v0.307.0: after a restart the Databases table lists each database once, not every pre-restore undo copy
gates / gates (push) Successful in 1m14s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 1m14s
Seen on demo-hp 2026-10-10 (adventurelog x4, bookstack x4). The synthesised run skips IsUndo files; only undo copies -> no synthesised run. Two tests, both red-proved. v0.306.0 (R-570) was built but never delivered; 0.307.0 carries it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1311,6 +1311,12 @@ func (m *Manager) GetFullStatus(nextDBDump time.Time) *FullBackupStatus {
|
||||
var results []DumpResult
|
||||
var latestTime time.Time
|
||||
for _, f := range status.DumpFiles {
|
||||
// 2026-10-10: a `pre-restore-` undo copy (R-379) is not part of any run — it stays in the file
|
||||
// list, never in the run's table (demo-hp listed adventurelog four times after a restart).
|
||||
// Pinned by TestSynthesisedRunListsNoUndoCopy.
|
||||
if f.IsUndo {
|
||||
continue
|
||||
}
|
||||
results = append(results, DumpResult{
|
||||
DB: DiscoveredDB{StackName: f.StackName, DBType: f.DBType, ContainerName: f.StackName},
|
||||
FilePath: f.FileName,
|
||||
@@ -1323,10 +1329,13 @@ func (m *Manager) GetFullStatus(nextDBDump time.Time) *FullBackupStatus {
|
||||
}
|
||||
// R-519: after a restart the run's result is not in memory, so it is SYNTHESISED from the files. A run
|
||||
// the stop cut off left a fresh .sql beside last night's tars — "Success" must not be read off that.
|
||||
status.LastDBDump = &DBDumpStatus{
|
||||
LastRun: latestTime,
|
||||
Results: results,
|
||||
Success: m.runInterrupted.IsZero(),
|
||||
// Only undo copies on disk → no run to show (nil, as with no files at all).
|
||||
if len(results) > 0 {
|
||||
status.LastDBDump = &DBDumpStatus{
|
||||
LastRun: latestTime,
|
||||
Results: results,
|
||||
Success: m.runInterrupted.IsZero(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user