v0.284.2 — the image clean-up sees digest-pulled (untagged) images (decision 53, R-736)
gates / gates (push) Successful in 26s
gates / gates (push) Successful in 26s
Found live on 9202: the product pins tag@digest, and such images are stored untagged (repo:<none>); `docker image ls` without -a did not list them, so the retention saw almost no app image. Now `image ls -a`; an anonymous <none>:<none> entry is never a candidate; the one-time marker is v2 so the corrected sweep runs once everywhere. Test TestImageRetention_SeesUntaggedDigestPulledImages, red-proofed. 0.284.0/0.284.1 were never floored. MinAgent: 0.131.0 (unchanged). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_0159rPz1ZhFKsS53msqPYxtS
This commit is contained in:
+1
-1
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Ask Claude Code: "Please update CONTEXT.md with what we did today"
|
||||
|
||||
Last updated: 2026-09-30 late evening (v0.284.0 + v0.284.1 — image retention, the install hold; v0.284.1 wires RemoveStack)
|
||||
Last updated: 2026-09-30 late evening (v0.284.0 + v0.284.1 — image retention, the install hold; v0.284.1 wires RemoveStack; v0.284.2 sees untagged digest-pulled images)
|
||||
|
||||
> **2026-09-30 late — v0.284.0.** Operator rulings: `09` §3 decision 53 (R-736 A: keep running + previous image per
|
||||
> service, delete older, never an image a container/compose/record names) → `stacks/image_retention.go`, with a
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user