v0.147.0 — feedback slice 1: pressing a button says something
The systemic complaint, twice in one evening: you press a button and nothing happens. No progress, no ETA, no named result. Three worst offenders, fixed on the two patterns already here (deploy 3-step panel, storage-init status poll). No new framework — that is a ROADMAP item; three targeted cards ship tonight. 4a — a verification restore names its result. The flash said the app had been restored "to a verification folder on the drive"; which folder, on which drive, was invisible, so the customer could not go and look at what they had just asked for. Full path now. The restore page gained a listing of existing verification copies (app, size, date, path) — nothing anywhere showed these, so they piled up and the only way to find them was SSH — each with a double-confirmed delete. That delete is the only one this release adds, so it names a STACK, never a path: the Manager resolves the name inside a backups/offsite-restore root it computed itself and refuses anything landing outside. Red-proofed — neutralise the name guard and stack:"" resolves to the offsite-restore ROOT and takes every copy with it. Refusals are asserted as non-effects. 4b — Megosztás enable shows what it is waiting for. Enabling ran ReconcileSamba synchronously inside the POST handler; on a golden without felhom-samba baked that is compose pulling ~100MB, i.e. minutes of an apparently-hung form post followed by "Beállítás mentve." whether or not anything came up. Detached + polled now, distinguishing "képfájl letöltése" from "indítás" — decided BEFORE the work starts, since afterwards the image is always present. Success is probed, not inferred (compose up -d exits 0 on a crash-loop). The password form starts the same job: with UserSet false reconcile deploys nothing, so on a fresh box that is where the pull actually happens. 4c — "Távoli mentés most" streams real progress. restic was already reporting bytes and percent; the runner seam used CombinedOutput() and discarded them. The manual run now passes --json and scans stdout line-by-line: total bytes, percent, current app. Manual only — the nightly stays silent, pinned by a test that fails if it ever passes --json. The poll now arms unconditionally, closing a race the manual trigger always ran: the redirect rendered before the goroutine wrote LastStatus=running, so the poll never armed and the page sat static during the very run just started. Red-proofed twice. Also closes the golden/controller infra-image drift at the source: infra.Images() derives from the existing pins and --print-infra-images exposes it, so the golden bake can stop carrying its own copy. That copy had already drifted — felhom-samba was never added, so the golden baked 3 of 4, which is why enabling Megosztás pulled at runtime in the first place. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Nn3VgQk9iwEGgyx6QJ2NvE
This commit is contained in:
@@ -128,9 +128,10 @@ func (m *Manager) offboxSnapshotSize(ctx context.Context, id string) (int64, err
|
||||
// probe). NEVER cfg.Paths.DataDir (the rootfs — the F-A1 filler). App's HDD drive first; else the first
|
||||
// schedulable storage path; else a Hungarian refusal.
|
||||
func (m *Manager) offboxRestoreScratchDir(stack string) (scratch, nsRoot string, err error) {
|
||||
// offsiteRestoreRootFor is THE place `backups/offsite-restore` is spelled (offbox_verify_copies.go)
|
||||
// — the listing/delete surface must resolve byte-identical paths to the ones written here.
|
||||
scratchFor := func(root string) (string, string) {
|
||||
nr := m.namespaceRoot(root)
|
||||
return filepath.Join(nr, "backups", "offsite-restore", stack), nr
|
||||
return filepath.Join(m.offsiteRestoreRootFor(root), stack), m.namespaceRoot(root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
isNet := func(path string) bool { return m.settings != nil && m.settings.IsNetworkStoragePath(path) }
|
||||
// (1) the app's own drive — preferred, but ONLY if it is not NETWORK storage (F-3afix-1). restic
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user