target[/assign] were the only two with zero
references. Server-rendered on /backups now, following the existing
SingleCopyWarning banner pattern -- not a 19th JS fetch, because a banner that
needs JavaScript to appear is one more thing that can silently not happen.
backupTargetView returns nil for healthy and unknown so those render nothing at
all. The offer control POSTs to the existing assign endpoint behind the standard
inline confirm, never auto-submits, and surfaces restart_required honestly
instead of adding a self-restart.
Scenario E (the seam test) drives backupsHandler over httptest and asserts the
RENDERED HTML -- handler -> view -> resolver -> template. It deliberately does
not call the resolver and assert a string, which would prove the resolver that
was never broken. Deleting the one line that sets data["BackupTarget"]
reproduces the R-112 state and fails every render assertion.
Tests 326 -> 338 (+12) in internal/web; suite green (27 packages); both template
gates pass. Three red-proofs run and reverted, files byte-identical after.
MinAgent unchanged at 0.113.0: R-114 reads BackupTarget/MountPath/GuestPath/Role,
none of which R-113 altered (it changed BoundUnderParent, which this code does
not read). demo-hp on agent 0.113.0 is not held.
The absent copy is verbatim the hub's customerMessages["backup_target_absent"]
so the banner and the email tell one story -- filed as a two-repo drift risk,
not solved.
NOT LIVE-VALIDATED. Scenario C cannot occur on a healthy box; Session C proves it.
Registered as /api/backup-target inside ServeStorageAPI, which main.go mounts ONLY
at /api/storage/. Live result: endpoint not found, while every unit test passed --
the tests called the handlers directly and never travelled the mount. Caught by
the first live call, which is why the live call is part of the procedure.
Moved to /api/storage/backup-target[/assign]. A new test asserts the dispatcher
source contains both paths, so a handler nothing routes to fails the suite --
the seam-wiring rule applied to a route rather than a button.
The half that makes the rest work: a degraded backup target recorded only in
config is the silent-degradation pattern this arc has spent a week removing.
Part 3 -- POST /api/backup-target/assign moves the target via the agent's
POST /backup/target. It is the ONLY writer of the role: registration does not set
it, the drive-gate does not, no scheduler does. Declining is not calling it. The
agent returns restart_required rather than restarting itself, because restarting
with a backup in flight records a spurious tier failure for a backup that
actually succeeded (E-1 did exactly that).
Part 4 -- GET /api/backup-target returns the state and, when degraded, Hungarian
copy in FACT -> CONSEQUENCE -> REMEDY order, pinned by a test: a customer told
only the fact cannot act on it.
Healthy renders NOTHING -- no badge, no reassurance, no tonal change.
degradedMessageFor is the single decision point, so exactly one place could start
decorating a working box. Red-proofed: reassuring on the healthy branch fails
Scenario E.
UNKNOWN is not degraded: an unreachable or pre-R-82 agent means we could not ask,
which is not evidence of degradation (R-88 Part 2's class).
A HOLLOW TEST caught by its own red-proof: TestUnknownStateRendersNothing used
{Known:false} with Degraded left false, so it passed even with the !Known guard
deleted -- the second condition covered for it. Now {Known:false, Degraded:true},
which fails properly. Without the red-proof the test would have been decoration.
State is derived from the AGENT, never from our intent flag: on the two boxes
migrated by hand in E-1 the intent was never recorded while the drive really is
the target.
MinAgent: 0.113.0
Green gate: build + vet + test rc=0 (27 packages), run separately from this commit.
admin